Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

TrackPGD: Efficient Adversarial Attack using Object Binary Masks against Robust Transformer Trackers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.03946 v2 pith:YYI25CE5 submitted 2024-07-04 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords trackerstransformeradversarialattacktrackpgdobjectattacksbinary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Adversarial perturbations can deceive neural networks by adding small, imperceptible noise to the input. Recent object trackers with transformer backbones have shown strong performance on tracking datasets, but their adversarial robustness has not been thoroughly evaluated. While transformer trackers are resilient to black-box attacks, existing white-box adversarial attacks are not universally applicable against these new transformer trackers due to differences in backbone architecture. In this work, we introduce TrackPGD, a novel white-box attack that utilizes predicted object binary masks to target robust transformer trackers. Built upon the powerful segmentation attack SegPGD, our proposed TrackPGD effectively influences the decisions of transformer-based trackers. Our method addresses two primary challenges in adapting a segmentation attack for trackers: limited class numbers and extreme pixel class imbalance. TrackPGD uses the same number of iterations as other attack methods for tracker networks and produces competitive adversarial examples that mislead transformer and non-transformer trackers such as MixFormerM, OSTrackSTS, TransT-SEG, and RTS on datasets including VOT2022STS, DAVIS2016, UAV123, and GOT-10k.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses

    cs.CR 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The survey organizes over 400 papers on embodied AI safety into a multi-level taxonomy and flags overlooked issues such as fragile multimodal fusion and unstable planning under jailbreaks.

  2. FSPGD: Rethinking Black-box Attacks on Semantic Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FSPGD uses two feature-similarity losses to craft segmentation attacks that transfer across CNN and transformer models, and reports large mIoU drops on Pascal VOC and Cityscapes.

Pith tools