Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

RAD: A Dataset and Benchmark for Real-Life Anomaly Detection with Robotic Observations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.00713 v6 pith:XVZVEFMI submitted 2024-10-01 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords detectionroboticanomalybenchmarklocalizationrealisticunderbenchmarks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Anomaly detection is essential for robotic perception and industrial inspection, yet most benchmarks are collected under controlled conditions with fixed viewpoints and stable illumination. These settings do not reflect robotic deployment, where camera pose, lighting, and surface reflectance vary continuously. We present RAD (Realistic Anomaly Detection), a robot-captured multi-view benchmark for pose-agnostic anomaly detection. RAD contains 5,848 RGB images from 13 everyday object categories, captured from 68 viewpoints per object with a Franka robotic arm and an RGB-D camera under uncontrolled lighting. The dataset covers four realistic defect types: scratched, missing, stained, and squeezed, with pixel-level annotations for localization. We benchmark representative 2D feature-based methods, 3D reconstruction pipelines, and vision-language models under a realistic setting in which test poses are unknown. Results show a clear gap between performance on conventional benchmarks and performance on RAD. Strong 2D feature-embedding methods remain the most reliable at image-level detection, whereas 3D approaches are more competitive for pixel-level localization but remain vulnerable to reflective materials, geometric symmetry, and sparse viewpoint coverage. Vision-language models perform poorly in both classification and localization. RAD provides a challenging testbed for robust robotic inspection and highlights open problems in jointly modeling appearance, geometry, and viewpoint uncertainty. Our website and code are available at https://chang-xinhai.github.io/rad-website/.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MATCH: Flow Matching for Multi-View Anomaly Detection

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    MATCH is the first flow matching method for multi-view anomaly detection, reporting SOTA results on Real-IAD and the first comprehensive evaluation on MANTA-Tiny while enabling real-time use by omitting the divergence term.

  2. Visual Anomaly Detection under Complex View-Illumination Interplay: A Large-Scale Benchmark

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    M2AD, a large-scale benchmark with 120 view-illumination configurations per object, shows that state-of-the-art visual anomaly detection methods drop markedly when viewpoint and lighting vary together.

  3. A Comprehensive Survey for Real-World Industrial Defect Detection: Challenges, Approaches, and Prospects

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A broad survey of industrial defect detection that structures the field by closed-set vs open-set and 2D vs 3D methods, with an emphasis on the rise of open-set anomaly detection.

Pith tools