REVIEW 2 cited by
The Phantom Menace: Unmasking Privacy Leakages in Vision-Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) combine visual and textual understanding, rendering them well-suited for diverse tasks like generating image captions and answering visual questions across various domains. However, these capabilities are built upon training on large amount of uncurated data crawled from the web. The latter may include sensitive information that VLMs could memorize and leak, raising significant privacy concerns. In this paper, we assess whether these vulnerabilities exist, focusing on identity leakage. Our study leads to three key findings: (i) VLMs leak identity information, even when the vision-language alignment and the fine-tuning use anonymized data; (ii) context has little influence on identity leakage; (iii) simple, widely used anonymization techniques, like blurring, are not sufficient to address the problem. These findings underscore the urgent need for robust privacy protection strategies when deploying VLMs. Ethical awareness and responsible development practices are essential to mitigate these risks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
PPE-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating MLLM Unlearning under Private-Public Entanglement
Existing MLLM unlearning methods reduce private-attribute leakage on entangled images but substantially harm co-occurring public figures and landmarks, with private knowledge often re-emerging after public finetuning.
-
MobileA3gent: Training Mobile GUI Agents Using Decentralized Self-Sourced Data from Diverse Users
A hierarchical auto-annotation pipeline plus episode-aware federated aggregation lets mobile GUI agents be trained on automatically labeled user trajectories at about 1% of human annotation cost.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.