Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

ARAP-GS: Drag-driven As-Rigid-As-Possible 3D Gaussian Splatting Editing with Diffusion Prior

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read ARAP-GS makes drag-driven editing of 3D Gaussian Splatting scenes work by deforming a sampled subset as rigidly as possible and refining appearance with a diffusion prior.

desk verdict Plausible and incremental drag editing for 3DGS, but the published interpolation formulas are internally inconsistent and must be fixed before the method is credible. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.12788 v1 pith:XZQ6CXQU submitted 2025-04-17 cs.GR cs.CV

Xiao Han , Runze Tian , Yifei Tong , Fenggen Yu , Dingyao Liu , Yan Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.GRcs.CV
keywords 3DGaussianSplattingdrag-driveneditingas-rigid-as-possibledeformationdiffusionpriorimagesuper-resolutionmulti-viewconsistencyscene
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

ARAP-GS sets out to give 3D Gaussian Splatting scenes the same drag-style editing that designers already have for meshes and 2D images: a user pulls handle points, and the scene deforms accordingly. Its approach is to treat Gaussian centers as vertices in an as-rigid-as-possible deformation, solve that deformation on a sampled subset, and interpolate the result to all other Gaussians. Because the warp changes geometry but not color or opacity, a second optimization stage uses a diffusion-based super-resolution prior to refine the edited views and then fine-tune the masked Gaussians. If the method holds up, drag-driven edits of captured 3D scenes become direct, coherent, and fast enough at 10–20 minutes per scene on a single GPU to be used interactively.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the ARAP energy, minimized on the centers of a representative subset of Gaussians: $E = \sum_i w_i \sum_{j\in N(i)} w_{ij}\|(p'_i-p'_j)-R_i(p_i-p_j)\|^2$, with rotations obtained by SVD of local covariance matrices. The subset $Q$ of 16,384 sampled Gaussians with $k=32$ KNN neighbors carries the deformation; every other Gaussian is moved by combining the deformed positions and quaternions of its eight nearest subset members through the weights in Eq. (5). The second mechanism is diffusion-prior fine-tuning: a pretrained super-resolution model enhances rendered views, an iterative dataset update swaps refined views into supervision every ten iterations, and a displacement-derived mask merges only the edited region, so appearance is corrected without wrecking multi-view geometry.

What would settle it

Render a synthetic Gaussian scene under a known rigid translation of the handle points and compare the deformed centers of non-sampled Gaussians with the exact rigid transform: as printed, Eq. (3) adds the original position again, so non-sampled Gaussians should overshoot by their own original displacement and the rendered scene should drift. Measuring that drift would settle whether the propagation rule is correct.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that applying ARAP deformation directly to 3D Gaussians is enough to make drag-driven editing of 3DGS scenes work. From a scene of hundreds of thousands to millions of Gaussians, it samples a representative subset, builds K-nearest-neighbor adjacency on that subset, and runs the classical ARAP iteration: update each sampled Gaussian's rotation by SVD of its local covariance, then solve for new centers under the handle-point constraints. All non-sampled Gaussians receive positions and rotation quaternions by distance-weighted interpolation from their nearest deformed subset members. Since this leaves color and opacity untouched, the pipeline then renders the deformed scene, enhances the edited views with an off-the-shelf diffusion super-resolution model, and fine-tunes the masked Gaussians using an iterative per-view dataset update to suppress cross-view inconsistency. The reported outcome is that this combination beats text-driven and 2D-drag baselines on all three metrics used — DAI, user preference, and an automated vision-language evaluator — while editing a scene in 10–20 minutes on a single RTX 3090.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scene deformation rests on the hand-specified interpolation rules of Eqs. (3)–(5) that carry the subset's motion to every other Gaussian, and the paper does not derive them from the ARAP energy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Drag edits become direct geometric operations on the 3D scene rather than per-view 2D edits, so a single drag should propagate coherently to every viewpoint.
  • The rigidity preservation keeps connected parts attached during stretching and rotation, but it also prevents topological changes such as opening a closed mouth, which the paper reports as a limitation.
  • Appearance is repaired by a pretrained diffusion prior without retraining the scene, so an edit completes in 10–20 minutes on one consumer GPU.
  • Because the input is handle points rather than text, the method covers edits that are hard to specify by a prompt, such as raising a bicycle seat or stretching a vase.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: a properly derived propagation rule would let the same two-stage pipeline scale to much larger scenes without the current sampling bottleneck.
  • Beyond the paper: the displacement mask used for view merging could also drive updates to scale, opacity, or spherical-harmonic coefficients, directly addressing the paper's listed future work.
  • Beyond the paper: swapping the subset-deformation stage for other handle-based or skeleton-driven warps would let the diffusion fine-tuner be reused as a generic appearance-restoration module for any geometric edit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes ARAP-GS, a drag-driven 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) editing method. The method first randomly samples a representative subset of Gaussians and connects them with KNN, then applies classical ARAP deformation to this subset using user-specified drag handles. The remaining Gaussians are deformed by interpolating positions and rotations from the deformed subset. In a second stage, rendered views are enhanced with the StableSR diffusion-based super-resolution model, and the 3DGS is fine-tuned with mask-guided iterative dataset updates. The method is evaluated on 10 scenes against text-driven 3D editing baselines (Instruct-NeRF2NeRF, GaussianEditor) and 2D drag-based baselines (DragDiffusion, SDEDrag) applied to 3DGS, using DAI, user study votes, and GPT-4o scores. The authors report state-of-the-art results and claim to be the first to apply ARAP directly to 3D Gaussians.

Significance. The idea of applying ARAP deformation directly to Gaussian centers is a natural and potentially impactful extension for geometry-aware 3DGS editing, and the two-stage pipeline combining geometric deformation with diffusion-based appearance refinement is practical and time-efficient. If the interpolation step is corrected and the implementation details are made reproducible, the method could be a valuable contribution to interactive 3D scene editing. The reported evaluation includes quantitative metrics and user studies, and the qualitative results show clear advantages over the selected baselines. However, the correctness of the full-scene deformation rests on the interpolation formulas in Sec. 3.2, which as printed are not identity-preserving; this is a load-bearing issue that must be resolved before the method can be accepted as described.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (3)-(5)] The interpolation formulas for non-subset Gaussians are not identity-preserving and therefore cannot be correct as written. Under zero deformation (p'_i = p_i and q'_i = q_i = q_l for all neighboring subset Gaussians i), Eq. (3) gives p'_l = sum_i w_il p_i + p_l, which displaces p_l by the weighted mean of its neighbors instead of leaving it unchanged. Similarly, Eq. (4) gives q'_l = sum_i w_il q_l (x) q_l, which is approximately q_l^2 after weighting—a doubled rotation—rather than q_l. The correct displacement-based forms should be p'_l = p_l + sum_i w_il (p'_i - p_i) and q'_l = normalize( sum_i w_il (q'_i (x) q_i^{-1}) ) (x) q_l, or an equivalent formulation. Since Eqs. (3)-(5) are the mechanism by which the roughly 98% of Gaussians outside the representative subset are deformed, the full-scene deformation pipeline as printed cannot produce the claimed rigidity-preserving edits. Please provide a derivation of these interpolation rules or correct the equations, and explicitly verify the identity case.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.3 and Table 1] "GTP-4o" is a typo and should be "GPT-4o".
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (5)] The weights in Eq. (5) use the deformed positions p'_i in the exponent, so the interpolation weights depend on the deformation itself. Please clarify whether this is intentional, and if so, justify why a deformation-dependent weight is appropriate; otherwise, the weights should be based on the original positions.
  3. [Sec. 3.3] The mask generation procedure (displacement threshold and projection onto the camera plane) is described only in prose; please specify the exact threshold and provide the projection formula, or refer to a precise location in the supplementary material.
  4. [Sec. 3.2] The paper does not explicitly state how the per-Gaussian rotation matrix R from ARAP is converted to the quaternion q, nor how the covariance matrix Sigma is updated after deformation. Please add the explicit update rule (e.g., Sigma' = R' Sigma R'^T with the scaling matrix unchanged).
  5. [Related Work and Experiments] The paper cites concurrent drag-driven 3DGS editing methods [10, 51] and cage-based GSDeformer [19] but does not compare with them because they are not publicly available; the novelty claim of being 'first to apply ARAP directly to 3D Gaussians' should be qualified and the relationship to these concurrent works discussed.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Mild self-referential fine-tuning: the diffusion-prior visual-quality gain is trained against StableSR's own enhanced views, so the appearance-improvement claim is partially circular; the ARAP geometric deformation itself is independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 3.3, 3DGS Fine-tuning with Diffusion Prior (Iterative Dataset Update and Eq. 6)]
    "Every t = 10 iterations, we select a subset with n views and use StableSR to enhance them. These enhanced images replace the original images as the supervision for those views."

    The fine-tuning loss optimizes the deformed 3DGS to reproduce Imerge = M⊙Isr + (1-M)⊙Igt (Eq. 6), where Isr is StableSR's own enhancement of the current render inside the mask. The 'with diffusion prior' variant is therefore trained to match the StableSR outputs that are later cited as evidence that the diffusion prior improves visual quality. The improvement over 'w/o StableSR' is forced by this construction rather than measured against an independent ground truth, making the appearance-improvement claim self-referential. This does not affect the geometric ARAP deformation, whose energy and update equations are imported from external work [55] and are not fitted to the evaluation.

full rationale

The ARAP 3DGS deformation stage is not circular: it applies the external Sorkine-Alexa ARAP energy (Eq. 1) to a randomly sampled Gaussian subset, solves for rotations via SVD, and interpolates the rest; no parameter is fitted to the reported DAI, user-study, or GPT-4o outcomes, and the ARAP update equations are grounded in [55], not in the authors' own prior work. The interpolation rules in Sec. 3.2 (Eqs. 3-5) are internally inconsistent (under identity deformation Eq. 3 gives p_l' = sum_i w_il p_i + p_l, not p_l) and are not derived, but this is a correctness/derivation gap rather than circularity, so it does not raise the circularity score. The only self-referential element is the diffusion-prior fine-tuning: the enhanced images used as supervision are generated by StableSR from the same rendered views, so the ablative claim that the diffusion prior improves visual quality is partly true by construction. Self-citations such as [56] appear only in related work and are not load-bearing. Overall, the central drag-deformation claim remains independent, giving a mild circularity score of 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central deformation rests on the standard ARAP algorithm and a random subset sampling scheme; the interpolation formulas for the remaining Gaussians are introduced ad hoc and appear erroneous. The diffusion fine-tuning relies on StableSR as an oracle. No free parameter is fitted to the evaluation metrics, but several hyperparameters are hand-chosen.

free parameters (5)
  • Representative subset size N = 16384
    Hand-chosen to balance memory and coverage; ARAP is applied only to this subset, so the entire deformation depends on it.
  • KNN neighbor count k = 32
    Used to build the adjacency graph for ARAP on the subset; hand-chosen.
  • Interpolation neighbor count = 8
    Number of nearest subset Gaussians used to interpolate transforms for the remaining Gaussians.
  • ARAP max iterations = 16
    Stopping criterion for the ARAP optimization loop.
  • Mask displacement threshold = unspecified
    The mask is generated by thresholding Gaussian position displacement, but the threshold value is not stated in the paper.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math ARAP energy minimization converges to a rigidity-preserving deformation when applied to point sets with fixed adjacency.
    Taken from Sorkine and Alexa (2007); the paper extends it to Gaussian centers without re-deriving convergence for point clouds.
  • ad hoc to paper Randomly sampling 16,384 Gaussians and connecting them with KNN yields a representative subset whose deformation can be interpolated to the full scene.
    No coverage or error analysis is provided for the random subset; the entire editing quality depends on this assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper The interpolation rules in Eq. (3)-(5) correctly transform non-subset Gaussians from the deformed subset.
    These formulas are introduced without derivation and appear mathematically inconsistent as written.
  • domain assumption StableSR's enhanced images, combined with iterative dataset update and mask blending, provide view-consistent supervision that improves appearance without harming geometry.
    Adopted from I-N2N and StableSR; no quantitative check of multi-view consistency is provided in the ablation.
  • domain assumption 3DGS rendering quality is preserved when deforming centers and covariances only, leaving color and opacity unchanged until fine-tuning.
    This motivates the two-stage design; the paper shows one qualitative example without diffusion prior.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ARAP-GS: Drag-driven As-Rigid-As-Possible 3D Gaussian Splatting Editing with Diffusion Prior." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XZQ6CXQU

@misc{pith2026250412788,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ARAP-GS: Drag-driven As-Rigid-As-Possible 3D Gaussian Splatting Editing with Diffusion Prior},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XZQ6CXQU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.12788}
}
read the original abstract

Drag-driven editing has become popular among designers for its ability to modify complex geometric structures through simple and intuitive manipulation, allowing users to adjust and reshape content with minimal technical skill. This drag operation has been incorporated into numerous methods to facilitate the editing of 2D images and 3D meshes in design. However, few studies have explored drag-driven editing for the widely-used 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) representation, as deforming 3DGS while preserving shape coherence and visual continuity remains challenging. In this paper, we introduce ARAP-GS, a drag-driven 3DGS editing framework based on As-Rigid-As-Possible (ARAP) deformation. Unlike previous 3DGS editing methods, we are the first to apply ARAP deformation directly to 3D Gaussians, enabling flexible, drag-driven geometric transformations. To preserve scene appearance after deformation, we incorporate an advanced diffusion prior for image super-resolution within our iterative optimization process. This approach enhances visual quality while maintaining multi-view consistency in the edited results. Experiments show that ARAP-GS outperforms current methods across diverse 3D scenes, demonstrating its effectiveness and superiority for drag-driven 3DGS editing. Additionally, our method is highly efficient, requiring only 10 to 20 minutes to edit a scene on a single RTX 3090 GPU.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.12788 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Results of ARAP-GS. Given a set of handle points and their deformations, ARAP-GS can efficiently achieve drag-driven 3DGS editing. Our method deforms the geometry of the 3DGS scene through rotation (above) or stretching (below) while preserving the original appearance and multi-view consistency. The first column illustrates the dragging operation, with the red points indicating the handle points and the arrows indic… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Method overview. Our method is implemented in two stages. In the first stage, for geometric deformations during editing, we leverage the explicit representation of 3D Gaussians, establishing a representative subset Q. Then we apply the traditional ARAP deformation directly to 3D Gaussians in Q, and obtain the rotation matrix R and new position p ′ for each 3D Gaussian. The rotation matrices and new positions of the … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Visual results of our method. The first two rows show the results of stretching, and last two rows show the results of rotation. The first column shows the dragging operation, with the red points indicating the handle points and the arrows indicating the dragging directions. ”Original” and ”Edited” denote the rendering results before and after editing. follows: DAI = 1 n Xn i=1 Xm j=1 ∥Ω(Io,i, pi,j , γ) − Ω(Ie,i, qi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative comparison results. We compare our method with state-of-the-art methods including I-N2N [16], GaussianEdi￾tor [12], DragDiffusion [53] and SDEDrag [44]. Compared to these methods, our method achieves more accurate geometric deformation and better multi-view…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Failure case of our method. When attempting to make the man open his mouth, the Gaussians in the mouth region main￾tain their original structure and do not tear to create holes, leading to less satisfactory results in this case. Future work. Although our method has mad…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EditVerse3D: High-Quality 3D Object Editing with Region-Aware Learning

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An end-to-end 3D editing framework achieves high-fidelity local edits from coarse bounding boxes and 2D image prompts using region-aware loss reweighting and a large-scale parts-derived training dataset.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [55]

    As-rigid-as-possible surface modeling

    Olga Sorkine and Marc Alexa. As-rigid-as-possible surface modeling. In Symposium on Geometry processing , pages 109–116. Citeseer, 2007. 2, 3, 4

    work page 2007

  2. [1]

    Blended diffusion for text-driven editing of natural images

    Omri Avrahami, Dani Lischinski, and Ohad Fried. Blended diffusion for text-driven editing of natural images. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 18208–18218, 2022. 3

    2022

  3. [2]

    360-gs: Layout-guided panoramic gaussian splatting for indoor roaming

    Jiayang Bai, Letian Huang, Jie Guo, Wen Gong, Yuanqi Li, and Yanwen Guo. 360-gs: Layout-guided panoramic gaussian splatting for indoor roaming. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00763, 2024. 2

    arXiv 2024

  4. [3]

    Implicit-arap: Efficient handle-guided deformation of high-resolution meshes and neural fields via local patch meshing

    Daniele Baieri, Filippo Maggioli, Zorah L ¨ahner, Simone Melzi, and Emanuele Rodol `a. Implicit-arap: Efficient handle-guided deformation of high-resolution meshes and neural fields via local patch meshing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12895, 2024. 3

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [4]

    Mip-nerf 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural radiance fields

    Jonathan T Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P Srinivasan, and Peter Hedman. Mip-nerf 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural radiance fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5470–5479, 2022. 5

    2022

  6. [5]

    Thin-plate spline mod- elling of elastic deformations in fingerprints

    Asker M Bazen and Sabih H Gerez. Thin-plate spline mod- elling of elastic deformations in fingerprints. In Proceedings of 3rd IEEE Benelux Signal Processing Symposium. Citeseer,

    work page

  7. [6]

    In- structpix2pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions

    Tim Brooks, Aleksander Holynski, and Alexei A Efros. In- structpix2pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18392–18402, 2023. 3

    2023

  8. [7]

    Dynasurfgs: Dynamic surface reconstruction with planar- based gaussian splatting

    Weiwei Cai, Weicai Ye, Peng Ye, Tong He, and Tao Chen. Dynasurfgs: Dynamic surface reconstruction with planar- based gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.13972,

    arXiv

Show all 72 references
  1. [8]

    Interactive skeleton-driven dynamic defor- mations

    Steve Capell, Seth Green, Brian Curless, Tom Duchamp, and Zoran Popovi´c. Interactive skeleton-driven dynamic defor- mations. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 21(3):586– 593, 2002. 8

    2002

  2. [9]

    A simple geometric model for elastic deforma- tions

    Isaac Chao, Ulrich Pinkall, Patrick Sanan, and Peter Schr¨oder. A simple geometric model for elastic deforma- tions. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) , 29(4):1–6,

  3. [10]

    Mvdrag3d: Drag-based creative 3d editing via multi-view generation-reconstruction priors

    Honghua Chen, Yushi Lan, Yongwei Chen, Yifan Zhou, and Xingang Pan. Mvdrag3d: Drag-based creative 3d editing via multi-view generation-reconstruction priors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.16272, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Rigidity controllable as-rigid-as-possible shape deformation

    Shu-Yu Chen, Lin Gao, Yu-Kun Lai, and Shihong Xia. Rigidity controllable as-rigid-as-possible shape deformation. Graphical Models, 91:13–21, 2017. 2, 3

    2017

  5. [12]

    Gaussianeditor: Swift and control- lable 3d editing with gaussian splatting

    Yiwen Chen, Zilong Chen, Chi Zhang, Feng Wang, Xi- aofeng Yang, Yikai Wang, Zhongang Cai, Lei Yang, Huaping Liu, and Guosheng Lin. Gaussianeditor: Swift and control- lable 3d editing with gaussian splatting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Patt...

    2024

  6. [13]

    Latentpaint: Image inpainting in latent space with diffusion models

    Ciprian Corneanu, Raghudeep Gadde, and Aleix M Mar- tinez. Latentpaint: Image inpainting in latent space with diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Win- ter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , pages 4334–4343, 2024. 3

    2024

  7. [14]

    Stabledrag: Stable dragging for point-based image editing

    Yutao Cui, Xiaotong Zhao, Guozhen Zhang, Shengming Cao, Kai Ma, and Limin Wang. Stabledrag: Stable dragging for point-based image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04437, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Generative adversarial nets

    Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2014. 2, 3

    2014

  9. [16]

    Instruct-nerf2nerf: Edit- ing 3d scenes with instructions

    Ayaan Haque, Matthew Tancik, Alexei A Efros, Aleksander Holynski, and Angjoo Kanazawa. Instruct-nerf2nerf: Edit- ing 3d scenes with instructions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 19740–19750, 2023. 2, 5, 7, 8

    2023

  10. [17]

    Prompt-to-prompt im- age editing with cross attention control

    Amir Hertz, Ron Mokady, Jay Tenenbaum, Kfir Aberman, Yael Pritch, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Prompt-to-prompt im- age editing with cross attention control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01626, 2022. 3

    2022 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Cascaded diffu- sion models for high fidelity image generation

    Jonathan Ho, Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, David J Fleet, Mohammad Norouzi, and Tim Salimans. Cascaded diffu- sion models for high fidelity image generation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23(47):1–33, 2022. 3

    2022

  12. [19]

    Gsdeformer: Direct cage- based deformation for 3d gaussian splatting

    Jiajun Huang and Hongchuan Yu. Gsdeformer: Direct cage- based deformation for 3d gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15491, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Arapreg: An as-rigid-as possible regularization loss for learning deformable shape generators

    Qixing Huang, Xiangru Huang, Bo Sun, Zaiwei Zhang, Jun- feng Jiang, and Chandrajit Bajaj. Arapreg: An as-rigid-as possible regularization loss for learning deformable shape generators. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 5815–5825, 2021. 3

    2021

  14. [21]

    Sc-gs: Sparse-controlled gaussian splatting for editable dynamic scenes

    Yi-Hua Huang, Yang-Tian Sun, Ziyi Yang, Xiaoyang Lyu, Yan-Pei Cao, and Xiaojuan Qi. Sc-gs: Sparse-controlled gaussian splatting for editable dynamic scenes. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4220–4230, 2024. 2

    2024

  15. [22]

    Harmonic coordinates for character articu- lation

    Pushkar Joshi, Mark Meyer, Tony DeRose, Brian Green, and Tom Sanocki. Harmonic coordinates for character articu- lation. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) , 26(3):71–es,

  16. [23]

    Mean value coor- dinates for closed triangular meshes

    Tao Ju, Scott Schaefer, and Joe Warren. Mean value coor- dinates for closed triangular meshes. In Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2, pages 223–228

  17. [24]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 42 (4):1–14, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  18. [25]

    Multiresolution shape deformations for meshes with dy- namic vertex connectivity

    Leif P Kobbelt, Thilo Bareuther, and Hans-Peter Seidel. Multiresolution shape deformations for meshes with dy- namic vertex connectivity. In Computer Graphics Forum , pages 249–260. Wiley Online Library, 2000. 3

    2000

  19. [26]

    As-stiff-as- needed surface deformationcombining arap energy with an anisotropic material

    Youna Le Vaou, Jean-Claude L ´eon, Stefanie Hahmann, St´ephane Masfrand, and Matthieu Mika. As-stiff-as- needed surface deformationcombining arap energy with an anisotropic material. Computer-Aided Design, 121:102803,

  20. [27]

    Fully explicit dynamic gaussian splat- ting

    Junoh Lee, Chang-Yeon Won, Hyunjun Jung, Inhwan Bae, and Hae-Gon Jeon. Fully explicit dynamic gaussian splat- ting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15629, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Smooth rotation enhanced as-rigid-as-possible mesh animation

    Zohar Levi and Craig Gotsman. Smooth rotation enhanced as-rigid-as-possible mesh animation. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics , 21(2):264–277, 2014. 2, 3

    2014

  22. [29]

    Blip-diffusion: Pre- trained subject representation for controllable text-to-image generation and editing

    Dongxu Li, Junnan Li, and Steven Hoi. Blip-diffusion: Pre- trained subject representation for controllable text-to-image generation and editing. Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 36, 2024. 3

    2024

  23. [30]

    Mat: Mask-aware transformer for large hole im- age inpainting

    Wenbo Li, Zhe Lin, Kun Zhou, Lu Qi, Yi Wang, and Ji- aya Jia. Mat: Mask-aware transformer for large hole im- age inpainting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 10758– 10768, 2022. 3

    2022

  24. [31]

    Diff- bir: Towards blind image restoration with generative diffu- sion prior

    Xinqi Lin, Jingwen He, Ziyan Chen, Zhaoyang Lyu, Bo Dai, Fanghua Yu, Wanli Ouyang, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Diff- bir: Towards blind image restoration with generative diffu- sion prior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15070, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Green coordinates

    Yaron Lipman, David Levin, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Green coordinates. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) , 27(3): 1–10, 2008. 3

    2008

  26. [33]

    Drag your noise: Interactive point-based edit- ing via diffusion semantic propagation

    Haofeng Liu, Chenshu Xu, Yifei Yang, Lihua Zeng, and Shengfeng He. Drag your noise: Interactive point-based edit- ing via diffusion semantic propagation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 6743–6752, 2024. 3

    2024

  27. [34]

    Deepmetahandles: Learning deformation meta-handles of 3d meshes with biharmonic coordinates

    Minghua Liu, Minhyuk Sung, Radomir Mech, and Hao Su. Deepmetahandles: Learning deformation meta-handles of 3d meshes with biharmonic coordinates. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12–21, 2021. 8

    2021

  28. [35]

    Editing condi- tional radiance fields

    Steven Liu, Xiuming Zhang, Zhoutong Zhang, Richard Zhang, Jun-Yan Zhu, and Bryan Russell. Editing condi- tional radiance fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF inter- national conference on computer vision , pages 5773–5783,

  29. [36]

    3d geometry-aware deformable gaussian splatting for dynamic view synthesis

    Zhicheng Lu, Xiang Guo, Le Hui, Tianrui Chen, Min Yang, Xiao Tang, Feng Zhu, and Yuchao Dai. 3d geometry-aware deformable gaussian splatting for dynamic view synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8900–8910, 2024. 2

    2024

  30. [37]

    Reconstructing and simulating dynamic 3d objects with mesh-adsorbed gaussian splatting

    Shaojie Ma, Yawei Luo, and Yi Yang. Reconstructing and simulating dynamic 3d objects with mesh-adsorbed gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.01593, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equa- tions

    Chenlin Meng, Yutong He, Yang Song, Jiaming Song, Jia- jun Wu, Jun-Yan Zhu, and Stefano Ermon. Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equa- tions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01073, 2021. 3

    2021 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis. Communications of the ACM, 65(1):99–106, 2021. 2, 5

    2021

  33. [40]

    Dragondiffusion: Enabling drag-style manipula- tion on diffusion models

    Chong Mou, Xintao Wang, Jiechong Song, Ying Shan, and Jian Zhang. Dragondiffusion: Enabling drag-style manipula- tion on diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02421,

    arXiv

  34. [41]

    Instant neural graphics primitives with a mul- tiresolution hash encoding

    Thomas M ¨uller, Alex Evans, Christoph Schied, and Alexan- der Keller. Instant neural graphics primitives with a mul- tiresolution hash encoding. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 41(4):1–15, 2022. 5

    2022

  35. [42]

    Creation of dihedral escher-like tilings based on as-rigid-as-possible deformation

    Yuichi Nagata and Shinji Imahori. Creation of dihedral escher-like tilings based on as-rigid-as-possible deformation. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 43(2):1–18, 2024. 3

    2024

  36. [43]

    Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models

    Alexander Quinn Nichol and Prafulla Dhariwal. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8162–8171. PMLR,

  37. [44]

    The blessing of random- ness: Sde beats ode in general diffusion-based image editing

    Shen Nie, Hanzhong Allan Guo, Cheng Lu, Yuhao Zhou, Chenyu Zheng, and Chongxuan Li. The blessing of random- ness: Sde beats ode in general diffusion-based image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01410, 2023. 3, 5, 7, 8

    2023 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Gsedit: Efficient text-guided edit- ing of 3d objects via gaussian splatting

    Francesco Palandra, Andrea Sanchietti, Daniele Baieri, and Emanuele Rodol `a. Gsedit: Efficient text-guided edit- ing of 3d objects via gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05154, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Drag your gan: Interactive point-based manipulation on the generative image manifold

    Xingang Pan, Ayush Tewari, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, Lingjie Liu, Abhimitra Meka, and Christian Theobalt. Drag your gan: Interactive point-based manipulation on the generative image manifold. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Conference Pro- ceedings, pages 1–11, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  40. [47]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 2, 3

    2022

  41. [48]

    Nested cages

    Leonardo Sacht, Etienne V ouga, and Alec Jacobson. Nested cages. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 34(6):1–14,

  42. [49]

    Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding

    Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Jay Whang, Emily L Denton, Kamyar Ghasemipour, Raphael Gontijo Lopes, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Tim Salimans, et al. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. Advances in neural information...

    2022

  43. [50]

    Free-form defor- mation of solid geometric models

    Thomas W Sederberg and Scott R Parry. Free-form defor- mation of solid geometric models. In Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Computer graphics and interac- tive techniques, pages 151–160, 1986. 3

    1986

  44. [51]

    Draggaussian: Enabling drag- style manipulation on 3d gaussian representation

    Sitian Shen, Jing Xu, Yuheng Yuan, Xingyi Yang, Qiuhong Shen, and Xinchao Wang. Draggaussian: Enabling drag- style manipulation on 3d gaussian representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05800, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Gir: 3d gaussian inverse ren- dering for relightable scene factorization

    Yahao Shi, Yanmin Wu, Chenming Wu, Xing Liu, Chen Zhao, Haocheng Feng, Jingtuo Liu, Liangjun Zhang, Jian Zhang, Bin Zhou, et al. Gir: 3d gaussian inverse ren- dering for relightable scene factorization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.05133, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Dragdiffusion: Harnessing diffusion models for interactive point-based image editing

    Yujun Shi, Chuhui Xue, Jun Hao Liew, Jiachun Pan, Han- shu Yan, Wenqing Zhang, Vincent YF Tan, and Song Bai. Dragdiffusion: Harnessing diffusion models for interactive point-based image editing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogniti...

    2024

  47. [54]

    Con- strained space deformation for design optimization

    Daniel Sieger, Stefan Menzel, and Mario Botsch. Con- strained space deformation for design optimization. Proce- dia Engineering, 82:114–126, 2014. 3

    2014

  48. [56]

    Gseditpro: 3d gaussian splatting editing with attention-based progressive localization

    Yanhao Sun, Runze Tian, Xiao Han, Xinyao Liu, Yan Zhang, and Kai Xu. Gseditpro: 3d gaussian splatting editing with attention-based progressive localization. In Computer Graphics Forum, page e15215. Wiley Online Library, 2024. 2

    2024

  49. [57]

    Recon- struction of deforming geometry from time-varying point clouds

    Michael Wand, Philipp Jenke, Qixing Huang, Martin Bokeloh, Leonidas Guibas, and Andreas Schilling. Recon- struction of deforming geometry from time-varying point clouds. In Symposium on Geometry processing , pages 49– 58, 2007. 3

    2007

  50. [58]

    Clip-nerf: Text-and-image driven manip- ulation of neural radiance fields

    Can Wang, Menglei Chai, Mingming He, Dongdong Chen, and Jing Liao. Clip-nerf: Text-and-image driven manip- ulation of neural radiance fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3835–3844, 2022. 2

    2022

  51. [59]

    Gaussianeditor: Editing 3d gaussians delicately with text instructions

    Junjie Wang, Jiemin Fang, Xiaopeng Zhang, Lingxi Xie, and Qi Tian. Gaussianeditor: Editing 3d gaussians delicately with text instructions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 20902–20911, 2024. 2

    2024

  52. [60]

    Chan, and Chen Change Loy

    Jianyi Wang, Zongsheng Yue, Shangchen Zhou, Kelvin C.K. Chan, and Chen Change Loy. Exploiting diffusion prior for real-world image super-resolution. 2024. 3, 5

    2024

  53. [61]

    Imagen editor and editbench: Advancing and evaluating text-guided im- age inpainting

    Su Wang, Chitwan Saharia, Ceslee Montgomery, Jordi Pont- Tuset, Shai Noy, Stefano Pellegrini, Yasumasa Onoe, Sarah Laszlo, David J Fleet, Radu Soricut, et al. Imagen editor and editbench: Advancing and evaluating text-guided im- age inpainting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF c...

    2023

  54. [62]

    View-consistent 3d editing with gaus- sian splatting

    Yuxuan Wang, Xuanyu Yi, Zike Wu, Na Zhao, Long Chen, and Hanwang Zhang. View-consistent 3d editing with gaus- sian splatting. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 404–420. Springer, 2025. 2

    2025

  55. [63]

    Gaussctrl: multi-view consistent text-driven 3d gaussian splatting edit- ing

    Jing Wu, Jia-Wang Bian, Xinghui Li, Guangrun Wang, Ian Reid, Philip Torr, and Victor Adrian Prisacariu. Gaussctrl: multi-view consistent text-driven 3d gaussian splatting edit- ing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08733, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Gpt-4v (ision) is a human-aligned evaluator for text-to-3d genera- tion

    Tong Wu, Guandao Yang, Zhibing Li, Kai Zhang, Ziwei Liu, Leonidas Guibas, Dahua Lin, and Gordon Wetzstein. Gpt-4v (ision) is a human-aligned evaluator for text-to-3d genera- tion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 22...

  57. [65]

    Gradient domain editing of deform- ing mesh sequences.ACM Transactions On Graphics (TOG), 26(3):84–es, 2007

    Weiwei Xu, Kun Zhou, Yizhou Yu, Qifeng Tan, Qunsheng Peng, and Baining Guo. Gradient domain editing of deform- ing mesh sequences.ACM Transactions On Graphics (TOG), 26(3):84–es, 2007. 3

    2007

  58. [66]

    Gaussian grouping: Segment and edit anything in 3d scenes

    Mingqiao Ye, Martin Danelljan, Fisher Yu, and Lei Ke. Gaussian grouping: Segment and edit anything in 3d scenes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00732, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Scaling up to excellence: Practicing model scaling for photo- realistic image restoration in the wild

    Fanghua Yu, Jinjin Gu, Zheyuan Li, Jinfan Hu, Xiangtao Kong, Xintao Wang, Jingwen He, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Scaling up to excellence: Practicing model scaling for photo- realistic image restoration in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and...

    2024

  60. [68]

    Inpaint anything: Segment anything meets image inpainting

    Tao Yu, Runseng Feng, Ruoyu Feng, Jinming Liu, Xin Jin, Wenjun Zeng, and Zhibo Chen. Inpaint anything: Segment anything meets image inpainting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06790, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3836–3847, 2023. 8

    2023

  62. [70]

    Good- drag: Towards good practices for drag editing with diffusion models

    Zewei Zhang, Huan Liu, Jun Chen, and Xiangyu Xu. Good- drag: Towards good practices for drag editing with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07206, 2024. 5

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Dreameditor: Text-driven 3d scene editing with neural fields

    Jingyu Zhuang, Chen Wang, Liang Lin, Lingjie Liu, and Guanbin Li. Dreameditor: Text-driven 3d scene editing with neural fields. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers, pages 1–10, 2023. 2

    2023

  64. [72]

    Tip-editor: An accurate 3d editor fol- lowing both text-prompts and image-prompts

    Jingyu Zhuang, Di Kang, Yan-Pei Cao, Guanbin Li, Liang Lin, and Ying Shan. Tip-editor: An accurate 3d editor fol- lowing both text-prompts and image-prompts. ACM Trans- actions on Graphics (TOG), 43(4):1–12, 2024. 2

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.