REVIEW 1 cited by
Resampling Forgery Detection Using Deep Learning and A-Contrario Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The amount of digital imagery recorded has recently grown exponentially, and with the advancement of software, such as Photoshop or Gimp, it has become easier to manipulate images. However, most images on the internet have not been manipulated and any automated manipulation detection algorithm must carefully control the false alarm rate. In this paper we discuss a method to automatically detect local resampling using deep learning while controlling the false alarm rate using a-contrario analysis. The automated procedure consists of three primary steps. First, resampling features are calculated for image blocks. A deep learning classifier is then used to generate a heatmap that indicates if the image block has been resampled. We expect some of these blocks to be falsely identified as resampled. We use a-contrario hypothesis testing to both identify if the patterns of the manipulated blocks indicate if the image has been tampered with and to localize the manipulation. We demonstrate that this strategy is effective in indicating if an image has been manipulated and localizing the manipulations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Cross-View Localization via Redundant Sliced Observations and A-Contrario Validation
Slice-Loc divides panoramic query images into slices, estimates each slice's 3-DoF pose, and uses an a-contrario false-alarm model to reject unreliable localizations, cutting DReSS cross-area mean error from 4.47 m to 1.86 m.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.