REVIEW 1 cited by
A Cram\'er Distance perspective on Quantile Regression based Distributional Reinforcement Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Cram\'er Distance perspective on Quantile Regression based Distributional Reinforcement Learning
read the original abstract
Distributional reinforcement learning (DRL) extends the value-based approach by approximating the full distribution over future returns instead of the mean only, providing a richer signal that leads to improved performances. Quantile Regression (QR) based methods like QR-DQN project arbitrary distributions into a parametric subset of staircase distributions by minimizing the 1-Wasserstein distance. However, due to biases in the gradients, the quantile regression loss is used instead for training, guaranteeing the same minimizer and enjoying unbiased gradients. Non-crossing constraints on the quantiles have been shown to improve the performance of QR-DQN for uncertainty-based exploration strategies. The contribution of this work is in the setting of fixed quantile levels and is twofold. First, we prove that the Cram\'er distance yields a projection that coincides with the 1-Wasserstein one and that, under non-crossing constraints, the squared Cram\'er and the quantile regression losses yield collinear gradients, shedding light on the connection between these important elements of DRL. Second, we propose a low complexity algorithm to compute the Cram\'er distance.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Multivariate Distributional Reinforcement Learning Using Sliced Divergences
SDRL applies sliced projections of one-dimensional divergences (Wasserstein, Cramér, MMD) to multivariate return distributions in RL, with Bellman contraction proofs for scalar and general matrix discounting.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.