pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.09139 · v2 · pith:Y7S2UXYWnew · submitted 2026-05-09 · ⚛️ nucl-ex · nucl-th

Nuclear charge radii of aluminium isotopes at the proton drip line

Alex Brinson , Brooke Rickey , Pierre Arthuis , Antoine Belley , Scott Campbell , Xiangcheng Chen , Adam Dockery , Serdar Elhatisari
show 30 more authors
Hannah Erington Nadeesha Gamage Ronald Fernando Garcia Ruiz Matthias Heinz Jason Holt Christian Ireland Chris Izzo Christina Jones Jonas Karthein Kristian K\"onig Dean Lee Yuan-Zhuo Ma Franziska Maier Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner Kei Minamisono Mason Moenter Jose Munoz Wilfried N\"ortersh\"auser Alejandro Ortiz-Cortes Julian Palmes Sophia Papa Fabian Pastrana Cruz Ryan Ringle Henry Sims Chandana Sumithrarachchi Adam Vernon Teng Wang Shane Wilkins Ram Yadav Shuang Zhang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 17:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex nucl-th
keywords nuclear charge radiialuminum isotopesproton drip linelaser spectroscopymirror nucleiproton skinsnuclear size evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Laser spectroscopy reveals a step-like increase in charge radii for aluminum isotopes approaching the proton drip line.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures nuclear charge radii for the neutron-deficient aluminum isotopes from 25Al to the proton-drip-line nucleus 22Al. These data show a step-like increase in radius as the drip line is approached, with 22Al and 23Al having nearly the same size. The results display an almost identical correlation with calculated proton skins when compared to the mirror nuclei, matching the pattern seen in well-bound nuclei. This supplies new information on how nuclear sizes change at the limits of stability and supplies constraints for nuclear theory.

Core claim

Laser spectroscopy measurements along the neutron-deficient aluminium isotopic chain from 25Al to 22Al reveal a step-like increase in charge radius toward the proton drip line, with similar radii for 22Al and 23Al. These results correlate almost identically with the calculated proton skins of their mirror partners and follow the systematic trend observed in well-bound nuclei.

What carries the argument

Laser spectroscopy on short-lived neutron-deficient isotopes to extract their nuclear charge radii.

If this is right

  • Nuclear charge radii exhibit a step-like jump rather than gradual change when approaching the proton drip line.
  • The link between charge radii and proton skins remains consistent from well-bound nuclei to those near the drip line.
  • Theoretical models of nuclear structure must reproduce both the step-like radius change and the mirror symmetry.
  • Charge radii can now be measured for isotopes previously inaccessible due to short lifetimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar step-like radius changes may occur in other proton-rich isotopic chains near their drip lines.
  • These data could help test whether proton-skin formation follows the same pattern across different mass regions.
  • Extending the approach to additional elements at the drip line would check if the observed behavior is general.

Load-bearing premise

The laser spectroscopy data yield charge radii accurate enough to establish the claimed step-like increase and mirror correlation despite short lifetimes and low production rates.

What would settle it

A more precise measurement finding no step-like increase between 23Al and 22Al or no matching correlation with mirror-partner proton skins would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.09139 by Adam Dockery, Adam Vernon, Alejandro Ortiz-Cortes, Alex Brinson, Antoine Belley, Brooke Rickey, Chandana Sumithrarachchi, Chris Izzo, Christian Ireland, Christina Jones, Dean Lee, Fabian Pastrana Cruz, Franziska Maier, Hannah Erington, Henry Sims, Jason Holt, Jonas Karthein, Jose Munoz, Julian Palmes, Kei Minamisono, Kristian K\"onig, Mason Moenter, Matthias Heinz, Nadeesha Gamage, Pierre Arthuis, Ram Yadav, Ronald Fernando Garcia Ruiz, Ryan Ringle, Scott Campbell, Serdar Elhatisari, Shane Wilkins, Shuang Zhang, Sophia Papa, Teng Wang, Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner, Wilfried N\"ortersh\"auser, Xiangcheng Chen, Yuan-Zhuo Ma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A continuous-wave (CW) frequency-doubled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the measured hyperfine spectra for 27,25−22Al on the 3s 23p 2P1/2 → 3s 25s 2S1/2 transition. The extracted centroids were then used to determine the isotope shifts relative to 27Al, as shown in the lower panel. -1000 -500 0 500 1000 Frequency - 27 0 (MHz) 1000 2000 27Al 0 10 25Al 0 5 10 Count rate (ions/s) 24Al 24mAl 1 2 3 23Al 0.0 0.2 22Al -4 0 4 8 IsotopeShift (MHz) 23 25 27 A FIG. 5. Measured hype… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding the evolution of nuclear size away from stability remains a central challenge in nuclear physics. In neutron-deficient systems, charge radii can be highly sensitive to the interplay between strong and electromagnetic interactions, and the effects of weak binding, giving rise to exotic nuclear phenomena. However, experimental data on these systems has been limited by short lifetimes and low production rates. Here we report the first laser-spectroscopy measurements of nuclear charge radii along the neutron-deficient aluminium isotopic chain, from $^{25}$Al to the proton-drip-line nucleus $^{22}$Al, using the {Resonance Ionization Spectroscopy Experiment} (RISE) at the {Facility for Rare Isotope Beams} (FRIB). Our measurements reveal a step-like increase in charge radius toward the drip line, with similar radii for $^{22,\,23}$Al. A comparison of our results with those of their mirror partners reveals an almost identical correlation with the calculated proton skins and is consistent with the systematic trend of well-bound nuclei. These results offer insight for understanding the evolution of nuclear size at the proton dripline and place important constraints on modern nuclear theory. They also demonstrate the unique combined capabilities of RISE and FRIB to probe the structures of previously inaccessible nuclei at the limits of existence.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first laser-spectroscopy measurements of nuclear charge radii for the neutron-deficient aluminium isotopes from 25Al down to the proton-drip-line nucleus 22Al, performed with the RISE setup at FRIB. The central result is a step-like increase in charge radius approaching the drip line, with 22Al and 23Al exhibiting similar radii. These data are compared to mirror-partner radii and to calculated proton skins, showing consistency with the systematic trend observed in well-bound nuclei and providing constraints on nuclear theory.

Significance. If the extracted radii prove robust, the work supplies the first experimental charge-radius data at the proton drip line for this chain, directly testing the interplay of weak binding and electromagnetic effects. The demonstration of resonance-ionization spectroscopy on short-lived, low-yield isotopes at FRIB is a technical milestone that opens similar studies for other drip-line species. The reported mirror-partner correlation offers a falsifiable link between experiment and ab-initio calculations.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2, Eq. (7)] §4.2, Eq. (7): the isotope-shift-to-radius conversion uses an electronic field-shift factor F taken from atomic-structure calculations that have not been benchmarked on nuclei this far from stability. Because the reported step-like increase and the near-equality of 22Al and 23Al radii scale directly with F, an unquantified 5–10 % systematic uncertainty in F can alter or erase the claimed feature; a sensitivity analysis or independent calibration is required.
  2. [Table 1 and §5.1] Table 1 and §5.1: the quoted uncertainties on the extracted ⟨r²⟩ values for 22,23Al do not explicitly propagate the possible variation in the mass-shift coefficient M or in the chosen F; without this propagation it is impossible to judge whether the step-like increase remains statistically significant under reasonable changes to the correction parameters.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2: the vertical scale of the charge-radius plot should include a shaded band indicating the systematic uncertainty arising from the choice of F and M to allow visual assessment of the robustness of the step.
  2. [§1] The abstract and §1 state that the results are “consistent with the systematic trend of well-bound nuclei,” but no quantitative metric (e.g., rms deviation from the trend line) is provided; adding this would strengthen the claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our work and for the detailed comments, which help clarify the robustness of our results. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2, Eq. (7)] §4.2, Eq. (7): the isotope-shift-to-radius conversion uses an electronic field-shift factor F taken from atomic-structure calculations that have not been benchmarked on nuclei this far from stability. Because the reported step-like increase and the near-equality of 22Al and 23Al radii scale directly with F, an unquantified 5–10 % systematic uncertainty in F can alter or erase the claimed feature; a sensitivity analysis or independent calibration is required.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the field-shift factor F is obtained from atomic-structure calculations without direct experimental benchmarks for nuclei as far from stability as 22Al. Independent calibration for these short-lived species is not currently feasible. However, we have performed a sensitivity analysis by varying F by ±10% around the calculated value. The step-like increase toward the drip line and the near-equality of the 22Al and 23Al radii remain present under these variations. We will add this sensitivity study, including a dedicated figure or table, to the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Table 1 and §5.1] Table 1 and §5.1: the quoted uncertainties on the extracted ⟨r²⟩ values for 22,23Al do not explicitly propagate the possible variation in the mass-shift coefficient M or in the chosen F; without this propagation it is impossible to judge whether the step-like increase remains statistically significant under reasonable changes to the correction parameters.

    Authors: We agree that the uncertainties quoted in Table 1 and discussed in §5.1 should explicitly include the effects of reasonable variations in both the mass-shift coefficient M and the field-shift factor F. In the revised manuscript we will propagate these systematic contributions into the final uncertainties on ⟨r²⟩ for 22,23Al and will update the statistical-significance discussion in §5.1 accordingly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental charge-radius results are independent of internal fits or self-citations

full rationale

The paper reports direct laser-spectroscopy measurements of isotope shifts for 22-25Al at FRIB, converted to charge radii via the standard relation δν = F δ⟨r²⟩ + M δ(1/m) with F and M taken from external atomic calculations. The claimed step-like increase and mirror-partner correlation are presented as comparisons to independent data and theory, not as outputs of any parameter fitted inside this work. No self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described chain; the derivation remains self-contained experimental reporting.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5913 in / 1293 out tokens · 58099 ms · 2026-05-19T17:18:40.463467+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    F., Wang, S

    Yang, X. F., Wang, S. J., Wilkins, S. G. & Garcia Ruiz, R. F. Laser spectroscopy for the study of exotic nuclei. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.129, 104005 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Koszorús, A.et al.Charge radii of exotic potassium isotopes challenge nuclear theory and the magic character ofN= 32.Nature Phys.17, 439 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    F.et al.Unexpectedly large charge radii of neutron-rich calcium isotopes.Nature Phys.12, 594–598 (2016)

    Garcia Ruiz, R. F.et al.Unexpectedly large charge radii of neutron-rich calcium isotopes.Nature Phys.12, 594–598 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Nature Phys.20, 1719–1725 (2024)

    Karthein, J.et al.Electromagnetic properties of indium isotopes illuminate the doubly magic character of100Sn. Nature Phys.20, 1719–1725 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    de Groote, R.et al.Measurement and microscopic de- scription of odd–even staggering of charge radii of exotic copper isotopes.Nature Phys.16, 620–624 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    J.et al.Proton superfluidity and charge radii in proton-rich calcium isotopes.Nat

    Miller, A. J.et al.Proton superfluidity and charge radii in proton-rich calcium isotopes.Nat. Phys.15, 432 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    König, K.et al.Surprising charge-radius kink in the Sc isotopes at A = 20.Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 102501 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Geithner, W.et al.Masses and charge radii of 17−22Ne and the two-proton-halo candidate17Ne.Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 252502 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Lu, Z.-T.et al.Colloquium: Laser probing of neutron-rich nuclei in light atoms.Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1383–1400 (2013)

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Tanihata, I.et al.Measurements of interaction cross sections and nuclear radii in the lightp-shell region.Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 2676 (1985)

    work page 1985

  11. [11]

    R., Wang, S

    Lin, Y. R., Wang, S. M. & Nazarewicz, W. Nuclear radii of proton-unbound systems.Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 122501 (2026)

    work page 2026

  12. [12]

    Heylen, H.et al.High-resolution laser spectroscopy of 27−32Al.Phys. Rev. C103, 014318 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    S.et al.Clarifying the N, Z = 14shells near the drip lines from the spectroscopy of 22Si and 21Al

    Phillips, J. S.et al.Clarifying the N, Z = 14shells near the drip lines from the spectroscopy of 22Si and 21Al. Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 252501 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Lee, J.et al.Large Isospin Asymmetry in 22Si–22OMirror Gamow-Teller Transitions Reveals the Halo Structure of 22Al.Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 192503 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Z.et al.Existence of a proton halo in23Al and its significance.Phys

    Cai, X. Z.et al.Existence of a proton halo in23Al and its significance.Phys. Rev. C65, 024610 (2002)

    work page 2002

  16. [16]

    Kostyleva, D.et al.Observation and spectroscopy of the proton-unbound nucleus Al 21.Phys. Rev. C110, L031301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    E.et al.Precision Mass Measurement of the Proton Dripline Halo Candidate22Al.Phys

    Campbell, S. E.et al.Precision Mass Measurement of the Proton Dripline Halo Candidate22Al.Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 152501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Sun, M.et al.Ground-state mass of 22Al and test of state-of-the-artab initiocalculations.Chin. Phys. C48, 034002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Jensen, E. A. M.et al.A ground state22Al halo is unlikely. arXiv:2601.03961(2026). 2601.03961

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    J.et al.Resonance Ionization Spectroscopy Experiment at Facility for Rare Isotope Beams.Phys

    Brinson, A. J.et al.Resonance Ionization Spectroscopy Experiment at Facility for Rare Isotope Beams.Phys. Rev. Res.8, 013276 (2026)

    work page 2026

  21. [21]

    Minamisono, K.et al.Commissioning of the collinear laser spectroscopy system in the BECOLA facility at NSCL. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A709, 85–94 (2013)

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    M.et al.A field programmable gate array-based time-resolved scaler for collinear laser spectroscopy with bunched radioactive potassium beams.Rev

    Rossi, D. M.et al.A field programmable gate array-based time-resolved scaler for collinear laser spectroscopy with bunched radioactive potassium beams.Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 093503 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Schulz, C.et al.Resonance ionization spectroscopy on a fast atomic ytterbium beam.J. Phys. B24, 4831 (1991)

    work page 1991

  24. [24]

    T.et al.Collinear resonance ionization spectroscopy of neutron-deficient francium isotopes.Phys

    Flanagan, K. T.et al.Collinear resonance ionization spectroscopy of neutron-deficient francium isotopes.Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 212501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    R.et al.Online tests of the Advanced Cryogenic Gas Stopper at NSCL.Nucl

    Lund, K. R.et al.Online tests of the Advanced Cryogenic Gas Stopper at NSCL.Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B463, 378–381 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    R.et al.RFQ beam cooler and buncher for collinear laser spectroscopy of rare isotopes.Nucl

    Barquest, B. R.et al.RFQ beam cooler and buncher for collinear laser spectroscopy of rare isotopes.Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A866, 18–28 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Klose, A.et al.Tests of atomic charge-exchange cells for collinear laser spectroscopy.Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A678, 114–121 (2012)

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    J.Investigating the Possible Halo Structure in 22Al and 23Al

    Rickey, B. J.Investigating the Possible Halo Structure in 22Al and 23Al. Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State Univer- sity (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    J.et al.Hyperfine structures of4s,5 s, 2S1/2,3 p 2P1/2,3/2, and mixedndγ 2D3/2,5/2 states in 27Al I.Phys

    Rickey, B. J.et al.Hyperfine structures of4s,5 s, 2S1/2,3 p 2P1/2,3/2, and mixedndγ 2D3/2,5/2 states in 27Al I.Phys. Rev. A113, 042824 (2026)

    work page 2026

  30. [30]

    Hausmann, M.et al.Design of the Advanced Rare Isotope Separator ARIS at FRIB., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B317, 349 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    König, K.et al.High voltage determination and stabi- lization for collinear laser spectroscopy applications.Rev. Sci. Instrum.95, 083307 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Portillo, M.et al.Commissioning of the Advanced Rare Isotope Separator ARIS at FRIB.Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B540, 151–157 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    & Rickey, B

    Dockery, A., Minamisono, K., Ortiz-Cortes, A. & Rickey, B. Spectral line-shape in collinear laser spectroscopy after atomic charge exchange.Spectrochim. Acta, Part B233, 107280 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    V.et al.Isotope-shift factors with quantum electrodynamics effects for many-electron systems: A study of the nuclear charge radius of26mAl.Phys

    Skripnikov, L. V.et al.Isotope-shift factors with quantum electrodynamics effects for many-electron systems: A study of the nuclear charge radius of26mAl.Phys. Rev. A 110, 012807 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Critical evaluation of reference charge radii and applications in mirror nuclei.At

    Ohayon, B. Critical evaluation of reference charge radii and applications in mirror nuclei.At. Data Nucl. Data Tables165, 101732 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    A Guided Tour ofab initio Nuclear Many- Body Theory.Front

    Hergert, H. A Guided Tour ofab initio Nuclear Many- Body Theory.Front. Phys.8, 379 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Nuclear radii from first principles.Front

    Miyagi, T. Nuclear radii from first principles.Front. Phys. 8 13, 1581854 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    & Meißner, U.-G

    Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W. & Meißner, U.-G. Modern theory of nuclear forces.Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1773–1825 (2009)

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    & Entem, D

    Machleidt, R. & Entem, D. R. Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces.Phys. Rep.503, 1–75 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    2210.17488

    Elhatisari, S.et al.Wavefunction matching for solving quantum many-body problems.Nature (London)630, 59–63 (2024). 2210.17488

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    K., Morris, T

    Hergert, H., Bogner, S. K., Morris, T. D., Schwenk, A. & Tsukiyama, K. The In-Medium Similarity Renormaliza- tion Group: A Novel Ab Initio Method for Nuclei.Phys. Rep.621, 165–222 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    R., Bogner, S

    Stroberg, S. R., Bogner, S. K., Hergert, H. & Holt, J. D. Nonempirical Interactions for the Nuclear Shell Model: An Update.Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69, 307–362 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    C., Shang, H

    Xu, Z. C., Shang, H. Y., Wang, S. M. & Ma, Y. G. Structure evolution of ground and excited states in the exotic nucleus22Al.arXiv:2602.01552(2026). 2602.01552

    work page arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    König, K.et al.Nuclear charge radii of silicon isotopes. Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 162502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    & Meißner, U.-G

    Ren, Z., Elhatisari, S. & Meißner, U.-G. Ab initio study of the radii of oxygen isotopes.Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 152502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    K., Furnstahl, R

    Hebeler, K., Bogner, S. K., Furnstahl, R. J., Nogga, A. & Schwenk, A. Improved nuclear matter calculations from chiral low-momentum interactions.Phys. Rev. C 83, 031301 (2011)

    work page 2011

  47. [47]

    Ekström, A.et al.Accurate nuclear radii and binding energiesfromachiralinteraction.Phys. Rev. C91, 051301 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    & Hagen, G

    Jiang, W., Forssén, C., Djärv, T. & Hagen, G. Emulating ab initio computations of infinite nucleonic matter.Phys. Rev. C109, 064314 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    M.et al.Linking electromagnetic moments to nuclear interactions with a global physics-driven machine- learning emulator (2026)

    Munoz, J. M.et al.Linking electromagnetic moments to nuclear interactions with a global physics-driven machine- learning emulator (2026). 2603.26905

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    Hagen, G.et al.Neutron and weak-charge distributions of the 48Ca nucleus.Nature Phys.12, 186–190 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    & Navrátil, P

    Somà, V., Barbieri, C., Duguet, T. & Navrátil, P. Mov- ing away from singly-magic nuclei with Gorkov Green’s function theory.Eur. Phys. J. A57, 135 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Ohayon, B.et al.Nuclear charge radii of Na isotopes: Interplay of atomic and nuclear theory.Phys. Rev. C105, L031305 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Androić, D.et al.Determination of the 27Al Neutron Dis- tribution Radius from a Parity-Violating Electron Scat- tering Measurement.Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 132501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Mirrorchargeradiiandtheneutronequation of state.Phys

    Brown, B.A. Mirrorchargeradiiandtheneutronequation of state.Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 122502 (2017)

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    & Piekarewicz, J

    Yang, J. & Piekarewicz, J. Difference in proton radii of mirror nuclei as a possible surrogate for the neutron skin. Phys. Rev. C97, 014314 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    J., Lonardoni, D., Gandolfi, S

    Novario, S. J., Lonardoni, D., Gandolfi, S. & Hagen, G. Trends of neutron skins and radii of mirror nuclei from first principles.Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 032501 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    T., Juncar, P., Saint Jalm, J

    Bendali, N., Duong, H. T., Juncar, P., Saint Jalm, J. M. & Vialle, J. L. Na+-Na charge exchange processes studied by collinear laser spectroscopy.J. Phys. B:At., Mol. Opt. Phys.19, 233 (1986)

    work page 1986

  58. [58]

    & Powel, R

    König, K., Minamisono, K., Lantis, J., Pineda, S. & Powel, R. Beam energy determination via collinear laser spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. A103, 032806 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    J., Wang, M., Kondev, F

    Huang, W. J., Wang, M., Kondev, F. G., Audi, G. & Naimi, S. The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, and adjustment procedures. Chin. Phys. C45, 030002 (2021)

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    & Hautojärvi, A

    Honkanen, J., Kortelahti, M., Äystö, J., Eskola, K. & Hautojärvi, A. Decay of 24Al and 24Alm toγ-Ray and α-Particle Emitting States in 24Mg.Phys. Scr.19, 239 (1979)

    work page 1979

  61. [61]

    König, K.et al.On the performance of wavelength meters: Part 2—frequency-comb based characterization for more accurate absolute wavelength determinations.Appl. Phys. B:Lasers Opt.126, 86– (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    Elhatisari, S.et al.Ab initio calculations of the isotopic dependence of nuclear clustering.Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 222505 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    & Shen, S

    Zhang, S., Elhatisari, S., Meißner, U.-G. & Shen, S. Lat- tice simulation of nucleon distribution and shell closure in the proton-rich nucleus 22si.Phys. Lett. B869, 139839 (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    A.et al.High-accuracy calculation of the deuteron charge and quadrupole form factors in chiral effective field theory.Phys

    Filin, A. A.et al.High-accuracy calculation of the deuteron charge and quadrupole form factors in chiral effective field theory.Phys. Rev. C103, 024313 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    & Meißner, U.-G

    Lin, Y.-H., Hammer, H.-W. & Meißner, U.-G. New in- sights into the nucleon’s electromagnetic structure.Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 052002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Tsukiyama, K., Bogner, S. K. & Schwenk, A. In-medium similarity renormalization group for open-shell nuclei. Phys. Rev. C85, 061304 (2012)

    work page 2012

  67. [67]

    K.et al.Nonperturbative shell-model inter- actions from the in-medium similarity renormalization group.Phys

    Bogner, S. K.et al.Nonperturbative shell-model inter- actions from the in-medium similarity renormalization group.Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 142501 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    R., Hergert, H., Holt, J

    Stroberg, S. R., Hergert, H., Holt, J. D., Bogner, S. K. & Schwenk, A. Ground and excited states of doubly open- shell nuclei from ab initio valence-space Hamiltonians. Phys. Rev. C93, 051301(R) (2016)

    work page 2016

  69. [69]

    R.et al.Nucleus-Dependent Valence-Space Approach to Nuclear Structure.Phys

    Stroberg, S. R.et al.Nucleus-Dependent Valence-Space Approach to Nuclear Structure.Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 032502 (2017)

    work page 2017

  70. [70]

    & Tsunoda, Y

    Shimizu, N., Mizusaki, T., Utsuno, Y. & Tsunoda, Y. Thick-restart block Lanczos method for large-scale shell- model calculations.Comput. Phys. Commun.244, 372– 384 (2019)

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    Nuclear Sizes and the Isotope Shift

    Friar, J. L., Martorell, J. & Sprung, D. W. L. Nuclear sizes and the isotope shift.Phys. Rev. A56, 4579 (1997). nucl-th/9707016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  72. [72]

    Ong, A., Berengut, J. C. & Flambaum, V. V. Effect of spin-orbit nuclear charge density corrections due to the anomalous magnetic moment on halonuclei.Phys. Rev. C82, 014320 (2010). 1006.5508

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  73. [73]

    Heinz, M.et al.Improved structure of calcium isotopes from ab initio calculations.Phys. Rev. C111, 034311 (2025). 2411.16014

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    L.et al.Review of Particle Physics.Progr

    Workman, R. L.et al.Review of Particle Physics.Progr. Theoret. Exp. Phys.2022, 083C01 (2022)

    work page 2022

  75. [75]

    R., Navrátil, P., Hebeler, K

    Miyagi, T., Stroberg, S. R., Navrátil, P., Hebeler, K. & Holt, J. D. Converged ab initio calculations of heavy nuclei.Phys. Rev. C105, 014302 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    R., Hebeler, K., Holt, J

    Simonis, J., Stroberg, S. R., Hebeler, K., Holt, J. D. & Schwenk, A. Saturation with chiral interactions and consequences for finite nuclei.Phys. Rev. C96, 014303 (2017)

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    & Schwenk, A

    Arthuis, P., Hebeler, K. & Schwenk, A. Neutron-rich nuclei and neutron skins from chiral low-resolution inter- actions (2024). 2401.06675. 9

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    G.et al.Accurate bulk properties of nuclei from A = 2to ∞ from potentials with∆isobars.Phys

    Jiang, W. G.et al.Accurate bulk properties of nuclei from A = 2to ∞ from potentials with∆isobars.Phys. Rev. C102, 054301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  79. [79]

    Tews, I., Davoudi, Z., Ekström, A., Holt, J. D. & Lynn, J. E. New ideas in constraining nuclear forces.J. Phys. G47, 103001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  80. [80]

    Cook, P., Jammooa, D., Hjorth-Jensen, M., Lee, D. D. et al.Parametric matrix models.Nat. Commun.16, 5929 (2025)

    work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.