Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Are Natural Domain Foundation Models Useful for Medical Image Classification?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.19522 v2 pith:WZGXSI6I submitted 2023-10-30 cs.CV

Are Natural Domain Foundation Models Useful for Medical Image Classification?

classification cs.CV
keywords modelsfoundationmedicalclassificationimagetasksconsistentlydinov2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The deep learning field is converging towards the use of general foundation models that can be easily adapted for diverse tasks. While this paradigm shift has become common practice within the field of natural language processing, progress has been slower in computer vision. In this paper we attempt to address this issue by investigating the transferability of various state-of-the-art foundation models to medical image classification tasks. Specifically, we evaluate the performance of five foundation models, namely SAM, SEEM, DINOv2, BLIP, and OpenCLIP across four well-established medical imaging datasets. We explore different training settings to fully harness the potential of these models. Our study shows mixed results. DINOv2 consistently outperforms the standard practice of ImageNet pretraining. However, other foundation models failed to consistently beat this established baseline indicating limitations in their transferability to medical image classification tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.