Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.03137 v4 pith:YRTEFE4Q submitted 2016-06-09 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords cirlcooperativehumanhumanslearningvalueactionsactive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

For an autonomous system to be helpful to humans and to pose no unwarranted risks, it needs to align its values with those of the humans in its environment in such a way that its actions contribute to the maximization of value for the humans. We propose a formal definition of the value alignment problem as cooperative inverse reinforcement learning (CIRL). A CIRL problem is a cooperative, partial-information game with two agents, human and robot; both are rewarded according to the human's reward function, but the robot does not initially know what this is. In contrast to classical IRL, where the human is assumed to act optimally in isolation, optimal CIRL solutions produce behaviors such as active teaching, active learning, and communicative actions that are more effective in achieving value alignment. We show that computing optimal joint policies in CIRL games can be reduced to solving a POMDP, prove that optimality in isolation is suboptimal in CIRL, and derive an approximate CIRL algorithm.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 326 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Optimal Interactive Learning on the Job via Facility Location Planning

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    COIL casts multi-task interactive robot learning as an uncapacitated facility location problem and uses approximation algorithms to plan skill, preference, and help queries that reduce human effort.

  2. Free Energy Risk Metrics for Systemically Safe AI: Gatekeeping Multi-Agent Study

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A gatekeeper that switches vehicles to a defensive policy when predicted loss is high reduced crashes in a simulated fleet, but the proposed free energy metric reduces to standard expected utility in the testbed.

Pith tools