Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Consensus using Asynchronous Failure Detectors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1502.02538 v2 pith:YLILBK53 submitted 2015-02-09 cs.DC

classification cs.DC
keywords consensusasynchronousfailureapproachcrash-tolerantdetectorsresultsolve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The FLP result shows that crash-tolerant consensus is impossible to solve in asynchronous systems, and several solutions have been proposed for crash-tolerant consensus under alternative (stronger) models. One popular approach is to augment the asynchronous system with appropriate failure detectors, which provide (potentially unreliable) information about process crashes in the system, to circumvent the FLP impossibility. In this paper, we demonstrate the exact mechanism by which (sufficiently powerful) asynchronous failure detectors enable solving crash-tolerant consensus. Our approach, which borrows arguments from the FLP impossibility proof and the famous result from CHT, which shows that $\Omega$ is a weakest failure detector to solve consensus, also yields a natural proof to $\Omega$ as a weakest asynchronous failure detector to solve consensus. The use of I/O automata theory in our approach enables us to model execution in a more detailed fashion than CHT and also addresses the latent assumptions and assertions in the original result in CHT.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Distributed Download from an External Data Source in Asynchronous Faulty Settings

    cs.DC 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    First asynchronous solutions for the Download problem: optimal deterministic crash-tolerant protocols, near-optimal randomized Byzantine-tolerant protocols, and a new Ω(n/2) lower bound for β ≥ 1/2.

Pith tools