Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Debiasing isn't enough! -- On the Effectiveness of Debiasing MLMs and their Social Biases in Downstream Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.02938 v1 pith:WPSV4UZS submitted 2022-10-06 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords evaluationmeasuresmlmssocialbiasbiasesdownstreamdebiasing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the relationship between task-agnostic intrinsic and task-specific extrinsic social bias evaluation measures for Masked Language Models (MLMs), and find that there exists only a weak correlation between these two types of evaluation measures. Moreover, we find that MLMs debiased using different methods still re-learn social biases during fine-tuning on downstream tasks. We identify the social biases in both training instances as well as their assigned labels as reasons for the discrepancy between intrinsic and extrinsic bias evaluation measurements. Overall, our findings highlight the limitations of existing MLM bias evaluation measures and raise concerns on the deployment of MLMs in downstream applications using those measures.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fairness Dynamics During Training

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Gender bias in Pythia-6.9b grows sharply after about 80k training steps even as general performance improves, and stopping earlier could trade 1.7% LAMBADA accuracy for a large fairness gain.

Pith tools