Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Towards Reliable Medical Question Answering: Techniques and Challenges in Mitigating Hallucinations in Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.13808 v1 pith:YNJJ3JGZ submitted 2024-08-25 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords medicaltechniquesdomainsaccuracychallengesespeciallygeneralhallucinations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has significantly impacted various domains, including healthcare and biomedicine. However, the phenomenon of hallucination, where LLMs generate outputs that deviate from factual accuracy or context, poses a critical challenge, especially in high-stakes domains. This paper conducts a scoping study of existing techniques for mitigating hallucinations in knowledge-based task in general and especially for medical domains. Key methods covered in the paper include Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based techniques, iterative feedback loops, supervised fine-tuning, and prompt engineering. These techniques, while promising in general contexts, require further adaptation and optimization for the medical domain due to its unique demands for up-to-date, specialized knowledge and strict adherence to medical guidelines. Addressing these challenges is crucial for developing trustworthy AI systems that enhance clinical decision-making and patient safety as well as accuracy of biomedical scientific research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Active Learning for Neurosymbolic Program Synthesis

    cs.PL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The abstract claims a new active learning technique, constrained conformal evaluation (tool SmartLabel), that finds the ground-truth program in 98% of benchmarks, but the delivered full text is a different paper, leav...

  2. Are the Hidden States Hiding Something? Testing the Limits of Factuality-Encoding Capabilities in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Hidden-state factuality probes trained on synthetic statements do not generalize to LLM-generated factual statements, despite reproducing prior results on original datasets.

  3. Disentangling Memory and Reasoning Ability in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Special tokens that separate memory recall from reasoning steps improve accuracy and interpretability on three QA benchmarks, but the gains over planning-token baselines are small.

  4. LLMs-in-the-Loop Part 2: Expert Small AI Models for Anonymization and De-identification of PHI Across Multiple Languages

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Small fine-tuned NER models for de-identifying health information in eight languages are claimed to beat GPT-4o, but only the English result is benchmarked externally.

Pith tools