Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Topological Insulator nano-SQUID: Flux-tunable platform for topological superconductivity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper predicts that an asymmetric topological-insulator nano-SQUID becomes a topological superconductor, with Majorana zero modes at its ends, for every odd flux quantum window, independent of the chemical potential.

desk verdict Solid SQUID experiment and a promising platform, but the topological phase is an inference from a two-junction model with an unmeasured decoupling assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.07993 v3 pith:YJFDV3GW submitted 2024-12-11 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con

Ella Nikodem , Jakob Schluck , Henry F. Legg , Max Geier , Michal Papaj , Mahasweta Bagchi , Liang Fu , Yoichi Ando This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords topologicalinsulatorMajoranazeromodesnano-SQUIDJosephsonjunctionsuperconductivityFu-Kanemodelflux-tunablesurfacestates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a simple device for topological superconductivity: a rectangular nanowire of a bulk-insulating three-dimensional topological insulator, side-contacted along its length by two superconductors, so that the top and bottom surfaces each form an SNS Josephson line junction and the nanowire cross-section acts as a tiny SQUID loop. The central theoretical claim is that when the two junctions are asymmetric, threading magnetic flux through the cross-section periodically drives only the weaker junction through a Fu-Kane-type topological phase transition, placing the whole columnar SQUID in a topological state for flux windows $(n-1/2)\Phi_s^0<\Phi<(n+1/2)\Phi_s^0$ with odd integer $n$ ($\Phi_s^0=h/2e$). If true, the two ends of the nanowire host Majorana zero modes that are insensitive to chemical-potential disorder, and the required ingredients, surface-dominated supercurrent and gate-tunable top/bottom asymmetry, are already demonstrated in the measured devices. The paper thus offers a concrete, accessible platform for realizing and eventually braiding Majorana modes.

What carries the argument

The central object is the columnar nano-SQUID: a rectangular TI nanowire sandwiched laterally by superconductors over its full length, so the nanowire cross-section is the SQUID loop and the top and bottom surfaces are two independent SNS line junctions sharing a common phase bias $\phi$. The load-bearing mechanism is the flux-induced phase winding: axial flux $\Phi$ sets the two junction phase differences to $\phi \mp \pi\Phi/\Phi_s^0$, as in the phenomenological current model $I(\phi)=I_t\sin(\phi-\pi\Phi/\Phi_s^0)+I_b\sin(\phi+\pi\Phi/\Phi_s^0)$. When the junctions are asymmetric, the weaker junction is the one that acquires a $\pi$ phase difference at odd half flux quanta, undergoing a Fu-Kane-type transition driven by the perfectly transmitted, $4\pi$-periodic Andreev bound states that cross zero energy at odd multiples of $\pi$. The paper supports this picture with a tight-binding model of the nanowire in a magnetic field, which reproduces the SQUID critical-current oscillations and the $0$–$\pi$ transition in the equilibrium phase difference, and with spectral-gap calculations showing $E_{\mathrm{gap}}\propto \cos(\phi/2)$ for the topological surface.

What would settle it

A tunnel-spectroscopy probe at one end of the nanowire should show a zero-bias conductance peak throughout each odd flux window $(n-1/2)\Phi_s^0<\Phi<(n+1/2)\Phi_s^0$ and none between them; a measurement showing no such flux-periodic peaks, or peaks of the wrong periodicity, would falsify the central prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery claim is that a columnar TI nano-SQUID becomes topological by flux alone. The paper argues that at half-integer flux quanta, $\Phi=(n+\tfrac12)\Phi_s^0$, time-reversal symmetry (neglecting magnetic-field effects beyond the flux) forces one Josephson junction to carry a phase difference of $\pi$ and the other a phase of 0; because a $\pi$ phase difference switches the sign of the junction's Josephson energy, the weaker junction takes the $\pi$, its spectral gap $E_{\mathrm{gap}}\propto \cos(\phi/2)$ closes, and the line junction passes into its topological regime while the stronger junction stays trivial. The topological window then extends over the full flux-quantum range $(n-1/2)\Phi_s^0<\Phi<(n+1/2)\Phi_s^0$ for odd $n$, independent of the chemical potential and of the exact asymmetry magnitude. Experimentally, the paper reports that five nanowire devices show critical-current oscillations with period $h/2e$ in axial fields, with $I_c$ nearly vanishing at $h/4e$ and recovering at $h/2e$, which it reads as proof that supercurrent flows only through the top and bottom surfaces; a back gate tunes the asymmetry, and at the symmetric point $I_c$ goes to zero at the minima, confirming the surface-only picture.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the top and bottom surface Josephson junctions are decoupled, so the columnar SQUID can be treated as two independent line junctions whose phase differences are set individually by the flux; if electrons can coherently tunnel between the surfaces before being reflected, the flux-driven $\pi$-phase arrangement that creates the topological phase can shift or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A tunnel probe at the nanowire ends should find zero-bias conductance peaks in each odd flux window, providing a direct experimental test of the predicted Majorana zero modes.
  • Because the topological condition is set by phase bias rather than chemical potential, the platform is expected to be resilient to the Coulomb disorder that has hampered semiconductor nanowire platforms.
  • The same device can be tuned between symmetric and asymmetric regimes with a back gate, making asymmetry a control knob for switching the topological phase.
  • The simulations predict the gapped topological phase survives for chemical potentials across the full bulk band gap, in both the well-defined-subband and decoupled-junction limits, so fabrication variations that alter subband structure should not destroy it.
  • The absence of an even-odd effect in the measured critical-current oscillations indicates well-defined transverse subbands are not formed, which the paper argues is consistent with the decoupled-junction description.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The decoupling premise could be tested by making nanowires with varied heights: if the height were reduced below the side-surface coherence length, top and bottom junctions would couple coherently and the flux window for the topological phase should shift or close.
  • The same flux-biased asymmetric two-junction mechanism could transfer to other spin-momentum-locked surface systems, such as higher-order topological insulators, wherever two line junctions are separated by a proximitized side wall, though the explicit calculation would need to be redone.
  • The observed contrast of the critical-current oscillations as a function of gate voltage offers a quantitative, gate-based diagnostic of the top/bottom asymmetry parameter, which the paper does not explicitly develop.
  • A concrete braiding protocol for the Majorana modes at the nanowire ends is left open; one possible route is a network of coupled columnar nano-SQUIDs with flux-controlled phase biases, but the paper only flags the need for braiding.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a combined experimental and theoretical study of a topological-insulator nanowire side-contacted by two superconducting electrodes, forming a columnar nano-SQUID in which the top and bottom surfaces act as two SNS line junctions. Experimentally, the authors observe critical-current oscillations in an axial magnetic field with period h/2e across five devices, with near-complete suppression at half-integer flux in the symmetric tuning, which they interpret as evidence for surface-only supercurrent with negligible bulk contribution. Theoretically, they propose that for an asymmetric nano-SQUID the magnetic flux drives only one of the two junctions through the Fu-Kane π-phase transition, leading to a topological superconducting phase in the flux windows (n−1/2)Φ_s^0 < Φ < (n+1/2)Φ_s^0 for odd integer n, with Majorana zero modes at the nanowire ends. The central experimental observation is well supported, whereas the topological prediction is derived from a two-junction model and gapped-spectrum simulations rather than from a direct topological-invariant calculation.

Significance. If the topological phase prediction is confirmed, the platform would be an important addition to the Majorana toolbox: it is gate-tunable, uses a bulk-insulating TI, and the predicted phase is robust to chemical-potential disorder. Credit should be given for the multi-device dataset, the careful field-alignment and flux-focusing analysis, and the Kwant-based tight-binding modeling with parameters taken from the BHZ model rather than fitted to the target result. The prediction is falsifiable and clearly stated. However, the paper does not yet provide a direct topological-invariant calculation or a finite-wire Majorana end-state demonstration for the full microscopic model, and the decoupling of top and bottom junctions is supported by an unmeasured coherence-length estimate. These gaps currently prevent full acceptance.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III and Supplement M] The central topological claim—flux-window topological superconductivity for (n−1/2)Φ_s^0 < Φ < (n+1/2)Φ_s^0 with odd n—is established only through the phenomenological two-junction model Eq. (1) and the single-channel gap formula E_gap ∝ cos(φ/2), not through a topological invariant computed in the microscopic tight-binding model. The simulations in Supplement M report min|ε(k)|, which is a necessary but not sufficient condition for a nontrivial class-D phase, and no finite-wire Majorana end-state calculation is presented. The statement in Sec. III that 'it is useful to perform more detailed analysis to understand the exact role of the front and back surfaces' concedes an unresolved piece that could render the combined system trivial even if each single junction lies in the Fu-Kane window; please add a direct Pfaffian/topological-invariant calculation or a transparent finite-wire MZM localization calculation for the full model.
  2. [Supplement L] The load-bearing premise that top and bottom junctions are decoupled rests on the estimate ξ_s << 15 nm for the Ar-etched side surfaces, and this coherence length is not measured. The absence of the h/e even-odd component in Ic(Bx) is indirect evidence but does not bound ξ_s. Because the phase-winding argument that one junction sits at π while the other sits at 0, and hence the entire topological window, depends on this decoupling, please provide a direct measurement of the side-surface coherence length, a more robust justification such as explicit modeling of side-surface disorder, or a clearly stated condition under which the prediction holds.
  3. [Sec. II, Eq. (1) and Fig. 4c] The equilibrium phase differences used to construct the topological phase diagram in Fig. 4c are obtained from Eq. (1), which includes only the first harmonic of the current-phase relation. The tight-binding simulations themselves show higher harmonics in the CPR (Supplement Figs. S11 and S13), and the degree to which the phase-winding picture survives with realistic higher harmonics is not demonstrated. Since the π-phase condition is the key to the Fu-Kane transition, please show explicitly that the phase distribution obtained from the full tight-binding energy-phase relation still places the weaker junction in the topological window over the claimed flux range.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption and main text] The main text states that the VG-dependence of Ic shown in Fig. 2d is for device B, but the Fig. 2 caption identifies panel (d) as device A; please correct this inconsistency.
  2. [Abstract and Methods] Please correct the typographical errors: 'supercurent' in the abstract, 'measurenents' in Methods, and the spacing in the 'T ransport regime' heading.
  3. [Supplement Fig. S1] In the Supplement, 'devicea A–C' should read 'devices A–C'.
  4. [Author list] The author listing contains the corrupted text 'Micha/suppress l Papaj'; this should read 'Michael Papaj'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the flux-window topological phase is derived from the external Fu-Kane line-junction criterion applied to the SQUID phase-winding, and the microscopic tight-binding check is parameter-independent.

full rationale

The central theoretical claim—that an asymmetric columnar TI nano-SQUID is topological for (n−1/2)Φ_s^0 < Φ < (n+1/2)Φ_s^0 with odd n—is obtained by combining the phenomenological two-junction model Eq. (1) with the external Fu-Kane result that a TI line junction with phase difference π < φ < 3π hosts a 1D topological Majorana state. Equation (1) is not defined in terms of the topological phase; it is a standard flux-biased SQUID current-phase relation whose inputs are the junction critical currents and the Aharonov-Bohm phase. The equilibrium phase differences in Fig. 4c are computed from Eq. (1), and the spectral gap formula E_gap ∝ cos(φ/2) is the known Fu-Kane Andreev bound-state dispersion, not an output of the present model. The tight-binding BHZ simulation in Methods provides an independent check of the h/2e SQUID oscillations and the 0–π transition, with parameters set by the BSTS model rather than fitted to the target topological result. The asymmetry It/Ib is varied, and the presence of asymmetry, not its fitted value, drives the topological window. The decoupling of the top and bottom junctions is a physical assumption supported by an order-of-magnitude estimate in Supplement L and by the absence of an h/e even-odd component in the measured oscillations; it is unmeasured but not a circular input. Self-citations (e.g., Legg et al. for subband physics and vF) are used for estimates and model context, not as the load-bearing justification for the topological phase. The paper explicitly flags the role of the front/back surfaces and the exact MZM location as future work, and Supplement M reports min|ε(k)| rather than a Pfaffian invariant or localized end states; those are completeness or correctness risks, not circularity. No step in the derivation reduces by construction to its own input, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central topological prediction rests on five axioms: the standard Fu-Kane ABS result, decoupling of the two junctions, TRS restoration at half-integer flux, single-harmonic SQUID energy minimization, and bulk-boundary correspondence. The first and fifth are standard; the decoupling and TRS restoration are domain assumptions argued but not directly verified; the single-harmonic model is an acknowledged approximation in the supplement.

free parameters (3)
  • BHZ tight-binding parameters (A, M0, B, μ, L, N) = A=1, M0=-1.5, B=0.5, μ=0.5, L=4, N=3
    Chosen by hand to model BSTS; not fitted to this paper's data, but the large-pairing scenario Δ=0.25 is selected to realize the decoupled-junction regime the authors argue matches the experiment.
  • Surface-state penetration depth δ = 2.5 nm
    Taken from prior literature to convert the geometrical nanowire cross-section to the effective electronic area A_eff; the conclusion that the Ic-oscillation period is h/2e rather than h/e depends on this value.
  • Asymmetry ratio I_t/I_b in Fig. 4c = 0.8
    Used for illustration in the topological phase diagram; the topological phase requires asymmetry but its size does not depend on the specific ratio.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Fu-Kane perfectly transmitted ABSs at kx=0 in the short-junction limit
    Section III relies on Ref. [4]: spin-momentum locking prohibits normal reflection and gives 4π-periodic ABSs crossing zero at odd multiples of π.
  • domain assumption Top and bottom junctions are independent (side-surface coherence length much shorter than nanowire height)
    Supplement Section L: the columnar SQUID picture requires decoupled junctions; the paper estimates ξ_s << 15 nm due to Ar-etch damage but does not measure ξ_s.
  • domain assumption At Φ=(n+1/2)Φ_s^0 time-reversal symmetry is restored when all magnetic-field effects beyond the flux are neglected
    Section III: used to argue that one junction acquires phase π and the other 0 at half-integer flux quanta; Zeeman and orbital effects are neglected.
  • domain assumption Ground-state phase difference minimizes the first-harmonic SQUID energy (Eq. 1)
    Section II and Fig. 4c: the extended topological region is computed with the single-harmonic current-phase relation I(φ)=I_t sin(φ-πΦ/Φ_s^0)+I_b sin(φ+πΦ/Φ_s^0).
  • standard math Bulk-boundary correspondence maps the gapped 1D topological phase to Majorana zero modes at the nanowire ends
    Section III: the tight-binding model is infinite along k, so MZMs at the ends are inferred from the topological phase in the bulk, not directly computed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Insulator nano-SQUID: Flux-tunable platform for topological superconductivity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YJFDV3GW

@misc{pith2026241207993,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Insulator nano-SQUID: Flux-tunable platform for topological superconductivity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YJFDV3GW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.07993}
}
abstract

Many efforts have been made in the past decade to realize topological superconductivity using superconducting proximity effect, but an ideal platform is still lacking. A 3D topological insulator (TI) is promising for this purpose due to the spin-momentum-locked surface state. Here we propose a novel yet simple TI platform which gives rise to a topological phase that is robust against disorder. It consists of a bulk-insulating rectangular TI nanowire laterally sandwiched by two superconductors. In this structure, the top and bottom surfaces individually work as SNS line junctions, forming a nanometer-scale columnar SQUID in which the nanowire cross-section defines the threading magnetic flux $\Phi$ in axial magnetic fields. We theoretically show that, when the two junctions are asymmetric, a robust topological phase occurs periodically for a wide range of $\Phi$, independently of the chemical potential. Our experiment found that a TI device of this structure indeed behaves as a columnar nano-SQUID where the supercurrent flows only through the top and bottom surfaces with vanishing bulk contribution. Furthermore, the top/bottom asymmetry can be tuned by a back gate, a key ingredient for the topological phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.07993 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: b for a sketch) and the only condition for the topo￾logical phase is a top/bottom asymmetry. Also, this topological phase is essentially insensitive to disorder. This prediction is the most important result of this pa￾per. Recall that the spin-momentum locking in the T…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tunable superconducting diode effect in a topological nano-SQUID

    cond-mat.supr-con 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A side-contacted BiSbTeSe2 nanowire Josephson junction shows a large, gate- and field-tunable superconducting diode effect, interpreted as a nano-SQUID whose sign reversal coincides with a topological phase transition.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The critical current can be obtained by finding the maximum as a function of ϕ , Ic = max ϕ {I(ϕ )}

    + Ib sin(ϕ + πΦ / Φ s 0), (1) where ϕ is the superconducting phase difference across the junctions and It (Ib) is the maximum supercurrent through the top (bottom) surface. The critical current can be obtained by finding the maximum as a function of ϕ , Ic = max ϕ {I(ϕ )}. The resulting Ic as a function of Φ are shown in Fig. 4a for two ratios of It/I b. As...

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    L. Fu, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, Topological insulators in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007)

    2007

  3. [3]

    Zhang, C.-X

    H. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.- C. Zhang, Topological insulators in Bi 2Se3, Bi 2Te3 and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface, Nat. Phys. 5, 438 (2009)

    2009

  4. [4]

    Ando, Topological insulator materials, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 82, 102001 (2013)

    Y. Ando, Topological insulator materials, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 82, 102001 (2013)

    2013

  5. [5]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Superconducting proximity effect and Majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Nayak, A

    C. Nayak, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computa- tion, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Breunig and Y

    O. Breunig and Y. Ando, Opportunities in topological insulator devices, Nature Reviews Physics (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Flensberg, F

    K. Flensberg, F. von Oppen, and A. Stern, Engineered platforms for topological superconductivity and Majo- rana zero modes, Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 944 (2021)

    2021

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    Prada, P

    E. Prada, P. San-Jose, M. W. A. de Moor, A. Geresdi, E. J. H. Lee, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, J. Nyg ˚ ard, R. Aguado, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, From Andreev to Majorana bound states in hybrid superconductor–semiconductor nanowires, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 575 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    A. C. Potter and P. A. Lee, Engineering a p + ip su- perconductor: Comparison of topological insulator and Rashba spin-orbit-coupled materials, Phys. Rev. B 83, 184520 (2011)

    2011

  3. [11]

    Das Sarma, In search of Majorana, Nat

    S. Das Sarma, In search of Majorana, Nat. Phys. 19, 165 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    R. Hess, H. F. Legg, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Trivial Andreev band mimicking topological bulk gap reopening in the nonlocal conductance of long rashba nanowires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 207001 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Grosfeld and A

    E. Grosfeld and A. Stern, Observing Majorana bound states of josephson vortices in topological superconduc- tors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 11810 (2011)

    2011

  6. [14]

    A. C. Potter and L. Fu, Anomalous supercurrent from Majorana states in topological insulator josephson junc- tions, Phys. Rev. B 88, 121109 (2013)

    2013

  7. [15]

    J. Feng, H. F. Legg, M. Bagchi, D. Loss, J. Klinovaja, and Y. Ando, Long-range crossed Andreev reflection in topological insulator nanowires proximitized by a super- conductor, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2407.02383 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    D. I. Indolese, P. Karnatak, A. Kononov, R. Dela- grange, R. Haller, L. Wang, P. Makk, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and C. Sch¨ onenberger, Compact SQUID realized in a double-layer graphene heterostructure, Nano Lett. 20, 7129 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Bai, X.-K

    M. Bai, X.-K. Wei, J. Feng, M. Luysberg, A. Bliesener, G. Lippertz, A. Uday, A. A. Taskin, J. Mayer, and Y. Ando, Proximity-induced superconductivity in (Bi1− xSbx)2Te3 topological-insulator nanowires, Com- mun. Materials 3, 20 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Cook and M

    A. Cook and M. Franz, Majorana fermions in a topological-insulator nanowire proximity-coupled to an s-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 84, 201105 (2011)

    2011

  11. [19]

    A. M. Cook, M. M. Vazifeh, and M. Franz, Stability of Majorana fermions in proximity-coupled topological in- sulator nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 86, 155431 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    de Juan, J

    F. de Juan, J. H. Bardarson, and R. Ilan, Conditions for fully gapped topological superconductivity in topological insulator nanowires, SciPost Phys. 6, 060 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    H. F. Legg, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Majorana bound states in topological insulators without a vortex, Phys. Rev. B 104, 165405 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Heffels, D

    D. Heffels, D. Burke, M. R. Connolly, P. Sch¨ uffelgen, D. Gr¨ utzmacher, and K. Moors, Robust and fragile Ma- jorana bound states in proximitized topological insulator nanoribbons, Nanomaterials 13, 723 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Z. Ren, A. A. Taskin, S. Sasaki, K. Segawa, and Y. Ando, Optimizing Bi 2− xSbxTe3− ySey solid solutions to ap- proach the intrinsic topological insulator regime, Phys. Rev. B 84, 165311 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    Arakane, T

    T. Arakane, T. Sato, S. Souma, K. Kosaka, K. Nakayama, M. Komatsu, T. Takahashi, Z. Ren, K. Segawa, and Y. Ando, Tunable Dirac cone in the topological insulator Bi2− xSbxTe3− ySey, Nat. Communun. 3, 636 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    Fischer, J

    R. Fischer, J. Pic´ o-Cort´ es, W. Himmler, G. Platero, M. Grifoni, D. A. Kozlov, N. N. Mikhailov, S. A. Dvoret- sky, C. Strunk, and D. Weiss, 4 π -periodic supercurrent tuned by an axial magnetic flux in topological insulator nanowires, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013087 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    R¨ oßler, D

    M. R¨ oßler, D. Fan, F. M¨ unning, H. F. Legg, A. Bliesener, G. Lippertz, A. Uday, R. Yazdanpanah, J. Feng, A. Taskin, and Y. Ando, Top-down fabrication of bulk- insulating topological insulator nanowires for quantum devices, Nano Lett. 23, 2846 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Octavio, M

    M. Octavio, M. Tinkham, G. E. Blonder, and T. M. Klapwijk, Subharmonic energy-gap structure in super- conducting constrictions, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6739 (1983)

    1983

  20. [28]

    Flensberg, J

    K. Flensberg, J. B. Hansen, and M. Octavio, Subhar- monic energy-gap structure in superconducting weak links, Phy. Rev. B 38, 8707 (1988)

    1988

  21. [29]

    Ghatak, O

    S. Ghatak, O. Breunig, F. Yang, Z. Wang, A. A. Taskin, and Y. Ando, Anomalous Fraunhofer patterns in gated Josephson junctions based on the bulk-insulating topo- logical insulator BiSbTeSe 2, Nano Lett. 18, 5124 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    L. Wang, I. Meric, P. Y. Huang, Q. Gao, Y. Gao, H. Tran, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, L. M. Campos, D. A. Muller, J. Guo, P. Kim, J. Hone, K. L. Shepard, and C. R. Dean, One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material, Science 342, 614 (2013)

    2013

  23. [31]

    V. E. Calado, S. Goswami, G. Nanda, M. Diez, A. R. Akhmerov, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. M. Klapwijk, and L. M. Vandersypen, Ballistic Josephson junctions in edge-contacted graphene, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 761 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    Rosenbach, W

    D. Rosenbach, W. Schmitt Tobias, P. Sch¨ uffelgen, P. Stehno Martin, C. Li, M. Schleenvoigt, R. Jalil Ab- dur, G. Mussler, E. Neumann, S. Trellenkamp, A. Gol- ubov Alexander, A. Brinkman, D. Gr¨ utzmacher, and T. Sch¨ apers, Reappearance of first shapiro step in nar- row topolog...

    2021

  25. [33]

    Suominen, J

    H. Suominen, J. Danon, M. Kjaergaard, K. Flens- berg, J. Shabani, C. Palmstrøm, F. Nichele, and C. Marcus, Anomalous Fraunhofer interference in epitax- ial superconductor-semiconductor Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 95, 035307 (2017). 9

    2017

  26. [34]

    Beach, D

    A. Beach, D. Reig-i Plessis, G. MacDougall, and N. Ma- son, Asymmetric Fraunhofer spectra in a topological insulator-based Josephson junction, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33, 425601 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Zhang, A

    P. Zhang, A. Zarassi, L. Jarjat, V. Van de Sande, M. Pendharkar, J. S. Lee, C. P. Dempsey, A. McFad- den, S. D. Harrington, J. T. Dong, H. Wu, A. H. Chen, M. Hocevar, C. J. Palmstrøm, and S. M. Frolov, Large second-order Josephson effect in planar superconductor- semiconductor ...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Zhang, K

    Y. Zhang, K. He, C.-Z. Chang, C.-L. Song, L.-L. Wang, X. Chen, J.-F. Jia, Z. Fang, X. Dai, W.-Y. Shan, S.- Q. Shen, Q. Niu, X.-L. Qi, S.-C. Zhang, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Crossover of the three-dimensional topologi- cal insulator Bi 2Se3 to the two-dimensional limit, Nature P...

    2010

  29. [37]

    Liu, X.-L

    C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, H. Zhang, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.- C. Zhang, Model Hamiltonian for topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 82, 045122 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    H. F. Legg, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Metallization and proximity superconductivity in topological insulator nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 105, 155413 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    S. Hart, H. Ren, T. Wagner, P. Leubner, M. Muhlbauer, C. Brune, H. Buhmann, L. W. Molenkamp, and A. Ya- coby, Induced superconductivity in the quantum spin Hall edge, Nat. Phys. 10, 638 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Murani, A

    A. Murani, A. Kasumov, S. Sengupta, Y. A. Ka- sumov, V. T. Volkov, I. I. Khodos, F. Brisset, R. Dela- grange, A. Chepelianskii, R. Deblock, H. Bouchiat, and S. Gu´ eron, Ballistic edge states in Bismuth nanowires re- vealed by SQUID interferometry, Nat. Commun. 8, 15941 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    S. Cho, B. Dellabetta, A. Yang, J. Schneeloch, Z. Xu, T. Valla, G. Gu, M. J. Gilbert, and N. Mason, Symmetry protected Josephson supercurrents in three-dimensional topological insulators, Nat. Commun. 4, 1689 (2013)

    2013

  34. [42]

    Ben Shalom, M

    M. Ben Shalom, M. Zhu, V. Fal’Ko, A. Mishchenko, A. Kretinin, K. Novoselov, C. Woods, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Geim, et al. , Quantum oscillations of the critical current and high-field superconducting prox- imity in ballistic graphene, Nat. Phys. 12, 318 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Kaufhold and A

    L. Kaufhold and A. Rosch, Stability of Majorana modes in Coulomb-disordered topological insulator nanowires, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.12671 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    The mean gauge-invariant phase difference jumps (or quickly crosses over) from 0 to π at Φ = Φ 2 0/ 2 flux bias

    The superconducting phase difference for our three- dimensional junction is defined gauge-invariantly by the mean of the local gauge-invariant phase difference (1/h ) ∫ h 0 dzγ (z) with γ(z) = φ − ∫ dleA(y, z )/ ℏ. The mean gauge-invariant phase difference jumps (or quickly crosse...

  37. [45]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, D. I. Pikulin, T. Hyart, H. Schome- rus, and J. P. Dahlhaus, Fermion-Parity Anomaly of the Critical Supercurrent in the Quantum Spin-Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 017003 (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    Tkachov and E

    G. Tkachov and E. M. Hankiewicz, Helical Andreev bound states and superconducting Klein tunneling in topological insulator Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 88, 075401 (2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quan- tumwires, Phys.-Usp. 44, 131 (2001)

    2001

  40. [48]

    universal

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Three “universal” mesoscopic Josephson effects, in Transport Phenomena in Meso- scopic Systems (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992) pp. 235–253

    1992

  41. [49]

    H. F. Legg, M. R¨ oßler, F. M¨ unning, D. Fan, O. Bre- unig, A. Bliesener, G. Lippertz, A. Uday, A. A. Taskin, D. Loss, J. Klinovaja, and Y. Ando, Giant magnetochi- ral anisotropy from quantum-confined surface states of topological insulator nanowires, Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 696 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Topological Insulator nano-SQUID: Flux-tunable platform for topological superconductivity

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New J. Phys. 16, 063065 (2014). Supplemental Material for “Topological Insulator nano-SQUID: Flux-tunable platform for topological superconductivity” Ella Nikodem, 1, ∗ Jak...

    2014

  43. [51]

    (S2) Turning to the subband picture, a given state with a momentum k has a wavefunction that lies at the exterior of the TINW and has a pairing potential only at the sides

    = −2ϵ cos φ cos(ÃΦ /Φ s 0). (S2) Turning to the subband picture, a given state with a momentum k has a wavefunction that lies at the exterior of the TINW and has a pairing potential only at the sides. As such, each state by it self effectively forms a nano-SQUID. In particular,...

  44. [52]

    The approximation that the integral can be approximated by a sum over nan o-SQUIDs, as in Eq

    is the sum of all the states in each occupied band. The approximation that the integral can be approximated by a sum over nan o-SQUIDs, as in Eq. (S3), reproduces well our results, in particular, (i) ∑ i εi(Φ) > 0 for Φ = 0, (ii) ∑ i εi(Φ) ≈ 0 at Φ = h/(4e), and (iii) ∑ i εi(Φ...

  45. [53]

    It should be noted that here we modeled each Josephson junction (top/bot tom) by a simple CPR of the form I(φ) = It/b sin φ, i.e

    due to the fact that the subbands in the normal state depend on flux. It should be noted that here we modeled each Josephson junction (top/bot tom) by a simple CPR of the form I(φ) = It/b sin φ, i.e. a single Josephson harmonic. This is sufficient for the purpose of capturing the...

  46. [54]

    Z. Ren, A. A. Taskin, S. Sasaki, K. Segawa, and Y. Ando, Phy s. Rev. B 84, 165311 (2011)

    2011

  47. [55]

    Dubos, H

    P. Dubos, H. Courtois, B. Pannetier, F. K. Wilhelm, A. D. Zaiki n, and G. Sch¨ on, Phys. Rev. B 63, 064502 (2001)

    2001

  48. [56]

    Zhang, P.-L

    J. Zhang, P.-L. Tse, A.-R. Jalil, J. K¨ olzer, D. Rosenbach, M. Luysberg, G. Panaitov, H. L¨ uth, Z. Hu, D. Gr¨ utzmacher, J. G. Lu, and T. Sch¨ apers, Nat. Communun. 12, 754 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk, Phys. Rev. B 25, 4515 (1982)

    1982

  50. [58]

    Octavio, M

    M. Octavio, M. Tinkham, G. E. Blonder, and T. M. Klapwijk, Ph ys. Rev. B 27, 6739 (1983)

    1983

  51. [59]

    Flensberg, J

    K. Flensberg, J. B. Hansen, and M. Octavio, Phy. Rev. B 38, 8707 (1988)

    1988

  52. [60]

    Ghatak, O

    S. Ghatak, O. Breunig, F. Yang, Z. Wang, A. A. Taskin, and Y. Ando, Nano Lett. 18, 5124 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    C. G. Molenaar, D. P. Leusink, X. L. Wang, and A. Brinkman, Sup ercond. Sci.Technol. 27, 104003 (2014)

    2014

  54. [62]

    Assouline, C

    A. Assouline, C. Feuillet-Palma, N. Bergeal, T. Zhang, A. Mottaghizadeh, A. Zimmers, E. Lhuillier, M. Eddrie, P. Atkin- son, M. Aprili, and H. Aubin, Nat. Communun. 10, 126 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    B. W. Maxfield and W. L. McLean, Phys. Rev. 139, A1515 (1965)

    1965

  56. [64]

    Zhang, A

    P. Zhang, A. Zarassi, L. Jarjat, V. Van de Sande, M. Pendharka r, J. S. Lee, C. P. Dempsey, A. McFadden, S. D. Harrington, J. T. Dong, H. Wu, A. H. Chen, M. Hocevar, C. J. Palmstrø m, and S. M. Frolov, SciPost Phys. 16, 030 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    Buzdin, Phys

    A. Buzdin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 107005 (2008)

    2008

  58. [66]

    V. E. Calado, S. Goswami, G. Nanda, M. Diez, A. R. Akhmerov, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. M. Klapwijk, and L. M. Vandersypen, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 761 (2015)

    2015

  59. [67]

    Ben Shalom, M

    M. Ben Shalom, M. Zhu, V. Fal’Ko, A. Mishchenko, A. Kretin in, K. Novoselov, C. Woods, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Geim, et al. , Nat. Phys. 12, 318 (2016)

    2016

  60. [68]

    H. F. Legg, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Phys. Rev. B 104, 165405 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, New J. Phys. 16, 063065 (2014)

    2014

  62. [70]

    Zhang and A

    Y. Zhang and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 206601 (2010)

    2010

  63. [71]

    Cook and M

    A. Cook and M. Franz, Phys. Rev. B 84, 201105 (2011)

    2011

  64. [72]

    de Juan, J

    F. de Juan, J. H. Bardarson, and R. Ilan, SciPost Phys. 6, 060 (2019)

    2019

  65. [73]

    A. M. Cook, M. M. Vazifeh, and M. Franz, Phys. Rev. B 86, 155431 (2012)

    2012

  66. [74]

    Heffels, D

    D. Heffels, D. Burke, M. R. Connolly, P. Sch¨ uffelgen, D. Gr¨ ut zmacher, and K. Moors, Nanomaterials 13, 723 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.