REVIEW 2 cited by
Enabling Calibration In The Zero-Shot Inference of Large Vision-Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Calibration of deep learning models is crucial to their trustworthiness and safe usage, and as such, has been extensively studied in supervised classification models, with methods crafted to decrease miscalibration. However, there has yet to be a comprehensive study of the calibration of vision-language models that are used for zero-shot inference, like CLIP. We measure calibration across relevant variables like prompt, dataset, and architecture, and find that zero-shot inference with CLIP is miscalibrated. Furthermore, we propose a modified version of temperature scaling that is aligned with the common use cases of CLIP as a zero-shot inference model, and show that a single learned temperature generalizes for each specific CLIP model (defined by a chosen pre-training dataset and architecture) across inference dataset and prompt choice.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Prompting without Panic: Attribute-aware, Zero-shot, Test-Time Calibration
Attribute-aware test-time prompt tuning with intra/inter-class text dispersion losses reduces average ECE from 11.7 to 4.11 across 11 fine-grained CLIP benchmarks.
-
Interpretable Failure Detection with Human-Level Concepts
ORCA ranks concept activations from CLIP and uses the rank-weighted agreement of the top-K concepts with the predicted category as its confidence score, improving failure-detection FPR on several benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.