REVIEW 2 cited by
Challenges in Data-to-Document Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent neural models have shown significant progress on the problem of generating short descriptive texts conditioned on a small number of database records. In this work, we suggest a slightly more difficult data-to-text generation task, and investigate how effective current approaches are on this task. In particular, we introduce a new, large-scale corpus of data records paired with descriptive documents, propose a series of extractive evaluation methods for analyzing performance, and obtain baseline results using current neural generation methods. Experiments show that these models produce fluent text, but fail to convincingly approximate human-generated documents. Moreover, even templated baselines exceed the performance of these neural models on some metrics, though copy- and reconstruction-based extensions lead to noticeable improvements.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Understanding Design Fixation in Generative AI
Generative AI models exhibit a design fixation phenomenon that limits the diversity and originality of their design outputs, according to a small lab study and a proposed theoretical framework.
-
Ta-G-T: Subjectivity Capture in Table to Text Generation via RDF Graphs
A modular T5-based pipeline using RDF triples, sentence aggregation, and style transfer generates factual text with subjective interpretations from tables, achieving moderate gains over several LLM baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.