Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey of Large Language Models in Finance (FinLLMs)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02315 v1 pith:Y7DIN7FD submitted 2024-02-04 cs.CL q-fin.GN

classification cs.CLq-fin.GN
keywords finllmsfinancialincludinglanguagedatasetsfinancellmsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across a wide variety of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks and have attracted attention from multiple domains, including financial services. Despite the extensive research into general-domain LLMs, and their immense potential in finance, Financial LLM (FinLLM) research remains limited. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of FinLLMs, including their history, techniques, performance, and opportunities and challenges. Firstly, we present a chronological overview of general-domain Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) through to current FinLLMs, including the GPT-series, selected open-source LLMs, and financial LMs. Secondly, we compare five techniques used across financial PLMs and FinLLMs, including training methods, training data, and fine-tuning methods. Thirdly, we summarize the performance evaluations of six benchmark tasks and datasets. In addition, we provide eight advanced financial NLP tasks and datasets for developing more sophisticated FinLLMs. Finally, we discuss the opportunities and the challenges facing FinLLMs, such as hallucination, privacy, and efficiency. To support AI research in finance, we compile a collection of accessible datasets and evaluation benchmarks on GitHub.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 14 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. TriAgent: Divergence-Aware Multi-Agent Committees for Cost-Efficient Financial Sentiment Analysis

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A divergence-routed VADER+FinBERT+LLM committee reaches ~0.87 F1 with a 1.5B critic, matching 7B with far less cost, while same-size persona voting regresses to 0.66.

  2. Assessing the Capabilities and Limitations of FinGPT Model in Financial NLP Applications

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    FinGPT matches GPT-4 on financial sentiment and headline classification, lags on QA and NER, and shows a bullish bias in stock movement prediction.

Pith tools