Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MedBookVQA: A Systematic and Comprehensive Medical Benchmark Derived from Open-Access Book

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.00855 v1 pith:WYE5PKAL submitted 2025-06-01 cs.AI

MedBookVQA: A Systematic and Comprehensive Medical Benchmark Derived from Open-Access Book

classification cs.AI
keywords medicalbenchmarkacrosscriticaldevelopmentgmaimedbookvqamultimodal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The accelerating development of general medical artificial intelligence (GMAI), powered by multimodal large language models (MLLMs), offers transformative potential for addressing persistent healthcare challenges, including workforce deficits and escalating costs. The parallel development of systematic evaluation benchmarks emerges as a critical imperative to enable performance assessment and provide technological guidance. Meanwhile, as an invaluable knowledge source, the potential of medical textbooks for benchmark development remains underexploited. Here, we present MedBookVQA, a systematic and comprehensive multimodal benchmark derived from open-access medical textbooks. To curate this benchmark, we propose a standardized pipeline for automated extraction of medical figures while contextually aligning them with corresponding medical narratives. Based on this curated data, we generate 5,000 clinically relevant questions spanning modality recognition, disease classification, anatomical identification, symptom diagnosis, and surgical procedures. A multi-tier annotation system categorizes queries through hierarchical taxonomies encompassing medical imaging modalities (42 categories), body anatomies (125 structures), and clinical specialties (31 departments), enabling nuanced analysis across medical subdomains. We evaluate a wide array of MLLMs, including proprietary, open-sourced, medical, and reasoning models, revealing significant performance disparities across task types and model categories. Our findings highlight critical capability gaps in current GMAI systems while establishing textbook-derived multimodal benchmarks as essential evaluation tools. MedBookVQA establishes textbook-derived benchmarking as a critical paradigm for advancing clinical AI, exposing limitations in GMAI systems while providing anatomically structured performance metrics across specialties.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. NeuroQA: A Large-Scale Image-Grounded Benchmark for 3D Brain MRI Understanding

    cs.CV 2026-05 accept novelty 8.0

    NeuroQA is a large-scale 3D brain MRI visual question answering benchmark with verified image-grounded QA pairs, multi-domain coverage, and baseline evaluations showing current models lag behind text-only performance.

  2. RL Forgets! Towards Continual Policy Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    On a new post-2025 multimodal reasoning continual-learning benchmark, standard RL still forgets heavily; Continual Policy Optimization reduces forgetting 13.7% and lifts pretrained capability 7% on Qwen3-VL-8B via par...

  3. RL Forgets! Towards Continual Policy Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    Current-task KL does not stop continual RL forgetting; CPO instead sparsely freezes high-movement parameters and cuts forgetting by ~14 points on Qwen3-VL-8B while lifting out-of-domain scores.