Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CoDet-M4: Detecting Machine-Generated Code in Multi-Lingual, Multi-Generator and Multi-Domain Settings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.13733 v2 pith:YVA6AK6U submitted 2025-03-17 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords codeprogrammingmodelslanguagesauthorshipdetectingdetectiondomains
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized code generation, automating programming with remarkable efficiency. However, these advancements challenge programming skills, ethics, and assessment integrity, making the detection of LLM-generated code essential for maintaining accountability and standards. While, there has been some research on this problem, it generally lacks domain coverage and robustness, and only covers a small number of programming languages. To this end, we propose a framework capable of distinguishing between human- and LLM-written code across multiple programming languages, code generators, and domains. We use a large-scale dataset from renowned platforms and LLM-based code generators, alongside applying rigorous data quality checks, feature engineering, and comparative analysis using evaluation of traditional machine learning models, pre-trained language models (PLMs), and LLMs for code detection. We perform an evaluation on out-of-domain scenarios, such as detecting the authorship and hybrid authorship of generated code and generalizing to unseen models, domains, and programming languages. Moreover, our extensive experiments show that our framework effectively distinguishes human- from LLM-written code and sets a new benchmark for this task.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. $\texttt{Droid}$: A Resource Suite for AI-Generated Code Detection

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DroidCollection and DroidDetect provide the largest open resource for detecting AI-generated code, including adversarial 'humanized' samples, and show that training on a small amount of such data restores detector robustness.

  2. CodeMirage: A Multi-Lingual Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated and Paraphrased Source Code from Production-Level LLMs

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CodeMirage is a ten-language, ten-LLM benchmark with original and paraphrased AI code, and it shows current AI-generated-code detectors drop sharply under cross-model and low-false-alarm settings.

Pith tools