Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate | Paper Citation Record

Observation 57925f43-91ab-40f7-b99c-2ea0dadb63f1 · outbound

This paper cites Improving factuality and reasoning in language models through multiagent debate.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Improving factuality and reasoning in language models through multiagent debate

Reference 1

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.710241Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 4d64e994-04d1-4776-b1f5-9e0815544b5e · outbound

This paper cites ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.716749Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c48be49a-4091-48b0-9cfa-da4ebb1f7eb6 · outbound

This paper cites Debate-to-write: A persona-driven multi-agent framework for diverse argument generation.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Debate-to-write: A persona-driven multi-agent framework for diverse argument generation

Reference 3

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.723087Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a8cd3242-d6a8-4bb6-90f8-5f1417322565 · outbound

This paper cites Encouraging divergent thinking in large language models through multi-agent debate.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Encouraging divergent thinking in large language models through multi-agent debate

Reference 4

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.728055Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation b51bc577-c07b-43ef-acbf-b94e59f624a5 · outbound

This paper cites Debate Helps Supervise Unreliable Experts.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Debate Helps Supervise Unreliable Experts

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.733493Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c947591f-ac8f-4eac-8fca-df635a5c83fb · outbound

This paper cites Towards detecting llms hallucination via markov chain-based multi-agent debate framework.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Towards detecting llms hallucination via markov chain-based multi-agent debate framework

Reference 6

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.739218Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation cba0ba25-9a78-4143-ba42-d7d777381b65 · outbound

This paper cites An empirical study of group conformity in multi-agent systems.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate An empirical study of group conformity in multi-agent systems

Reference 7

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.744664Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 6b3352d0-3e1a-4cb3-9908-d83dfadce394 · outbound

This paper cites From Debate to Decision: Conformal Social Choice for Safe Multi-Agent Deliberation.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate From Debate to Decision: Conformal Social Choice for Safe Multi-Agent Deliberation

Reference 8

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.749339Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation cea1c96e-ef87-4233-be20-46107b40d4d1 · outbound

This paper cites Epistemic context learning: Building trust the right way in llm-based multi-agent systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21742, 2026.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Epistemic context learning: Building trust the right way in llm-based multi-agent systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21742, 2026

Reference 9

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.753999Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d235b4d8-d9d5-4367-9c73-831f641735b7 · outbound

This paper cites Cortexdebate: Debating sparsely and equally for multi-agent debate.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Cortexdebate: Debating sparsely and equally for multi-agent debate

Reference 10

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.759111Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d2a125c0-19ad-42c6-bb56-fee63ed8a987 · outbound

This paper cites Confidencecal: Enhancing llms reliability through confidence calibration in multi-agent debate.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Confidencecal: Enhancing llms reliability through confidence calibration in multi-agent debate

Reference 11

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.763930Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 5746fea6-619b-4c39-9d2e-7be13003c46a · outbound

This paper cites Demystifying Multi-Agent Debate: The Role of Confidence and Diversity.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Demystifying Multi-Agent Debate: The Role of Confidence and Diversity

Reference 12

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.768605Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 6ad612e1-d448-4ed0-8382-41346172d6df · outbound

This paper cites Mad-logic: Multi-agent debate enhances symbolic translation and reasoning.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Mad-logic: Multi-agent debate enhances symbolic translation and reasoning

Reference 13

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.773668Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 7dc1bc76-9fc6-451f-bb47-27079534bfe4 · outbound

This paper cites Multi-agent debate with memory masking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.20215, 2026.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Multi-agent debate with memory masking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.20215, 2026

Reference 14

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.778176Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 5a3172f0-1795-4586-a235-c2d510f96cb1 · outbound

This paper cites Confidence Calibration and Rationalization for LLMs via Multi-Agent Deliberation.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Confidence Calibration and Rationalization for LLMs via Multi-Agent Deliberation

Reference 15

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.783072Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 0bd028ef-ad48-4397-ab9c-a75c2d3585b5 · outbound

This paper cites Perplexity cannot always tell right from wrong.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.22950, 2026.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Perplexity cannot always tell right from wrong.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.22950, 2026

Reference 16

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.788712Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e33c4f3c-7b9f-478c-b274-04dfa54c9775 · outbound

This paper cites Can Perplexity Reflect Large Language Model's Ability in Long Text Understanding?.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Can Perplexity Reflect Large Language Model's Ability in Long Text Understanding?

Reference 17

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.793164Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation b7ddbff2-49fc-4bae-babb-b75ac8b684da · outbound

This paper cites When Two LLMs Debate, Both Think They'll Win.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate When Two LLMs Debate, Both Think They'll Win

Reference 18

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.798389Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f93dbc94-21d7-43db-84d9-9d1889dd6103 · outbound

This paper cites Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2018.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2018

Reference 19

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.976234Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 129ff180-42da-4ea5-b2c3-1d12439fd112 · outbound

This paper cites Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Reference 20

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.808243Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e53a74b3-9b41-4994-b4a0-1eb5786bcaff · outbound

This paper cites Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:24824–24837, 2022.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:24824–24837, 2022

Reference 21

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.813026Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 2b61a9ad-fa45-453d-ad3e-061e6a346dc4 · outbound

This paper cites Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models

Reference 22

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.817710Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c94570ef-f10f-454b-8b2e-ee753c3329c1 · outbound

This paper cites Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:11809–11822, 2023.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:11809–11822, 2023

Reference 23

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.822216Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 65119a62-46b9-460f-94f1-0ac955f0d9f4 · outbound

This paper cites Graph of thoughts: Solving elaborate problems with large language models.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Graph of thoughts: Solving elaborate problems with large language models

Reference 24

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.826683Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 663c7255-240f-45f2-bc0e-83d4ec098af9 · outbound

This paper cites Tab-cot: Zero-shot tabular chain of thought.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Tab-cot: Zero-shot tabular chain of thought

Reference 25

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.924746Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 78706210-805e-446b-973a-0e46c2c11d66 · outbound

This paper cites Automatic prompt augmentation and selection with chain- of-thought from labeled data.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Automatic prompt augmentation and selection with chain- of-thought from labeled data

Reference 26

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.907526Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation a66fb643-acba-481a-b976-839ec8ede7a2 · outbound

This paper cites Advancing collaborative debates with role differentiation through multi-agent reinforcement learning.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Advancing collaborative debates with role differentiation through multi-agent reinforcement learning

Reference 27

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.890421Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 923c76ed-ae96-40bb-8589-f6399fc8674f · outbound

This paper cites From Debate to Equilibrium: Belief-Driven Multi-Agent LLM Reasoning via Bayesian Nash Equilibrium.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate From Debate to Equilibrium: Belief-Driven Multi-Agent LLM Reasoning via Bayesian Nash Equilibrium

Reference 28

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.846673Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c11713f2-0088-4c90-97ff-a37103f6d0b6 · outbound

This paper cites Free-MAD: Consensus-Free Multi-Agent Debate.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Free-MAD: Consensus-Free Multi-Agent Debate

Reference 29

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.851788Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 2ecc0a6a-1ea1-4721-9b87-97e0849fa1fe · outbound

This paper cites Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems

Reference 30

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.856499Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 09e9f596-ab7a-4456-9d02-fc34fe4d6578 · outbound

This paper cites PAL: Program-aided Language Models.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate PAL: Program-aided Language Models

Reference 31

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.862049Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d9b29197-0cce-4c1e-8766-ae04cf0972ae · outbound

This paper cites Let's Verify Step by Step.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Let's Verify Step by Step

Reference 32

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.867380Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e2687cf7-c8a5-42f3-957d-ddf8ad761f59 · outbound

This paper cites Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge

Reference 33

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.872480Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 013a63fe-406c-47be-a26c-adc277da2b80 · outbound

This paper cites Mmlu-pro: A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:95266–95290, 2024.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Mmlu-pro: A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:95266–95290, 2024

Reference 34

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.872426Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation dc4a6d74-e59a-4b99-ae2a-d4ab93d25224 · outbound

This paper cites Truthfulqa: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Truthfulqa: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods

Reference 35

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.882614Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 104129cf-63a4-41b7-a895-35a8ca853ef2 · outbound

This paper cites Gpqa: A graduate-level google-proof q&a benchmark.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Gpqa: A graduate-level google-proof q&a benchmark

Reference 36

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.888194Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 27b3bd4a-77b5-47d7-b8c1-60a3ade25270 · outbound

This paper cites Breaking mental set to improve reasoning through diverse multi-agent debate.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Breaking mental set to improve reasoning through diverse multi-agent debate

Reference 37

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.893485Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 35529c90-5eb4-45a7-ade4-92caeff1f588 · outbound

This paper cites Understanding agent scaling in llm-based multi-agent systems via diversity.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03794, 2026.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Understanding agent scaling in llm-based multi-agent systems via diversity.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03794, 2026

Reference 38

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.899106Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e527ef7b-d310-4bc3-9dc3-50a57228ad26 · outbound

This paper cites Hear Both Sides: Efficient Multi-Agent Debate via Diversity-Aware Message Retention.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Hear Both Sides: Efficient Multi-Agent Debate via Diversity-Aware Message Retention

Reference 39

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.904034Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 7bc9317f-b205-4f1f-991b-85eb41f92a66 · outbound

This paper cites Dy- nadebate: Breaking homogeneity in multi-agent debate with dynamic path generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.05746, 2026.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Dy- nadebate: Breaking homogeneity in multi-agent debate with dynamic path generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.05746, 2026

Reference 40

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.909297Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation ed0ddaf4-f18d-426c-b9b8-c2c450cc7c07 · outbound

This paper cites Bge m3-embedding: Multi-lingual, multi-functionality, multi-granularity text embeddings through self-knowledge distillation, 2024.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Bge m3-embedding: Multi-lingual, multi-functionality, multi-granularity text embeddings through self-knowledge distillation, 2024

Reference 41

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.913991Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e63808f0-9a5a-46b0-9704-83052acf7964 · outbound

This paper cites Qwen3 Technical Report.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Qwen3 Technical Report

Reference 42

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.918855Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 07e5a5db-f7bc-4e74-87ca-fd9615729a7d · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Unresolved cited work

Reference 43

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.812036Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation f166cc42-0435-4596-9879-86f057c341e7 · outbound

This paper cites Medxpertqa: Benchmarking expert-level medical reasoning and understanding.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Medxpertqa: Benchmarking expert-level medical reasoning and understanding

Reference 44

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.792549Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation ac3e9db2-b22b-4deb-be4c-abe0b0008005 · outbound

This paper cites Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning

Reference 45

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.933549Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 40ff3642-4eea-4b25-8bed-02db16045409 · outbound

This paper cites Agentscourt: Building judicial decision-making agents with court debate simulation and legal knowledge augmentation.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Agentscourt: Building judicial decision-making agents with court debate simulation and legal knowledge augmentation

Reference 46

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.771343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation ab7c6418-a592-41c9-a0c2-a5f15b7d775b · outbound

This paper cites Debatrix: Multi-dimensional debate judge with iterative chronological analysis based on llm.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Debatrix: Multi-dimensional debate judge with iterative chronological analysis based on llm

Reference 47

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.753892Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 6155dc2a-9557-41d9-841a-30b57096d6ec · outbound

This paper cites Improving multi-agent debate with sparse communication topology.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Improving multi-agent debate with sparse communication topology

Reference 48

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.947895Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f228a31e-f548-4b4f-91e2-b2a7a86dbb2e · outbound

This paper cites S2-mad: Breaking the token barrier to enhance multi-agent debate efficiency.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate S2-mad: Breaking the token barrier to enhance multi-agent debate efficiency

Reference 49

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.952544Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation ad9ecdf9-981b-432a-9f40-30465ad53371 · outbound

This paper cites Rumad: Reinforcement-unifying multi-agent debate.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.23864, 2026.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Rumad: Reinforcement-unifying multi-agent debate.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.23864, 2026

Reference 50

Resolution: verified exact; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:01.629324Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 24be5544-d004-448c-a662-6def0c6dcdf2 · outbound

This paper cites Groupdebate: Enhancing the efficiency of multi-agent debate using group discussion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.14051, 2024.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Groupdebate: Enhancing the efficiency of multi-agent debate using group discussion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.14051, 2024

Reference 51

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.962240Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation b74d3701-057b-4ecb-a0a8-b452f1953135 · outbound

This paper cites Debate Only When Necessary: Adaptive Multiagent Collaboration for Efficient LLM Reasoning.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Debate Only When Necessary: Adaptive Multiagent Collaboration for Efficient LLM Reasoning

Reference 52

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.967086Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation ab4c6d47-d747-47ae-a800-503cb4d1b6e9 · outbound

This paper cites imad: Intelligent multi-agent debate for efficient and accurate llm inference.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate imad: Intelligent multi-agent debate for efficient and accurate llm inference

Reference 53

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.972036Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e51f73d5-a6f0-4907-9751-774a167a2339 · outbound

This paper cites Peacemaker or troublemaker: How sycophancy shapes multi-agent debate.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.23055, 2025.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Peacemaker or troublemaker: How sycophancy shapes multi-agent debate.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.23055, 2025

Reference 54

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:00.976629Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 96d53525-ea9c-475d-9b38-d6ac1ed2bd8c · outbound

This paper cites Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping

Reference 55

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.704362Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation b29a1e21-7e64-40f9-aa30-85b66722243b · outbound

This paper cites Dempster-shafer theory.Encyclopedia of artificial intelligence, 1(330-331):3, 1992.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Dempster-shafer theory.Encyclopedia of artificial intelligence, 1(330-331):3, 1992

Reference 56

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.688604Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 94e1bb13-dbcd-4e38-b565-09c62661e8a3 · outbound

This paper cites Interpretation and fusion of hyper opinions in subjective logic.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Interpretation and fusion of hyper opinions in subjective logic

Reference 57

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.672042Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 2330a141-d483-48cf-8b87-97a643530ca9 · outbound

This paper cites The modified dempster-shafer approach to classification.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 27(1):96–104, 2002.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate The modified dempster-shafer approach to classification.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 27(1):96–104, 2002

Reference 58

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.655992Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 82362c54-a142-4347-ad7e-32ad66d21de8 · outbound

This paper cites A k-nearest neighbor classification rule based on dempster-shafer theory.IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, 25(5):804–813, 1995.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate A k-nearest neighbor classification rule based on dempster-shafer theory.IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, 25(5):804–813, 1995

Reference 59

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.635484Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 9016f690-3360-4296-8562-8a22c3c19ae3 · outbound

This paper cites Combining the classification results of independent classifiers based on the dempster/shafer theory of evidence.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Combining the classification results of independent classifiers based on the dempster/shafer theory of evidence

Reference 60

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.618930Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 2c20a14f-4385-4b4c-b6f9-68a557d77f1b · outbound

This paper cites A neural network classifier based on dempster-shafer theory.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(2):131–150, 2000.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate A neural network classifier based on dempster-shafer theory.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(2):131–150, 2000

Reference 61

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.602395Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 6df13105-83b9-475f-a673-94adad05c843 · outbound

This paper cites A new correlation belief function in dempster-shafer evidence theory and its application in classification.Scientific Reports, 13(1):7609, 2023.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate A new correlation belief function in dempster-shafer evidence theory and its application in classification.Scientific Reports, 13(1):7609, 2023

Reference 62

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.584059Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 3555a859-64de-4698-9b30-aae22b9c6c7f · outbound

This paper cites Trusted multi-view classification with dynamic evidential fusion.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 45(2): 2551–2566, 2022.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Trusted multi-view classification with dynamic evidential fusion.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 45(2): 2551–2566, 2022

Reference 63

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.567424Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation c3f60515-37a7-4ff1-b7e5-4e9f8bb7ce62 · outbound

This paper cites Detecting misbehaviors of large vision-language models by evidential uncertainty quantification.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.05535, 2026.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Detecting misbehaviors of large vision-language models by evidential uncertainty quantification.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.05535, 2026

Reference 64

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:01.024764Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d396b2e2-9ffd-4ce4-9b0d-0bc4d7e5c054 · outbound

This paper cites From observation to understanding: Front-door adjustments with uncertainty calibration for enhancing egocentric reasoning in lvlms.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate From observation to understanding: Front-door adjustments with uncertainty calibration for enhancing egocentric reasoning in lvlms

Reference 65

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.549842Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation b310da9d-410b-4c7e-bb20-6fce6761073d · outbound

This paper cites Not all inconsistency is equal: Decomposing lvlm uncertainty into belief divergence and belief conflict.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Not all inconsistency is equal: Decomposing lvlm uncertainty into belief divergence and belief conflict

Reference 66

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.532765Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 60b2cbb1-2545-4ff9-8ab8-e879d31d789d · outbound

This paper cites Visual hallucination detection in large vision-language models via evidential conflict.International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 186: 109507, 2025.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Visual hallucination detection in large vision-language models via evidential conflict.International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 186: 109507, 2025

Reference 67

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.516068Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation da1b26fd-980a-4775-be0e-504e53b83404 · outbound

This paper cites LLM-based Corroborating and Refuting Evidence Retrieval for Scientific Claim Verification.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate LLM-based Corroborating and Refuting Evidence Retrieval for Scientific Claim Verification

Reference 68

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:01.044428Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 69ce857e-4328-40df-81f2-69956649b28f · outbound

This paper cites JAILJUDGE: A Comprehensive Jailbreak Judge Benchmark with Multi-Agent Enhanced Explanation Evaluation Framework.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate JAILJUDGE: A Comprehensive Jailbreak Judge Benchmark with Multi-Agent Enhanced Explanation Evaluation Framework

Reference 69

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:01.049793Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 767ee5f1-b9c7-4b13-942c-498fd03dd742 · outbound

This paper cites Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms

Reference 70

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:01.054692Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 02e23273-7704-4dcb-9fa2-d08bac0eff20 · outbound

This paper cites The surpris- ing effectiveness of ppo in cooperative multi-agent games.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:24611–24624, 2022.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate The surpris- ing effectiveness of ppo in cooperative multi-agent games.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:24611–24624, 2022

Reference 71

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.498102Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 9f8816be-20e2-46d0-910f-116f28e5af45 · outbound

This paper cites Think how your teammates think: Active inference can benefit decentralized execution.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Think how your teammates think: Active inference can benefit decentralized execution

Reference 72

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.481930Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation a3f3d099-b8c2-4c89-bb3f-7e9bb5f765f7 · outbound

This paper cites Code: Communication delay-tolerant multi-agent collaboration via dual alignment of intent and timeliness.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Code: Communication delay-tolerant multi-agent collaboration via dual alignment of intent and timeliness

Reference 73

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:01.068439Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 36fe129b-7828-4647-8ac3-5f45a65dfb85 · outbound

This paper cites From General Relation Patterns to Task-Specific Decision-Making in Continual Multi-Agent Coordination.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate From General Relation Patterns to Task-Specific Decision-Making in Continual Multi-Agent Coordination

Reference 74

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:01.073424Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation fa70dd2f-e0c2-4bcb-99c6-19197a02b2c0 · outbound

This paper cites The Llama 3 Herd of Models.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate The Llama 3 Herd of Models

Reference 75

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:01.078424Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a3d4a30e-3374-4d74-ba36-601c753e627b · outbound

This paper cites ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Tools.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Tools

Reference 76

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:01.083200Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation cf92bea4-1e8e-4446-8fe6-cfa766258423 · outbound

This paper cites DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Models.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Models

Reference 77

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:01.088159Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation baaeb85b-d0a5-440b-b579-3528bde04779 · outbound

This paper cites DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

Reference 78

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:01.093092Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f6ea4deb-48d2-461a-968c-797707b9afa0 · outbound

This paper cites Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding

Reference 79

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:01.097741Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 03427a3e-e73e-43b1-978f-d9598203d465 · outbound

This paper cites MLC [27] employs reinforcement learning for task-specific role differentiation.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate MLC [27] employs reinforcement learning for task-specific role differentiation

Reference 80

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.455087Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation dee36562-39af-4c01-94c4-03e3fe8982c8 · outbound

This paper cites CortexDebate [ 10] and ConfidenceCal [11] attempt to select opinions using explicit confidence as soft weights.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate CortexDebate [ 10] and ConfidenceCal [11] attempt to select opinions using explicit confidence as soft weights

Reference 81

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.438564Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation c0e2e358-b803-4278-a4d3-566b9be723e9 · outbound

This paper cites YES,” “NO,.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate YES,” “NO,

Reference 82

Resolution: malformed identifier; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.420941Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation e892dce0-b608-4082-82bb-81b1b34061d6 · outbound

This paper cites Output the final result inside\boxed{}. Example:\boxed{42}.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Output the final result inside\boxed{}. Example:\boxed{42}

Reference 84

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.382973Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 1fa2096b-af22-4a8a-af98-ea6ad36d9f7a · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Unresolved cited work

Reference 85

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.365567Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation df4ce770-bb31-4752-8dab-e4fd2dea73eb · outbound

This paper cites Only consider an objection if it identifies a SPECIFIC step where a particular number, formula, or factual claim is wrong.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Only consider an objection if it identifies a SPECIFIC step where a particular number, formula, or factual claim is wrong

Reference 86

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.349486Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 38c5a388-94e7-4943-a37e-fef68d1316e0 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Unresolved cited work

Reference 88

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.332018Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 3823f33c-e2a5-4f32-8130-d5e16f5b3052 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate Unresolved cited work

Reference 89

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.402998Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Observation 04c8a8be-079c-4e37-9801-f5a2ee73f062 · outbound

This paper cites {Output Instruction} 25.

Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate {Output Instruction} 25

Reference 90

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T14:51:02.315130Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

Coverage vector

Reference resolution

Outbound references

Pith citing papers