Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 7 cited by

This review establishes that the non-relativistic limit of the AdS5/CFT4 brane construction produces a consistent holographic duality: non-relativistic string theory on String Newton-Cartan AdS5×S5 is dual to Galilean Yang-Mills with five i

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 17:27 UTC pith:YZZLTBSU

load-bearing objection A honest, well-organized review of a program that is still a proposal; the authors say so themselves, which is the main reason to take it seriously. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2603.24657 v2 pith:YZZLTBSU submitted 2026-03-25 hep-th

An Introduction to String Newton-Cartan Holography and Integrability

Andrea Fontanella , Juan Miguel Nieto Garc\'ia This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords String Newton-Cartan geometrynon-relativistic string theorygauge/gravity dualityGalilean Yang-MillsAdS/CFT correspondenceintegrabilityclassical spectral curvep-brane Newton-Cartan holography
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper's pith is that holography survives a singular non-relativistic limit, and that the resulting duality is a new, exactly-solvable corner of AdS/CFT. Its central proposal is that non-relativistic string theory on the String Newton-Cartan version of AdS5×S5 is dual to Galilean Yang-Mills theory with five interacting scalar fields in 3+1 dimensions, the first example of String Newton-Cartan holography. The review shows how five consistency conditions—horizon, uniqueness, holographic realisation, symmetry matching, and a quantitative test—govern the limit, and that symmetry matching selects GYM over Galilean Electrodynamics. It also reviews classical string solutions, quantisation, coset actions, and integrability, arguing that the theory is classically integrable through a Lax connection whose monodromy is non-diagonalisable rather than trivial.

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that non-relativistic string theory on the String Newton-Cartan version of AdS5×S5—the theory obtained by the non-relativistic limit of type IIB strings in AdS5×S5—is holographically dual to Galilean Yang-Mills theory with five interacting scalar fields. The duality is derived by taking the non-relativistic limit inside the brane construction of AdS5/CFT4, requiring the limit to commute with the near-horizon limit, to preserve a horizon, to place the gauge theory on the Penrose conformal boundary, and to match symmetries one-to-one. The paper reports that only the quantitative test is missing; the rigorous near-boundary analysis that wou

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the String Newton-Cartan geometry, in which the Lorentzian target-space metric is replaced by a degenerate longitudinal metric τ and a transverse tensor h, together with a critical closed B-field that cancels the divergent τ term in the string action. This geometry determines both the bulk and the boundary: its Penrose boundary is a 3+1d Newton-Cartan spacetime on which the dual gauge theory lives. The argument then runs through five consistency conditions, the decisive one being symmetry matching: the proposed asymptotic symmetry algebra of the bulk is mapped one-to-one onto the spacetime and internal symmetries of the gauge theory, which selects the interactin

Load-bearing premise

The proposal stands or falls on the assumption that matching the proposed asymptotic symmetry algebra of the bulk—which the paper says has not been fixed by a rigorous near-boundary analysis—is sufficient to identify the holographic dual, given that the quantitative-test condition is explicitly missing (§3.2.3).

What would settle it

Compute the first unprotected observable on both sides: the one-loop correction to the folded-string dispersion relation E = J^2/(4πκT) from the GYM side should match the string-side result. Alternatively, a rigorous near-boundary analysis of the SNC AdS5×S5 background that reveals additional asymptotic symmetry generators would break the one-to-one dictionary and refute the proposed identification.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Holography is not an exclusive property of Lorentzian AdS spacetimes: a quantum-consistent, Weyl-anomaly-free non-Lorentzian example exists, so holography can be studied in spacetimes without local Lorentz invariance.
  • The non-relativistic corner simplifies the theory: classical solutions have dispersion relations of non-relativistic type, with energy quadratic in angular momentum, and the theory admits a Lax connection, making exact solvability plausible.
  • The symmetry dictionary associates the infinite tower of boundary supertranslations and rotations with the conformal Milne spacetime symmetries and internal symmetries of GYM, providing a concrete holographic map even before quantitative checks.
  • The same five-condition logic generalises: membrane Newton-Cartan holography for AdS4/ABJM and p-brane Newton-Cartan limits of Dq-branes give a family of dualities, and the aligned 3-NC limit reproduces the original AdS5/CFT4, so relativistic AdS/CFT appears as a special case.
  • Integrability in the non-relativistic corner is not of the standard Liouville type: the trivial classical spectral curve signals that the usual characteristic-equation technology must be replaced by non-diagonalisable monodromy data, which may still carry conserved charges.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the symmetry-matching criterion is as powerful as the review assumes, the same method could be used to discriminate between competing non-relativistic limits of a given duality: any candidate whose symmetry algebra contains physical extra generators with non-zero Noether charge, as in GED, is disfavoured without computing any observable.
  • The absence of a point-like BMN vacuum suggests that the natural holographic dictionary for this corner should be built around extended folded-string states; operators dual to such states, rather than BMN-type operators, are the ones likely to exhibit the quadratic dispersion E ~ J^2.
  • The review's DLCQ_n/DLCQ_m interpretation of BPS decoupling limits implies that many known and proposed non-relativistic dualities are not independent but are related by string dualities; testing one duality quantitatively could indirectly constrain its S/T/U-dual partners.
  • The non-diagonalisable monodromy, while obstructing a conventional spectral curve, might be exactly what makes the corner solvable: one can try to define a generalised spectral parameter or truncated characteristic equation that captures the relevant conserved charges; this is a concrete open problem suggested by the review.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript is an invited review of String Newton-Cartan (SNC) holography, centred on the non-relativistic limit of type IIB string theory on AdS5 x S5 (the GGK theory) and its proposed holographic duality with Galilean Yang-Mills (GYM) theory with five interacting scalars. It reviews the limit, null-reduction, and expansion methods for constructing non-relativistic string actions; the SNC geometry of AdS5 x S5 in several coordinate systems; a set of five consistency conditions for taking non-relativistic limits of the AdS/CFT brane construction; the GGK/GYM proposal and its p-brane, Carroll, and flat-space generalizations; classical string solutions and their quantisation; and the coset formalism, Lax connection, and spectral-curve approach to integrability. The review is candid that the rigorous near-boundary analysis fixing the asymptotic symmetry algebra has not yet been done and that the quantitative holographic test is missing.

Significance. If established, the GGK/GYM duality would provide the first holographic correspondence between a non-Lorentzian String Newton-Cartan bulk and a non-relativistic gauge theory, and would define an exactly-solvable corner of AdS/CFT. The review's value is that it collects the construction in one place: explicit limit procedures, the critical B-field mechanism, SNC metric data, classical solutions with dispersion relations, quantisation frameworks, and Lax-connection results. The authors are unusually explicit about open points, including the conjectural status of the asymptotic symmetry algebra and the absence of a quantitative test. The paper does not ship machine-checked proofs or code, but the displayed derivations are detailed enough to be checked independently. The main caveat is that the abstract and introductory sections present the 'first example' claim more strongly than the reviewed evidence supports.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3.2.3 and Table 3.1] The flagship statement in §1.3 that GGK/GYM 'provides the first example of String Newton–Cartan holography' is stronger than the evidence reviewed in the manuscript. The proposed asymptotic symmetry algebra Gasym in (3.2.31) is inferred from heuristics: the text states that the Brown–Hennaux-type near-boundary analysis 'has not been done yet', and the fifth consistency condition, the quantitative test, is explicitly missing. The one-to-one correspondence in Table 3.1 therefore matches the gauge-theory symmetries against a conjectured algebra and cannot exclude other candidates, such as the GED theory, with the same strength as a derived asymptotic symmetry algebra would. Since the review does acknowledge these gaps elsewhere, this is primarily a framing issue, but the abstract and §1.3 should consistently say 'proposed/candidate first example' unless the asymptotic analysis and quantitat
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §1.3] Add the qualifier 'proposed' to the claim of a 'first example of String Newton–Cartan holography', so that the introductory formulation aligns with the caveats given in §3.2.3 and §6.2.
  2. [§2.1.3, after Eq. (2.1.33)] The text explicitly doubts the sufficiency of the Frobenius condition (2.1.33) and suggests that it may need to be supplemented by δ²L(0)/δx(0)δx(0) = 0. Please state clearly whether this affects only the expansion method or also the claimed equivalence of the three constructions reviewed in §2.1. As written, the status is ambiguous.
  3. [§3.2.3 and Table 3.1] A few sentences explaining how the generators {P^(n)_i′, J_i′j′}, which act on the 9-dimensional z=0 submanifold, become internal symmetries of the 3+1-dimensional gauge theory would help readers follow the symmetry-matching dictionary.
  4. [§3.3–§3.4] Consider adding a summary table showing, for each proposed duality (GGK/GYM, D1NC, MNC/ABJM, D3NC, generic p-NC, Carroll), which of the five consistency conditions are satisfied and which remain open. This would make the review's own assessment easier to compare across the different constructions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the GGK/GYM identification is presented as a proposal with explicitly admitted gaps, and its symmetry check is an independent comparison rather than a definitional reduction.

full rationale

Walked the claimed derivation chain: the non-relativistic limit (2.1.5)-(2.1.9), the SNC AdS5×S5 background (3.2.4), the GYM gauge-theory limit (3.2.22), the symmetry-matching argument (3.2.30)-(3.2.32), and the classical-string/quantisation checks in Chapter 4. No step reduces to its own input by definition. The five consistency conditions are used as checks, not as derived predictions: condition 4 compares the Ggauge symmetries read from the explicit GYM action (3.2.32) with the proposed Gasym (3.2.31), obtained by evaluating the independently computed Gbulk Killing vectors at z=0. The paper explicitly calls Gasym 'expected/proposed' and states that the rigorous Brown-Hennaux-type analysis 'has not been done yet' (§3.2.3); this is an admitted open problem, not a circularity. Condition 5, the quantitative test, is explicitly stated to be 'missing in the current state of the art' (§3.2.3, §6.2), so the strongest claim remains a proposal, but the review is honest about this limitation. The 'aligned 3-NC limit' (§3.3.2) explicitly identifies that limit with standard AdS/CFT rather than renaming a known result as a new prediction. Self-citations are numerous because this is a review of the authors' own program, but the key computations—Killing vectors, gauge-theory symmetries, classical solutions, and coset constructions—are reproduced in the text and do not reduce to an unverified self-citation. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction and no ansatz is smuggled in only via citation. Overall, the central derivation has independent content; the admitted lack of a quantitative test is a correctness/evidence gap, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The ledger is light on fitted numbers because this is a review of a theory program: parameters such as κ and w in the classical solutions are solution data, not fits, and the constraints p+q=10, p∥=q−2 are derived in §3.3.4. The genuine hand-chosen inputs are the scalings and critical fields that define each non-relativistic limit. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are invented; the auxiliary Lagrange-multiplier and Hubbard-Stratonovich fields are technical devices with constraint-implying equations of motion from prior work.

free parameters (3)
  • Critical B-field value B90 = ±1
    Chosen by hand (§3.2.2, eq. 3.2.21) to cancel the c²-divergent term in the D3-brane gauge-side action; a consistency constraint, not fitted to data.
  • Dilaton rescaling shift = Φ → ln c + Φ (SNC), Φ → −3 ln c + Φ (inverted SNC limit), Φ → ln c + Φ (Carroll)
    Selected so the next-to-leading action stays finite in the limit; the particular shift is part of the hand-built commuting-limits construction (§3.2.2, §3.4.1).
  • Coordinate-rescaling weights in SNC limits = XA → c XA, Xa → Xa/c (limit 1); XA invariant, Xa → Xa/c, Aα → Aα/c² (limit 2)
    These engineered scalings encode the non-relativistic limit; the weights are fixed by demanding the consistency conditions (Uniqueness, Holographic realisation) rather than derived from a more fundamental principle (§3.2.2).
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption c-expansion of the vielbein EμA = c τμA + c⁻¹ mμA + O(c⁻³), Eμa = eμa + O(c⁻²) (2.1.2), with the critical B-field bcrit = τA ∧ τB εAB cancelling the divergence
    The core encoding of the stringy non-relativistic limit, inherited from [25,27,30,31]; the review takes it as given for the whole construction.
  • ad hoc to paper The five consistency conditions (Horizon, Uniqueness, Holographic realisation, Symmetry matching, Quantitative test) define what makes a valid holographic duality
    Introduced in this review as the organizing axiomatic framework of §3.2; no proof that they are necessary or sufficient.
  • domain assumption Near-horizon (α′→0) and non-relativistic (c→∞) limits commute
    Verified for the SNC case but explicitly open for D1NC/D3NC (§3.2.4, §3.3.3), where higher-order divergences may survive; the review itself flags this as an outstanding consistency test.
  • domain assumption The proposed asymptotic symmetry algebra Gasym (3.2.31) is the full asymptotic symmetry group of SNC AdS5×S5
    The symmetry-matching pillar of the GGK/GYM duality rests on this; the review admits the Brown-Hennaux-type analysis 'has not been done yet' (§3.2.3).
  • domain assumption S-duality (and the wider duality web of [87,135,136]) maps the SNC to the D1NC construction
    Used to connect the two proposed holographies (§3.2.4); the identification is 'expected to arise from the S-dual' rather than demonstrated.
  • standard math Standard mathematical machinery: Hubbard-Stratonovich transformations, Binet's formula, Inönü-Wigner contraction / Lie algebra expansion, generalized Lamé equation solutions
    Used throughout §§2.1, 4.2, 5.2 without proof; uncontroversial background.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 64041 in / 17004 out tokens · 160229 ms · 2026-08-02T17:27:36.600269+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

String Newton-Cartan holography is a new example of gauge/gravity duality relating non-relativistic string theory and gauge theories. We review how to construct a family of string and $p$-brane Newton-Cartan holographic dualities by consistently taking the non-relativistic limit of the AdS/CFT correspondence. We also review classical string solutions, quantisation, string coset action and integrability of the non-relativistic string theory appearing in the String Newton-Cartan limit of the AdS$_5$/CFT$_4$ correspondence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.24657 by Andrea Fontanella, Juan Miguel Nieto Garc\'ia.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: The non-relativistic limit produces a codimension two singular foliation of the target space, where the relativistic vielbein Eµ Aˆ is replaced by the degenerate SNC vielbeine (τµ A, eµ a ), with A = 0, 1, a = 2, ..., 9. In order to get a more interesting action, we have two options: either we also make the worldsheet non-relativistic, leading us to actions that might have Weyl anomalies, or we also scal… view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: In the gravity theory, there are two conceptually different symmetries: the symmetries acting in the bulk and the asymptotic symmetries acting at the boundary. Only the asymptotic symmetries need to holographically match the symmetries of the dual gauge theory. demanding the ‘Symmetry matching’ of section 3.2, which we are going to discuss next. 3.2.3 Matching the symmetries Accordingly to the holographi… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-relativistic limits of $\mathcal N=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory and S-duality

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Constructs a family of non-relativistic limits of 4d MSYM via brane setups that organize into a 3D moduli space with nontrivial topology where PSL(2,Z) dualities act more complexly than in the relativistic theory, est...

  2. Groenewold-Moyal twists, integrable spin-chains and AdS/CFT

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A Groenewold-Moyal twist deforms an integrable sl(2) spin-chain whose spectrum is computed perturbatively via the Baxter equation and matched at order J^{-3} to a non-local charge of a deformed BMN string in AdS.

  3. Large-$N$ Carrollian Thermodynamics from AdS Black-Hole Phase-Space Contractions

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Finite Carrollian limit of extended AdS first law is reinterpreted as double-scaled large-N low-temperature holographic ensemble with finite products, new boundary stress tensor, and celestial correlator representations.

  4. Large-$N$ Carrollian Thermodynamics from AdS Black-Hole Phase-Space Contractions

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Finite Carrollian black-hole thermodynamics arises as a double-scaled low-temperature large-N ensemble in AdS/CFT, with the boundary Brown-York stress tensor reproducing the contracted bulk Hamiltonian and first law.

  5. Phase-Space Contractions of Carrollian Black-Hole Thermodynamics

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Carrollian contraction of Schwarzschild-AdS thermodynamics requires rescaling the time generator and G such that the extended first law remains finite, yielding T to 0 and S to infinity with finite T delta S and V delta P.

  6. Phase-Space Contractions of Carrollian Black-Hole Thermodynamics

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Double-scaling contractions of extended AdS black-hole thermodynamics produce finite Carrollian phase-space first laws with pressure-volume contributions under the condition α + γ = 1.

  7. Phase-Space Contractions of Carrollian Black-Hole Thermodynamics

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In the Carrollian limit of AdS black holes, finite thermodynamic phase space requires α + γ = 1, yielding T to 0 and S to infinity while keeping TδS and VδP finite.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

279 extracted references · 240 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena,“The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998),hep-th/9711200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov,“Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory”,Phys. Lett. B428, 105 (1998),hep-th/9802109

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography

    E. Witten,“Anti-de Sitter space and holography”,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998), hep-th/9802150

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Wilson loops in large N field theories

    J. M. Maldacena,“Wilson loops in large N field theories”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4859 (1998),hep-th/9803002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena,“N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals”, JHEP 0810, 091 (2008),arxiv:0806.1218

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    The Search for a holographic dual to AdS(3) x S**3 x S**3 x S**1

    S. Gukov, E. Martinec, G. W. Moore and A. Strominger,“The Search for a holographic dual to AdS(3) x S**3 x S**3 x S**1”,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 9, 435 (2005), hep-th/0403090

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    The holographic dual ofAdS3 ×S 3 ×S 3 ×S 1

    D. Tong,“The holographic dual ofAdS3 ×S 3 ×S 3 ×S 1”,JHEP 1404, 193 (2014), arxiv:1402.5135

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    A holographic dual for string theory on AdS3×S3×S3×S1

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel and W. Li,“A holographic dual for string theory on AdS3×S3×S3×S1”,JHEP 1708, 111 (2017),arxiv:1707.02705

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Non-Relativistic Holography - A Group-Theoretical Perspective

    V. K. Dobrev,“Non-Relativistic Holography - A Group-Theoretical Perspective”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1430001 (2014),arxiv:1312.0219

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Intertwining Operator Realization of Non-Relativistic Holography

    N. Aizawa and V. K. Dobrev,“Intertwining Operator Realization of Non-Relativistic Holography”,Nucl. Phys. B 828, 581 (2010),arxiv:0906.0257

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    Torsional Newton-Cartan Geometry and Lifshitz Holography

    M. H. Christensen, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers and B. Rollier,“Torsional Newton-Cartan Geometry and Lifshitz Holography”,Phys. Rev. D 89, 061901 (2014),arxiv:1311.4794

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    Boundary Stress-Energy Tensor and Newton-Cartan Geometry in Lifshitz Holography

    M. H. Christensen, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers and B. Rollier,“Boundary Stress-Energy Tensor and Newton-Cartan Geometry in Lifshitz Holography”,JHEP 1401, 057 (2014), arxiv:1311.6471

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    Particle Number and 3D Schroedinger Holography

    J. Hartong and B. Rollier,“Particle Number and 3D Schroedinger Holography”, JHEP 1409, 111 (2014),arxiv:1305.3653

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    Schrödinger Invariance from Lifshitz Isometries in Holography and Field Theory

    J. Hartong, E. Kiritsis and N. A. Obers,“Schrödinger Invariance from Lifshitz Isometries in Holography and Field Theory”,Phys. Rev. D 92, 066003 (2015),arxiv:1409.1522

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    Lifshitz space–times for Schrödinger holography

    J. Hartong, E. Kiritsis and N. A. Obers,“Lifshitz space–times for Schrödinger holography”,Phys. Lett. B 746, 318 (2015),arxiv:1409.1519

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    Torsional Newton–Cartan geometry and the Schrödinger algebra

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Hartong and J. Rosseel,“Torsional Newton–Cartan geometry and the Schrödinger algebra”,Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 135017 (2015),arxiv:1409.5555. 110

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Toward an AdS/cold atoms correspondence: A Geometric realization of the Schrodinger symmetry

    D. T. Son,“Toward an AdS/cold atoms correspondence: A Geometric realization of the Schrodinger symmetry”,Phys. Rev. D 78, 046003 (2008),arxiv:0804.3972

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  18. [18]

    Comments on string theory backgrounds with non-relativistic conformal symmetry

    J. Maldacena, D. Martelli and Y. Tachikawa,“Comments on string theory backgrounds with non-relativistic conformal symmetry”,JHEP 0810, 072 (2008),arxiv:0807.1100

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  19. [19]

    Holography for Schrodinger backgrounds

    M. Guica, K. Skenderis, M. Taylor and B. C. van Rees,“Holography for Schrodinger backgrounds”,JHEP 1102, 056 (2011),arxiv:1008.1991

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  20. [20]

    Holography for chiral scale-invariant models

    R. N. Caldeira Costa and M. Taylor,“Holography for chiral scale-invariant models”, JHEP 1102, 082 (2011),arxiv:1010.4800

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    Non-relativistic holography

    M. Taylor,“Non-relativistic holography”,arxiv:0812.0530

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Lifshitz holography

    M. Taylor,“Lifshitz holography”,Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 033001 (2016), arxiv:1512.03554

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    A non-lorentzian primer

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Figueroa-O’Farrill and J. Gomis,“A non-lorentzian primer”, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 69, 1 (2023),arxiv:2206.12177

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    The Carrollian Kaleidoscope

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, P. Dhivakar, S. Mondal and A. Shukla,“The Carrollian Kaleidoscope”,arxiv:2506.16164

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Nonrelativistic closed string theory

    J. Gomis and H. Ooguri,“Nonrelativistic closed string theory”, J. Math. Phys. 42, 3127 (2001),hep-th/0009181

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  26. [26]

    IIA/B, wound and wrapped

    U. H. Danielsson, A. Guijosa and M. Kruczenski,“IIA/B, wound and wrapped”, JHEP 0010, 020 (2000),hep-th/0009182

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  27. [27]

    Non-relativistic superstrings: A New soluble sector of AdS(5) x S**5

    J. Gomis, J. Gomis and K. Kamimura,“Non-relativistic superstrings: A New soluble sector of AdS(5) x S**5”,JHEP 0512, 024 (2005),hep-th/0507036

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  28. [28]

    ’Stringy’ Newton-Cartan Gravity

    R. Andringa, E. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis and M. de Roo,“’Stringy’ Newton-Cartan Gravity”,Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 235020 (2012),arxiv:1206.5176

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  29. [29]

    Newton–Cartan (super)gravity as a non-relativistic limit

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Rosseel and T. Zojer,“Newton–Cartan (super)gravity as a non-relativistic limit”,Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 205003 (2015),arxiv:1505.02095

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Nonrelativistic String Theory and T-Duality

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis and Z. Yan,“Nonrelativistic String Theory and T-Duality”, JHEP 1811, 133 (2018),arxiv:1806.06071

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    String Theory and String Newton-Cartan Geometry

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis, J. Rosseel, C. Şimşek and Z. Yan,“String Theory and String Newton-Cartan Geometry”,J. Phys. A 53, 014001 (2020),arxiv:1907.10668

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Nonrelativistic strings and limits of the AdS/CFT correspondence

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong and N. A. Obers,“Nonrelativistic strings and limits of the AdS/CFT correspondence”,Phys. Rev. D 96, 086019 (2017),arxiv:1705.03535

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    Strings with Non-Relativistic Conformal Symmetry and Limits of the AdS/CFT Correspondence

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, L. Menculini, N. A. Obers and Z. Yan,“Strings with Non-Relativistic Conformal Symmetry and Limits of the AdS/CFT Correspondence”, JHEP 1811, 190 (2018),arxiv:1810.05560

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Relating non-relativistic string theories

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, L. Menculini, N. A. Obers and G. Oling,“Relating non-relativistic string theories”,JHEP 1911, 071 (2019),arxiv:1907.01663

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1911

  35. [35]

    Spin Matrix Theory String Backgrounds and Penrose Limits of AdS/CFT

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers and G. Oling,“Spin Matrix Theory String Backgrounds and Penrose Limits of AdS/CFT”,JHEP 2103, 129 (2021), arxiv:2011.02539

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Nonrelativistic near-BPS corners of N= 4super-Yang-Mills withSU(1,1)symmetry

    S. Baiguera, T. Harmark and N. Wintergerst,“Nonrelativistic near-BPS corners of N= 4super-Yang-Mills withSU(1,1)symmetry”,JHEP 2102, 188 (2021), arxiv:2009.03799. 111

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Symmetry structure of the interactions in near-BPS corners ofN= 4super-Yang-Mills

    S. Baiguera, T. Harmark, Y. Lei and N. Wintergerst,“Symmetry structure of the interactions in near-BPS corners ofN= 4super-Yang-Mills”,JHEP 2104, 029 (2021), arxiv:2012.08532

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Spin Matrix Theory in near1 8-BPS corners ofN = 4 super-Yang-Mills

    S. Baiguera, T. Harmark and Y. Lei,“Spin Matrix Theory in near1 8-BPS corners ofN = 4 super-Yang-Mills”,JHEP 2202, 191 (2022),arxiv:2111.10149

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Nonrelativistic String Theory in Background Fields

    J. Gomis, J. Oh and Z. Yan,“Nonrelativistic String Theory in Background Fields”, JHEP 1910, 101 (2019),arxiv:1905.07315

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  40. [40]

    Torsional Newton Cartan gravity from non-relativistic strings

    A. D. Gallegos, U. Gürsoy and N. Zinnato,“Torsional Newton Cartan gravity from non-relativistic strings”,JHEP 2009, 172 (2020),arxiv:1906.01607

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  41. [41]

    Nonrelativistic Expansion of Closed Bosonic Strings

    J. Hartong and E. Have,“Nonrelativistic Expansion of Closed Bosonic Strings”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 021602 (2022),arxiv:2107.00023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Nonrelativistic approximations of closed bosonic string theory

    J. Hartong and E. Have,“Nonrelativistic approximations of closed bosonic string theory”, JHEP 2302, 153 (2023),arxiv:2211.01795

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    New approach to the study of nonrelativistic bosonic string in flat spacetime

    R. Banerjee, S. Moinuddin and P. Mukherjee,“New approach to the study of nonrelativistic bosonic string in flat spacetime”,Phys. Rev. D 103, 046020 (2021), arxiv:2008.00814

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Geometry of nonrelativistic string

    S. Moinuddin and P. Mukherjee,“Geometry of nonrelativistic string”, Phys. Scripta 98, 015304 (2023),arxiv:2105.06218

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Can non-relativistic strings propagate without geometric baggage? A minimal Hamiltonian formulation in Newton-Cartan geometry

    P. Nandi, S. Moinuddin and A. Sattar,“Can non-relativistic strings propagate without geometric baggage? A minimal Hamiltonian formulation in Newton-Cartan geometry”, JHEP 2510, 062 (2025),arxiv:2506.12506

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Note About T-duality of Non-Relativistic String

    J. Klusoň,“Note About T-duality of Non-Relativistic String”,JHEP 1908, 074 (2019), arxiv:1811.12658

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908

  47. [47]

    T-duality of Non-Relativistic String in Torsional Newton-Cartan Background

    J. Klusoň,“T-duality of Non-Relativistic String in Torsional Newton-Cartan Background”,JHEP 2005, 024 (2020),arxiv:1909.13508

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  48. [48]

    Non-Relativistic D-brane from T-duality Along Null Direction

    J. Klusoň,“Non-Relativistic D-brane from T-duality Along Null Direction”, JHEP 1910, 153 (2019),arxiv:1907.05662

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  49. [49]

    Torsional string Newton-Cartan geometry for non-relativistic strings

    L. Bidussi, T. Harmark, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers and G. Oling,“Torsional string Newton-Cartan geometry for non-relativistic strings”,JHEP 2202, 116 (2022), arxiv:2107.00642

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Dynamics of Perturbations in Double Field Theory & Non-Relativistic String Theory

    S. M. Ko, C. Melby-Thompson, R. Meyer and J.-H. Park,“Dynamics of Perturbations in Double Field Theory & Non-Relativistic String Theory”,JHEP 1512, 144 (2015), arxiv:1508.01121

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    Classification of non-Riemannian doubled-yet-gauged spacetime

    K. Morand and J.-H. Park,“Classification of non-Riemannian doubled-yet-gauged spacetime”,Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 685 (2017),arxiv:1707.03713, [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 78, 901 (2018)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    A worldsheet supersymmetric Newton-Cartan string

    C. D. A. Blair,“A worldsheet supersymmetric Newton-Cartan string”, JHEP 1910, 266 (2019),arxiv:1908.00074

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  53. [53]

    Non-Riemannian isometries from double field theory

    C. D. A. Blair, G. Oling and J.-H. Park,“Non-Riemannian isometries from double field theory”,JHEP 2104, 072 (2021),arxiv:2012.07766

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Non-relativistic duality andT ¯Tdeformations

    C. D. A. Blair,“Non-relativistic duality andT ¯Tdeformations”,JHEP 2007, 069 (2020), arxiv:2002.12413

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  55. [55]

    Note about Hamiltonian formalism for Newton–Cartan string and p-brane

    J. Kluson,“Note about Hamiltonian formalism for Newton–Cartan string and p-brane”, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 511 (2018),arxiv:1712.07430. 112

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Remark About Non-Relativistic String in Newton-Cartan Background and Null Reduction

    J. Klusoň,“Remark About Non-Relativistic String in Newton-Cartan Background and Null Reduction”,JHEP 1805, 041 (2018),arxiv:1803.07336

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Nonrelativistic String Theory Sigma Model and Its Canonical Formulation

    J. Klusoň,“Nonrelativistic String Theory Sigma Model and Its Canonical Formulation”, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 108 (2019),arxiv:1809.10411

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    Lie Algebra Expansion and Integrability in Superstring Sigma-Models

    A. Fontanella and L. Romano,“Lie Algebra Expansion and Integrability in Superstring Sigma-Models”,JHEP 2007, 083 (2020),arxiv:2005.01736

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  59. [59]

    Coset space actions for nonrelativistic strings

    A. Fontanella and S. J. van Tongeren,“Coset space actions for nonrelativistic strings”, JHEP 2206, 080 (2022),arxiv:2203.07386

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    Extending the nonrelativistic string AdS coset

    A. Fontanella and J. M. Nieto García,“Extending the nonrelativistic string AdS coset”, Phys. Rev. D 106, L121901 (2022),arxiv:2208.02295

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Non-relativistic string monodromies

    A. Fontanella, J. M. Nieto García and O. Ohlsson Sax,“Non-relativistic string monodromies”,JHEP 2301, 165 (2023),arxiv:2211.04479

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Classical string solutions in non-relativistic AdS5 × S5: closed and twisted sectors

    A. Fontanella and J. M. N. García,“Classical string solutions in non-relativistic AdS5 × S5: closed and twisted sectors”,J. Phys. A 55, 085401 (2022),arxiv:2109.13240

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Flowing from relativistic to nonrelativistic string vacua in AdS5×S5

    A. Fontanella and J. M. Nieto García,“Flowing from relativistic to nonrelativistic string vacua in AdS5×S5”,Phys. Rev. D 109, 026014 (2024),arxiv:2305.19316

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Rotating solutions of non-relativistic string theory

    J. Gomis and F. Passerini,“Rotating solutions of non-relativistic string theory”, Phys. Lett. B 617, 182 (2005),hep-th/0411195

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  65. [65]

    Holography of Non-relativistic String on AdS(5) x S**5

    M. Sakaguchi and K. Yoshida,“Holography of Non-relativistic String on AdS(5) x S**5”, JHEP 0802, 092 (2008),arxiv:0712.4112

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  66. [66]

    Light-cone gauge in non-relativistic AdS5×S5 string theory

    A. Fontanella and J. M. Nieto García,“Light-cone gauge in non-relativistic AdS5×S5 string theory”,JHEP 2311, 053 (2023),arxiv:2102.00008

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    A perturbative approach to the non-relativistic string spectrum

    M. de Leeuw, A. Fontanella and J. M. Nieto García,“A perturbative approach to the non-relativistic string spectrum”,JHEP 2410, 096 (2024),arxiv:2403.09563

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Nonrelativistic Open String and Yang-Mills Theory

    J. Gomis, Z. Yan and M. Yu,“Nonrelativistic Open String and Yang-Mills Theory”, JHEP 2103, 269 (2021),arxiv:2007.01886

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    T-Duality in Nonrelativistic Open String Theory

    J. Gomis, Z. Yan and M. Yu,“T-Duality in Nonrelativistic Open String Theory”, JHEP 2102, 087 (2021),arxiv:2008.05493

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    Non-relativistic expansion of open strings and D-branes

    J. Hartong and E. Have,“Non-relativistic expansion of open strings and D-branes”, JHEP 2409, 087 (2024),arxiv:2407.05985

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    A non-relativistic limit of NS-NS gravity

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Lahnsteiner, L. Romano, J. Rosseel and C. Şimşek,“A non-relativistic limit of NS-NS gravity”,JHEP 2106, 021 (2021),arxiv:2102.06974

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Non-relativistic ten-dimensional minimal supergravity

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Lahnsteiner, L. Romano, J. Rosseel and C. Simsek,“Non-relativistic ten-dimensional minimal supergravity”,JHEP 2112, 123 (2021),arxiv:2107.14636

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    Non-Lorentzian IIB supergravity from a polynomial realization of SL(2,R)

    E. A. Bergshoeff, K. T. Grosvenor, J. Lahnsteiner, Z. Yan and U. Zorba, “Non-Lorentzian IIB supergravity from a polynomial realization of SL(2,R)”, JHEP 2312, 022 (2023),arxiv:2306.04741

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    The surprising structure of non-relativistic 11-dimensional supergravity

    E. A. Bergshoeff, C. D. A. Blair, J. Lahnsteiner and J. Rosseel,“The surprising structure of non-relativistic 11-dimensional supergravity”,JHEP 2412, 010 (2024), arxiv:2407.21648

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    The M5-brane limit of eleven-dimensional supergravity

    E. Bergshoeff, N. Lambert and J. Smith,“The M5-brane limit of eleven-dimensional supergravity”,JHEP 2506, 060 (2025),arxiv:2502.07969. 113

    arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Curvatures and Non-metricities in the Non-Relativistic Limit of Bosonic Supergravity

    E. Lescano,“Curvatures and Non-metricities in the Non-Relativistic Limit of Bosonic Supergravity”,arxiv:2601.03342

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [77]

    Non-relativistic heterotic string theory

    E. A. Bergshoeff and L. Romano,“Non-relativistic heterotic string theory”, JHEP 2401, 146 (2024),arxiv:2310.19716

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Heterotic string sigma models: discrete light cone quantization and its current-current deformation

    E. A. Bergshoeff, K. T. Grosvenor, L. Romano and Z. Yan,“Heterotic string sigma models: discrete light cone quantization and its current-current deformation”, JHEP 2509, 021 (2025),arxiv:2505.07458

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Non-relativistic limits of bosonic and heterotic Double Field Theory

    E. Lescano and D. Osten,“Non-relativistic limits of bosonic and heterotic Double Field Theory”,JHEP 2407, 286 (2024),arxiv:2405.10362

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  80. [80]

    A Non-Relativistic Limit for Heterotic Supergravity and its Gauge Lagrangian

    E. Lescano,“A Non-Relativistic Limit for Heterotic Supergravity and its Gauge Lagrangian”,arxiv:2502.08711

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.