REVIEW 9 cited by
XAI meets LLMs: A Survey of the Relation between Explainable AI and Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this survey, we address the key challenges in Large Language Models (LLM) research, focusing on the importance of interpretability. Driven by increasing interest from AI and business sectors, we highlight the need for transparency in LLMs. We examine the dual paths in current LLM research and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): enhancing performance through XAI and the emerging focus on model interpretability. Our paper advocates for a balanced approach that values interpretability equally with functional advancements. Recognizing the rapid development in LLM research, our survey includes both peer-reviewed and preprint (arXiv) papers, offering a comprehensive overview of XAI's role in LLM research. We conclude by urging the research community to advance both LLM and XAI fields together.
Forward citations
Cited by 9 Pith papers
-
Multi-Modal Requirements Data-based Acceptance Criteria Generation using LLMs
Multi-modal RAG (text plus UI screenshots) with reward-based polishing generates acceptance criteria from user stories that three industry experts rated near 4/5 on relevance, correctness, and understandability.
-
Word Overuse and Alignment in Large Language Models: The Influence of Learning from Human Feedback
People prefer text containing the words that an instruction-tuned model uses far more than its base version, linking human feedback training to LLM word overuse.
-
Transforming Remanufacturing Automation with Large Language Models: A Forward-Looking Analysis with Case Studies
The authors propose ReManGPT, a conceptual orchestration framework for applying LLMs to remanufacturing, and illustrate it with case studies in disassembly planning, repair guidance, and robotic execution.
-
Triadic Fusion of Cognitive, Functional, and Causal Dimensions for Explainable LLMs: The TAXAL Framework
TAXAL proposes a triadic cognitive-functional-causal framework for role-sensitive explainability in agentic LLMs, demonstrated through cross-domain case studies.
-
Bridging Minds and Machines: Toward an Integration of AI and Cognitive Science
A survey arguing that AI has prioritized task performance over cognitive foundations, illustrated with a subjective maturity table and seven future research directions.
-
Towards Efficient Multi-LLM Inference: Characterization and Analysis of LLM Routing and Hierarchical Techniques
A survey of LLM routing and hierarchical inference techniques that proposes an unvalidated unified evaluation metric called the Inference Efficiency Score.
-
Unveiling Instruction-Specific Neurons & Experts: An Analytical Framework for LLM's Instruction-Following Capabilities
Activation-frequency analysis identifies sparse units in LLMs that respond to instructions; same-category instructions share more of these units than different-category ones, and fine-tuning measurably changes the sets.
-
Toward Human-Centered Multi-Agent Systems: Integrating Cognition, Culture, Values, and Cooperation in AI Agents
A survey arguing that multi-agent AI systems remain task-centric and lack integrated computational models of human cognition, culture, values, and social cooperation.
-
Multi-agent Systems for Misinformation Lifecycle : Detection, Correction And Source Identification
A conceptual multi-agent architecture for classifying, detecting, correcting, and sourcing misinformation is proposed but not implemented or evaluated.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.