REVIEW 3 cited by
AQuaMuSe: Automatically Generating Datasets for Query-Based Multi-Document Summarization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Summarization is the task of compressing source document(s) into coherent and succinct passages. This is a valuable tool to present users with concise and accurate sketch of the top ranked documents related to their queries. Query-based multi-document summarization (qMDS) addresses this pervasive need, but the research is severely limited due to lack of training and evaluation datasets as existing single-document and multi-document summarization datasets are inadequate in form and scale. We propose a scalable approach called AQuaMuSe to automatically mine qMDS examples from question answering datasets and large document corpora. Our approach is unique in the sense that it can general a dual dataset -- for extractive and abstractive summaries both. We publicly release a specific instance of an AQuaMuSe dataset with 5,519 query-based summaries, each associated with an average of 6 input documents selected from an index of 355M documents from Common Crawl. Extensive evaluation of the dataset along with baseline summarization model experiments are provided.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Query-Focused Event Summarization: A Dataset and Benchmark
QFESum provides a large event-oriented QFS benchmark; RAT adaptive retrieval plus SHC hierarchical event clustering beat baselines on lexical, semantic, LLM-event-match and human metrics.
-
A Unifying Scheme for Extractive Content Selection Tasks
The authors unify six extractive content selection tasks under instruction-guided prompting, release a benchmark (IGCS-BENCH) and a 12,490-instance LLM-generated synthetic dataset (GENCS), and show transfer learning f...
-
Compare: A Framework for Scientific Comparisons
Compare is a RAG-based system that generates qualitative, citation-supported comparisons of scientific contributions at institution and publication granularity.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.