REVIEW 1 cited by
SA-DS: A Dataset for Large Language Model-Driven AI Accelerator Design Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In the ever-evolving landscape of Deep Neural Networks (DNN) hardware acceleration, unlocking the true potential of systolic array accelerators has long been hindered by the daunting challenges of expertise and time investment. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising solution for automating code generation which is key to unlocking unprecedented efficiency and performance in various domains, including hardware descriptive code. The generative power of LLMs can enable the effective utilization of preexisting designs and dedicated hardware generators. However, the successful application of LLMs to hardware accelerator design is contingent upon the availability of specialized datasets tailored for this purpose. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Systolic Array-based Accelerator Data Set (SA-DS). SA-DS comprises a diverse collection of spatial array designs following the standardized Berkeley's Gemmini accelerator generator template, enabling design reuse, adaptation, and customization. SA-DS is intended to spark LLM-centered research on DNN hardware accelerator architecture. We envision that SA-DS provides a framework that will shape the course of DNN hardware acceleration research for generations to come. SA-DS is open-sourced under the permissive MIT license at https://github.com/ACADLab/SA-DS.git}{https://github.com/ACADLab/SA-DS.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
SLDB: An End-To-End Heterogeneous System-on-Chip Benchmark Suite for LLM-Aided Design
SLDB provides a benchmark for evaluating LLMs on full SoC integration, showing that current LLMs pass syntax checks but fail most functional integration tasks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.