Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 71 references

Visualization of topological shear polaritons in gypsum thin films

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Thin films of gypsum are shown to carry shear phonon polaritons that pass through a canalization regime as frequency rises.

desk verdict A credible first visualization of elliptical and canalized shear polaritons in thin gypsum, with a real but manageable soft spot: the bulk permittivity used to assign regimes is shifted by a few cm^-1 from the film's own TO resonances. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.19242 v1 pith:X2NTKBHR submitted 2025-01-31 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall

Pablo Díaz-Núñez , Christian Lanza , Ziwei Wang , Vasyl G. Kravets , Jiahua Duan , José Álvarez-Cuervo , Aitana Tarazaga Martín-Luengo , Alexander N. Grigorenko
show 5 more authors
Qian Yang Alexander Paarmann Joshua Caldwell Pablo Alonso-González Artem Mishchenko
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hall
keywords shearphononpolaritonsgypsummonocliniccrystalsnear-fieldnano-imagingtopologicaltransitioncanalizationslowlight
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first observation of shear phonon polaritons in thin films of an exfoliable crystal, gypsum (calcium sulfate dihydrate). Using near-field nano-imaging and spectroscopy, it follows the polariton propagation as the frequency rises and finds a topological transition from hyperbolic shear propagation to elliptical shear propagation, with a shear canalization regime in between. The same transition appears in transfer-matrix dispersions, analytical isofrequency contours, and full-wave simulations. The paper also measures unusually low group velocities, down to 0.0005c, which makes gypsum a candidate platform for slow-light and nanophotonic devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is the monoclinic dielectric permittivity tensor of gypsum, whose non-zero off-diagonal component $\varepsilon_{xy}(\omega)$ cannot be removed at all frequencies by a single rotation. The paper rotates the monoclinic plane by the frequency-dependent angle $\gamma(\omega) = 0.5 \tan^{-1}(2\,\Re\{\varepsilon_{xy}\}/(\Re\{\varepsilon_{xx}\}-\Re\{\varepsilon_{yy}\}))$, producing a coordinate frame where the real part of the off-diagonal term vanishes. The signs of $\Re\{\varepsilon_{mm}\}$, $\Re\{\varepsilon_{nn}\}$, and $\Re\{\varepsilon_{zz}\}$ in that frame define the hyperbolic type I, hyperbolic type II, and elliptical regimes, while the canalized regime sits at the crossing $\Re\{\varepsilon_{mm}\} \approx 0$; transfer-matrix methods and analytical isofrequency contours turn this tensor into the predicted polariton dispersions that the near-field images are compared against.

What would settle it

Measure the permittivity of an exfoliated gypsum flake independently, for example by infrared ellipsometry, and recompute the isofrequency contours; if the sign pattern of $\Re\{\varepsilon_{mm}\}$, $\Re\{\varepsilon_{nn}\}$, and $\Re\{\varepsilon_{zz}\}$ or the off-diagonal component differs from the bulk tensor, the assigned hyperbolic, canalized, and elliptical frequency bands would shift or disappear. A simpler check is near-field imaging at the nominal canalization frequency: the two parallel fringes should appear only there, and a closed elliptical contour at that frequency would rule out the reported transition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that gypsum thin films support shear phonon polaritons in three distinct propagation regimes within a narrow mid-infrared window around 1100–1200 cm$^{-1}$: hyperbolic shear, canalized shear, and elliptical shear. These regimes are identified by the signs of the real parts of the permittivity components in a frequency-dispersive coordinate frame, and the paper assigns them to Reststrahlen bands built from two in-plane sulphate stretching phonons at about 1110 and 1138 cm$^{-1}$. The canalization occurs where the relevant permittivity component crosses zero, and the experimental images show asymmetric flattened wavefronts that the paper interprets as shear canalization, a form not reported before. Along the a axis the fitted polariton dispersion gives group velocities as low as 0.0005c with lifetimes around 0.6–2 ps. The paper concludes that gypsum is the first exfoliable material shown to host these shear phenomena in thin-film form.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the bulk infrared dielectric tensor of gypsum, including its Lorentz-oscillator parameters, describes the 75 nm and 150 nm exfoliated flakes at every frequency used.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Gypsum becomes the first exfoliable crystal platform demonstrated to support shear phonon polaritons in thin films.
  • The hyperbolic-to-elliptical transition through canalization provides a single material whose polariton topology can be tuned simply by changing the illumination frequency.
  • Group velocities down to 0.0005c suggest that gypsum films could be used for slow-light devices and enhanced infrared light-matter interactions.
  • Because gypsum is exfoliable, its thin films can be stacked or integrated into heterostructures with other van der Waals materials.
  • The asymmetric intensity of the canalized wavefronts gives a new observable signature for shear behavior in low-symmetry crystals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because all regime assignments use the bulk permittivity tensor, the exact transition frequencies for nanoscale flakes should be checked with an independent thickness-dependent measurement; small shifts would move the canalization band without changing the overall picture.
  • Editorial inference: the paper notes that oscillator angle and losses control the shear asymmetry, so deliberately varying losses (for example by temperature or by coupling to metal antennas) could act as a tuning knob for the propagation direction.
  • Editorial inference: the canalized shear regime, with energy flux along one direction for all allowed wavevectors, could be tested as a directional coupler by placing a second gypsum flake or a plasmonic antenna in the path of the canalized fringes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the first observation of elliptical and canalized shear phonon polaritons in thin films of gypsum, an exfoliable monoclinic crystal. Using s-SNOM nano-imaging and nano-FTIR spectroscopy on 75-nm and 150-nm flakes, the authors visualize a frequency-driven transition from hyperbolic shear polaritons through a canalization regime to elliptical shear polaritons. The experimental dispersion, extracted by fitting real-space fringes, is compared with transfer-matrix-method (TMM) calculations and full-wave COMSOL simulations, both based on the bulk dielectric tensor of gypsum from Aronson et al. (1983). The manuscript also reports unusually low group velocities, down to 0.0005c, and attributes the shear character to non-zero off-diagonal permittivity components in the monoclinic plane. The central claim is the topological transition of shear polaritons in a thin-film exfoliable material, supported by real-space images and theoretical IFCs.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this work extends shear polariton physics from bulk non-van der Waals crystals to exfoliable thin films, which is significant for nanophotonic integration and for exploring slow-light and non-Hermitian phenomena. The study is strengthened by the combination of real-space nano-imaging, nano-FTIR spectroscopy, TMM dispersion calculations, and COMSOL simulations, and by using an external bulk permittivity tensor rather than fitting the polariton data itself. The observation of canalized and elliptical shear polaritons in a natural material is potentially impactful. However, the quantitative regime assignments and the slow-light figures depend on assumptions that are not fully validated in the manuscript, as detailed below.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2, Figure 2B/C, SI Figure S7, Tables S1/S2] The central regime assignment—hyperbolic, canalized, elliptical—relies entirely on the bulk permittivity tensor of Aronson et al. (1983), yet the paper's own nano-FTIR data place the in-plane TO resonances at approximately 1105 and 1135 cm−1, whereas the Aronson tensor has them at 1110.2 and 1138.2 cm−1. SI Figure S7 further notes a shift of the 1135 cm−1 TO to higher frequencies in the 150-nm flake. Because the Reststrahlen bands used to define the regimes are narrow (e.g., 1110–1122, 1122–1138, 1138–1172 cm−1), shifts of 3–5 cm−1 are comparable to the band widths and can move the canalization frequency and the topological transition by more than the experimental frequency step. The authors should provide an independent determination of the thin-film permittivity, or at minimum test the sensitivity of the TMM/COMSOL predictions and regime labels to the observed TO shifts and to realistic variations of oscillator strengths and dampings.
  2. [Methods, 'Analytical approximations to the dispersion of shear polaritons in thin films'] The analytical IFC formula used to produce Figure 4K is presented without proof, with the text stating that 'a detailed proof of the former result will be given elsewhere.' Since Figure 4K is a key theoretical corroboration of the claimed topological transition, this is load-bearing. The authors should either provide a complete derivation in the paper or supplementary material, cite a published derivation if it exists, or explicitly validate the formula against the TMM IFCs over the full frequency and wavevector range shown. Without this, the analytical IFC panel cannot be considered independent support for the central claim.
  3. [§2, Figure 2G,H and SI Figure S5] The group velocities down to 0.0005c and lifetimes of 0.6–2 ps are extracted by fitting the experimental dispersion with a power law y = a x^b and then differentiating. The manuscript reports no uncertainties on the fit parameters and no goodness-of-fit metrics, and the experimental dispersion points in Figure 2G,H carry sizable error bars. Given that the slow-light claim is a highlighted result, the authors should report confidence intervals on the group velocity and lifetime, and demonstrate that the power-law form is appropriate over the fitted range rather than an arbitrary smoothing of the data.
  4. [§2, Eq. (1) and SI Figure S2] The frequency-dependent rotation angle γ(ω) used to diagonalize the real part of the permittivity is derived in the lossless limit, as the authors acknowledge in the text ('the derivation of γ(ω) considers a lossless scenario and it may be valid only when the losses are small'). The experimental frequencies are close to TO phonons where losses are large, so the rotated-frame classification of hyperbolic and elliptical regimes may be quantitatively unreliable. The authors should quantify the error in γ(ω) and in the regime boundaries when the full complex tensor is used without neglecting losses, or justify more rigorously that the lossless rotation remains a valid diagnostic for the IFC topology in this frequency range.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 4 caption and main text] The main text refers to 'Figure 4C-F' for the real-part field simulations, while the caption lists panels '(C-E)' for four frequencies (1120, 1130, 1140, 1150 cm−1). Please correct the panel numbering for consistency.
  2. [SI Figure S5] The power-law fit y = a x^b is described without specifying which quantity is x and which is y (frequency versus wavevector) and over what range. Please define these variables explicitly in the caption or methods.
  3. [Introduction, Ref. [29]] The paper frequently references prior work on hyperbolic shear metasurfaces [29] for the rotation-angle framework, but it would help the reader to state explicitly which formulas are taken from [29] and which are new to this work, particularly Eq. (1) and the analytical IFC expression.
  4. [Abstract] The abstract claims 'the first observation of elliptical shear and canalized shear phonon polaritons in gypsum thin films'; the word 'first' is strong given that the paper itself notes the narrowness of the frequency bands and the reliance on an external bulk permittivity. Please consider softening the wording or providing a more detailed contextual comparison in the introduction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the polariton predictions are based on an independent 1983 bulk permittivity tensor, not on fits to the observed near-field data.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—elliptical, canalized, and hyperbolic shear phonon polaritons in gypsum—are experimental observations interpreted with a theoretical model whose only material input is the independent Lorentz-oscillator permittivity tensor from Aronson et al. (1983), obtained from bulk reflectance rather than from the present polariton data. The TMM dispersions, IFCs, and COMSOL simulations are therefore genuine predictions, not fits to the observed fringes; the experimental wavevectors extracted from line-profile fits are compared with, not used to construct, the calculated dispersions. The frequency-dependent rotation gamma(omega) in Eq. (1) is a standard real-part diagonalization and is not a fitted parameter. No load-bearing step reduces to the paper's own outputs. Two non-circular caveats are worth flagging: the analytical IFC formula in the Methods says 'A detailed proof of the former result will be given elsewhere,' so that panel is not fully self-contained, and the validity of the bulk Aronson tensor for 75–150 nm exfoliated flakes is assumed rather than independently re-measured. These are correctness/robustness concerns, not circularity, because the cited and measured inputs are external to the claimed observation. Citations to prior shear-polariton work (refs 26–29) supply the interpretive framework but are externally published and do not forbid alternatives, so they do not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its predictions inherit a bulk-fitted dielectric tensor, a lossless rotation-angle approximation, and an unproved analytical dispersion formula; the experimental dispersion extraction adds standard fit parameters. These are the items a reader must accept before the central claim follows.

free parameters (3)
  • Gypsum Lorentz oscillator parameters from Aronson et al. 1983 = Table S1/S2 values; e.g., in-plane oscillators at 1110.2 cm^-1 and 1138.2 cm^-1 with strengths 0.28429 and 0.26264
    Bulk reflectance fits used as the permittivity input for all regime classification, TMM, IFC, and COMSOL calculations; no thin-film correction is applied.
  • Near-field fitting parameters A, kp, C (Eq. 2) = Not reported numerically; complex values inferred from Figure S5 fits
    Used to extract polariton wavevector, wavelength, and propagation length from line profiles; the dispersion plots in Figure 2G/H depend on these fits.
  • Power-law fit coefficients a and b for dispersion (y = a x^b) = Not reported
    Used to compute group velocity and lifetime; no uncertainty propagation is given for these derived quantities.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Maxwell equations and the 4x4 transfer-matrix formalism describe polariton modes in anisotropic slabs.
    Applied in Section 2 and Methods for dispersion and IFC calculations.
  • domain assumption The Aronson et al. bulk permittivity tensor is valid for exfoliated gypsum thin films at 1100 to 1200 cm^-1.
    All theoretical predictions use this tensor, from Section 1 and Figure 1D onwards.
  • domain assumption s-SNOM fringes are dominated by propagating polariton interference described by E(x) = A exp(i2kp x)/sqrt(2x) + C.
    Used to extract kp and dispersion from line profiles in Eq. 2.
  • ad hoc to paper The lossless frequency-dependent rotation angle gamma(omega) is applicable despite operating near TO phonons with large losses.
    The paper itself notes gamma(omega) is a lossless derivation and observed fringe rotation exceeds the predicted variation of about 3 degrees (Section 2).
  • ad hoc to paper The analytical shear polariton dispersion formula quoted in Methods is correct.
    Proof is deferred; Methods states 'A detailed proof of the former result will be given elsewhere.'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Visualization of topological shear polaritons in gypsum thin films." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X2NTKBHR

@misc{pith2026250119242,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Visualization of topological shear polaritons in gypsum thin films},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X2NTKBHR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.19242}
}
read the original abstract

Low symmetry crystals have recently emerged as a platform for exploring novel light-matter interactions in the form of hyperbolic shear polaritons. These excitations exhibit unique optical properties such as frequency-dispersive optical axes and asymmetric light propagation and energy dissipation, which arise from the presence of non-orthogonal resonances. However, only non-vdW materials have been demonstrated to support hyperbolic shear polaritons, limiting their exotic properties and potential applications. Here we introduce for the first time novel shear phenomena in low symmetry crystal thin films by demonstrating the existence of elliptical and canalized shear phonon polaritons in gypsum, an exfoliable monoclinic sulphate mineral. Our results unveil a topological transition from hyperbolic shear to elliptical shear polaritons, passing through a canalization regime with strong field confinement. Importantly, we observe a significant slowdown of group velocity, reaching values as low as 0.0005c, highlighting the potential of gypsum for "slow light" applications and extreme light-matter interaction control. These findings expand the application scope of low-symmetry crystals with the benefits that an exfoliable material provides, such as stronger field confinement, tunability, and versatility for its incorporation in complex photonic devices that might unlock new optical phenomena at the nanoscale.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The highly anisotropic crystal nature o f these materials has enabled the visualization of PhPs exhibiting exotic optical phenomena at the nanoscale

    Introduction Phonon polaritons (PhPs, light-matter hybrid quasiparticles arising from the coupling of infrared photons with lattice vibrations in polar crystals) in thin layers of van der Waals (vdW) materials have attracted enormous attention in recent years. The highly anisotropic crystal nature o f these materials has enabled the visualization of PhPs ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    slow light

    Results and Discussion Crystal structure and infrared response of Gypsum Gypsum (calcium sulphate dihydrate, CaSO4·2H2O) is one of the most abundant sulphate minerals in nature, with numerous industrial applications ranging from construction34,35 to agriculture.36 The schematic in Figure 1A shows its monoclinic crystal structure (space group 𝐼2/𝑎) with di...

    work page

  3. [3]

    slow light

    Conclusions In summary, our work introduces gypsum as a material platform supporting unique polaritonic excitations such as elliptical shear, canalized shear, and hyperbolic shear PhPs. Importantly, these shear optical phenomena are visualized for the first time in th in films of an exfoliable crystal, holding great potential against non -vdW materials in...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Dai, S. et al. Tunable Phonon Polaritons in Atomically Thin van der Waals Crystals of Boron Nitride. Science 343, 1125–1129 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Li, P. et al. Hyperbolic phonon-polaritons in boron nitride for near-field optical imaging and focusing. Nat Commun 6, 7507 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Giles, A. J. et al. Ultralow-loss polaritons in isotopically pure boron nitride. Nature Mater 17, 134–139 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Lee, I.-H. et al. Image polaritons in boron nitride for extreme polariton confinement with low losses. Nat Commun 11, 3649 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Menabde, S. G. et al. Near-field probing of image phonon-polaritons in hexagonal boron nitride on gold crystals. Science Advances 8, eabn0627 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Caldwell, J. D. et al. Sub-diffractional volume-confined polaritons in the natural hyperbolic material hexagonal boron nitride. Nat Commun 5, 5221 (2014)

    2014

  2. [10]

    Ma, W. et al. In-plane anisotropic and ultra-low-loss polaritons in a natural van der Waals crystal. Nature 562, 557 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Zheng, Z. et al. A mid-infrared biaxial hyperbolic van der Waals crystal. Science Advances 5, eaav8690 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Álvarez-Pérez, G. et al. Infrared Permittivity of the Biaxial van der Waals Semiconductor α- MoO3 from Near- and Far-Field Correlative Studies. Advanced Materials 32, 1908176 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Wu, Y. et al. Chemical switching of low-loss phonon polaritons in α-MoO3 by hydrogen intercalation. Nat Commun 11, 2646 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    & Vennik, J

    Clauws, P. & Vennik, J. Lattice Vibrations of V2O5. Determination of TO and LO Frequencies from Infrared Reflection and Transmission. physica status solidi (b) 76, 707– 713 (1976)

    1976

  7. [15]

    Sucharitakul, S. et al. V2O5: A 2D van der Waals Oxide with Strong In-Plane Electrical and Optical Anisotropy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 23949–23956 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Taboada-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Broad spectral tuning of ultra-low-loss polaritons in a van der Waals crystal by intercalation. Nat. Mater. 19, 964–968 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Optical Properties of Crystalline and Amorphous Semiconductors

    Adachi, S. Optical Properties of Crystalline and Amorphous Semiconductors. (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1999). doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5241-3

    1999 doi

  10. [18]

    Álvarez-Pérez, G. et al. Negative reflection of nanoscale-confined polaritons in a low-loss natural medium. Science Advances 8, eabp8486 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Duan, J. et al. Planar refraction and lensing of highly confined polaritons in anisotropic media. Nat Commun 12, 4325 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Hu, H. et al. Gate-tunable negative refraction of mid-infrared polaritons. Science 379, 558– 561 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Li, P. et al. Collective near-field coupling and nonlocal phenomena in infrared-phononic metasurfaces for nano-light canalization. Nat Commun 11, 3663 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Duan, J. et al. Multiple and spectrally robust photonic magic angles in reconfigurable α- MoO3 trilayers. Nat. Mater. 22, 867–872 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Dai, S. et al. Subdiffractional focusing and guiding of polaritonic rays in a natural hyperbolic material. Nature Communications 6, 6963 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    Autore, M. et al. Boron nitride nanoresonators for phonon-enhanced molecular vibrational spectroscopy at the strong coupling limit. Light Sci Appl 7, 17172–17172 (2018). 12

    2018

  17. [25]

    Bylinkin, A. et al. Real-space observation of vibrational strong coupling between propagating phonon polaritons and organic molecules. Nat. Photonics 15, 197–202 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    & Wang, D.-W

    Xu, C., Cai, H. & Wang, D.-W. Vibrational strong coupling between Tamm phonon polaritons and organic molecules. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, JOSAB 38, 1505–1509 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Dolado, I. et al. Remote near-field spectroscopy of vibrational strong coupling between organic molecules and phononic nanoresonators. Nat Commun 13, 6850 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Bylinkin, A. et al. Dual-Band Coupling of Phonon and Surface Plasmon Polaritons with Vibrational and Electronic Excitations in Molecules. Nano Lett. 23, 3985–3993 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Passler, N. C. et al. Hyperbolic shear polaritons in low-symmetry crystals. Nature 602, 595– 600 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Matson, J. et al. Controlling the propagation asymmetry of hyperbolic shear polaritons in beta-gallium oxide. Nat Commun 14, 5240 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Hu, G. et al. Real-space nanoimaging of hyperbolic shear polaritons in a monoclinic crystal. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 64–70 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    M., Galiffi, E., Ni, X

    Renzi, E. M., Galiffi, E., Ni, X. & Alù, A. Hyperbolic Shear Metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 263803 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Polariton Dispersion and Crystal Optics in Monoclinic Materials

    Claus, R. Polariton Dispersion and Crystal Optics in Monoclinic Materials. physica status solidi (b) 88, 683–688 (1978)

    1978

  26. [34]

    & Alù, A

    Krasnok, A. & Alù, A. Low-Symmetry Nanophotonics. ACS Photonics 9, 2–24 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Galiffi, E. et al. Extreme light confinement and control in low-symmetry phonon-polaritonic crystals. Nat Rev Mater 9, 9–28 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Yves, S., Galiffi, E., Ni, X., Renzi, E. M. & Alù, A. Twist-Induced Hyperbolic Shear Metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. X 14, 021031 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    & Dvorkin, L

    Lushnikova, N. & Dvorkin, L. 25 - Sustainability of gypsum products as a construction material. in Sustainability of Construction Materials (Second Edition) (ed. Khatib, J. M.) 643–681 (Woodhead Publishing, 2016). doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-100370-1.00025-1

    2016 doi

  30. [38]

    Singh, V. K. 13 - Types of gypsum and set regulation of cement. in The Science and Technology of Cement and Other Hydraulic Binders (ed. Singh, V. K.) 467–497 (Woodhead Publishing, 2023). doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-95080-0.00013-3

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    & Ferrio, J

    Palacio, S., Azorín, J., Montserrat-Martí, G. & Ferrio, J. P. The crystallization water of gypsum rocks is a relevant water source for plants. Nat Commun 5, 4660 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Pedersen, B. F. & Semmingsen, D. Neutron diffraction refinement of the structure of gypsum, CaSO4.2H2O. Acta Cryst B 38, 1074–1077 (1982)

    1982

  33. [41]

    R., Emslie, A

    Aronson, J. R., Emslie, A. G., Miseo, E. V., Smith, E. M. & Strong, P. F. Optical constants of monoclinic anisotropic crystals: gypsum. Appl. Opt., AO 22, 4093–4098 (1983)

    1983

  34. [42]

    Anbalagan, G., Mukundakumari, S., Murugesan, K. S. & Gunasekaran, S. Infrared, optical absorption, and EPR spectroscopic studies on natural gypsum. Vibrational Spectroscopy 50, 226–230 (2009)

    2009

  35. [43]

    Chen, W. et al. Origin of gypsum growth habit difference as revealed by molecular conformations of surface-bound citrate and tartrate. CrystEngComm 20, 3581–3589 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    Santos, J. C. C., Negreiros, F. R., Pedroza, L. S., Dalpian, G. M. & Miranda, P. B. Interaction of Water with the Gypsum (010) Surface: Structure and Dynamics from Nonlinear Vibrational Spectroscopy and Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 17141–17152 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    & Soots, V

    Krishnamurthy, N. & Soots, V. Raman Spectrum of Gypsum. Can. J. Phys. 49, 885–896 (1971)

    1971

  38. [46]

    J., Dawson, P

    Berenblut, B. J., Dawson, P. & Wilkinson, G. R. The Raman spectrum of gypsum. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Spectroscopy 27, 1849–1863 (1971). 13

    1971

  39. [47]

    & Williams, Q

    Knittle, E., Phillips, W. & Williams, Q. An infrared and Raman spectroscopic study of gypsum at high pressures. Phys Chem Min 28, 630–640 (2001)

    2001

  40. [48]

    & Kaneko, N

    Takahashi, H., Maehara, I. & Kaneko, N. Infrared reflection spectra of gypsum. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Spectroscopy 39, 449–455 (1983)

    1983

  41. [49]

    Prieto-Taboada, N., Gómez-Laserna, O., Martínez-Arkarazo, I., Olazabal, M. Á. & Madariaga, J. M. Raman Spectra of the Different Phases in the CaSO4–H2O System. Anal. Chem. 86, 10131–10137 (2014)

    2014

  42. [50]

    Cole, W. F. & Lancucki, C. J. Hydrogen Bonding in Gypsum. Nature Physical Science 242, 104–105 (1973)

    1973

  43. [51]

    G., Ivanovski, V

    Mayerhöfer, T. G., Ivanovski, V. & Popp, J. Dispersion analysis of non-normal reflection spectra from monoclinic crystals. Vibrational Spectroscopy 63, 396–403 (2012)

    2012

  44. [52]

    E., Otto, A

    Koch, E. E., Otto, A. & Kliewwer, K. L. Reflection spectroscopy on monoclinic crystals. Chemical Physics 3, 362–369 (1974)

    1974

  45. [53]

    Chen, J. et al. Optical nano-imaging of gate-tunable graphene plasmons. Nature 487, 77–81 (2012)

    2012

  46. [54]

    Fei, Z. et al. Gate-tuning of graphene plasmons revealed by infrared nano-imaging. Nature 487, 82–85 (2012)

    2012

  47. [55]

    Chen, S. et al. Real-space observation of ultraconfined in-plane anisotropic acoustic terahertz plasmon polaritons. Nat. Mater. 22, 860–866 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Chen, S. et al. Real-space nanoimaging of THz polaritons in the topological insulator Bi2Se3. Nat Commun 13, 1374 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    Passler, N. C. & Paarmann, A. Generalized 4 × 4 matrix formalism for light propagation in anisotropic stratified media: study of surface phonon polaritons in polar dielectric heterostructures. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, JOSAB 34, 2128–2139 (2017)

    2017

  50. [58]

    L., Boardman, A

    Tsakmakidis, K. L., Boardman, A. D. & Hess, O. ‘Trapped rainbow’ storage of light in metamaterials. Nature 450, 397–401 (2007)

    2007

  51. [59]

    L., Hess, O., Boyd, R

    Tsakmakidis, K. L., Hess, O., Boyd, R. W. & Zhang, X. Ultraslow waves on the nanoscale. Science 358, eaan5196 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    Klein, M. et al. Slow light in a 2D semiconductor plasmonic structure. Nat Commun 13, 6216 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    Kumar, A. et al. Slow light topological photonics with counter-propagating waves and its active control on a chip. Nat Commun 15, 926 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    & Chen, J

    Duan, J., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Cheng, Y. & Chen, J. Near-field optics on flatland: from noble metals to van der Waals materials. Advances in Physics: X 4, 1593051 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    Ermolaev, G. A. et al. Wandering principal optical axes in van der Waals triclinic materials. Nat Commun 15, 1552 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    Zheng, Z. et al. Phonon Polaritons in Twisted Double-Layers of Hyperbolic van der Waals Crystals. Nano Lett. 20, 5301–5308 (2020)

    2020

  57. [65]

    Hu, G. et al. Topological polaritons and photonic magic angles in twisted α-MoO3 bilayers. Nature 582, 209–213 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    & Antezza, M

    Zhou, C.-L., Wu, X.-H., Zhang, Y., Yi, H.-L. & Antezza, M. Polariton topological transition effects on radiative heat transfer. Phys. Rev. B 103, 155404 (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    Li, S., Zhou, J. & Du, W. Configurable topological phonon polaritons in twisted hBN metasurfaces. Appl. Opt., AO 60, 5735–5741 (2021)

    2021

  60. [68]

    Duan, J. et al. Enabling propagation of anisotropic polaritons along forbidden directions via a topological transition. Science Advances 7, eabf2690 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    Nörenberg, T. et al. Germanium Monosulfide as a Natural Platform for Highly Anisotropic THz Polaritons. ACS Nano 16, 20174–20185 (2022). 14

    2022

  62. [70]

    L., Querry, M

    Long, L. L., Querry, M. R., Bell, R. J. & Alexander, R. W. Optical properties of calcite and gypsum in crystalline and powdered form in the infrared and far-infrared. Infrared Physics 34, 191–201 (1993)

    1993

  63. [71]

    V., Volkov, V

    Álvarez-Pérez, G., Voronin, K. V., Volkov, V. S., Alonso-González, P. & Nikitin, A. Y. Analytical approximations for the dispersion of electromagnetic modes in slabs of biaxial crystals. Phys. Rev. B 100, 235408 (2019). Acknowledgements A.M. and P.D. -N. acknowledge support fr...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.