Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Gravitational Memory in Generalized Proca Gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper computes the first displacement-memory formula for Generalized Proca gravity and finds an unbounded critical-angle enhancement in the Lorentz-violating branch.

desk verdict First GP memory formulas, but the total dispersive memory in Eq. (84) is under-specified—worth refereeing, not desk-rejecting. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20545 v1 pith:XUNPCT5W submitted 2025-08-28 gr-qc

Lavinia Heisenberg , Benedetta Rosatello , Guangzi Xu , Jann Zosso This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords gravitationalmemorydisplacementGeneralizedProcagravityLorentzviolationgroupvelocitysecond-orderactionstress-energytensorsuperluminalpropagation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Generalized Proca gravity is the most general metric theory with a gravitational vector field and derivative self-interactions that still keeps second-order equations of motion. The paper derives, for the first time, the permanent displacement memory left in the spacetime metric after a burst of gravitational radiation in this theory. It identifies two physically distinct asymptotic backgrounds: a Lorentz-invariant massive case, whose scalar and vector modes propagate slower than light and disperse, and a Lorentz-violating massless case whose modes travel at fixed speeds. In the Lorentz-violating case, any mode faster than the tensor graviton focuses its energy onto a single critical direction, making the memory amplitude grow without bound at that angle. The resulting formulas turn gravitational memory into a direct probe of the Proca mass and of Lorentz-violating propagation speeds.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the gauge-invariant scalar-vector-tensor decomposition of the perturbed action, which isolates five dynamical degrees of freedom (two tensor, two vector, one scalar) and reduces the second-order action to a sum of independent wave sectors. From that action, the second-variation method produces the gauge-invariant asymptotic stress-energy tensor for each sector. The memory integral then follows from the Isaacson back-reaction equation with a Green's function adapted to the physical group velocity $\beta_\psi$ rather than the phase velocity, which introduces the angular factor $V_\psi = (1 - \beta_\psi \,\mathbf{n}'\cdot\mathbf{n}/\beta_T)^{-1}$; the sign change of this factor when $\beta_\psi>\beta_T$ is what produces the critical-angle divergence.

What would settle it

Compute the memory from a concrete compact-binary model in case (a) using the paper's own flux formulas: if one needs a Jacobian $d\omega/d\beta$ to convert the frequency integral into the $\beta$-integral of equation (84), and that Jacobian changes the angular pattern or amplitude, the formula as written is incomplete. Observationally, in case (b), a detector network should see a sharp enhancement of memory in the specific direction $\mathbf{n}'\cdot\mathbf{n}=\beta_T/\beta_\psi$ for a known source; the absence of such an angular feature, combined with existing bounds on subluminal and superluminal propagation speeds, would exclude the enhancement mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the complete displacement-memory formula for Generalized Proca gravity, obtained by reducing the theory to its five dynamical gauge-invariant degrees of freedom and computing the effective stress-energy tensor that sources the low-frequency metric perturbation. In the massive Lorentz-invariant branch, the tensor memory is the general-relativistic result plus an integral over subluminal, dispersive scalar and vector modes, with the integrand carrying the group velocity of each mode and a denominator $1 - (\beta_\chi/\beta_T)\,\mathbf{n}'\cdot\mathbf{n}$; because these modes are dispersive, the total memory must be assembled from all emission speeds $\beta_\chi\in[0,1]$. In the Lorentz-violating branch, the scalar, vector, and tensor modes are non-dispersive, and whenever a source mode is faster than the tensor mode the memory amplitude diverges at the critical angle $\mathbf{n}'\cdot\mathbf{n}=\beta_T/\beta_\psi$. The paper states this as the first computation of this memory in Generalized Proca gravity and ties the unbounded enhancement to the same causal-structure mechanism seen in the earlier Lorentz-violating vector-tensor analysis.

Load-bearing premise

The fragile step is the claim that the total memory from dispersive scalar and vector modes can be obtained simply by integrating the flux over all group velocities $\beta_\chi$ from 0 to 1 without specifying the radiation spectrum that maps frequency to $\beta_\chi$; without that spectral density, equation (84) leaves the total memory amplitude underdetermined.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the Lorentz-invariant massive branch, the memory signal from the Proca scalar and vector modes arrives late and spread out in time, because each frequency travels at its own subluminal group velocity; the shape of that tail encodes the Proca mass.
  • In the Lorentz-violating branch, any mode with $\beta_\psi>\beta_T$ produces a memory amplitude that grows without bound at the critical angle, so past null results in memory searches translate directly into upper bounds on the Proca coupling parameters.
  • The polarization content differs sharply between branches: the massive branch shows only the two tensor polarizations, whereas the Lorentz-violating branch generically activates all six metric polarizations, with the vector polarizations present only when the tensor speed deviates from luminal.
  • Combined with the multimessenger bound that the tensor speed is within $10^{-15}$ of the speed of light and with Cherenkov-radiation bounds on subluminal modes, the memory result restricts the Lorentz-violating parameter space to near-luminal propagation, or to the special luminality conditions.
  • If the additional GP modes are excited in compact binary coalescences, the nondetection of memory in existing catalogs bounds the amplitude of the critical-angle enhancement, making Generalized Proca gravity testable with current detectors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The $\beta_\chi$ integral in equation (84) implicitly assumes a spectral distribution; a natural extension is to derive the Jacobian $d\omega/d\beta$ from a specific emission model, which would turn the formula into a ready-made waveform template for matched-filtering searches.
  • The critical-angle divergence is a kinematic resonance of any theory with superluminal propagation, so the same angular memory feature should appear in other spontaneously Lorentz-violating vector theories; a null search at the predicted angle would constrain the whole class, not just Generalized Proca gravity.
  • The discreteness of the Lorentz-violating branch suggests the two backgrounds could coexist in different spacetime regions; if so, transitions between branches might generate stochastic or burst-like memory signatures that future gravitational-wave observatories could search for.
  • Because the memory integral depends on group velocity while wavefront arrival depends on phase velocity, multi-messenger timing of a gravitational-wave memory signal with an electromagnetic counterpart could, in principle, measure the dispersion relation of the additional modes directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a computation of gravitational displacement memory in Generalized Proca (GP) gravity. Building on the authors' earlier unified framework for memory in scalar-tensor and Einstein-Æther theories, the paper constructs a gauge-invariant second-order action on an asymptotically flat background, identifies two nontrivial background branches: (a) a Lorentz-invariant massive branch with dispersive vector and scalar modes, and (b) a Lorentz-violating massless branch with non-dispersive modes. It derives the effective stress-energy tensor via the second-variation method and obtains per-mode memory formulas, giving Eq. (84) for the total tensor memory in case (a) and Eqs. (86)-(88) in case (b), where a superluminal source sector produces an unbounded memory enhancement at a critical angle. The paper also discusses polarization content and observational constraints from GW170817 and Cherenkov radiation.

Significance. This work is the first computation of gravitational displacement memory in GP gravity and a valuable extension of the Isaacson/second-variation framework to dispersive massive modes. The gauge-invariant SVT decomposition and the identification of the two distinct background branches are clearly presented, and the per-mode memory formulas and the case-(b) results closely follow the structure of the well-established Einstein-Æther analysis. The distinction between phase and group velocity in the memory integral is an important conceptual point. However, the headline total memory formula for the Lorentz-invariant branch, Eq. (84), is underdetermined as written, because the conversion of the sum over dispersive modes into an integral over group velocities lacks a spectral measure and Jacobian. This is a fixable but load-bearing gap in the paper's central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III C, Eq. (84)] The total case-(a) memory formula is not well-defined as written. The per-mode result (83) is derived for a monochromatic mode with fixed frequency ωχ and group velocity βχ = sqrt(1 - m²/ωχ²). Summing over frequencies requires an integral over ωχ (or over βχ with the Jacobian dωχ/dβχ = ωχ³βχ/m²) and a frequency-resolved flux dFχ/dωχ. Eq. (84) instead writes ∫₀¹ dβχ Fχ(u',Ω') with the same Fχ defined in Eq. (70) for a single mode, giving no spectral density, no Jacobian, and no statement of the frequency dependence of the flux. The expression is therefore dimensionally and operationally ambiguous, and the total memory depends on the radiation spectrum. The paper's own Sec. IV acknowledges that the full memory formula requires an explicit integration over the frequency content, confirming that Eq. (84) is incomplete. The authors should replace Eq. (84) with an explicit spectral integral.
  2. [Section III C, Eq. (84)] The retarded time u' used in the integrand of Eq. (84) is the same for all frequencies and for both χ = S and χ = V. For dispersive modes, the appropriate retarded time is u'_χ(ωχ) = t' - r'/βχ(ωχ), which depends on the frequency. A correct frequency-resolved formulation must evaluate Fχ on the frequency-dependent retarded time and integrate over ωχ (or βχ) with the associated Jacobian; otherwise modes of different frequencies are mis-weighted. This issue is directly tied to the previous comment and should be resolved together.
  3. [Section III C, case (b), Eqs. (86)-(88)] The assertion that the memory becomes unbounded at the critical direction n'·n = βT/βψ is plausible but not quantitatively demonstrated. Unlike the luminal case, where the TT projection removes the divergence at n' = n, the critical direction here is at a finite angle from the observer direction, so the TT projection of n'_i n'_j is nonzero and the angular integral appears to diverge logarithmically. The authors should provide the explicit behavior of the integrand near the critical direction (or cite the analogous calculation in Ref. [41]) and discuss the cutoff provided by finite source size or wave-packet width, since this underpins the proposed observational constraints.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III C, text after Eq. (83)] The sentence 'This can effectively be obtain through an integration over all possible emission speeds' contains a typo; 'obtain' should be 'obtained'.
  2. [Section III C, Eq. (84)] The symbol Vχ in the integrand is defined in Eq. (80) as an angular factor, while Vψ elsewhere denotes phase velocities (e.g., Eq. (23)); this dual use is confusing, and a distinct symbol such as \mathcal{V}_χ would improve clarity.
  3. [Section III C, Eq. (89)] The constraint on the tensor-mode speed is written as β_T^(b) = 1 + O(10^{-15}); since the GW170817 bound is on |c_T - 1|, it would be more precise to state the deviation can be either sign or to use an absolute value.
  4. [Section II B 2, Eqs. (30)-(31)] The technical assumptions 1 - σ\bar A² ≠ 0 and 3\bar A² \bar G_{3,X}² + 4\bar G_{2,XX}\bar G_4(1 - σ\bar A²) ≠ 0 are introduced without physical motivation; a brief remark that these conditions ensure the corresponding modes are dynamical would help the reader.
  5. [Section II C, Eqs. (47c)-(47d)] The square-root factors in the vector polarization amplitudes assume the combination under the square root is positive; the authors should state the sign conditions required for real, physical polarizations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the GP memory formulas are derived from the GP action and the Isaacson/second-variation framework rather than assumed; the case-(b) parallel to Einstein-Æther is a derived mapping, not an imported result.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing derivation is self-contained: it starts from the GP action (1), derives the gauge-invariant second-order actions (37) and (40) for the two asymptotically flat branches, computes the momentum fluxes (69)-(72) from those actions via the second-variation formula (62), and solves the Isaacson memory equation (73) with the retarded Green's function (75). The final formulas (83)-(84) and (86)-(88) are new combinations of these computed objects, not restatements of the inputs. Although the framework and the Einstein-Æther analogue are taken from the authors' earlier papers [39]-[41], the GP-specific dispersion relations, velocities (23), (25), (28), flux normalization constants (38), (39), and critical-angle divergence structure are derived here; case (b) is obtained by mapping GP background conditions into EÆ-like wave equations, not by copying the EÆ memory formula. Heavy self-citation is present but not load-bearing in a circular sense. The only substantive concern flagged by a reader is that Eq. (84) integrates over βχ without exhibiting the Jacobian dω/dβ or spectral weight, so the total case-(a) memory is underdetermined without a radiation spectrum. That is an incompleteness or ambiguity concern, not a circularity: Eq. (84) is not equivalent to its input by construction, and the per-mode formula (83) is a well-defined derived result. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness claim from prior work is used to forbid alternatives. Therefore no circular step meets the evidentiary standard.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper adds no new particles or forces; it takes the GP action with arbitrary polynomial functions G_i as input. The main external inputs are the asymptotically flat background structure, the Isaacson scale separation, and the group-velocity transport theorem. The free parameters are the background values of the GP couplings; none are fitted to data.

free parameters (2)
  • Effective mass m^2 = barG2_X / barG2_F = not fitted; free GP coupling ratio
    Sets dispersion of the scalar and vector modes in case (a); appears in the group velocity beta_chi and in the frequency integration of Eq. (84).
  • Background couplings for case (b) speeds; e.g. sigma=barG4_X/barG4, gamma=barG2_F+2barA^2 barG2_Y = not fitted; arbitrary background values
    The velocities V_T, V_V, V_S in Eqs. (28) are functions of these couplings, and the memory formulas in Eqs. (86) to (88) depend on them through beta_psi and V_psi.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Asymptotically flat background with constant, purely timelike vector expectation value barA_mu=(barA,0,0,0), Eq. (4).
    This choice produces exactly the two nontrivial background branches (a) and (b); spatial or time-dependent vector backgrounds are excluded.
  • domain assumption Separation of scales epsilon_2^2 ~ epsilon_1^2 f_H^2/f_L^2 << 1 for the Isaacson multiscale expansion, Eq. (55).
    Justifies treating the averaged second-order perturbation as a stress tensor and using the leading-order back-reaction equation (61) for memory.
  • domain assumption No asymptotic matter fields, Psi_m=0.
    Only self-sourced memory from vacuum radiative modes is computed; matter contributions to memory are not included.
  • ad hoc to paper G4 != 0, G2_F != 0, and in case (b) gamma != 0, 1-sigma barA^2 != 0, plus denominator conditions in Eq. (28c).
    These conditions are imposed to keep the metric, vector, and scalar modes dynamical; when they fail, some modes become non-dynamical and the formulas change.
  • standard math Biot's theorem that energy transport occurs at the group velocity, Ref. [75].
    Used to write momentum fluxes as functions of group-velocity retarded times u_psi=t-r/beta_psi, which is central to the dispersive memory derivation.
  • standard math Standard SO(3) SVT decomposition and gauge-invariant variable construction, Appendix A.
    Reduces 14 perturbative components to 10 gauge-invariant variables; no extra physics is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational Memory in Generalized Proca Gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XUNPCT5W

@misc{pith2026250820545,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational Memory in Generalized Proca Gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XUNPCT5W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20545}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the gravitational memory effect in the full Generalized Proca gravity, the most general metric theory including a gravitational Proca field with derivative self-interactions that still maintains second-order equations of motion. Building on our previous works on memory in other massless and massive metric theories, we extend a unified framework for computing displacement memory and apply it to Generalized Proca gravity. We identify two non-trivial physically distinct classes of background conditions of Generalized Proca theory within the assumption of asymptotic flatness: a Lorentz-invariant but massive case, and a Lorentz-violating, massless case. The former exhibits dispersive scalar and vector modes and allows a Horndeski-like treatment of memory, while the latter resembles the asymptotic dynamics of Einstein-{\AE}ther theory including the same Lorentz-breaking effects on displacement memory. In both cases, we derive the fully gauge invariant and dynamical second order action, derive the effective stress-energy tensor and study its contribution to the memory integral. We highlight the distinction between phase and group velocity in the tensor memory formula sourced by dispersive propagating modes. Finally, we re-emphasize how observational constraints on Lorentz violation may be imposed by the structure of the memory signal.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scalar memory from compact binary coalescences

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In Ricci-coupled scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, the change in scalar charge during binary black hole mergers generates a scalar memory contribution that modifies the total memory signal on observable timescales.

  2. A no-go theorem in bumblebee vector-tensor cosmology

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bumblebee gravity with non-minimal couplings is healthy only under the degeneracy σ=-ξ/2, which fixes the potential and yields a stealth de Sitter solution with scalar sound speed squared ≈1/6.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [41]

    Gravitational-wave memory effects in Brans-Dicke theory: Waveforms and effects in the post-Newtonian approximation,

    S. Tahura, D. A. Nichols, and K. Yagi, “Gravitational-wave memory effects in Brans-Dicke theory: Waveforms and effects in the post-Newtonian approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 10, (2021) 104010, arXiv:2107.02208 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [1]

    vacuum expectation

    Background dynamics Given our choice of a constant background, all the terms involving derivative operators are evaluated to zero at the background level, where the EOMs reduce to the simple form containing only the coefficients ¯G2 and ¯G2,X: 0 =(0)Jµ[hµν,aµ] = ¯Aµ ¯G2,X, (6) 0 =(0)Gµν[hµν,aµ] =−1 2ηµν ¯G2 + 1 2 ¯Aµ ¯Aν ¯G2,X. (7) The background Proca eq...

  3. [2]

    Second-order action and linear equations A systematic way of deriving the leading-order dy- namics of the theory is to calculate the gauge-invariant second-order action (2)S in the framework of the SVT decomposition. We refer to Appendix A for the details of this decomposition, while we recall here the 3+1 de- composition of the metric and vector field pe...

  4. [3]

    In the end, the physics of the asymptotically flat vacuum in both cases depends only on five dynamical degrees of freedom

    Gauge Invariant Second Order Action of Dynamical Degrees of Freedom The final step is to simplify the second-order gauge- invariant action using the linear relations, leaving only the dynamical degrees of freedom. In the end, the physics of the asymptotically flat vacuum in both cases depends only on five dynamical degrees of freedom. Case (a). As a conse...

  5. [4]

    Case (a) By further imposing the background condition ¯A = 0, the second-order action in Eqs. (16) reduces to (2)LT = 1 4 ¯G4hTT ij □hij TT , (C3a) (2)LV = 1 2Σi( ¯G2,F □− ¯G2,X)Σi− 1 2 ¯G4Ξi∇2Ξi, (C3b) (2)LS = ¯G4(3 2Θ ¨Θ− 1 2Θ∇2Θ + 2Φ∇2Θ) + 1 2 ¯G2,X(Ω2 + Υ∇2Υ) + ¯G2,F (1 2 ¨Υ∇2Υ− 1 2Ω∇2Ω− ˙Υ∇2Ω). (C3c) We vary this action with respect to the gauge-inva...

  6. [5]

    Case (b) Setting the effective mass to zero through the con- straint ¯G2,X = 0, the second order action Eq. (16) be- comes (2)LT =−1 4( ¯G4− ¯A2 ¯G4,X)hab TT ¨hTT ab + 1 4 ¯G4hab TT∇2hTT ab , (C17a) 16 (2)LV = ¯G2,F (1 2 ¯A2Ξi□Ξi + ¯AΞi□Σi + 1 2Σi□Σi) + ¯G2,Y (− ¯A4Ξi¨Ξi− 2 ¯A3Ξi ¨Σi− ¯A2Σi ¨Σi) − 1 2( ¯G4 + ¯A2 ¯G4,X)Ξi∇2Ξi− ¯A ¯G4,XΞi∇2Σi, (C17b) (2)LS ...

  7. [6]

    (C30) is a general equation for the scalar propagating degree of freedom, and it is non- dynamical if and only if 3¯A2 ¯G2 3,X+4 ¯G2,XX ¯G4(1−σ ¯A2) =

    Therefore, Eq. (C30) is a general equation for the scalar propagating degree of freedom, and it is non- dynamical if and only if 3¯A2 ¯G2 3,X+4 ¯G2,XX ¯G4(1−σ ¯A2) =

  8. [7]

    center of the energy pulse

    Otherwise, it follows the same asymptotic behaviour as previously described in the tensor and the vector sec- tor. Appendix D: Displacement memory from the energy pulse perspective In this appendix, we present a useful and illuminating point-particle/energy-pulse approximation on the com- putations of gravitational displacement memory. This is a generaliz...

Show all 94 references
  1. [8]

    Radiation of gravitational waves by a cluster of superdense stars,

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and A. G. Polnarev, “Radiation of gravitational waves by a cluster of superdense stars,” Sov. Astron. 18 (1974) 17

    1974

  2. [9]

    Gravitational radiation from point-masses in unbound orbits: Newtonian results,

    M. Turner, “Gravitational radiation from point-masses in unbound orbits: Newtonian results,” Astrophysical Journal 216 (1977) 610–619

    1977

  3. [10]

    Kinematic Resonance and Memory Effect in Free Mass Gravitational Antennas,

    V. B. Braginsky and L. P. Grishchuk, “Kinematic Resonance and Memory Effect in Free Mass Gravitational Antennas,” Sov. Phys. JETP 62 (1985) 427–430

    1985

  4. [11]

    Gravitational-wave bursts with memory and experimental prospects,

    V. Braginsky and K. Thorne, “Gravitational-wave bursts with memory and experimental prospects,” Nature 327 (1987) 123–125

    1987

  5. [12]

    Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments,

    D. Christodoulou, “Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 1486–1489

    1991

  6. [13]

    Hereditary effects in gravitational radiation,

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, “Hereditary effects in gravitational radiation,” Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 4304–4319

    1992

  7. [14]

    Geodesic deviation at null infinity and the physical effects of very long wave gravitational radiation,

    M. Ludvigsen, “Geodesic deviation at null infinity and the physical effects of very long wave gravitational radiation,” General Relativity and Gravitation 21 (1989) 1205–1212

    1989

  8. [15]

    Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect,

    K. S. Thorne, “Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect,” Phys. Rev. D 45 no. 2, (1992) 520–524

    1992

  9. [16]

    Christodoulou’s nonlinear gravitational-wave memory: Evaluation in the quadrupole approximation,

    A. G. Wiseman and C. M. Will, “Christodoulou’s nonlinear gravitational-wave memory: Evaluation in the quadrupole approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 44 (Nov,

  10. [17]

    Nonlinear gravitational-wave memory from binary black hole mergers,

    M. Favata, “Nonlinear gravitational-wave memory from binary black hole mergers,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 696 (2009) L159–L162, arXiv:0902.3660 [astro-ph.SR]

    2009 arXiv

  11. [18]

    The gravitational-wave memory effect,

    M. Favata, “The gravitational-wave memory effect,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 084036, arXiv:1003.3486 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Perturbative and gauge invariant treatment of gravitational wave memory,

    L. Bieri and D. Garfinkle, “Perturbative and gauge invariant treatment of gravitational wave memory,” Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 8, (2014) 084039, arXiv:1312.6871 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Gravitational wave memory and the wave equation,

    D. Garfinkle, “Gravitational wave memory and the wave equation,” Class. Quant. Grav. 39 no. 13, (2022) 135010, arXiv:2201.05543 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Continuing Isaacson’s Legacy: A general metric theory perspective on gravitational memory and the non-linearity of gravity,

    J. Zosso, “Continuing Isaacson’s Legacy: A general metric theory perspective on gravitational memory and the non-linearity of gravity,” in 59th Rencontres de Moriond on Gravitation: Moriond 2025 Gravitation . 5,

    2025

  15. [22]

    The Poincar´ e and BMS flux-balance laws with application to binary systems,

    G. Comp` ere, R. Oliveri, and A. Seraj, “The Poincar´ e and BMS flux-balance laws with application to binary systems,” JHEP 10 (2020) 116, arXiv:1912.03164 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [23]

    An electromagnetic analogue of gravitational wave memory,

    L. Bieri and D. Garfinkle, “An electromagnetic analogue of gravitational wave memory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 195009, arXiv:1307.5098 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Enhanced Electromagnetic Memory,

    J. Zosso, “Enhanced Electromagnetic Memory,” arXiv:2507.09555 [gr-qc]

  18. [25]

    Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 269 (1962) 21–52

    1962

  19. [26]

    R. K. Sachs, “Gravitational waves in general relativity

  20. [27]

    Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 270 (1962) 103–126

    1962

  21. [28]

    Note on the memory effect,

    J. Frauendiener, “Note on the memory effect,” Class. Quant. Grav. 9 (06, 1992) 1639–1641

    1992

  22. [29]

    Geometry and Physics of Null Infinity,

    A. Ashtekar, “Geometry and Physics of Null Infinity,” arXiv:1409.1800 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  23. [30]

    Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems,

    A. Strominger and A. Zhiboedov, “Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems,” JHEP 01 (2016) 086, arXiv:1411.5745 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Testing Brans-Dicke Gravity with Screening by Scalar Gravitational Wave Memory,

    K. Koyama, “Testing Brans-Dicke Gravity with Screening by Scalar Gravitational Wave Memory,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 2, (2020) 021502, arXiv:2006.15914 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [32]

    New Symmetries of Massless QED,

    T. He, P. Mitra, A. P. Porfyriadis, and A. Strominger, “New Symmetries of Massless QED,” JHEP 10 (2014) 112, arXiv:1407.3789 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Asymptotic Symmetries and Electromagnetic Memory,

    S. Pasterski, “Asymptotic Symmetries and Electromagnetic Memory,” JHEP 09 (2017) 154, arXiv:1505.00716 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Infrared Photons and Gravitons,

    S. Weinberg, “Infrared Photons and Gravitons,” Phys. Rev. 140 (Oct, 1965) B516–B524

    1965

  28. [35]

    Outlook for detecting the gravitational-wave displacement and spin memory effects with current and future gravitational-wave detectors,

    A. M. Grant and D. A. Nichols, “Outlook for detecting the gravitational-wave displacement and spin memory effects with current and future gravitational-wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 6, (2023) 064056, arXiv:2210.16266 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 029901 (2023)]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Measuring gravitational wave memory with LISA,

    H. Inchausp´ e, S. Gasparotto, D. Blas, L. Heisenberg, J. Zosso, and S. Tiwari, “Measuring gravitational wave memory with LISA,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 4, (2025) 044044, arXiv:2406.09228 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Compact binary systems in scalar-tensor gravity. II. Tensor gravitational waves to second post-Newtonian order,

    R. N. Lang, “Compact binary systems in scalar-tensor gravity. II. Tensor gravitational waves to second post-Newtonian order,” Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 8, (2014) 084014, arXiv:1310.3320 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Compact binary systems in scalar-tensor gravity. III. Scalar waves and energy flux,

    R. N. Lang, “Compact binary systems in scalar-tensor gravity. III. Scalar waves and energy flux,” Phys. Rev. D 91 no. 8, (2015) 084027, arXiv:1411.3073 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Gravitational Wave Memory: A New Approach to Study Modified Gravity,

    S. M. Du and A. Nishizawa, “Gravitational Wave Memory: A New Approach to Study Modified Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 10, (2016) 104063, arXiv:1609.09825 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Unifying ordinary and null memory,

    L. Heisenberg, G. Xu, and J. Zosso, “Unifying ordinary and null memory,” JCAP 05 (2024) 119, arXiv:2401.05936 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Gravitational memory effects and Bondi-Metzner-Sachs symmetries in scalar-tensor theories,

    S. Hou and Z.-H. Zhu, “Gravitational memory effects and Bondi-Metzner-Sachs symmetries in scalar-tensor theories,” JHEP 01 (2021) 083, arXiv:2005.01310 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Brans-Dicke theory in Bondi-Sachs form: Asymptotically flat solutions, asymptotic symmetries and gravitational-wave memory effects,

    S. Tahura, D. A. Nichols, A. Saffer, L. C. Stein, and K. Yagi, “Brans-Dicke theory in Bondi-Sachs form: Asymptotically flat solutions, asymptotic symmetries and gravitational-wave memory effects,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 10, (2021) 104026, arXiv:2007.13799 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    ”Conserved charges

    S. Hou and Z.-H. Zhu, “”Conserved charges” of the Bondi-Metzner-Sachs algebra in the Brans-Dicke theory,” Chin. Phys. C 45 no. 2, (2021) 023122, 20 arXiv:2008.05154 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Gravitational memory effects in Brans-Dicke theory,

    S. Hou, “Gravitational memory effects in Brans-Dicke theory,” Astron. Nachr. 342 no. 1-2, (2021) 96–102, arXiv:2011.02087 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Conserved charges in Chern-Simons modified theory and memory effects,

    S. Hou, T. Zhu, and Z.-H. Zhu, “Conserved charges in Chern-Simons modified theory and memory effects,” JCAP 04 no. 04, (2022) 032, arXiv:2112.13049 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Asymptotic analysis of Chern-Simons modified gravity and its memory effects,

    S. Hou, T. Zhu, and Z.-H. Zhu, “Asymptotic analysis of Chern-Simons modified gravity and its memory effects,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 2, (2022) 024025, arXiv:2109.04238 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Gravitational wave memory beyond general relativity,

    L. Heisenberg, N. Yunes, and J. Zosso, “Gravitational wave memory beyond general relativity,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 2, (2023) 024010, arXiv:2303.02021 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Generalization of the Proca Action,

    L. Heisenberg, “Generalization of the Proca Action,” JCAP 05 (2014) 015, arXiv:1402.7026 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Constraining superluminal Einstein-Æther gravity through gravitational memory,

    L. Heisenberg, B. Rosatello, G. Xu, and J. Zosso, “Constraining superluminal Einstein-Æther gravity through gravitational memory,” Phys. Rev. D 112 no. 2, (2025) 024052, arXiv:2505.09544 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Asymptotic analysis of Einstein-Æther theory and its memory effects: The linearized case,

    S. Hou, A. Wang, and Z.-H. Zhu, “Asymptotic analysis of Einstein-Æther theory and its memory effects: The linearized case,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 4, (2024) 044025, arXiv:2309.01165 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    The general property of the tensor gravitational memory effect in theories of gravity,

    S. Hou, “The general property of the tensor gravitational memory effect in theories of gravity,” arXiv:2411.17318 [gr-qc]

  45. [53]

    Zosso, Probing Gravity - Fundamental Aspects of Metric Theories and their Implications for Tests of General Relativity

    J. Zosso, Probing Gravity - Fundamental Aspects of Metric Theories and their Implications for Tests of General Relativity. PhD thesis, Zurich, ETH, 2024. arXiv:2412.06043 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame,

    T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, “Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame,” Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 024028, arXiv:gr-qc/0007031

    2001 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Einstein-Aether waves,

    T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, “Einstein-Aether waves,” Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 024003, arXiv:gr-qc/0402005

    2004 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Energy in the Einstein-aether theory,

    C. Eling, “Energy in the Einstein-aether theory,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 084026, arXiv:gr-qc/0507059. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 80, 129905 (2009)]

    2006 arXiv

  49. [57]

    C. M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2 ed., 2018

    2018

  50. [58]

    Effects of Spontaneous Lorentz Violation in Gravity,

    R. Bluhm, “Effects of Spontaneous Lorentz Violation in Gravity,” PoS QG-PH (2007) 009, arXiv:0801.0141 [gr-qc]

    2007 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Gravitational-wave effects in the most general vector–tensor theory,

    Y.-Q. Dong, X.-B. Lai, Y.-Q. Liu, and Y.-X. Liu, “Gravitational-wave effects in the most general vector–tensor theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C 85 no. 6, (2025) 645, arXiv:2409.11838 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Quantum electrodynamics in nonlinear gauge,

    Y. Nambu, “Quantum electrodynamics in nonlinear gauge,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. E 68 (1968) 190–195

    1968

  53. [61]

    Gravitational Phenomenology in Higher Dimensional Theories and Strings,

    V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, “Gravitational Phenomenology in Higher Dimensional Theories and Strings,” Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 1886–1903

    1989

  54. [62]

    Spontaneous Breaking of Lorentz Symmetry in String Theory,

    V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, “Spontaneous Breaking of Lorentz Symmetry in String Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989) 683

    1989

  55. [63]

    Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model,

    V. A. Kostelecky, “Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 105009, arXiv:hep-th/0312310

    2004 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Spontaneous Lorentz violation, Nambu-Goldstone modes, and gravity,

    R. Bluhm and V. A. Kostelecky, “Spontaneous Lorentz violation, Nambu-Goldstone modes, and gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 065008, arXiv:hep-th/0412320

    2005 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Spontaneous Lorentz violation and the long-range gravitational preferred-frame effect,

    M. L. Graesser, A. Jenkins, and M. B. Wise, “Spontaneous Lorentz violation and the long-range gravitational preferred-frame effect,” Phys. Lett. B 613 (2005) 5–10, arXiv:hep-th/0501223

    2005 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Spontaneous Lorentz and Diffeomorphism Violation, Massive Modes, and Gravity,

    R. Bluhm, S.-H. Fung, and V. A. Kostelecky, “Spontaneous Lorentz and Diffeomorphism Violation, Massive Modes, and Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 065020, arXiv:0712.4119 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Gravitational Radiation in the Limit of High Frequency. I. The Linear Approximation and Geometrical Optics,

    R. A. Isaacson, “Gravitational Radiation in the Limit of High Frequency. I. The Linear Approximation and Geometrical Optics,” Phys. Rev. 166 (Feb, 1968) 1263–1271

    1968

  60. [68]

    Effective gravitational couplings for cosmological perturbations in generalized Proca theories,

    A. De Felice, L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, S. Mukohyama, S. Tsujikawa, and Y.-l. Zhang, “Effective gravitational couplings for cosmological perturbations in generalized Proca theories,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 4, (2016) 044024, arXiv:1605.05066 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Gauge-ready formulation of cosmological perturbations in scalar-vector-tensor theories,

    L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, and S. Tsujikawa, “Gauge-ready formulation of cosmological perturbations in scalar-vector-tensor theories,” Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 12, (2018) 123504, arXiv:1807.07202 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Polarization modes of gravitational waves in generalized Proca theory,

    Y.-Q. Dong, Y.-Q. Liu, and Y.-X. Liu, “Polarization modes of gravitational waves in generalized Proca theory,” arXiv:2305.12516 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    The averaged lagrangian and high-frequency gravitational waves,

    M. A. H. Maccallum and A. H. Taub, “The averaged lagrangian and high-frequency gravitational waves,” Commun. Math. Phys. 30 (1973) 153–169

    1973

  64. [72]

    Derivative self-interactions for a massive vector field,

    J. Beltran Jimenez and L. Heisenberg, “Derivative self-interactions for a massive vector field,” Phys. Lett. B 757 (2016) 405–411, arXiv:1602.03410 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Dark energy survivals in massive gravity after GW170817: SO(3) invariant,

    L. Heisenberg and S. Tsujikawa, “Dark energy survivals in massive gravity after GW170817: SO(3) invariant,” JCAP 01 (2018) 044, arXiv:1711.09430 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Gravitational-Wave Observations as a Tool for Testing Relativistic Gravity,

    D. M. Eardley, D. L. Lee, A. P. Lightman, R. V. Wagoner, and C. M. Will, “Gravitational-Wave Observations as a Tool for Testing Relativistic Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (Apr, 1973) 884–886

    1973

  67. [75]

    Gravitational-Wave Observations as a Tool for Testing Relativistic Gravity,

    D. M. Eardley, D. L. Lee, and A. P. Lightman, “Gravitational-Wave Observations as a Tool for Testing Relativistic Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 8 (Nov, 1973) 3308–3321

    1973

  68. [76]

    Leveraging gravitational-wave memory to distinguish neutron star-black hole binaries from black hole binaries,

    S. Tiwari, M. Ebersold, and E. Z. Hamilton, “Leveraging gravitational-wave memory to distinguish neutron star-black hole binaries from black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 12, (2021) 123024, arXiv:2110.11171 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Gravitational Radiation in the Limit of High Frequency. II. Nonlinear Terms and the Effective Stress Tensor,

    R. A. Isaacson, “Gravitational Radiation in the Limit of High Frequency. II. Nonlinear Terms and the Effective Stress Tensor,” Phys. Rev. 166 (Feb, 1968) 1272–1280

    1968

  70. [78]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973

    1973

  71. [79]

    The Basics of gravitational wave theory,

    E. E. Flanagan and S. A. Hughes, “The Basics of gravitational wave theory,” New J. Phys. 7 (2005) 204, arXiv:gr-qc/0501041

    2005 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Maggiore, Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments

    M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments. Oxford University Press, 10, 2007

    2007

  73. [81]

    Space-time averages of classical physical fields,

    R. Zalaletdinov, “Space-time averages of classical physical fields,” arXiv:gr-qc/0411004

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    Effective Gravitational Wave Stress-energy Tensor in Alternative Theories of Gravity,

    L. C. Stein and N. Yunes, “Effective Gravitational Wave Stress-energy Tensor in Alternative Theories of Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 064038, arXiv:1012.3144 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  75. [83]

    The Gravitational-wave memory from eccentric binaries,

    M. Favata, “The Gravitational-wave memory from eccentric binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 124013, arXiv:1108.3121 [gr-qc] . 21

    2011 arXiv

  76. [84]

    General Theorems on the Equivalence of Group Velocity and Energy Transport,

    M. A. Biot, “General Theorems on the Equivalence of Group Velocity and Energy Transport,” Phys. Rev. 105 (Feb, 1957) 1129–1137

    1957

  77. [85]

    S. M. Carroll, Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity. Cambridge University Press, 2019

    2019

  78. [86]

    Does spacetime have memories? Searching for gravitational-wave memory in the third LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA gravitational-wave transient catalogue,

    S. Y. Cheung, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, “Does spacetime have memories? Searching for gravitational-wave memory in the third LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA gravitational-wave transient catalogue,” Class. Quant. Grav. 41 no. 11, (2024) 115010, arXiv:2404.11919 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  79. [87]

    A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant,

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo, 1M2H, Dark Energy Camera GW-E, DES, DLT40, Las Cumbres Observatory, VINROUGE, MASTER Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant,” Nature 551 no. 7678, (2017) 85–88, arXiv:1710.05835 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Lower bound on the propagation speed of gravity from gravitational Cherenkov radiation,

    G. D. Moore and A. E. Nelson, “Lower bound on the propagation speed of gravity from gravitational Cherenkov radiation,” JHEP 09 (2001) 023, arXiv:hep-ph/0106220

    2001 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Constraining the New Aether: gravitational Cherenkov radiation,

    J. W. Elliott, G. D. Moore, and H. Stoica, “Constraining the New Aether: gravitational Cherenkov radiation,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2005 no. 08, (Aug., 2005) 066–066

    2005

  82. [90]

    New binary pulsar constraints on Einstein-æther theory after GW170817,

    T. Gupta, M. Herrero-Valea, D. Blas, E. Barausse, N. Cornish, K. Yagi, and N. Yunes, “New binary pulsar constraints on Einstein-æther theory after GW170817,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38 no. 19, (2021) 195003, arXiv:2104.04596 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Well-posed Cauchy formulation for Einstein-æther theory,

    O. Sarbach, E. Barausse, and J. A. Preciado-L´ opez, “Well-posed Cauchy formulation for Einstein-æther theory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 36 no. 16, (2019) 165007, arXiv:1902.05130 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Republication of: On the gravitational stability of the expanding universe,

    E. Lifshitz, “Republication of: On the gravitational stability of the expanding universe,” J. Phys. (USSR) 10 no. 2, (1946) 116

    1946

  85. [93]

    Second-order Gauge-invariant Cosmological Perturbation Theory: Current Status updated in 2019,

    K. Nakamura, “Second-order Gauge-invariant Cosmological Perturbation Theory: Current Status updated in 2019,” arXiv:1912.12805 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  86. [2025]

    arXiv:2505.17603 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.