REVIEW 1 cited by
On Regularization Parameter Estimation under Covariate Shift
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper identifies a problem with the usual procedure for L2-regularization parameter estimation in a domain adaptation setting. In such a setting, there are differences between the distributions generating the training data (source domain) and the test data (target domain). The usual cross-validation procedure requires validation data, which can not be obtained from the unlabeled target data. The problem is that if one decides to use source validation data, the regularization parameter is underestimated. One possible solution is to scale the source validation data through importance weighting, but we show that this correction is not sufficient. We conclude the paper with an empirical analysis of the effect of several importance weight estimators on the estimation of the regularization parameter.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Nonparametric Goodness-of-fit Testing under Covariate Shift
Truncated importance-weighted kernel ridge regression with multiplier bootstrap yields valid L2(Q) confidence balls for nonparametric goodness-of-fit under covariate shift.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.