Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Radial Metallicity Gradients for the Chemically Selected Galactic Thin Disc Main-Sequence Stars

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The thin disc's iron abundance falls by 0.074 dex per kpc outward, and radial migration shifts that number by at most 6 percent.

desk verdict The guiding-radius gradient is a solid, useful confirmation, but the 'at most 6%' radial migration claim is not supported by a static-potential traceback that cannot see churning. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13660 v1 pith:XJZUCHSX submitted 2024-11-20 astro-ph.GA

F. Akbaba , T. Ak , S. Bilir , O. Plevne , Onal Tas. O , G. M. Seabroke This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords GalacticthindiscradialmetallicitygradientguidingradiustracebackearlyorbitalmigrationGALAHDR3Gaiamain-sequencestars
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper analyzes 66,545 main-sequence stars that GALAH DR3 and Gaia DR3 place on the chemical thin-disc side of the [α/Fe]-[Fe/H] plane, and measures how iron, $\alpha$-element, and magnesium abundances change with orbital radius. It finds a present-day iron gradient of $d[\mathrm{Fe/H}]/dR_{\mathrm{Guiding}}=-0.074\pm0.006$ dex kpc$^{-1}$ when stars are ordered by guiding radius, and a shallower $-0.040\pm0.002$ dex kpc$^{-1}$ when they are ordered by a traceback early orbital radius, $R_{\mathrm{teo}}$, obtained by integrating each orbit backward under a static potential. The central claim is that radial migration changes these gradients by at most 6 percent, so the steep negative iron gradient is not an artifact of stars drifting from their birth radii. The paper argues further that a negative gradient has persisted over disc history, that radial orbital variation grows with stellar age, and that the observed present-day gradient matches the adopted chemical evolution model.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the traceback early orbital radius, $R_{\mathrm{teo}}$, defined by integrating each star's orbit backward for its full BSTEP age in the static, axisymmetric MWPotential2014 model of the Milky Way. It approximates where a star orbited early in life without assuming any prior metallicity gradient, unlike birth-radius estimates that invert an assumed gradient-age relation. Contrasting $R_{\mathrm{teo}}$ with the guiding radius $R_{\mathrm{Guiding}}$ -- the circular-orbit radius carrying the star's angular momentum -- gives the difference distribution used to quantify radial orbital variation; two Gaussian components are fitted to that distribution to isolate migrated from non-migrated stars and to correct the gradients.

What would settle it

Recompute $R_{\mathrm{teo}}$ for the same stars in a time-dependent potential that includes a bar and spiral arms: if the $R_{\mathrm{Guiding}}-R_{\mathrm{teo}}$ distribution changes by more than the quoted 6 percent, or if the $R_{\mathrm{teo}}$-based iron gradient shifts by more than roughly 0.01 dex kpc$^{-1}$, the central claim fails. A direct test would be to inject simulated stars with known birth radii and migration histories into the pipeline and check whether $R_{\mathrm{teo}}$ recovers their early orbital radii.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the chemically selected Galactic thin disc has a robust negative present-day iron gradient, $d[\mathrm{Fe/H}]/dR_{\mathrm{Guiding}} = -0.074 \pm 0.006$ dex kpc$^{-1}$, with a shallower value $d[\mathrm{Fe/H}]/dR_{\mathrm{teo}} = -0.040 \pm 0.002$ dex kpc$^{-1}$ when stars are ordered by their traceback early orbital radius. Magnesium follows iron ($-0.074 \pm 0.006$ and $-0.039 \pm 0.002$ dex kpc$^{-1}$), while the $\alpha$-element ratio is essentially flat ($+0.004 \pm 0.002$ and $+0.003 \pm 0.001$ dex kpc$^{-1}$). The authors further establish that radial orbital variation affects the iron gradient by at most 6 percent: removing the migrated stars changes the all-age gradient from $-0.074$ to $-0.068 \pm 0.006$ dex kpc$^{-1}$, a change they regard as statistically insignificant. Age-resolved gradients stay negative for all age bins, with radial orbital variation increasing from 1.7 percent for 1-3 Gyr stars to 11.4 percent for 11-13 Gyr stars, and the observed values agree with the adopted chemical evolution model at the present day.

Load-bearing premise

Everything involving the traceback early orbital radius rests on the assumption that the Milky Way's gravitational potential has stayed static and axisymmetric over each star's lifetime, so backwards orbits in MWPotential2014 ignore the bar, spiral arms, and giant molecular clouds--the very structures thought to drive radial migration.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The present-day thin-disc iron gradient is about $-0.07$ dex kpc$^{-1}$, a constraint that Galactic chemical evolution models must reproduce.
  • Radial migration does not statistically bias the measured gradient, since removing migrated stars changes it by at most 6 percent.
  • A negative metallicity gradient has persisted along the disc throughout the modelled history, independent of whether the disc formed inside-out.
  • The $R_{\mathrm{teo}}$ method provides a way to estimate early orbital radii without assuming a metallicity gradient, useful for other chemo-dynamical samples.
  • Older thin-disc stars show larger radial orbital variation, so age-resolved samples are needed before interpreting old stars' chemical signatures as birth-place signatures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the sample spans only the local disc out to about 1.6 kpc, the 6 percent migration fraction likely underestimates whole-disc churning; applying $R_{\mathrm{teo}}$ to outer-disc or bar-region samples would be a natural stress test.
  • The same sample could be binned in age and $R_{\mathrm{teo}}$ simultaneously to map how the empirical gradient steepened with time, providing a model-independent check on two-infall and chemodynamical enrichment histories.
  • The tension between the model and the oldest stars (10-12 Gyr, where the model predicts a much more metal-rich environment) suggests that improved ages at the old end would either tighten the gradient history or expose systematic age biases.
  • Applying the $R_{\mathrm{teo}}$ machinery to the high-alpha stars rejected from the thin-disc sample would test whether thick-disc stars show a different radial migration signature, which bears on whether they formed at distinct radii.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper measures radial metallicity gradients for a sample of 66,545 chemically selected thin-disc main-sequence stars from GALAH DR3 and Gaia DR3. Gradients are computed as linear fits to binned median abundances against two dynamical radii: the guiding radius R_Guiding and a 'traceback early orbital radius' R_teo obtained by backward orbit integration in the static axisymmetric MWPotential2014. The guiding-radius gradients are d[Fe/H]/dR = -0.074 +/- 0.006, d[alpha/Fe]/dR = +0.004 +/- 0.002, and d[Mg/H]/dR = -0.074 +/- 0.006 dex/kpc, while the R_teo-based gradients are about -0.04 dex/kpc. The authors compare their gradients with literature values and with the Spitoni et al. (2021) chemical evolution model, and they analyze the distribution of R_Guiding - R_teo as a function of stellar age, concluding that radial orbital variations affect the gradient results by at most 6%.

Significance. The direct guiding-radius gradient is a useful, clean measurement from high-quality public data and agrees with several independent determinations, including Plevne et al. (2015), Boeche et al. (2013), and Gaia Collaboration (2023). The age-binned analysis and the comparison with the Spitoni et al. (2021) model are valuable empirical contributions, and the paper is transparent about its sample selection and orbital calculations. However, the more novel claims built on R_teo, namely that the early orbital radius gradient is -0.04 dex/kpc and that radial migration affects the gradients by at most 6%, are not supported by the static axisymmetric orbit integration. In such a potential the guiding radius is conserved, so R_Guiding - R_teo measures epicyclic phase rather than churning; the 6% statement is therefore a misstatement of what the calculation shows. The robust part of the paper is the guiding-radius gradient; the migration-related interpretation needs substantial revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [3.1.1, 4.5] The claim that radial orbital variations affect the gradients by at most 6% (Abstract; Section 4.5) is not established by the method. R_teo is computed by backward orbit integration in MWPotential2014, a static axisymmetric potential in which the z-component of angular momentum is conserved; hence R_Guiding is an integral of motion, and R_Guiding - R_teo measures only the epicyclic phase at the lookback time, not any angular-momentum change (churning). The two-Gaussian decomposition in Fig. 13 and the area-integral procedure therefore quantify the distribution of radial oscillation amplitudes, not the fraction of migrated stars. Since churning is driven by the non-axisymmetric, time-dependent perturbations that MWPotential2014 explicitly omits (as the text itself states in Section 3.1.1), the 'at most 6%' conclusion is a misstatement of what the calculation shows. I agree with the stress-test concern that this is a load-bearing issue for the abstract's third finding.
  2. [4.1, 3.1.1] The R_teo-based gradients, e.g. d[Fe/H]/dR_teo = -0.040 +/- 0.002 dex/kpc, are presented in the abstract and Section 4.1 as early-disc gradients. Because R_teo is the radial coordinate of the same static orbit at a lookback time equal to the stellar age, it is not a birth radius and does not represent the early spatial chemical structure of the disc; at best it is the radius at a particular epicyclic phase of the current orbit. The authors acknowledge in Section 3.1.1 that R_teo 'represents early orbital characteristics rather than a true birth radius', but the abstract and the abstract-level interpretation do not carry this caveat. The R_teo gradient should be renamed and reframed accordingly, or removed from the abstract.
  3. [4.5.1, Table 1] The age trend in Fig. 14 and the 'contamination' percentages in Table 1 are interpreted as evidence that radial migration increases with stellar age. Under the static axisymmetric approximation, the radial action is conserved, so the growing dispersion of R_Guiding - R_teo with age can reflect the known age-velocity dispersion relation (older populations have hotter, more radially extended orbits) rather than cumulative migration. Consequently, the 'corrected' gradients in Table 1 are not corrected for radial migration in the sense of churning. A direct test of migration would require comparing guiding radii with birth radii from a simulation containing bar and spiral perturbations, or at least measuring angular-momentum change; the present static-potential traceback cannot provide that test.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figures 1, 9-11] There are repeated typographical issues: 'Kieldiagram' in the Figure 1 caption and 'locii' in the captions of Figures 9-11 should be corrected to 'Kiel diagram' and 'loci'.
  2. [4.2] The sentence 'Figure 9 shows the comparison of the radial metallicity gradient with the results of Katz et al. (2021)' does not match the displayed Figure 9, which shows only the sample fits with density and age colour coding; the Katz et al. curve is not visible in the figure. Please add the comparison curve to the figure or move the comparison to the text.
  3. [4.5] The computation of the 6% figure from the two fitted Gaussians is described only as 'integrating the difference between the areas covered by these two distributions relative to the total sample area'; the fitting method, the normalization, and the error budget for this number should be stated explicitly.
  4. [References] Many entries have missing DOIs (e.g., Ahumada et al., Ak et al. 2007, Genovali et al.) and one entry is still an arXiv preprint (Lu et al. 2022); the bibliographic details should be completed before final submission.
  5. [Header] The manuscript header retains 'Received 26 April 2016; Revised 6 June 2016', which appears to be an artifact of the journal template and should be updated to the actual submission and revision dates.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; minor self-citations are externally validated and the central gradient fits rest on independent data.

full rationale

The central results are direct linear least-squares fits of GALAH DR3 abundance ratios against orbital radii (R_Guiding and R_teo) for a chemically selected sample; these fits are not defined in terms of one another or of the reported gradients, and they are benchmarked against external literature values and the independent Spitoni et al. (2021) chemical evolution model. The R_teo radius is model-dependent, explicitly defined as an earlier orbital radius in a static axisymmetric potential (MWPotential2014), and the paper states it 'represents early orbital characteristics rather than a true birth radius' and acknowledges that neglecting spiral arms and the bar introduces uncertainty; this is a validity limitation on the 'at most 6%' radial-orbital-variation claim, not a circular reduction, because the 6% is a measured statistic of the R_Guiding - R_teo distribution rather than an input to the gradient fits. The chemical thin-disc selection uses the Plevne et al. (2020) boundary line from the authors' prior work, but the paper compares it with the independent Sun et al. (2023) boundary and finds them very similar, so the self-citation is corroborated externally and is not the sole load-bearing evidence. The T. Ak et al. (2015) citation about the vertical extent of the low-alpha population is auxiliary. No step was found where an equation reduces to itself, a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, or a uniqueness claim is imported from the authors.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central gradient measurement depends on survey data quality and the chosen potential. The migration-minimality claim additionally depends on a fitted two-Gaussian decomposition and on an axisymmetric potential that excludes churning. The chemical boundary is an imported fitted result from prior work by overlapping authors.

free parameters (2)
  • Chemical separation boundary from Plevne et al. (2020)
    The thin disc sample is defined by this GMM-derived boundary on the [alpha/Fe]-[Fe/H] plane. It is a fitted result from prior work by overlapping authors, used here as a fixed input; changing it changes the sample and hence the measured gradient.
  • Two-Gaussian fit parameters for R_Guiding - R_teo = mu1=0.05, sigma1=0.63; mu2=-0.87, sigma2=1.05
    These parameters are fitted to the sample's R_Guiding - R_teo histogram in Section 4.5 and are used to compute the claim that at most 6% of stars are radially migrated.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The MWPotential2014 axisymmetric, static potential accurately describes the Milky Way for orbit integration and backward traceback over stellar lifetimes
    Section 3.1 states the model 'does not consider the effects of large-scale perturbation sources such as the Galactic bar, spiral arms, or giant molecular clouds'; Section 3.1.1 assumes the potential is constant over time.
  • domain assumption The Plevne et al. (2020) GMM boundary line on the [alpha/Fe]-[Fe/H] plane correctly separates thin and thick disc populations
    Section 3.2 uses it as a fixed classifier and does not recalculate it; the result depends on this choice.
  • domain assumption BSTEP ages from GALAH DR3 are accurate enough for age-binned gradient analysis
    Section 2.1 uses precomputed BSTEP ages; Figure 5 compares with StarHorse but systematic errors in old-star ages remain.
  • domain assumption Inverse parallax distances with sigma_pi/pi <= 0.02 are unbiased for this sample
    Section 2 uses d=1000/pi; the paper compares with Bailer-Jones distances but does not apply a Lutz-Kelker correction.
  • domain assumption The Spitoni et al. (2021) chemical evolution model predictions are comparable to the local observations
    Section 4.3 uses model outputs obtained via private communication; details of how the model was sampled are not fully documented.
invented entities (1)
  • Traceback early orbital radius (R_teo)
    purpose: To approximate a star's early orbital radius without assuming a metallicity gradient, by integrating the orbit backward for the stellar age under a static potential.
    R_teo is defined in Section 3.1.1 and depends on the assumed static axisymmetric potential and on stellar ages. The paper explicitly states it is 'not a true birth radius' and that uncertainties from neglected perturbations are not directly measurable. No external validation is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Radial Metallicity Gradients for the Chemically Selected Galactic Thin Disc Main-Sequence Stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XJZUCHSX

@misc{pith2026241113660,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Radial Metallicity Gradients for the Chemically Selected Galactic Thin Disc Main-Sequence Stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XJZUCHSX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13660}
}
abstract

{We present the radial metallicity gradients within the Galactic thin disc population through main-sequence stars selected on the chemical plane using GALAH DR3 accompanied with Gaia DR3 astrometric data. The [Fe/H], [$\alpha$/Fe] and [Mg/H] radial gradients are estimated for guiding radius as $-0.074\pm 0.006$, $+0.004\pm0.002$, $-0.074\pm0.006$ dex kpc$^{-1}$ and for the traceback early orbital radius as $-0.040\pm0.002$, $+0.003\pm 0.001$, $-0.039\pm 0.002$ dex kpc$^{-1}$ for 66,545 thin-disc stars, respectively. Alteration of the chemical structure within the Galactic disc caused by the radial orbital variations complicates results for the radial metallicity gradient. The effect of radial orbital variations on the metallicity gradients as a function on time indicates the following results: (i) The presence of a gradient along the disc throughout the time for which the model provides similar prediction, (ii) the radial orbital variations becomes more pronounced with the age of the stellar population and (iii) the effect of radial orbital variations on the metallicity gradients is minimal. The effect of radial orbital variations is found to be at most 6\% which does not statistically affect the radial gradient results. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the chemical evolution within the Galactic disc and provide an important basis for further research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unveiling the Origins and Dynamics of the Hierarchical Triple Star System CN Lyn

    astro-ph.SR 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A detailed reanalysis of CN Lyn yields component abundances, a revised third-body orbit, and evidence that the metal-poor third star is a captured halo object.

  2. Kings of the Milky Way: A Homogeneous Gaia DR3 Analysis of King Open Clusters and the Galactic Disc Metallicity Gradient

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A homogeneous Gaia DR3 re-analysis of all 27 King open clusters gives consistent parameters and a metallicity gradient of about -0.06 dex/kpc, but the King-only slope is not statistically significant as printed.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , Prieto , C A

    ApogeeDR16 APACrefauthors Ahumada , R. , Prieto , C A. , Almeida , A. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2020 07 , 249 1 3 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e APACrefDOI

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e 2020

  2. [2]

    , Bilir , S

    Ak2007a APACrefauthors Ak , S. , Bilir , S. , Karaali , S. \ Buser , R. APACrefauthors \ 2007 02 , Astronomische Nachrichten 328 2 169 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1002/asna.200610709 APACrefDOI

    doi:10.1002/asna.200610709 2007

  3. [3]

    , Bilir , S

    Ak2007b APACrefauthors Ak , S. , Bilir , S. , Karaali , S. , Buser , R. \ Cabrera-Lavers , A. APACrefauthors \ 2007 11 , 12 8 605-612 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1016/j.newast.2007.04.005 APACrefDOI

    doi:10.1016/j.newast.2007.04.005 2007

  4. [4]

    , Bilir , S

    Ak2015 APACrefauthors Ak , T. , Bilir , S. , \"O zd \"o nmez , A. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2015 05 , 357 1 72 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s10509-015-2245-3 APACrefDOI

    doi:10.1007/s10509-015-2245-3 2015

  5. [5]

    , Chiappini , C

    Andersetal2017 APACrefauthors Anders , F. , Chiappini , C. , Minchev , I. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2017 04 , 600 A70 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629363 APACrefDOI

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629363 2017

  6. [6]

    , Gispert , P

    Anders2023 APACrefauthors Anders , F. , Gispert , P. , Ratcliffe , B. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2023 10 , 678 A158 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346666 APACrefDOI

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346666 2023

  7. [7]

    , Sip o cz , B M

    Astropy2018 APACrefauthors Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A M. , Sip o cz , B M. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2018 09 , 156 3 123 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f APACrefDOI

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  8. [8]

    , Tollerud , E J

    Astropy2013 APACrefauthors Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T P. , Tollerud , E J. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2013 10 , 558 A33 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 APACrefDOI

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

Show all 105 references
  1. [9]

    , Rybizki , J

    Bailer21 APACrefauthors Bailer-Jones , C A L. , Rybizki , J. , Fouesneau , M. , Demleitner , M. \ Andrae , R. APACrefauthors \ 2021 03 , 161 3 147 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 APACrefDOI

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    , Feltzing , S

    Bensby14 APACrefauthors Bensby , T. , Feltzing , S. \ Oey , M S. APACrefauthors \ 2014 02 , 562 A71 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322631 APACrefDOI

    2014 doi

  3. [11]

    , Ruchti , G R

    Bergemann2014 APACrefauthors Bergemann , M. , Ruchti , G R. , Serenelli , A. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2014 05 , 565 A89 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423456 APACrefDOI

    2014 doi

  4. [12]

    , Alan , N

    Biliretal2020 APACrefauthors Bilir , S. , Alan , N. , G \"u c tekin , S T. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2020 06 , 37 e022 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1017/pasa.2020.12 APACrefDOI

    2020 doi

  5. [14]

    , Siebert , A

    Boecheetal2013 APACrefauthors Boeche , C. , Siebert , A. , Piffl , T. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2013 11 , 559 A59 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322085 APACrefDOI

    2013 doi

  6. [15]

    \ Marsakov , V A

    MarsakovBarkova2004 APACrefauthors Borkova , T V. \ Marsakov , V A. APACrefauthors \ 2004 03 , Astronomy Letters 30 3 148-158 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1134/1.1667861 APACrefDOI

    2004 doi

  7. [16]

    APACrefauthors \ 2015 02 , 216 2 29

    galpy APACrefauthors Bovy , J. APACrefauthors \ 2015 02 , 216 2 29 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 APACrefDOI

    2015 doi

  8. [17]

    , Marigo , P

    Bressan2012 APACrefauthors Bressan , A. , Marigo , P. , Girardi , L. , Salasnich , B. , Dal Cero , C. , Rubele , S. \ Nanni , A. APACrefauthors \ 2012 11 , 427 1 127-145 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x APACrefDOI

    2012

  9. [18]

    , Asplund , M

    Buder2018 APACrefauthors Buder , S. , Asplund , M. , Duong , L. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2018 08 , 478 4 4513-4552 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1281 APACrefDOI

    2018 doi

  10. [19]

    , Sharma , S

    GalahDR3 APACrefauthors Buder , S. , Sharma , S. , Kos , J. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2021 09 , 506 1 150-201 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1242 APACrefDOI

    2021 doi

  11. [20]

    , Seleznev , A F

    Carraroetal2016 APACrefauthors Carraro , G. , Seleznev , A F. , Baume , G. \ Turner , D G. APACrefauthors \ 2016 02 , 455 4 4031-4045 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2663 APACrefDOI

    2016 doi

  12. [21]

    \ Pancino , E

    CarreraPancino2011 APACrefauthors Carrera , R. \ Pancino , E. APACrefauthors \ 2011 11 , 535 A30 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117473 APACrefDOI

    2011 doi

  13. [22]

    , Ness , M K

    Carillo2023 APACrefauthors Carrillo , A. , Ness , M K. , Hawkins , K. , Sanderson , R E. , Wang , K. , Wetzel , A. \ Bellardini , M A. APACrefauthors \ 2023 01 , 942 1 35 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca1c7 APACrefDOI

    2023 doi

  14. [23]

    , Sch \"o nrich , R

    Casagrande11 APACrefauthors Casagrande , L. , Sch \"o nrich , R. , Asplund , M. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2011 06 , 530 A138 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016276 APACrefDOI

    2011 doi

  15. [24]

    , Matteucci , F

    Cescuttietal2007 APACrefauthors Cescutti , G. , Matteucci , F. , Fran c ois , P. \ Chiappini , C. APACrefauthors \ 2007 02 , 462 3 943-951 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065403 APACrefDOI

    2007 doi

  16. [25]

    , Matteucci , F

    Chiappini1997 APACrefauthors Chiappini , C. , Matteucci , F. \ Gratton , R. APACrefauthors \ 1997 03 , 477 2 765-780 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/303726 APACrefDOI

    1997 doi

  17. [26]

    , Ak , S

    Coskunoglu2011 APACrefauthors Co s kuno g lu , B. , Ak , S. , Bilir , S. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2011 04 , 412 2 1237-1245 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17983.x APACrefDOI

    2011

  18. [27]

    , Tasdemir , S

    Dursun2024 APACrefauthors Dursun , D C. , Tasdemir , S. , Koc , S. \ Iyer , S. APACrefauthors \ 2024 06 , Physics and Astronomy Reports 2 1 1-17 . APACrefDOI doi:10.26650/PAR.2024.00002 APACrefDOI

    2024

  19. [28]

    , Andersen , J

    Edvardsson93 APACrefauthors Edvardsson , B. , Andersen , J. , Gustafsson , B. , Lambert , D L. , Nissen , P E. \ Tomkin , J. APACrefauthors \ 1993 12 , 102 603

    1993

  20. [29]

    , Lynden-Bell , D

    ELS APACrefauthors Eggen , O J. , Lynden-Bell , D. \ Sandage , A R. APACrefauthors \ 1962 11 , 136 748 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/147433 APACrefDOI

    1962 doi

  21. [30]

    , Matteucci , F

    Francoisetal2004 APACrefauthors Fran c ois , P. , Matteucci , F. , Cayrel , R. , Spite , M. , Spite , F. \ Chiappini , C. APACrefauthors \ 2004 07 , 421 613-621 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034140 APACrefDOI

    2004 doi

  22. [31]

    \ Bland-Hawthorn , J

    FreemanBlanHawthor2002 APACrefauthors Freeman , K. \ Bland-Hawthorn , J. APACrefauthors \ 2002 01 , 40 487-537 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093840 APACrefDOI

    2002

  23. [32]

    , Kordopatis , G

    GaiaDR3-2023b APACrefauthors Gaia Collaboration , Recio-Blanco , A. , Kordopatis , G. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2023 06 , 674 A38 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243511 APACrefDOI

    2023 doi

  24. [33]

    , Brown , A G A

    GaiaDR3 APACrefauthors Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A. , Brown , A G A. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2023 06 , 674 A1 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 APACrefDOI

    2023 doi

  25. [34]

    , Lemasle , B

    Genovalietal2014 APACrefauthors Genovali , K. , Lemasle , B. , Bono , G. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2014 06 , 566 A37 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323198 APACrefDOI

    2014 doi

  26. [35]

    , Wyse , R F G

    GilmoreWyseKuijen1989 APACrefauthors Gilmore , G. , Wyse , R F G. \ Kuijken , K. APACrefauthors \ 1989 01 , 27 555-627 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.27.090189.003011 APACrefDOI

    1989

  27. [36]

    , Kawata , D

    Grand2015 APACrefauthors Grand , R J J. , Kawata , D. \ Cropper , M. APACrefauthors \ 2015 03 , 447 4 4018-4027 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stv016 APACrefDOI

    2015 doi

  28. [37]

    , Millman, K J

    Numpy APACrefauthors Harris, C R. , Millman, K J. , van der Walt, S J. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2020 09 , Nature 585 7825 357--362 . APACrefURL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 APACrefURL APACrefDOI doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 APACrefDOI

    2020 doi

  29. [38]

    , Prantzos , N

    Hou2000 APACrefauthors Hou , J L. , Prantzos , N. \ Boissier , S. APACrefauthors \ 2000 10 , 362 921-936 . APACrefDOI doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0007164 APACrefDOI

    2000 doi arXiv

  30. [39]

    APACrefauthors \ 2007 , Computing in Science & Engineering 9 3 90--95

    Matplotlib APACrefauthors Hunter, J D. APACrefauthors \ 2007 , Computing in Science & Engineering 9 3 90--95 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 APACrefDOI

    2007 doi

  31. [40]

    , Brachwitz , F

    Iwamoto1999 APACrefauthors Iwamoto , K. , Brachwitz , F. , Nomoto , K. , Kishimoto , N. , Umeda , H. , Hix , W R. \ Thielemann , F K. APACrefauthors \ 1999 12 , 125 2 439-462 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/313278 APACrefDOI

    1999 doi

  32. [41]

    \ Lindegren , L

    JorgensenLindegren2005 APACrefauthors J rgensen , B R. \ Lindegren , L. APACrefauthors \ 2005 06 , 436 1 127-143 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042185 APACrefDOI

    2005 doi

  33. [42]

    , Ak , S G

    Karaali2003 APACrefauthors Karaali , S. , Ak , S G. , Bilir , S. , Karata s , Y. \ Gilmore , G. APACrefauthors \ 2003 08 , 343 3 1013-1024 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06743.x APACrefDOI

    2003

  34. [43]

    , G \'o mez , A

    Katezetal2021 APACrefauthors Katz , D. , G \'o mez , A. , Haywood , M. , Snaith , O. \ Di Matteo , P. APACrefauthors \ 2021 11 , 655 A111 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140453 APACrefDOI

    2021 doi

  35. [44]

    APACrefauthors \ 1998 05 , 498 2 541-552

    Kennicutt1998 APACrefauthors Kennicutt , R. APACrefauthors \ 1998 05 , 498 2 541-552 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/305588 APACrefDOI

    1998 doi

  36. [45]

    , Gerhard , O

    Khoperskov2020 APACrefauthors Khoperskov , S. , Gerhard , O. , Di Matteo , P. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2020 02 , 634 L8 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936645 APACrefDOI

    2020 doi

  37. [46]

    , Yontan , T

    Koc2022K APACrefauthors Ko c , S. , Yontan , T. , Bilir , S. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2022 04 , 163 4 191 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac58a0 APACrefDOI

    2022 doi

  38. [47]

    , Prantzos , N

    Kubryk2013 APACrefauthors Kubryk , M. , Prantzos , N. \ Athanassoula , E. APACrefauthors \ 2013 12 , 436 2 1479-1491 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1667 APACrefDOI

    2013 doi

  39. [48]

    , Prantzos , N

    Kubryketal2015a APACrefauthors Kubryk , M. , Prantzos , N. \ Athanassoula , E. APACrefauthors \ 2015 08 , 580 A126 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424171 APACrefDOI

    2015 doi

  40. [49]

    , Fran c ois , P

    Lemasleetal2013 APACrefauthors Lemasle , B. , Fran c ois , P. , Genovali , K. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2013 10 , 558 A31 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322115 APACrefDOI

    2013 doi

  41. [50]

    , Zasowski , G

    Lian2022 APACrefauthors Lian , J. , Zasowski , G. , Mackereth , T. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2022 07 , 513 3 4130-4151 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1151 APACrefDOI

    2022 doi

  42. [51]

    , Zhao , J

    Liangetal2019 APACrefauthors Liang , X. , Zhao , J. , Chen , Y. , Zuo , W. , Zhang , J. , Zhu , J. \ Zhao , G. APACrefauthors \ 2019 12 , 887 2 193 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab58c1 APACrefDOI

    2019 doi

  43. [52]

    , Bastian , U

    Lindegren APACrefauthors Lindegren , L. , Bastian , U. , Biermann , M. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2021 05 , 649 A4 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039653 APACrefDOI

    2021 doi

  44. [53]

    , Minchev , I

    Lu2022 APACrefauthors Lu , Y. , Minchev , I. , Buck , T. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2022 12 , arXiv e-prints arXiv:2212.04515 . APACrefDOI doi:10.48550/arXiv.2212.04515 APACrefDOI

    2022 doi arXiv

  45. [54]

    APACrefauthors \ 2018 10 , 156 4 171

    Luck2018 APACrefauthors Luck , R E. APACrefauthors \ 2018 10 , 156 4 171 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aadcac APACrefDOI

    2018 doi

  46. [55]

    , Sestito , P

    Magrinietal2009 APACrefauthors Magrini , L. , Sestito , P. , Randich , S. \ Galli , D. APACrefauthors \ 2009 01 , 494 1 95-108 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810634 APACrefDOI

    2009 doi

  47. [56]

    APACrefauthors \ 2012 , Chemical Evolution of Galaxies Chemical Evolution of Galaxies

    Matteucci12 APACrefauthors Matteucci , F. APACrefauthors \ 2012 , Chemical Evolution of Galaxies Chemical Evolution of Galaxies . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22491-1 APACrefDOI

    2012 doi

  48. [57]

    \ Francois , P

    MatteucciFrancois1989 APACrefauthors Matteucci , F. \ Francois , P. APACrefauthors \ 1989 08 , 239 885-904 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/239.3.885 APACrefDOI

    1989 doi

  49. [58]

    \ Binney , J

    MihalasBinney1981 APACrefauthors Mihalas , D. \ Binney , J. APACrefauthors \ 1981 , Galactic astronomy. Structure and kinematics Galactic astronomy. Structure and kinematics . W H Freeman & Co

    1981

  50. [59]

    , Anders , F

    Minchevetal2018 APACrefauthors Minchev , I. , Anders , F. , Recio-Blanco , A. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2018 12 , 481 2 1645-1657 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2033 APACrefDOI

    2018 doi

  51. [60]

    , Chiappini , C

    Minchev2013 APACrefauthors Minchev , I. , Chiappini , C. \ Martig , M. APACrefauthors \ 2013 10 , 558 A9 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220189 APACrefDOI

    2013 doi

  52. [61]

    , Donor , J

    Myersetal2022 APACrefauthors Myers , N. , Donor , J. , Spoo , T. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2022 09 , 164 3 85 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac7ce5 APACrefDOI

    2022 doi

  53. [62]

    , Hogg , D W

    Canon APACrefauthors Ness , M. , Hogg , D W. , Rix , H W. , Zasowski , G. \ Ho , A. APACrefauthors \ 2015 01 , The Cannon The Cannon . American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#225 American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#225 \ 225, 302.07

    2015

  54. [63]

    , Oralhan , \.I A

    Netopil2022 APACrefauthors Netopil , M. , Oralhan , \.I A. , C akmak , H. , Michel , R. \ Karata s , Y. APACrefauthors \ 2022 01 , 509 1 421-439 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2961 APACrefDOI

    2022 doi

  55. [64]

    O nal Ta s , \

    OnalTas2018 APACrefauthors \"O nal Ta s , \"O . , Bilir , S. \ Plevne , O. APACrefauthors \ 2018 02 , 363 2 35 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s10509-018-3248-7 APACrefDOI

    2018 doi

  56. [65]

    O nal Ta s , \

    OnalTas2016 APACrefauthors \"O nal Ta s , \"O . , Bilir , S. , Seabroke , G M. , Karaali , S. , Ak , S. , Ak , T. \ Bostanc , Z F. APACrefauthors \ 2016 09 , 33 e044 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1017/pasa.2016.33 APACrefDOI

    2016 doi

  57. [66]

    , Santos-Peral , P

    Palla2022 APACrefauthors Palla , M. , Santos-Peral , P. , Recio-Blanco , A. \ Matteucci , F. APACrefauthors \ 2022 07 , 663 A125 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142645 APACrefDOI

    2022 doi

  58. [67]

    , Few , C G

    Pilkington2012 APACrefauthors Pilkington , K. , Few , C G. , Gibson , B K. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2012 04 , 540 A56 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117466 APACrefDOI

    2012 doi

  59. [68]

    \ Valenti , J A

    PiskunovValenti2017 APACrefauthors Piskunov , N. \ Valenti , J A. APACrefauthors \ 2017 01 , 597 A16 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629124 APACrefDOI

    2017 doi

  60. [69]

    , Ak , T

    Plevne2015 APACrefauthors Plevne , O. , Ak , T. , Karaali , S. , Bilir , S. , Ak , S. \ Bostanci , Z F. APACrefauthors \ 2015 11 , 32 e043 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1017/pasa.2015.44 APACrefDOI

    2015 doi

  61. [70]

    O nal Ta s , \

    Plevne2020 APACrefauthors Plevne , O. , \"O nal Ta s , \"O . , Bilir , S. \ Seabroke , G M. APACrefauthors \ 2020 04 , 893 2 108 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab80bb APACrefDOI

    2020 doi

  62. [71]

    \ Eyer , L

    PontEyer2004 APACrefauthors Pont , F. \ Eyer , L. APACrefauthors \ 2004 06 , 351 2 487-504 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07780.x APACrefDOI

    2004

  63. [72]

    , Abia , C

    Prantzosetal2023 APACrefauthors Prantzos , N. , Abia , C. , Chen , T. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2023 05 , . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1551 APACrefDOI

    2023 doi

  64. [73]

    , Abia , C

    Prantzosetal2018 APACrefauthors Prantzos , N. , Abia , C. , Limongi , M. , Chieffi , A. \ Cristallo , S. APACrefauthors \ 2018 05 , 476 3 3432-3459 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/sty316 APACrefDOI

    2018 doi

  65. [74]

    , Anders , F

    StarHorse APACrefauthors Queiroz , A B A. , Anders , F. , Santiago , B X. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2018 05 , 476 2 2556-2583 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/sty330 APACrefDOI

    2018 doi

  66. [76]

    , Minchev , I

    Ratcliffeetal2023 APACrefauthors Ratcliffe , B. , Minchev , I. , Anders , F. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2023 2 10 , 525 2 2208-2228 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1573 APACrefDOI

    2023 doi

  67. [78]

    \ Binney , J

    SchonrichBinney2009 APACrefauthors Sch \"o nrich , R. \ Binney , J. APACrefauthors \ 2009 06 , 396 1 203-222 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14750.x APACrefDOI

    2009

  68. [79]

    \ Zinn , R

    SZ APACrefauthors Searle , L. \ Zinn , R. APACrefauthors \ 1978 10 , 225 357-379 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/156499 APACrefDOI

    1978 doi

  69. [80]

    , Hayden , M R

    Sharmaetal2021 APACrefauthors Sharma , S. , Hayden , M R. \ Bland-Hawthorn , J. APACrefauthors \ 2021 11 , 507 4 5882-5901 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2015 APACrefDOI

    2021 doi

  70. [81]

    , Stello , D

    Sharmaetal2018 APACrefauthors Sharma , S. , Stello , D. , Buder , S. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2018 01 , 473 2 2004-2019 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2582 APACrefDOI

    2018 doi

  71. [82]

    , Randich , S

    Spinaetal2014 APACrefauthors Spina , L. , Randich , S. , Palla , F. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2014 08 , 568 A2 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424135 APACrefDOI

    2014 doi

  72. [83]

    , Silva Aguirre , V

    Spitonietal2019 APACrefauthors Spitoni , E. , Silva Aguirre , V. , Matteucci , F. , Calura , F. \ Grisoni , V. APACrefauthors \ 2019 03 , 623 A60 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834188 APACrefDOI

    2019 doi

  73. [84]

    , Verma , K

    Spitonietal2020 APACrefauthors Spitoni , E. , Verma , K. , Silva Aguirre , V. \ Calura , F. APACrefauthors \ 2020 03 , 635 A58 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937275 APACrefDOI

    2020 doi

  74. [85]

    , Verma , K

    Spitonietal2021 APACrefauthors Spitoni , E. , Verma , K. , Silva Aguirre , V. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2021 03 , 647 A73 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039864 APACrefDOI

    2021 doi

  75. [86]

    , Chen , X

    Sunetal2023 APACrefauthors Sun , T. , Chen , X. , Bi , S. , Ge , Z. , Xiang , M. \ Wu , Y. APACrefauthors \ 2023 07 , 523 1 1199-1208 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1499 APACrefDOI

    2023 doi

  76. [87]

    \ Yontan , T

    Tasdemir2023 APACrefauthors Taşdemir , S. \ Yontan , T. APACrefauthors \ 2023 05 , Physics and Astronomy Reports 1 1 1-10 . APACrefDOI doi:10.26650/PAR.2023.00001 APACrefDOI

    2023

  77. [88]

    , Conroy , C

    Ting2015 APACrefauthors Ting , Y S. , Conroy , C. \ Goodman , A. APACrefauthors \ 2015 07 , 807 1 104 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/104 APACrefDOI

    2015 doi

  78. [89]

    , Bilir , S

    Guctekin2019 APACrefauthors Tun c el G \"u c tekin , S. , Bilir , S. , Karaali , S. , Plevne , O. \ Ak , S. APACrefauthors \ 2019 02 , Advances in Space Research 63 3 1360-1373 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1016/j.asr.2018.10.041 APACrefDOI

    2019 doi

  79. [90]

    \ Groenewegen , M A T

    vandenHoekGroenewegen1997 APACrefauthors van den Hoek , L B. \ Groenewegen , M A T. APACrefauthors \ 1997 06 , 123 305-328 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/aas:1997162 APACrefDOI

    1997 doi

  80. [91]

    \ Drake Jr, F L

    Python APACrefauthors Van Rossum, G. \ Drake Jr, F L. APACrefauthors \ 1995 , Python reference manual Python reference manual . Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica Amsterdam

    1995

  81. [92]

    , Carrillo , A

    Wang2024 APACrefauthors Wang , K. , Carrillo , A. , Ness , M K. \ Buck , T. APACrefauthors \ 2024 01 , 527 1 321-333 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3182 APACrefDOI

    2024 doi

  82. [93]

    APACrefauthors \ 2010 , D ata S tructures for S tatistical C omputing in P ython D ata S tructures for S tatistical C omputing in P ython

    Pandas APACrefauthors W es M c K inney. APACrefauthors \ 2010 , D ata S tructures for S tatistical C omputing in P ython D ata S tructures for S tatistical C omputing in P ython . S t\'efan van der W alt\ J arrod M illman\ ( ), P roceedings of the 9th P ython in S cience C onf...

    2010 doi

  83. [94]

    \ Weaver , T A

    WoosleyWeaver1995 APACrefauthors Woosley , S E. \ Weaver , T A. APACrefauthors \ 1995 11 , 101 181 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/192237 APACrefDOI

    1995 doi

  84. [95]

    \ Karaali , S

    Yaz2010 APACrefauthors Yaz , E. \ Karaali , S. APACrefauthors \ 2010 02 , 15 2 234-246 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1016/j.newast.2009.07.010 APACrefDOI

    2010 doi

  85. [96]

    , Bilir , S

    Yontan2023b APACrefauthors Yontan , T. , Bilir , S. , C akmak , H. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2023 08 , Advances in Space Research 72 4 1454-1473 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1016/j.asr.2023.04.015 APACrefDOI

    2023 doi

  86. [97]

    \ Canbay , R

    Yontan2023 APACrefauthors Yontan , T. \ Canbay , R. APACrefauthors \ 2023 12 , Physics and Astronomy Reports 1 2 65 . APACrefDOI doi:10.48550/arXiv.2310.13582 APACrefDOI

    2023 doi arXiv

  87. [98]

    , C akmak , T

    Yontan2022 APACrefauthors Yontan , T. , C akmak , T. , Bilir , S. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 2022 10 , 58 333-353 . APACrefDOI doi:10.22201/ia.01851101p.2022.58.02.14 APACrefDOI

    2022 doi

  88. [99]

    , Canbay , R

    Yucel2024 APACrefauthors Yücel , G. , Canbay , R. \ Bakış , V. APACrefauthors \ 2024 06 , Physics and Astronomy Reports 2 1 18-28 . APACrefDOI doi:10.26650/PAR.2024.00003 APACrefDOI

    2024

  89. [100]

    , Sutterlin, P

    Bettonvil2003 APACrefauthors Bettonvil, F C. , Sutterlin, P. , Hammerschlag, R H. , Rutten, R J. \ Stix, M. APACrefauthors \ 2003 , Proc. SPIE Conf. Ser. Proc. SPIE Conf. Ser. \ 4853, 306

    2003

  90. [101]

    , van Breugel, W

    Bland2001 APACrefauthors Bland-Hawthorn, J. , van Breugel, W. \ Gillingham, P R. APACrefauthors \ 2001 , ApJ 563 611

    2001

  91. [102]

    \ Gillingham, R H

    Kosugi2007 APACrefauthors Kosugi, T. \ Gillingham, R H. APACrefauthors \ 2007 , Sol. Phys. 243 3

    2007

  92. [103]

    , Matsuzaki, K

    Kosugi2009 APACrefauthors Kosugi, T. , Matsuzaki, K. , Sakao, R. , Bettonvil, F C. , Sutterlin, P. \ Hammerschlag, R H. APACrefauthors \ 2009 , Sol. Phys. 243 3

    2009

  93. [104]

    , Cohen, A L

    Paivio1975 APACrefauthors Power, J D. , Cohen, A L. , Nelson, S M. \ et al. APACrefauthors \ 1975 , Cognition 37 2 635

    1975

  94. [105]

    APACrefauthors \ 2007 , The Physics of Chromospheric Plasmas The Physics of Chromospheric Plasmas

    Rutten2007 APACrefauthors Rutten, R J. APACrefauthors \ 2007 , The Physics of Chromospheric Plasmas The Physics of Chromospheric Plasmas . P. Heinzel, I. Dorotovic \ R J. Rutten\ ( ), ASP Conf. Ser. ASP Conf. Ser. \ 368, 27

    2007

  95. [106]

    APACrefauthors \ 2004 , Astronomy and Astrophysics Library Astronomy and Astrophysics Library \ ( 2 \ )

    Stix2004 APACrefauthors Stix, M. APACrefauthors \ 2004 , Astronomy and Astrophysics Library Astronomy and Astrophysics Library \ ( 2 \ ). Berlin Springer

    2004

  96. [107]

    Strunk1979 APACrefauthors Strunk Jr. , W. \ White, E B. APACrefauthors \ 1979 , The Elements of Style The Elements of Style \ ( 3 \ ). New York MacMillan

    1979

  97. [108]

    write newline

    " write newline " cite write " FUNCTION editor.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION editor.trans.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION trans.postfix translator num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION authors.editors.reflist.apa5 'field := 'dot :...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.