REVIEW 1 cited by
OrthoNets: Orthogonal Channel Attention Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Designing an effective channel attention mechanism implores one to find a lossy-compression method allowing for optimal feature representation. Despite recent progress in the area, it remains an open problem. FcaNet, the current state-of-the-art channel attention mechanism, attempted to find such an information-rich compression using Discrete Cosine Transforms (DCTs). One drawback of FcaNet is that there is no natural choice of the DCT frequencies. To circumvent this issue, FcaNet experimented on ImageNet to find optimal frequencies. We hypothesize that the choice of frequency plays only a supporting role and the primary driving force for the effectiveness of their attention filters is the orthogonality of the DCT kernels. To test this hypothesis, we construct an attention mechanism using randomly initialized orthogonal filters. Integrating this mechanism into ResNet, we create OrthoNet. We compare OrthoNet to FcaNet (and other attention mechanisms) on Birds, MS-COCO, and Places356 and show superior performance. On the ImageNet dataset, our method competes with or surpasses the current state-of-the-art. Our results imply that an optimal choice of filter is elusive and generalization can be achieved with a sufficiently large number of orthogonal filters. We further investigate other general principles for implementing channel attention, such as its position in the network and channel groupings. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/hady1011/OrthoNets/
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A4-Unet: Deformable Multi-Scale Attention Network for Brain Tumor Segmentation
A4-Unet stacks existing attention modules and reports strong BraTS Dice scores, though metric inconsistencies and unclear data provenance undermine the state-of-the-art claim.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.