Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

VaLiD: Mitigating the Hallucination of Large Vision Language Models by Visual Layer Fusion Contrastive Decoding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.15839 v2 pith:XZ6TPOIP submitted 2024-11-24 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords visualtextbfhallucinationsvalidencodinglayercapabilitiescontent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in multimodal task reasoning. However, they often generate responses that appear plausible yet do not accurately reflect the visual content, a phenomenon known as hallucination. Recent approaches have introduced training-free methods to mitigate hallucinations by adjusting the decoding strategy during the inference stage, typically attributing hallucinations to the language model itself. Our analysis, however, reveals that distortions in the visual encoding process significantly affect the model's reasoning capabilities. Specifically, earlier visual layers may retain key features but gradually distort as the information propagates toward the output layer. Building on these insights, we propose a novel hallucination-mitigation method from the visual encoding perspective: \textbf{V}isu\textbf{a}l \textbf{L}ayer Fus\textbf{i}on Contrastive \textbf{D}ecoding (\textbf{VaLiD}). This method utilizes uncertainty to guide the visual layer selection, correcting distortions in the visual encoding process and thereby enhancing the reliability of the generated content. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of VaLiD in mitigating hallucinations across various benchmarks, achieving state-of-the-art performance when compared to baseline methods. Codes are available at \href{https://github.com/RicardoLuL/VaLiD_LVLMs_hallucinations}{Github}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Training-free Uncertainty Guidance for Complex Visual Tasks with MLLMs

    cs.CV 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Selecting the visual input that minimizes an MLLM's output entropy (or maximizes its yes/no confidence) improves fine-grained visual search, long-video QA, and temporal grounding without any training.

  2. Two Causes, Not One: Rethinking Omission and Fabrication Hallucinations in MLLMs

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Omission and fabrication hallucinations in MLLMs are claimed to have distinct causes, and the new VPFC method reduces omissions without adding fabrications.

  3. MCA-LLaVA: Manhattan Causal Attention for Reducing Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    MCA-LLaVA reindexes image tokens by sums of mirrored 2D coordinates so instruction tokens attend across the whole image, reducing hallucination on POPE, CHAIR, and MME.

Pith tools