REVIEW 2 cited by
RAGentA: Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Attributed Question Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present RAGentA, a multi-agent retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework for attributed question answering (QA) with large language models (LLMs). With the goal of trustworthy answer generation, RAGentA focuses on optimizing answer correctness, defined by coverage and relevance to the question and faithfulness, which measures the extent to which answers are grounded in retrieved documents. RAGentA uses a multi-agent architecture that iteratively filters retrieved documents, generates attributed answers with in-line citations, and verifies completeness through dynamic refinement. Central to the framework is a hybrid retrieval strategy that combines sparse and dense methods, improving Recall@20 by 12.5% compared to the best single retrieval model, resulting in more correct and well-supported answers. Evaluated on a synthetic QA dataset derived from the FineWeb index, RAGentA outperforms standard RAG baselines, achieving gains of 1.09% in correctness and 10.72% in faithfulness. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of our multi-agent RAG architecture and hybrid retrieval strategy in advancing trustworthy QA with LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Claim2Source at CheckThat! 2026: Improving Multilingual Scientific Claim-Source Retrieval with Verification-based Re-Ranking
A three-stage pipeline with bilingual claims, metadata-enhanced sources, and verification-based LLM re-ranking reaches 0.7628 average MRR@5 and ranks first on CheckThat! 2026 Task 1.
-
SIGIR 2025 -- LiveRAG Challenge Report
In the SIGIR 2025 LiveRAG Challenge, all 25 active RAG teams beat the no-RAG baseline on LLM-judged correctness, and LLM scores correlated with human scores at r=0.88.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.