REVIEW 1 cited by
Hot Casimir wormholes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this work, we explore the thermal effects on Casimir wormholes in the context of higher-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity. Motivated by the fundamental role of EGB gravity in describing a wide range of gravitational phenomena, we investigate how thermal fluctuations affect the quantum vacuum energy density associated with the Casimir effect and its impact on the global structure of traversable wormholes. By deriving the shape function from the EGB field equations with thermally corrected Casimir energy, we verify that all necessary conditions for wormhole formation are satisfied, including asymptotic flatness and throat stability. Our results indicate that thermal corrections modify of the wormhole geometry, increasing spatial curvature in the throat region and influencing its traversability. Furthermore, we analyze gravitational Casimir effects and discuss their possible role in modified gravity theories. Expanding on the approach of reference \cite{M. Zubair1, Mushayydha, Mushayydha2}, we adopt here the appropriate formulation for Casimir wormholes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, taking into account the Casimir energy density in higher dimensions. This approach allows us to obtain more accurate results compared to the simplified approximation previously used.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Traversable wormholes from a smoothed string fluid in 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity
A 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet wormhole sourced by a smoothed string fluid is built, but the advertised null-energy-condition satisfaction and asymptotic flatness are not supported by the paper's own equations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.