Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LLM-based Corroborating and Refuting Evidence Retrieval for Scientific Claim Verification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.07937 v1 pith:X5PT2KQV submitted 2025-03-11 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords ciberclaimscientificevidencellmsverificationacrosscorroborating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we introduce CIBER (Claim Investigation Based on Evidence Retrieval), an extension of the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework designed to identify corroborating and refuting documents as evidence for scientific claim verification. CIBER addresses the inherent uncertainty in Large Language Models (LLMs) by evaluating response consistency across diverse interrogation probes. By focusing on the behavioral analysis of LLMs without requiring access to their internal information, CIBER is applicable to both white-box and black-box models. Furthermore, CIBER operates in an unsupervised manner, enabling easy generalization across various scientific domains. Comprehensive evaluations conducted using LLMs with varying levels of linguistic proficiency reveal CIBER's superior performance compared to conventional RAG approaches. These findings not only highlight the effectiveness of CIBER but also provide valuable insights for future advancements in LLM-based scientific claim verification.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PURPOSE: Poisoning Conflict Resolution in RAG via Proxy-Fact-Grounded Updates

    cs.CR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A black-box poisoning attack that frames false information as a fact-compatible update defeats conflict-resolution safeguards in RAG on most tested settings.

  2. Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate

    cs.MA 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DEAR trains two RL policies, peer selection and generation-behavior control, to regulate how LLM debaters reference each other, improving benchmark accuracy while cutting token use.

Pith tools