Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 71 references

Gauge origami on broken lines

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that the K-theoretic partition function of its gauge origami moduli space on broken lines is a single plethystic exponential for all ranks, with a factorization into rank-one factors and a direct comparison to the…

desk verdict The new Quot-scheme moduli space and closed-form partition function are worth taking seriously, but the zero-locus theorem that carries the virtual class contradicts the paper's own Example 2.2 and must be fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07149 v1 pith:Y6PTCK5T submitted 2025-02-11 math.AG hep-th

Sergej Monavari This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGhep-th MSC 14C0514N3514D21
keywords gaugeorigamibrokenlinesQuotschemeK-theoreticinvariantsplethysticexponentialvirtualfundamentalclassinstantonpartitionfunctionquiverrepresentations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces a moduli space of zero-dimensional quotient sheaves on the union of two affine lines, the 'broken lines' of the title, as a mathematical model for gauge origami on intersecting branes. Because the space is generally singular and has several irreducible components, the paper builds a virtual fundamental class and virtual structure sheaf through a quiver description, and defines K-theoretic invariants by equivariant localization. The main result is the closed formula $$Z_r(q)=\operatorname{Exp}\left(\frac{q(1-t_1t_2)(1-$t_1^{{r_1}}$$t_2^{{r_2}}$)}{(1-t_1)(1-t_2)}\right)$$ for all ranks, together with a factorization into rank-one factors. A sympathetic reader would care because the formula reduces an infinite sequence of virtual intersection numbers to one generating function, and links the new singular moduli space to the classical instanton partition function and to Quot schemes of the affine plane.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the zero-locus description of $M_{r,n}$ inside the smooth non-commutative Quot scheme: a framed quiver with one vertex, two loops, and two framing vertices produces a representation space whose quotient by $\mathrm{GL}(V)$ carries a vector bundle whose section has zero locus exactly $\mathrm{Quot}_C(\mathcal{E}_r,n)$, giving the virtual class by the standard zero-locus obstruction theory. The computation is carried by the vertex term $T^{\mathrm{vir}}_{\mathbf n}$—the virtual $T$-representation at a torus-fixed point—whose decomposition into off-diagonal pieces makes the limiting factorization visible. The plethystic exponential is the packaging device that turns the infinite sum over fixed points into the closed rational-function formula.

What would settle it

For $r_1=r_2=1$ and $n=1$, write out the section $s(B_1,B_2,I_1,I_2)=(e_1\wedge e_2)\otimes[B_1,B_2]+\sum_i B_iI_i$ and solve $s=0$. If the printed relation $B_iI_i=0$ for $i=1,2$ is used, the component parameterising a length-one quotient on the first axis with support away from the origin disappears, contradicting the three-component description $Y_1\cup Y_2\cup Y_0$ of Example 2.2; replacing the relation by $B_{\hat i}I_i=0$ restores the missing component. A direct Gr\"obner basis computation of the zero locus settles which relations are correct.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the K-theoretic partition function of $M_{r,n}$ is given by the plethystic exponential above (Corollary 3.12), for every $r=(r_1,r_2)$, and that this is not an accident of low rank: the proof is a global computation valid for all $n$. The moduli space $M_{r,n}=\mathrm{Quot}_C(\mathcal{E}_r,n)$, with $C=Z(x_1x_2)\subset\mathbb{A}^2$, is cut out inside a smooth non-commutative Quot scheme as the zero locus of a section, which yields a perfect obstruction theory and virtual cycles. The torus-fixed locus is reduced and zero-dimensional, indexed by tuples of nonnegative integers; after proving framing-weight independence, the paper scales the framing parameters to infinity and obtains the factorization $$Z_r(q)=\prod_{\$\alpha$=1}^{r_1}$Z^{{(1)}}$(q $t_1^{{r_1-\alpha}}$$t_2^{{r_2}}$)\prod_{\$\alpha$=1}^{r_2}$Z^{{(2)}}$(q $t_2^{{r_2-\alpha}}$),$$ with each rank-one factor computed directly. It also shows that in the smooth case $r=(0,r)$ the virtual structure sheaf is $\Lambda_{-t_2}T^*M_{r,n}$, recovering the equivariant $\chi_y$-genus series, and that in general the invariants equal tautological integrals on the framed quiver moduli space of the projective plane, i.e. a classical instanton partition function with matter.

Load-bearing premise

The construction depends on the zero-locus equations (2.3) cutting out exactly the intended moduli space, but as printed those equations contradict Example 2.2 by forcing $B_iI_i=0$ on each axis and deleting the off-origin components; the intended relation is likely $B_{\hat i}I_i=0$, and until that is corrected the virtual class is not sound.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any rank pair $(r_1,r_2)$, the full series $Z_r(q)$ is known in closed form, so each coefficient can be read off by expanding the plethystic exponential without running the localization sum.
  • In the smooth specialization $r=(0,r)$, the virtual structure sheaf is $\Lambda_{-t_2}T^*M_{r,n}$, so the new partition function reproduces the generating series of equivariant $\chi_y$-genera of the Quot scheme of the affine line, providing a direct check of the virtual construction.
  • The broken-line invariants are equal to specific tautological integrals on the Quot scheme of $\mathbb{A}^2$ and on the framed moduli space of the projective plane, so the result computes a classical instanton partition function with fundamental and anti-fundamental matter.
  • Corollaries 3.13, 3.15, and 3.16 give concrete specializations: vanishing in the Calabi-Yau limit, a square-root-twisted variant with the $[t_1t_2][t_1^{r_1}t_2^{r_2}]/[t_1][t_2]$ form, and a cohomological limit of $\bigl((1-q)^{-1}\bigr)^{(s_1+s_2)(r_1s_1+r_2s_2)/(s_1s_2)}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: the proof structure—fixed-locus classification, framing independence, scaling to infinity—is a generally applicable recipe: any Quot-type moduli space with a proper Quot-to-Chow map and a zero-dimensional reduced fixed locus should admit an analogous factorization, although the paper states it only for broken lines.
  • Extension: the bubbling component $\mathbb{P}^{r_1+r_2-1}$ in Example 2.2 suggests a moduli of expanded degenerations interpretation; establishing one would explain the three-component picture globally and might give a proper compactification of $M_{r,n}$.
  • Extension: testing the same machinery on a chain of $k$ affine lines would be a direct generalization; the natural conjecture, not made in the paper, is an analogous plethystic exponential with one factor per component and pairwise interaction terms.
  • Extension: the equality with the matter partition function of framed gauge theory gives a dictionary between the equivariant parameters $t_1,t_2$ and matter masses; a refined elliptic version would be more delicate because framing independence typically fails for higher-rank elliptic genera, as the paper notes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a moduli space of zero-dimensional quotients of a torsion sheaf on the union of two affine lines (the 'broken lines'), calls it the gauge origami moduli space M_{r,n}, and realizes it as a Quot scheme. The authors provide a quiver model and claim a global zero-locus description inside a non-commutative Quot scheme, from which they construct a virtual fundamental class and a virtual structure sheaf. They then define a K-theoretic partition function Z_r(q), compute it in closed form for all ranks via localization and a vertex formalism, and derive corollaries including a factorisation into rank-1 contributions, a Nekrasov-Okounkov twist, a cohomological limit, and relations to the Quot scheme of A^2 and to framed ADHM moduli spaces.

Significance. If the main theorem (Corollary 3.12) is correct, the paper provides a notable new example of a closed-form K-theoretic partition function for a singular, non-equidimensional Quot-type moduli space, with a clean factorization into rank-1 pieces and nontrivial links to Nekrasov's gauge origami and to tautological integrals on Quot schemes. The localization and vertex methods are standard, and the paper advertises parameter-free derivations and explicit formulas, which are valuable. However, the significance is conditional on the validity of the zero-locus construction, which is the foundation for the virtual class and hence for all subsequent computations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.3, Eq. (2.3)] Theorem 2.3 states that points of M_{r,n} satisfy the relations [B1,B2]=0 and B_i I_i=0 for i=1,2. This is internally inconsistent with Example 2.2. A point on the component Y_1 with support (a,0), a≠0, is represented by (B1,B2,I1,I2)=(a,0,1,0) up to GL(V); it satisfies B_2 I_1=0 but B_1 I_1=a≠0, and by Example 2.2 it lies in M_{r,1}. The same argument applies to Y_2. The correct O_C-module condition is B_{\hat i} I_i=0, where {i,\hat i}={1,2}. As written, the zero locus Z(s) excludes the smooth components Y_1,Y_2, so Corollary 2.4 does not define the virtual class of M_{r,n}. This is a load-bearing error: Proposition 3.4, the vertex terms in Section 3.4.1, and the localization proof of Theorem 3.11 all use the obstruction bundle associated with the section B_i I_i, not with the corrected condition.
  2. [Proposition 3.5] The identity v^{(ii,\alpha\alpha)}_n = (1 - t_i^{-1}) \sum_{a=1}^{n_{i\alpha}} t_{\hat i}^{-a} is algebraically false for n_{i\alpha} \ge 2. Using the definition v^{(ii,\alpha\alpha)}_n = (1 - t_i^{-1}) Z_{n_{i\alpha}} - (1 - t_1^{-1})(1 - t_2^{-1}) Z_{n_{i\alpha}}^2 and Z_{n_{i\alpha}} = \sum_{a=0}^{n_{i\alpha}-1} t_{\hat i}^{-a}, a direct calculation gives (1 - t_i^{-1}) Z_{n_{i\alpha}} t_{\hat i}^{-n_{i\alpha}}, not the stated sum. For example, when i=1 and n=2, the left-hand side equals (1 - t_1^{-1})(t_2^{-2}+t_2^{-3}) whereas the right-hand side is (1 - t_1^{-1})(t_2^{-1}+t_2^{-2}). This invalidates the proof of T-movability as written and casts doubt on the vertex contributions used subsequently.
  3. [Corollary 3.12 and Theorem 3.11] Because of the incorrect zero-locus relations in Theorem 2.3, the vertex term T^{vir}_n in Proposition 3.4 is not the virtual tangent space of M_{r,n}. The localization sum in Theorem 3.11 therefore does not compute the invariants of M_{r,n}. The rank-1 formula in Proposition 3.10 is independently justified via the smooth Quot scheme and is not at issue, and the factorization formula may be recoverable after a correction, but the current proof of Corollary 3.12 does not establish the closed form for the gauge origami partition function. The main claim is unproven as the manuscript stands.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.4, proof of Proposition 3.4] The notation 'Hom(K_i\cdot t_i, Q_n)' is unclear; it should specify whether the twist by t_i is on the domain W_i or on the target Q_n. The subsequent expression 'K_i t_i^{-1} Q_n' suggests a particular convention, but it is not stated consistently.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typos and small errors, e.g., 'thefore' in Section 1.3.1, 'theort' in Section 1.3.2, and 'defined as a a Nakajima' in Section 1.4. These do not affect the mathematics but should be corrected.
  3. [Corollary 3.13] The vanishing is stated for n>0, but the definition of Z_r(q) includes the n=0 term; the statement should specify that the coefficients for n>0 vanish in the Calabi-Yau limit, which is presumably what is meant.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Z_r(q) is derived from localization and vertex factorization, not assumed.

full rationale

The derivation of Corollary 3.12 does not reduce to its own inputs. The moduli space is defined as Quot_C(E_r,n), realized as a zero locus inside the non-commutative Quot scheme, and the partition function is evaluated by T-equivariant virtual localization: Proposition 3.2 classifies the fixed points, Proposition 3.4 computes the vertex term T^vir_n from the quiver tangent space and the bundle V, Proposition 3.5 checks movability, Theorem 3.8 proves framing independence using a published rigidity lemma ([20, Prop. 3.10] and [1, Prop. 3.2]) together with properness of the Quot-to-Chow morphism, and Proposition 3.9 computes the framing limits that yield the factorization into rank-one factors. Each rank-one factor is then computed independently in Proposition 3.10 by localization on Sym^n A^1. The final plethystic exponential in Corollary 3.12 is obtained by algebraically summing the rank-one exponents; no parameter is fitted and the target formula is not used as an input. The self-citations [20,21] supply general localization and rigidity lemmas, not the final formula, and are accompanied by independent arguments in the paper. The apparent index inconsistency between relations (2.3) in Theorem 2.3 and Example 2.2 is a correctness concern about the zero-locus description, not a circularity in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; the equivariant parameters t1, t2, w are inputs from the torus action, not fitted numbers. The derivation relies on standard localization theorems and on prior published results, mostly by the same research school, but not on the target result itself. The apparent index error in the zero-locus relations is a flaw in the statement, not a hidden fitted parameter.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Quot-to-Chow morphism rho: M_{r,n} to Sym^n C is proper (Rydh [65], Fantechi-Ricolfi [19]).
    Used in Theorem 3.8 to conclude that certain fixed loci are proper, which is needed for the framing-independence argument.
  • domain assumption [20, Prop. 3.10] (and [1, Prop. 3.2]) about poles of K-theoretic partition functions and compact weights.
    Invoked in the proof of Theorem 3.8 to show that the partition function has no poles of the form 1 - w^{-1}_{i alpha} w_{j beta} t^nu.
  • standard math Thomason localization and virtual localization in K-theory [18,62,72].
    Basis for expressing invariants as sums over the torus-fixed locus.
  • standard math Behrend-Fantechi construction of virtual cycles for zero loci of sections of vector bundles [6].
    Used to define the virtual fundamental class and virtual structure sheaf on M_{r,n} via the zero-locus description.
  • domain assumption Identification of the non-commutative Quot scheme and its tangent space (Beentjes-Ricolfi [5], Ricolfi [64]).
    Used in Theorem 2.3 and Proposition 3.4 to compute the virtual tangent space at fixed points.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gauge origami on broken lines." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y6PTCK5T

@misc{pith2026250207149,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gauge origami on broken lines},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y6PTCK5T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07149}
}
abstract

In analogy to Nekrasov's theory of gauge origami on intersecting branes, we introduce the gauge origami moduli space on broken lines. We realize this moduli space as a Quot scheme parametrising zero-dimensional quotients of a torsion sheaf on two intersecting affine lines, and describe it as a moduli space of quiver representations. We construct a virtual fundamental class and virtual structure sheaf, by which we define $K$-theoretic invariants. We compute its associated partition function for all ranks, and show that it reproduces the generating series of equivariant $\chi_{y}$-genus when the moduli space is smooth. Finally, we relate our partition function with the virtual invariants of the Quot schemes of the affine plane and Nekrasov's partition function.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07149 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Framed quiver L. Let r = (r1, r2) and n ≥ 0. A L-representations with dimension vector (r, n) is the data of: • a tuple of vector spaces (W1, W2, V ) (one to each node of L) such that dim V = n and dim Wi = ri for i = 1, 2, • homomorphisms Ba ∈ End(V ) and Ii ∈ Hom(Wi , V ) for a, i = 1, 2. Let (W1, W2, V ) be a tuple of vector spaces with dimension vector (r1, r2, n). The moduli space of L-representations is the af… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Framed quiver L˜. Fix a dimension vector (r, n) and two vector spaces (W, V ) of dimensions dim W = r and dim V = n. Similarly to Section 2.2, we define the space Ur,n = { (B1, B2, I) ∈ Rr,n | ChB1, B2iI(W) ∼= V } ⊂ End(V ) ⊕2 ⊕ Hom(W, V ), which admits a free GL(V )-action, so that the quotient Mnc r,n . .= Ur,n/ GL(V ) exists3 as a smooth (n 2 + nr)-dimensional quasiprojective variety, cf. [64, Lemma 2.1]. Define … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. ADHM quiver. Set U fr r,n = ( (B1, B2, I, J) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Arbesfeld, K-theoretic Donaldson-Thomas theory and the Hilbert schem e of points on a surface , Algebr

    N. Arbesfeld, K-theoretic Donaldson-Thomas theory and the Hilbert schem e of points on a surface , Algebr. Geom. 8 (2021), no. 5, 587–625

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Arbesfeld, D

    N. Arbesfeld, D. Johnson, W. Lim, D. Oprea, and R. Pandhari pande, The virtual K-theory of Quot schemes of surfaces, J. Geom. Phys. 164 (2021), Paper No. 104154, 36

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Arbesfeld, M

    N. Arbesfeld, M. Kool, and W. Lim, Nekrasov’s gauge origami, Oh-Thomas’s virtual cycle, and f ramed sheaves, in preparation

    work page

  4. [4]

    Awata and H

    H. Awata and H. Kanno, Quiver matrix model and topological partition function in s ix dimensions , J. High Energy Phys. (2009), no. 7, 076, 23

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    S. V. Beentjes and A. T. Ricolfi, Virtual counts on Quot schemes and the higher rank local DT/P T correspon- dence, Math. Res. Lett. 28 (2021), no. 4, 967–1032

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Behrend and B

    K. Behrend and B. Fantechi, The intrinsic normal cone , Invent. Math. 128 (1997), no. 1, 45–88

    work page 1997

  7. [7]

    Benini, G

    F. Benini, G. Bonelli, M. Poggi, and A. Tanzini, Elliptic non-Abelian Donaldson-Thomas invariants of C3, J. High Energy Phys. (2019), no. 7, 068, 41

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Bifet, Sur les points fixes du sch´ ema QuotOr X /X/k sous l’action du tore Gr m,k, C

    E. Bifet, Sur les points fixes du sch´ ema QuotOr X /X/k sous l’action du tore Gr m,k, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math. 309 (1989), no. 9, 609–612

    work page 1989

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Bojko, Wall-crossing for punctual quot-schemes , ArXiv:2111.11102, 2021

    A. Bojko, Wall-crossing for punctual quot-schemes , ArXiv:2111.11102, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Bojko and J

    A. Bojko and J. Huang, Equivariant Segre and Verlinde invariants for Quot schemes , ArXiv:2303.14266, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Y. Cao, M. Kool, and S. Monavari, K-theoretic DT/PT correspondence for toric Calabi-Yau 4-fo lds, Comm. Math. Phys. 396 (2022), no. 1, 225–264

    2022

  4. [12]

    Y. Cao, M. Kool, and S. Monavari, A Donaldson-Thomas crepant resolution conjecture on Calab i-Yau 4-folds , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 376 (2023), no. 11, 8225–8268

    2023

  5. [13]

    Cazzaniga, D

    A. Cazzaniga, D. Ralaivaosaona, and A. T. Ricolfi, Higher rank motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants of A3 via wall-crossing, and asymptotics , Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 174 (2023), no. 1, 97–122

    2023

  6. [14]

    Cazzaniga and A

    A. Cazzaniga and A. T. Ricolfi, Framed motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants of small crepa nt resolutions , Math. Nachr. 295 (2022), no. 6, 1096–1112

    2022

  7. [15]

    Cazzaniga and A

    A. Cazzaniga and A. T. Ricolfi, Framed sheaves on projective space and Quot schemes , Math. Z. 300 (2022), no. 1, 745–760

    2022

  8. [16]

    Del Zotto, N

    M. Del Zotto, N. Nekrasov, N. Piazzalunga, and M. Zabzine , Playing with the index of M-theory , Comm. Math. Phys. 396 (2022), no. 2, 817–865

    2022

  9. [17]

    Ellingsrud and M

    G. Ellingsrud and M. Lehn, Irreducibility of the punctual quotient scheme of a surface , Ark. Mat. 37 (1999), no. 2, 245–254

    1999

  10. [18]

    Fantechi and L

    B. Fantechi and L. G¨ ottsche, Riemann-Roch theorems and elliptic genus for virtually smo oth schemes , Geom. Topol. 14 (2010), no. 1, 83–115

    2010

  11. [19]

    Fantechi and A

    B. Fantechi and A. T. Ricolfi, On the stack of 0-dimensional coherent sheaves: structural aspects, ArXiv:2403.03878, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Fasola and S

    N. Fasola and S. Monavari, Tetrahedron instantons in Donaldson-Thomas theory , Adv. Math. 462 (2025), 110099

    2025

  13. [21]

    Fasola, S

    N. Fasola, S. Monavari, and A. T. Ricolfi, Higher rank K-theoretic Donaldson-Thomas theory of points , Forum Math. Sigma 9 (2021), 51, e15

    2021

  14. [22]

    Feyzbakhsh and R

    S. Feyzbakhsh and R. P. Thomas, Rank r DT theory from rank 1, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 36 (2023), no. 3, 795–826

    2023

  15. [23]

    Feyzbakhsh and R

    S. Feyzbakhsh and R. P. Thomas, Rank r DT theory from rank 0 , Duke Math. J. 173 (2024), no. 11, 2063–2116

    2024

  16. [24]

    Graber and R

    T. Graber and R. Pandharipande, Localization of virtual classes , Invent. Math. 135 (1999), no. 2, 487–518. GAUGE ORIGAMI ON BROKEN LINES 24

    1999

  17. [25]

    Graffeo, P

    M. Graffeo, P. Lella, S. Monavari, A. T. Ricolfi, and A. Samm artano, The geometry of double nested Hilbert schemes of points on curves , ArXiv:2310.09230, to appear in Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 20 23

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Iqbal, C

    A. Iqbal, C. Koz¸ caz, and C. Vafa, The refined topological vertex , J. High Energy Phys. (2009), no. 10, 069, 58

    2009

  19. [27]

    B. Kim, A. Kresch, and T. Pantev, Functoriality in intersection theory and a conjecture of Co x, Katz, and Lee , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 179 (2003), no. 1-2, 127–136

    2003

  20. [28]

    Kimura, Double quiver gauge theory and BPS/CFT correspondence , SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom

    T. Kimura, Double quiver gauge theory and BPS/CFT correspondence , SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. 19 (2023), Paper No. 039, 32

    2023

  21. [29]

    Kimura and G

    T. Kimura and G. Noshita, Gauge origami and quiver W-algebras , J. High Energy Phys. (2024), no. 5, Paper No. 208, 175

    2024

  22. [30]

    Kimura and G

    T. Kimura and G. Noshita, Gauge origami and quiver W-algebras II: Vertex function and beyond quantum q-Langlands correspondence, ArXiv:2404.17061, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Kimura and G

    T. Kimura and G. Noshita, Gauge origami and quiver W-algebras III: Donaldson–Thomas qq-characters, ArXiv:2411.01987, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    N. Kuhn, H. Liu, and F. Thimm, The 3-fold K-theoretic DT/PT vertex correspondence holds , ArXiv:2311.15697, 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Liu, Invariance of elliptic genus under wall-crossing , Internat

    H. Liu, Invariance of elliptic genus under wall-crossing , Internat. Math. Res. Notices 2025 (2025), no. 3, rnaf003

    2025

  26. [34]

    Manolache, Virtual pull-backs , J

    C. Manolache, Virtual pull-backs , J. Algebr. Geom. 21 (2012), no. 2, 201–245

    2012

  27. [35]

    Marian and A

    A. Marian and A. Negut ¸, The cohomology of the Quot scheme on a smooth curve as a Yangia n representation, ArXiv:2307.13671, 2023

    2023

  28. [37]

    Marian and D

    A. Marian and D. Oprea, Virtual intersections on the Quot scheme and Vafa-Intrilig ator formulas , Duke Math. J. 136 (2007), no. 1, 81–113

    2007

  29. [38]

    Maulik, N

    D. Maulik, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, and R. Pandharipand e, Gromov-Witten theory and Donaldson-Thomas theory. I , Compos. Math. 142 (2006), no. 5, 1263–1285

    2006

  30. [39]

    Monavari, Canonical vertex formalism in DT theory of toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds, J

    S. Monavari, Canonical vertex formalism in DT theory of toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds, J. Geom. Phys. 174 (2022), 104466

    2022

  31. [40]

    Monavari, Equivariant Enumerative Geometry and Donaldson-Thomas Th eory, Ph.D

    S. Monavari, Equivariant Enumerative Geometry and Donaldson-Thomas Th eory, Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit Utrecht, 2022

    2022

  32. [41]

    Monavari, E

    S. Monavari, E. Pavia, and A. T. Ricolfi, Derived hyperquot schemes , ArXiv:2411.08695, 2024

    2024

  33. [42]

    Monavari and A

    S. Monavari and A. T. Ricolfi, On the motive of the nested Quot scheme of points on a curve , J. Algebra 610 (2022), 99–118

    2022

  34. [43]

    Monavari and A

    S. Monavari and A. T. Ricolfi, Sur la lissit´ e du sch´ ema Quot ponctuel embo ˆ ıt´ e, Can. Math. Bull. 66 (2023), no. 1, 178–184

    2023

  35. [44]

    Monavari and A

    S. Monavari and A. T. Ricolfi, Hyperquot schemes on curves: virtual class and motivic inva riants, ArXiv:2404.17942, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Nakajima, Lectures on Hilbert schemes of points on surfaces , University Lecture Series, vol

    H. Nakajima, Lectures on Hilbert schemes of points on surfaces , University Lecture Series, vol. 18, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999

    1999

  37. [46]

    Nekrasov, Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting , Adv

    N. Nekrasov, Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7 (2003), no. 5, 831–864

    2003

  38. [47]

    Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence: non-perturbative Dyson-Schwing er equations and qq-characters , Jour- nal of High Energy Physics 2016 (2016), no

    N. Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence: non-perturbative Dyson-Schwing er equations and qq-characters , Jour- nal of High Energy Physics 2016 (2016), no. 3, 181

    2016

  39. [48]

    Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence II: instantons at crossroads, modu li and compactness theorem , Adv

    N. Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence II: instantons at crossroads, modu li and compactness theorem , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 21 (2017), no. 2, 503–583

    2017

  40. [49]

    Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence III: Gauge origami partition funct ion and qq-characters, Comm

    N. Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence III: Gauge origami partition funct ion and qq-characters, Comm. Math. Phys. 358 (2018), no. 3, 863–894

    2018

  41. [50]

    Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence IV: sigma models and defects in gaug e theory , Lett

    N. Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence IV: sigma models and defects in gaug e theory , Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019), no. 3, 579–622

    2019

  42. [51]

    Nekrasov, Magnificent four , Ann

    N. Nekrasov, Magnificent four , Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e D 7 (2020), no. 4, 505–534

    2020

  43. [52]

    Nekrasov and A

    N. Nekrasov and A. Okounkov, Membranes and sheaves , Algebr. Geom. 3 (2016), no. 3, 320–369

    2016

  44. [53]

    Nekrasov and N

    N. Nekrasov and N. Piazzalunga, Magnificent four with colors , Comm. Math. Phys. 372 (2019), no. 2, 573–597

    2019

  45. [54]

    Nesterov, On quasimap invariants of moduli spaces of Higgs bundles , Moduli 1 (2024), 28, Id/No e6

    D. Nesterov, On quasimap invariants of moduli spaces of Higgs bundles , Moduli 1 (2024), 28, Id/No e6

    2024

  46. [55]

    Oh and R

    J. Oh and R. P. Thomas, Counting sheaves on Calabi-Yau 4-folds, I , Duke Math. J. 172 (2023), no. 7, 1333–1409

    2023

  47. [56]

    Okounkov, Lectures on K-theoretic computations in enumerative geome try, Geometry of moduli spaces and representation theory, IAS/Park City Math

    A. Okounkov, Lectures on K-theoretic computations in enumerative geome try, Geometry of moduli spaces and representation theory, IAS/Park City Math. Ser., vol. 24, A mer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2017, pp. 251–380

    2017

  48. [57]

    Ontani, Virtual invariants of critical loci in GIT quotients of line ar spaces, ArXiv:2311.07400, 2023

    R. Ontani, Virtual invariants of critical loci in GIT quotients of line ar spaces, ArXiv:2311.07400, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Oprea and R

    D. Oprea and R. Pandharipande, Quot schemes of curves and surfaces: virtual classes, integ rals, Euler charac- teristics, Geom. Topol. 25 (2021), no. 7, 3425–3505. GAUGE ORIGAMI ON BROKEN LINES 25

    2021

  50. [59]

    Oprea and S

    D. Oprea and S. Sinha, Euler characteristics of tautological bundles over Quot sc hemes of curves , Adv. Math. 418 (2023), Paper No. 108943, 45

    2023

  51. [60]

    Pomoni, W

    E. Pomoni, W. Yan, and X. Zhang, Tetrahedron instantons, Comm. Math. Phys. 393 (2022), no. 2, 781–838

    2022

  52. [61]

    Pomoni, W

    E. Pomoni, W. Yan, and X. Zhang, Probing M-theory with tetrahedron instantons , J. High Energy Phys. (2023), no. 11, Paper No. 177, 22

    2023

  53. [62]

    Qu, Virtual pullbacks in K-theory, Ann

    F. Qu, Virtual pullbacks in K-theory, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 68 (2018), no. 4, 1609–1641

    2018

  54. [63]

    A. T. Ricolfi, On the motive of the Quot scheme of finite quotients of a locall y free sheaf , J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 144 (2020), 50–68

    2020

  55. [64]

    A. T. Ricolfi, Motivic classes of noncommutative Quot schemes , ArXiv:2303.10617, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  56. [65]

    Rydh, Families of cycles and the Chow scheme , Ph.D

    D. Rydh, Families of cycles and the Chow scheme , Ph.D. thesis, KTH, Stockholm, 2008

    2008

  57. [66]

    Sinha and M

    S. Sinha and M. Zhang, Quantum K-invariants via Quot schemes I , ArXiv:2406.12191, 2024

    2024

  58. [67]

    Sinha and M

    S. Sinha and M. Zhang, Quantum K-invariants via Quot schemes II , ArXiv:2410.23486, 2024

    2024

  59. [68]

    Stark, Cosection localization and the Quot scheme Quotl S(E), Proc

    S. Stark, Cosection localization and the Quot scheme Quotl S(E), Proc. A. 478 (2022), no. 2268, Paper No. 20220419, 16

    2022

  60. [69]

    R. J. Szabo and M. Tirelli, Instanton counting and Donaldson-Thomas theory on toric Ca labi-Yau four-orbifolds, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 27 (2023), no. 6, 1665–1757

    2023

  61. [70]

    R. J. Szabo and M. Tirelli, Tetrahedron instantons on orbifolds , Lett. Math. Phys. 115 (2025), no. 1, 11

    2025

  62. [71]

    R. P. Thomas, A K-theoretic Fulton class , Facets of algebraic geometry. Vol. II, London Math. Soc. Le cture Note Ser., vol. 473, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2022 , pp. 367–379

    2022

  63. [72]

    R. W. Thomason, Une formule de Lefschetz en K-th´ eorie ´ equivariante alg´ ebrique, Duke Math. J. 68 (1992), no. 3, 447–462. Ecole Polytechnique F ´ed´erale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland Email address : sergej.monavari@epfl.ch

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.