Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

LEGION: Learning to Ground and Explain for Synthetic Image Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.15264 v1 pith:X4O25YZO submitted 2025-03-19 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords imagedetectionlegionsyntheticannotationsimagesartifactcurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid advancements in generative technology have emerged as a double-edged sword. While offering powerful tools that enhance convenience, they also pose significant social concerns. As defenders, current synthetic image detection methods often lack artifact-level textual interpretability and are overly focused on image manipulation detection, and current datasets usually suffer from outdated generators and a lack of fine-grained annotations. In this paper, we introduce SynthScars, a high-quality and diverse dataset consisting of 12,236 fully synthetic images with human-expert annotations. It features 4 distinct image content types, 3 categories of artifacts, and fine-grained annotations covering pixel-level segmentation, detailed textual explanations, and artifact category labels. Furthermore, we propose LEGION (LEarning to Ground and explain for Synthetic Image detectiON), a multimodal large language model (MLLM)-based image forgery analysis framework that integrates artifact detection, segmentation, and explanation. Building upon this capability, we further explore LEGION as a controller, integrating it into image refinement pipelines to guide the generation of higher-quality and more realistic images. Extensive experiments show that LEGION outperforms existing methods across multiple benchmarks, particularly surpassing the second-best traditional expert on SynthScars by 3.31% in mIoU and 7.75% in F1 score. Moreover, the refined images generated under its guidance exhibit stronger alignment with human preferences. The code, model, and dataset will be released.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Code-in-the-Loop Forensics: Agentic Tool Use for Image Forgery Detection

    cs.AI 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    ForenAgent lets MLLMs create and iteratively improve low-level Python tools for image forgery detection via a two-stage training pipeline and a new 100k-image benchmark dataset.

  2. LaP-Forensics: Latent-Pixel Consistency Guided Multimodal Reasoning for Deepfake Detection

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dual-stream deepfake forensic model that adds DDIM reconstruction residuals to RGB features improves artifact localization and cross-generator detection in evaluations, with honest caveats about text faithfulness.

  3. AIGI-Holmes: Towards Explainable and Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection via Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AIGI-Holmes combines visual expert pretraining, SFT on explanation data, and direct preference optimization to deliver human-verifiable explanations and top detection accuracy on unseen AI generators.

  4. Position: AI/ML Deepfake Research is Misaligned with AI-Generated Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (AIG-NCII)

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The dominant real-world use of generative-image abuse is non-consensual intimate imagery, yet the AI/ML research field focuses almost exclusively on viewer deception.

Pith tools