Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontiers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.01454 v3 pith:YC7P5C35 submitted 2021-02-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords textgenerationmauvehumanopen-endeddistributiondivergencefrontiers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As major progress is made in open-ended text generation, measuring how close machine-generated text is to human language remains a critical open problem. We introduce MAUVE, a comparison measure for open-ended text generation, which directly compares the learnt distribution from a text generation model to the distribution of human-written text using divergence frontiers. MAUVE scales up to modern text generation models by computing information divergences in a quantized embedding space. Through an extensive empirical study on three open-ended generation tasks, we find that MAUVE identifies known properties of generated text, scales naturally with model size, and correlates with human judgments, with fewer restrictions than existing distributional evaluation metrics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Just on Time: Token-Level Early Stopping for Diffusion Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Jot, a token-level early stopping rule using a top-2 confidence ratio and spatial context, speeds up diffusion language model decoding by up to 19.6x with minor quality loss.

  2. IDEAlign: Comparing Large Language Models to Human Experts in Open-ended Interpretive Annotations

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    IDEAlign uses a pick-the-odd-one-out triplet task to measure idea-level similarity between LLMs and expert human annotations, and shows LLM judges using this protocol outperform lexical and vector-based baselines.

  3. Multi-Hypothesis Distillation of Multilingual Neural Translation Models for Low-Resource Languages

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Generating several candidate translations per source sentence for knowledge distillation yields better small multilingual translators than standard single-hypothesis distillation, especially in low-resource settings.

Pith tools