REVIEW 2 cited by
PrExMe! Large Scale Prompt Exploration of Open Source LLMs for Machine Translation and Summarization Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized NLP research. Notably, in-context learning enables their use as evaluation metrics for natural language generation, making them particularly advantageous in low-resource scenarios and time-restricted applications. In this work, we introduce PrExMe, a large-scale Prompt Exploration for Metrics, where we evaluate more than 720 prompt templates for open-source LLM-based metrics on machine translation (MT) and summarization datasets, totalling over 6.6M evaluations. This extensive comparison (1) benchmarks recent open-source LLMs as metrics and (2) explores the stability and variability of different prompting strategies. We discover that, on the one hand, there are scenarios for which prompts are stable. For instance, some LLMs show idiosyncratic preferences and favor to grade generated texts with textual labels while others prefer to return numeric scores. On the other hand, the stability of prompts and model rankings can be susceptible to seemingly innocuous changes. For example, changing the requested output format from "0 to 100" to "-1 to +1" can strongly affect the rankings in our evaluation. Our study contributes to understanding the impact of different prompting approaches on LLM-based metrics for MT and summarization evaluation, highlighting the most stable prompting patterns and potential limitations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
PromptOptMe: Error-Aware Prompt Compression for LLM-based MT Evaluation Metrics
PromptOptMe compresses the inputs of the GEMBA-MQM MT evaluation prompt with a two-stage fine-tuned LLaMA 3.2 model, achieving a 2.37x token reduction without quality loss in the headline GPT-4o configuration.
-
ScImage: How Good Are Multimodal Large Language Models at Scientific Text-to-Image Generation?
A human-scored benchmark shows that even GPT-4o averages below 4/5 correctness and all tested models struggle with scientific diagram prompts that combine spatial, numeric, and attribute requirements.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.