REVIEW 2 cited by
Understanding the Gains from Repeated Self-Distillation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Self-Distillation is a special type of knowledge distillation where the student model has the same architecture as the teacher model. Despite using the same architecture and the same training data, self-distillation has been empirically observed to improve performance, especially when applied repeatedly. For such a process, there is a fundamental question of interest: How much gain is possible by applying multiple steps of self-distillation? To investigate this relative gain, we propose studying the simple but canonical task of linear regression. Our analysis shows that the excess risk achieved by multi-step self-distillation can significantly improve upon a single step of self-distillation, reducing the excess risk by a factor as large as $d$, where $d$ is the input dimension. Empirical results on regression tasks from the UCI repository show a reduction in the learnt model's risk (MSE) by up to 47%.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Self-Boost via Optimal Retraining: An Analysis via Approximate Message Passing
For binary classification with noisy labels, the paper derives the Bayes-optimal function for combining a model's current predictions with the given labels during retraining, and shows a fitted version improves linear...
-
Optimal Self-Distillation for Rectified Flow via Linear Probing
For linear rectified flow with ridge regression on fixed interpolants, optimally mixed self-distillation strictly improves velocity risk whenever the teacher is off the ridge stationary point, with a closed-form mixin...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.