Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

The FLoRes Evaluation Datasets for Low-Resource Machine Translation: Nepali-English and Sinhala-English

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1902.01382 v3 pith:XWHF5ZQI submitted 2019-02-04 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords availabledatalow-resourcefloresbecausedatasetsevaluationexperiments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

For machine translation, a vast majority of language pairs in the world are considered low-resource because they have little parallel data available. Besides the technical challenges of learning with limited supervision, it is difficult to evaluate methods trained on low-resource language pairs because of the lack of freely and publicly available benchmarks. In this work, we introduce the FLoRes evaluation datasets for Nepali-English and Sinhala-English, based on sentences translated from Wikipedia. Compared to English, these are languages with very different morphology and syntax, for which little out-of-domain parallel data is available and for which relatively large amounts of monolingual data are freely available. We describe our process to collect and cross-check the quality of translations, and we report baseline performance using several learning settings: fully supervised, weakly supervised, semi-supervised, and fully unsupervised. Our experiments demonstrate that current state-of-the-art methods perform rather poorly on this benchmark, posing a challenge to the research community working on low-resource MT. Data and code to reproduce our experiments are available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/flores.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Disentangling Language Modeling and Boundaries

    cs.CL 2026-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper hypothesizes that next-byte and boundary distributions in byte-level LMs can be disentangled, proposes two experiments to test it, but provides no experimental results.

  2. From Measurement to Mitigation: Exploring the Transferability of Debiasing Approaches to Gender Bias in Maltese Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    English-style debiasing methods only partially transfer to Maltese language models, with Counterfactual Data Augmentation most effective but hampered by grammatical errors.

  3. Linguistic Analysis of Sinhala YouTube Comments on Sinhala Music Videos: A Dataset Study

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new dataset of 63,471 Sinhala YouTube comments on music videos and 964 derived stop-words is presented and compared against general Sinhala corpora.

  4. Analyzing the Effect of Linguistic Similarity on Cross-Lingual Transfer: Tasks and Experimental Setups Matter

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Cross-lingual transfer success is best predicted by syntactic similarity for POS tagging and parsing, by trigram overlap for n-gram topic models, and by mBERT pretraining coverage for mBERT-based topic models.

  5. Why do language models perform worse for morphologically complex languages?

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A language-modeling performance gap between agglutinative and fusional languages largely disappears when training data is measured and scaled in bytes rather than tokens.

  6. Pivot Language for Low-Resource Machine Translation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Hindi-pivot transfer gives a 14.2 SacreBLEU on Nepali-English devtest, beating the fully supervised direct baseline by 6.6 points, but with no code, no error bars, and a non-controlled baseline.

Pith tools