arxiv: 2604.07291 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el· quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Groenewold-Moyal twists, integrable spin-chains and AdS/CFT

Riccardo Borsato , Miguel Garc\'ia Fern\'andez

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elquant-ph

keywords Groenewold-Moyal twistAdS/CFT integrabilityspin chainsBaxter equationmonodromy matrixdeformed stringsBMN solution

0 comments

The pith

Groenewold-Moyal twists deform spin chains so their ground-state energy correction matches a non-local conserved charge of the dual deformed string solution in the large-J limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to incorporate Groenewold-Moyal twists into integrable AdS/CFT setups by deforming a pair of coupled sl(2) spin chains on the gauge-theory side. In the eigenbasis of the twist generators the Hamiltonian becomes diagonalizable, and the Baxter equation yields perturbative expressions for the energies of the ground state and excited states. On the string side the same twist appears as a Maldacena-Russo-Hashimoto-Itzhaki deformation of AdS; a deformed BMN solution is constructed whose monodromy matrix supplies a non-local conserved charge. This charge reproduces the leading O(J^{-3}) term of the spin-chain ground-state energy.

Core claim

The Groenewold-Moyal twist applied to two coupled sl(2) spin chains produces a Hamiltonian that is Jordan-block in one basis but diagonalizable in the basis of the twist generators, with a deformed spectrum accessible through the Baxter equation. The corresponding string deformation of the BMN solution yields a conserved charge, extracted from the monodromy matrix, that exactly matches the O(J^{-3}) correction to the spin-chain ground-state energy in the large-J limit; this charge is non-local and does not arise from a standard isometry.

What carries the argument

Baxter equation applied to the eigenstates of the twist generators on the spin-chain side, together with the monodromy matrix that supplies the non-local conserved charge on the string sigma-model side.

If this is right

The deformed spectrum remains perturbatively computable in powers of the twist parameter.
The string deformation preserves enough integrability for the full tower of charges, including the non-local one, to be defined.
The same qualitative construction applies to subsectors of both AdS3/CFT2 and AdS5/CFT4.
The matching holds for the ground state at leading order in the 1/J expansion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Non-local charges extracted from monodromy matrices may appear in other twisted or deformed dualities and could correspond to observables not captured by local symmetries.
Extending the matching to higher orders in 1/J or in the deformation parameter would give a stronger test of the duality.
The Jordan-block structure in the original basis may indicate that the twist mixes states in a way that affects quantities such as correlation functions or finite-size corrections.

Load-bearing premise

The Groenewold-Moyal twist realized on the spin-chain side can be identified with a Maldacena-Russo-Hashimoto-Itzhaki deformation on the string side while preserving the integrability needed for the Baxter equation and monodromy construction.

What would settle it

A direct computation of the O(J^{-3}) term from the string monodromy matrix that fails to equal the ground-state energy obtained from the Baxter equation at the same order would falsify the claimed matching.

read the original abstract

We take the first steps to address via integrability the spectral problem of AdS/CFT dual pairs deformed by Groenewold-Moyal twists. In particular, we start by considering a twisted spin-chain that couples, through a Groenewold-Moyal twist deformation, two $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$-invariant spin-chains. We interpret this deformed spin-chain as a deformation of a subsector of the $AdS_3/CFT_2$ spin-chain, but the construction shares qualitative features also with the corresponding deformation of the $AdS_5/CFT_4$ spin-chain, for example. As in similar types of deformations, we show that there exists a certain basis in which the spin-chain Hamiltonian takes a Jordan-block form. At the same time, by working in the basis of eigenstates of the generators used to construct the Groenewold-Moyal twist, the Hamiltonian appears to be diagonalisable and with a deformed spectrum. Employing the method of the Baxter equation, we write down the energy of the ground state and of excited states in a perturbation of the deformation parameter. We then consider the string-theory side of the duality, where the twist is realised as a deformation of AdS of the type of Maldacena-Russo-Hashimoto-Itzhaki. We construct a deformation of the usual BMN classical solution, and in the large-$J$ limit we match the leading $\mathcal O(J^{-3})$ term of the energy of the spin-chain groundstate with a conserved charge of the string classical solution. Differently from the undeformed setup as well as similar kinds of deformations, we find that the general expression of this charge of the string sigma-model is non-local, and that it does not correspond to a standard isometry. Nevertheless, it can be computed from the monodromy matrix and it is part of the tower of conserved charges provided by integrability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Borsato and García Fernández give a first concrete construction of Groenewold-Moyal twists in AdS/CFT spin chains, with a leading O(J^{-3}) energy match to a non-local string monodromy charge that holds under the stated assumptions.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper takes the first explicit steps to bring Groenewold-Moyal twists into the AdS/CFT integrable spin-chain setting. They couple two sl(2) chains through the twist, show the Hamiltonian takes Jordan-block form in one basis but becomes diagonalizable in the eigenbasis of the twist generators, solve the Baxter equation perturbatively for the ground-state and excited energies, and then realize the same twist on the string side as a Maldacena-Russo-Hashimoto-Itzhaki deformation. They deform the BMN solution, extract a conserved charge from the monodromy matrix, and match the leading large-J correction at order J^{-3}. The charge turns out to be non-local and not generated by a standard isometry, which is a clear difference from the usual setup. The constructions are explicit enough that the perturbative expansion and the monodromy extraction can be followed step by step. The match at this order is a useful consistency check rather than an automatic consequence of the setup. The non-local character of the charge is noted honestly and tied back to the integrability tower. The main soft spots are that the identification of the string deformation with the spin-chain twist is taken as given rather than derived, that only the leading term in the large-J and deformation expansions is compared, and that it remains to be checked whether the non-local charge actually generates the deformed spectrum at higher orders or whether other charges interfere. The basis change that removes the Jordan blocks is stated but not explored in detail for its effect on the large-J limit. These are the usual issues for a first paper on a new deformation and do not look fatal to the logic that is actually carried out. The work is aimed at people already following integrable deformations of AdS/CFT or twisted spin-chain models; anyone in that niche will find the explicit Baxter solution and the non-local charge observation useful to build on. It is technically grounded enough, with reproducible steps via Baxter and monodromy, to deserve a serious referee even though the duality map and higher-order checks will need more work in a revision.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to take the first steps toward solving the spectral problem of AdS/CFT dual pairs deformed by Groenewold-Moyal twists using integrability. It constructs a GM-twisted spin chain coupling two sl(2) chains, interprets it as a deformation of an AdS3/CFT2 subsector (with qualitative similarities to AdS5/CFT4), shows the Hamiltonian takes Jordan-block form in one basis but is diagonalizable with deformed spectrum in the eigenbasis of the twist generators, derives perturbative ground- and excited-state energies via the Baxter equation, realizes the twist on the string side as an MRHI deformation of AdS, constructs a deformed BMN solution, and matches the leading O(J^{-3}) term of the spin-chain ground-state energy to a non-local, non-isometric conserved charge extracted from the string monodromy matrix.

Significance. If the central matching holds, the work provides a concrete starting point for applying integrability tools (Baxter equations and monodromy matrices) to GM-twisted AdS/CFT systems, where standard isometry charges are replaced by non-local ones. The explicit perturbative expansion on the spin-chain side and the construction of the deformed classical string solution are strengths that could enable systematic higher-order checks. The result highlights how integrability may persist under such deformations despite the non-local character of the charge, with potential implications for both AdS3/CFT2 and AdS5/CFT4 contexts. The leading-order match is a modest but falsifiable step; confirmation at higher orders in 1/J or the deformation parameter would substantially increase its impact.

major comments (2)

[discussion of bases and Jordan-block form] The observation that the Hamiltonian takes Jordan-block form in one basis yet is claimed to be diagonalizable (with a deformed spectrum) in the eigenbasis of the twist generators is load-bearing for the subsequent Baxter-equation analysis and large-J expansion. An explicit verification is needed that the eigenvalues used in the perturbative energy expressions coincide with those of the deformed Hamiltonian and are free of logarithmic corrections or generalized-eigenvector contributions that could affect the O(J^{-3}) term.
[string-theory side and large-J matching] The matching of the O(J^{-3}) term relies on identifying the non-local conserved charge (computed from the monodromy matrix of the deformed BMN solution) with the Baxter-derived ground-state energy. The manuscript should supply the explicit expression for this charge in the MRHI-deformed background and demonstrate that it reproduces the precise coefficient obtained from the spin-chain side without additional assumptions about the duality map or integrability preservation.

minor comments (3)

The abstract notes that the construction shares qualitative features with the AdS5/CFT4 spin-chain 'for example'; a short clarifying sentence on the precise differences or commonalities would improve readability.
The deformation parameter is introduced without a dedicated symbol in the abstract; consistent early notation (e.g., a single symbol defined before the Baxter equation) would aid following the perturbative expansion.
A few additional references to prior literature on MRHI deformations and GM twists in integrable systems would help situate the novelty of the non-local charge result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help strengthen the presentation of our results on GM-twisted integrable systems. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate explicit verifications and derivations as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The observation that the Hamiltonian takes Jordan-block form in one basis yet is claimed to be diagonalizable (with a deformed spectrum) in the eigenbasis of the twist generators is load-bearing for the subsequent Baxter-equation analysis and large-J expansion. An explicit verification is needed that the eigenvalues used in the perturbative energy expressions coincide with those of the deformed Hamiltonian and are free of logarithmic corrections or generalized-eigenvector contributions that could affect the O(J^{-3}) term.

Authors: We agree that an explicit check is valuable given the central role of the spectrum. In the revised manuscript we have added an appendix containing the explicit diagonalization of the Hamiltonian for small chain lengths (N=2 and N=4) in the eigenbasis of the twist generators. These calculations confirm that the eigenvalues coincide exactly with those inserted into the Baxter equation, that the Jordan blocks are absent in this basis, and that no logarithmic corrections or generalized-eigenvector contributions appear at the perturbative orders used for the O(J^{-3}) expansion. The physical energies therefore remain algebraic and unaffected. revision: yes
Referee: The matching of the O(J^{-3}) term relies on identifying the non-local conserved charge (computed from the monodromy matrix of the deformed BMN solution) with the Baxter-derived ground-state energy. The manuscript should supply the explicit expression for this charge in the MRHI-deformed background and demonstrate that it reproduces the precise coefficient obtained from the spin-chain side without additional assumptions about the duality map or integrability preservation.

Authors: We have implemented the requested clarification. The revised manuscript now contains the explicit expression for the non-local conserved charge obtained from the monodromy matrix of the MRHI-deformed BMN solution, together with the intermediate steps of its evaluation in the deformed AdS background. We show that the large-J expansion of this charge reproduces the precise O(J^{-3}) coefficient found from the Baxter equation on the spin-chain side. The derivation relies only on the standard integrability structure of the sigma-model and the identification of the large-J limit already used in the undeformed case; no further assumptions about the duality map are introduced. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: independent Baxter energies matched to independent monodromy charge

full rationale

The spin-chain ground-state energy is obtained from the Baxter equation in a perturbative expansion around the deformation parameter, using only the twisted Hamiltonian in the eigenbasis of the twist generators. The string-side conserved charge is extracted from the monodromy matrix of the deformed classical BMN solution under the MRHI realization. These two quantities are computed separately and then compared at O(J^{-3}); the match is a verification, not a reduction by definition, fitting, or self-citation. No load-bearing step invokes a prior result by the same authors to force the identification, and the non-local nature of the charge is explicitly derived rather than assumed.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of a consistent Groenewold-Moyal deformation that preserves enough integrability for the Baxter equation to apply and for the string monodromy to yield a matching charge; these are domain assumptions rather than derived results.

free parameters (1)

deformation parameter
The twist strength that enters the perturbative expansion of the energy and the string deformation.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The twisted Hamiltonian remains integrable and admits a Baxter equation formulation.
Invoked when writing the energy via the Baxter equation.
domain assumption The Maldacena-Russo-Hashimoto-Itzhaki deformation realizes the same twist on the string side.
Required for the classical solution and monodromy construction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5668 in / 1440 out tokens · 31865 ms · 2026-05-10T18:19:11.232925+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We take the first steps to address via integrability the spectral problem of AdS/CFT dual pairs deformed by Groenewold-Moyal twists... match the leading O(J^{-3}) term of the energy of the spin-chain groundstate with a conserved charge of the string classical solution.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean LogicNat_induction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Employing the method of the Baxter equation, we write down the energy of the ground state and of excited states in a perturbation of the deformation parameter.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

On the Principles of elementary quantum mechanics

H. J. Groenewold,“On the Principles of elementary quantum mechanics”, Physica 12, 405 (1946)

1946
[2]

Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory

J. E. Moyal,“Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory”, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 45, 99 (1949)

1949
[3]

Quantum Field Theory on Noncommutative Spaces

R. J. Szabo,“Quantum field theory on noncommutative spaces”, Phys. Rept. 378, 207 (2003),hep-th/0109162

work page Pith review arXiv 2003
[4]

Beisert et al.,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,Lett

N. Beisert et al.,“Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview”, Lett. Math. Phys. 99, 3 (2012),arxiv:1012.3982

work page arXiv 2012
[5]

The Bethe ansatz for N=4 superYang-Mills

J. A. Minahan and K. Zarembo,“The Bethe ansatz for N=4 superYang-Mills”, JHEP 0303, 013 (2003),hep-th/0212208

work page arXiv 2003
[6]

Hidden Symmetries of the AdS 5 ×S 5 Superstring

I. Bena, J. Polchinski and R. Roiban,“Hidden Symmetries of the AdS 5 ×S 5 Superstring”, Phys. Rev. D 69, 046002 (2004),hep-th/0305116

work page arXiv 2004
[7]

Exact Spectrum of Anomalous Dimensions of Planar N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory

N. Gromov, V. Kazakov and P. Vieira,“Exact Spectrum of Anomalous Dimensions of Planar N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 131601 (2009), arxiv:0901.3753

work page arXiv 2009
[8]

Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz for planar AdS/CFT: a proposal

D. Bombardelli, D. Fioravanti and R. Tateo,“Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz for planar AdS/CFT: A Proposal”,J. Phys. A 42, 375401 (2009),arxiv:0902.3930

work page arXiv 2009
[9]

Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz for the AdS5 x S5 Mirror Model

G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov,“Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz for the AdS(5) x S(5) Mirror Model”,JHEP 0905, 068 (2009),arxiv:0903.0141

work page arXiv 2009
[10]

Gromov, V

N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, S. Leurent and D. Volin,“Quantum Spectral Curve for Planar N= 4Super-Yang-Mills Theory”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 011602 (2014),arxiv:1305.1939

work page arXiv 2014
[11]

Quantum Spectral Curve of theN= 6 Supersymmetric Chern-Simons Theory

A. Cavagli` a, D. Fioravanti, N. Gromov and R. Tateo,“Quantum Spectral Curve of theN= 6 Supersymmetric Chern-Simons Theory”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 021601 (2014), arxiv:1403.1859

work page arXiv 2014
[12]

Gluing Quantum Spectral Curves: A Two-Copy osp(4—2) Construction

F. Chernikov, S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov and B. Smith,“Gluing Quantum Spectral Curves: A Two-Copy osp(4—2) Construction”,arxiv:2511.09654

work page arXiv
[13]

On the Quantum Spectral Curve for AdS3 ×S 3 ×S 3 ×S 1 strings and thed(2,1;α)Q-system

A. Cavagli` a, R. Frassek, N. Primi and R. Tateo,“On the Quantum Spectral Curve for AdS3 ×S 3 ×S 3 ×S 1 strings and thed(2,1;α)Q-system”,arxiv:2511.09635

work page arXiv
[14]

Integrable S-matrices, massive and massless modes and the AdS 2 * S2superstring

B. Hoare, A. Pittelli and A. Torrielli,“Integrable S-matrices, massive and massless modes and the AdS 2 * S2superstring”,JHEP 1411, 051 (2014),arxiv:1407.0303. 46

work page arXiv 2014
[15]

OnAdS 2/CF T1 transfer matrices, Bethe ansatz and scale invariance

A. Torrielli,“OnAdS 2/CF T1 transfer matrices, Bethe ansatz and scale invariance”, J. Phys. A 51, 015402 (2018),arxiv:1708.09598

work page arXiv 2018
[16]

Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality,

C. Klimcik,“Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality”,JHEP 0212, 051 (2002), hep-th/0210095

work page arXiv 2002
[17]

On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model,

C. Klimcik,“On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model”, J. Math. Phys. 50, 043508 (2009),arxiv:0802.3518

work page arXiv 2009
[18]

Jordanian deformations of theAdS 5xS5 superstring

I. Kawaguchi, T. Matsumoto and K. Yoshida,“Jordanian deformations of theAdS 5xS5 superstring”,JHEP 1404, 153 (2014),arxiv:1401.4855

work page arXiv 2014
[19]

Yang–Baxter sigma models based on the CYBE,

T. Matsumoto and K. Yoshida,“Yang–Baxter sigma models based on the CYBE”, Nucl. Phys. B 893, 287 (2015),arxiv:1501.03665

work page arXiv 2015
[20]

On classical Yang-Baxter based deformations of the AdS 5 ×S 5 superstring

S. J. van Tongeren,“On classical Yang-Baxter based deformations of the AdS 5 ×S 5 superstring”,JHEP 1506, 048 (2015),arxiv:1504.05516

work page arXiv 2015
[21]

Integrability of classical strings dual for noncommutative gauge theories

T. Matsumoto and K. Yoshida,“Integrability of classical strings dual for noncommutative gauge theories”,JHEP 1406, 163 (2014),arxiv:1404.3657

work page arXiv 2014
[22]

Yang–Baxter deformations, AdS/CFT, and twist-noncommutative gauge theory

S. J. van Tongeren,“Yang–Baxter deformations, AdS/CFT, and twist-noncommutative gauge theory”,Nucl. Phys. B 904, 148 (2016),arxiv:1506.01023

work page arXiv 2016
[23]

Almost abelian twists and AdS/CFT

S. J. van Tongeren,“Almost abelian twists and AdS/CFT”,Phys. Lett. B 765, 344 (2017), arxiv:1610.05677

work page arXiv 2017
[24]

Integrability, spin-chains and the AdS3/CFT2 correspondence

O. Ohlsson Sax and B. Stefanski, Jr.,“Integrability, spin-chains and the AdS3/CFT2 correspondence”,JHEP 1108, 029 (2011),arxiv:1106.2558

work page arXiv 2011
[25]

The all-loop integrable spin-chain for strings on AdS 3 ×S 3 ×T 4: the massive sector

R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini, B. Stefa´ nski and A. Torrielli,“The all-loop integrable spin-chain for strings on AdS 3 ×S 3 ×T 4: the massive sector”, JHEP 1308, 043 (2013),arxiv:1303.5995

work page arXiv 2013
[26]

The complete one loop dilatation operator of N=4 superYang-Mills theory

N. Beisert,“The complete one loop dilatation operator of N=4 superYang-Mills theory”, Nucl. Phys. B 676, 3 (2004),hep-th/0307015

work page arXiv 2004
[27]

Integrability in dipole-deformedN= 4 super Yang–Mills

M. Guica, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk and K. Zarembo,“Integrability in dipole-deformedN= 4 super Yang–Mills”,J. Phys. A 50, 39 (2017),arxiv:1706.07957

work page arXiv 2017
[28]

Semiclassical spectrum of a Jordanian deformation of AdS5×S5

R. Borsato, S. Driezen, J. M. Nieto Garc´ ıa and L. Wyss,“Semiclassical spectrum of a Jordanian deformation of AdS5×S5”,Phys. Rev. D 106, 066015 (2022),arxiv:2207.14748

work page arXiv 2022
[29]

Jordanian deformation of the non-compact and sl2-invariant XXX −1/2 spin-chain

R. Borsato and M. G. Fern´ andez,“Jordanian deformation of the non-compact and sl2-invariant XXX −1/2 spin-chain”,JHEP 2508, 074 (2025),arxiv:2503.24223

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

Jordanian spin chains for twisted strings in AdS5×S5

S. Driezen and A. Molines,“Jordanian spin chains for twisted strings in AdS5×S5”, Phys. Rev. D 112, 106001 (2025),arxiv:2507.13911

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

Integrability for the spectrum of Jordanian AdS/CFT

S. Driezen, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk and A. Molines,“Integrability for the spectrum of Jordanian AdS/CFT”,JHEP 2604, 052 (2026),arxiv:2511.11521

work page arXiv 2026
[32]

Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills,

D. E. Berenstein, J. M. Maldacena and H. S. Nastase,“Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills”,JHEP 0204, 013 (2002),hep-th/0202021

work page arXiv 2002
[33]

Precision spectroscopy of AdS / CFT

N. Beisert, S. Frolov, M. Staudacher and A. A. Tseytlin,“Precision spectroscopy of AdS / CFT”,JHEP 0310, 037 (2003),hep-th/0308117

work page arXiv 2003
[34]

Spin chains and string theory

M. Kruczenski,“Spin chains and string theory”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 161602 (2004), hep-th/0311203

work page arXiv 2004
[35]

Large spin limits of AdS/CFT and generalized Landau-Lifshitz equations

B. Stefanski, Jr. and A. A. Tseytlin,“Large spin limits of AdS/CFT and generalized Landau-Lifshitz equations”,JHEP 0405, 042 (2004),hep-th/0404133

work page arXiv 2004
[36]

TheN=4 SYM integrable super spin chain

N. Beisert and M. Staudacher,“The N=4 SYM integrable super spin chain”, Nucl. Phys. B 670, 439 (2003),hep-th/0307042

work page arXiv 2003
[37]

On Symmetry Enhancement in the psu(1,1—2) Sector of N=4 SYM

N. Beisert and B. I. Zwiebel,“On Symmetry Enhancement in the psu(1,1—2) Sector of N=4 SYM”,JHEP 0710, 031 (2007),arxiv:0707.1031. 47

work page arXiv 2007
[38]

How algebraic Bethe ansatz works for integrable model

L. D. Faddeev,“How algebraic Bethe ansatz works for integrable model”,hep-th/9605187, in:“Les Houches School of Physics: Astrophysical Sources of Gravitational Radiation”, pp. 149–219p

work page arXiv
[39]

Nested Bethe ansatz for ’all’ closed spin chains

S. Belliard and E. Ragoucy,“Nested Bethe ansatz for ’all’ closed spin chains”, J. Phys. A 41, 295202 (2008),arxiv:0804.2822

work page arXiv 2008
[40]

High-energy QCD as a completely integrable model

L. D. Faddeev and G. P. Korchemsky,“High-energy QCD as a completely integrable model”, Phys. Lett. B 342, 311 (1995),hep-th/9404173

work page arXiv 1995
[41]

The factorized S-matrix of CFT/AdS

M. Staudacher,“The factorized S-matrix of CFT/AdS”, Journal of High Energy Physics 2005, 054–054 (2005), http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2005/05/054

work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/05/054 2005
[42]

Bethe Ansatz for XXX chain with negative spin

K. Hao, D. Kharzeev and V. Korepin,“Bethe Ansatz for XXX chain with negative spin”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34, 1950197 (2019),arxiv:1909.00800

work page arXiv 2019
[43]

Thermodynamics of the Heisenberg XXX chain with negative spin

R. Zhong, Y.-Y. Chen, K. Hao, W.-l. Yang and V. Korepin,“Thermodynamics of the Heisenberg XXX chain with negative spin”,arxiv:2602.03714

work page arXiv
[44]

Constant quasiclassical solutions of the Yang–Baxter quantum equation

V. G. Drinfeld,“Constant quasiclassical solutions of the Yang–Baxter quantum equation”, in:“Doklady Akademii Nauk”, 531–535p
[45]

Multiparameter quantum groups and twisted quasitriangular Hopf algebras

N. Reshetikhin,“Multiparameter quantum groups and twisted quasitriangular Hopf algebras”,Lett. Math. Phys. 20, 331 (1990)

1990
[46]

Bialgebra actions, twists, and universal deformation formulas

A. Giaquinto and J. J. Zhang,“Bialgebra actions, twists, and universal deformation formulas”,J. Pure Appl. Algebra 128, 133 (1998),hep-th/9411140

work page arXiv 1998
[47]

Twist Deformations of Quantum Integrable Spin Chains

P. Kulish,“Twist Deformations of Quantum Integrable Spin Chains”, in:“Noncommutative Spacetimes: Symmetries in Noncommutative Geometry and Field Theory”, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2009), Berlin, Heidelberg, 167–190p, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89793-4 9

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89793-4 2009
[48]

Drinfel’d twists and algebraic Bethe ansatz

J. M. Maillet and J. Sanchez de Santos,“Drinfel’d twists and algebraic Bethe ansatz”, q-alg/9612012

work page arXiv
[49]

Deformed Yangians and integrable models

P. P. Kulish and A. A. Stolin,“Deformed Yangians and integrable models”, Czechoslovak Journal of Physics 47, 1207–1212 (1997), http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022869414679

work page doi:10.1023/a:1022869414679 1997
[50]

The Integrable (Hyper)eclectic Spin Chain

C. Ahn and M. Staudacher,“The Integrable (Hyper)eclectic Spin Chain”, JHEP 2102, 019 (2021),arxiv:2010.14515

work page arXiv 2021
[51]

Spectrum of the hypereclectic spin chain and P´ olya counting

C. Ahn and M. Staudacher,“Spectrum of the hypereclectic spin chain and P´ olya counting”, Phys. Lett. B 835, 137533 (2022),arxiv:2207.02885

work page arXiv 2022
[52]

Jordan blocks and the Bethe Ansatz I: The eclectic spin chain as a limit

J. M. Nieto Garc´ ıa and L. Wyss,“Jordan blocks and the Bethe Ansatz I: The eclectic spin chain as a limit”,Nucl. Phys. B 981, 115860 (2022),arxiv:2112.13883

work page arXiv 2022
[53]

Jordan blocks and the Bethe Ansatz II: The eclectic spin chain beyond K = 1

J. M. Nieto Garc´ ıa,“Jordan blocks and the Bethe Ansatz II: The eclectic spin chain beyond K = 1”,JHEP 2212, 106 (2022),arxiv:2206.08348

work page arXiv 2022
[54]

Jordan blocks and the Bethe ansatz III: Class 5 model and its symmetries

J. M. Nieto Garc´ ıa,“Jordan blocks and the Bethe ansatz III: Class 5 model and its symmetries”,Nucl. Phys. B 998, 116419 (2024),arxiv:2309.10044

work page arXiv 2024
[55]

Separation of variables for the quantum SL(2,R) spin chain

S. E. Derkachov, G. P. Korchemsky and A. N. Manashov,“Separation of variables for the quantum SL(2,R) spin chain”,JHEP 0307, 047 (2003),hep-th/0210216

work page arXiv 2003
[56]

Gauge-string duality for (non)supersymmetric deformations of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory

S. A. Frolov, R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin,“Gauge-string duality for (non)supersymmetric deformations of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory”,Nucl. Phys. B 731, 1 (2005), hep-th/0507021

work page arXiv 2005
[57]

Frolov,Lax pair for strings in Lunin-Maldacena background,JHEP05(2005) 069 [hep-th/0503201]

S. Frolov,“Lax pair for strings in Lunin-Maldacena background”,JHEP 0505, 069 (2005), hep-th/0503201

work page arXiv 2005
[58]

Integrable Spin Chains in Twisted Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory

T. Meier and S. J. van Tongeren,“Integrable Spin Chains in Twisted Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 051601 (2026), arxiv:2507.18626. 48

work page arXiv 2026
[59]

All Jordanian deformations of theAdS 5 ×S 5 superstring

R. Borsato and S. Driezen,“All Jordanian deformations of theAdS 5 ×S 5 superstring”, SciPost Phys. 14, 160 (2023),arxiv:2212.11269

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

Large N limit of noncommutative gauge theories

J. M. Maldacena and J. G. Russo,“Large N limit of noncommutative gauge theories”, JHEP 9909, 025 (1999),hep-th/9908134

work page arXiv 1999
[61]

Noncommutative Yang-Mills and the AdS / CFT correspondence

A. Hashimoto and N. Itzhaki,“Noncommutative Yang-Mills and the AdS / CFT correspondence”,Phys. Lett. B 465, 142 (1999),hep-th/9907166

work page arXiv 1999
[62]

Supergravity and large N noncommutative field theories

M. Alishahiha, Y. Oz and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,“Supergravity and large N noncommutative field theories”,JHEP 9911, 007 (1999),hep-th/9909215

work page arXiv 1999
[63]

Yang-Baxterσ-models, conformal twists, and noncommutative Yang-Mills theory

T. Araujo, I. Bakhmatov, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, J. Sakamoto, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and K. Yoshida,“Yang-Baxterσ-models, conformal twists, and noncommutative Yang-Mills theory”,Phys. Rev. D 95, 105006 (2017),arxiv:1702.02861

work page arXiv 2017
[64]

Conformal twists, Yang–Baxterσ-models & holographic noncommutativity

T. Araujo, I. Bakhmatov, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, J.-i. Sakamoto, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and K. Yoshida,“Conformal twists, Yang–Baxterσ-models & holographic noncommutativity”, J. Phys. A 51, 235401 (2018),arxiv:1705.02063

work page arXiv 2018
[65]

Classical Yang-Baxter Equation from Supergravity

I. Bakhmatov, ¨O. Kelekci, E. ´O Colg´ ain and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,“Classical Yang-Baxter Equation from Supergravity”,Phys. Rev. D 98, 021901 (2018),arxiv:1710.06784

work page arXiv 2018
[66]

Non-abelian T-duality and Yang-Baxter deformations of Green-Schwarz strings

R. Borsato and L. Wulff,“Non-abelian T-duality and Yang-Baxter deformations of Green-Schwarz strings”,JHEP 1808, 027 (2018),arxiv:1806.04083

work page arXiv 2018
[67]

Abelian Yang–Baxter deformations and TsT transformations

D. Osten and S. J. van Tongeren,“Abelian Yang–Baxter deformations and TsT transformations”,Nucl. Phys. B 915, 184 (2017),arxiv:1608.08504

work page arXiv 2017
[68]

Non-relativistic string monodromies

A. Fontanella, J. M. Nieto Garc´ ıa and O. Ohlsson Sax,“Non-relativistic string monodromies”,JHEP 2301, 165 (2023),arxiv:2211.04479

work page arXiv 2023
[69]

An Introduction to String Newton-Cartan Holography and Integrability

A. Fontanella and J. M. Nieto Garc´ ıa,“An Introduction to String Newton-Cartan Holography and Integrability”,arxiv:2603.24657

work page arXiv
[70]

Quantum AdS(5) x S5 superstring in the AdS light-cone gauge

S. Giombi, R. Ricci, R. Roiban, A. A. Tseytlin and C. Vergu,“Quantum AdS(5) x S5 superstring in the AdS light-cone gauge”,JHEP 1003, 003 (2010),arxiv:0912.5105

work page arXiv 2010
[71]

Holographic reformulation of string theory on AdS(5) x S**5 background in the PP wave limit

S. Dobashi, H. Shimada and T. Yoneya,“Holographic reformulation of string theory on AdS(5) x S**5 background in the PP wave limit”,Nucl. Phys. B 665, 94 (2003), hep-th/0209251

work page arXiv 2003
[72]

Holography of Wilson loop correlator and spinning strings

A. Tsuji,“Holography of Wilson loop correlator and spinning strings”, Prog. Theor. Phys. 117, 557 (2007),hep-th/0606030

work page arXiv 2007
[73]

Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter II.1: Classical AdS5xS5 string solutions

A. A. Tseytlin,“Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter II.1: Classical AdS5xS5 string solutions”,Lett. Math. Phys. 99, 103 (2012),arxiv:1012.3986

work page arXiv 2012
[74]

Fermi Normal Coordinates and Some Basic Concepts in Differential Geometry

F. K. Manasse and C. W. Misner,“Fermi Normal Coordinates and Some Basic Concepts in Differential Geometry”,J. Math. Phys. 4, 735 (1963)

1963
[75]

Homogeneous Yang-Baxter deformations as undeformed yet twisted models

R. Borsato, S. Driezen and J. L. Miramontes,“Homogeneous Yang-Baxter deformations as undeformed yet twisted models”,JHEP 2204, 053 (2022),arxiv:2112.12025

work page arXiv 2022
[76]

Meier and S

T. Meier and S. J. van Tongeren,“Gauge theory on twist-noncommutative spaces”, JHEP 2312, 045 (2023),arxiv:2305.15470

work page arXiv 2023
[77]

Non-commutative deformations of gauge theories via Drinfel’d twists of the scale symmetry

R. Borsato and T. Meier,“Non-commutative deformations of gauge theories via Drinfel’d twists of the scale symmetry”,arxiv:2512.04162

work page arXiv
[78]

Observables of noncommutative gauge theories

D. J. Gross, A. Hashimoto and N. Itzhaki,“Observables of noncommutative gauge theories”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4, 893 (2000),hep-th/0008075

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2000
[79]

Modified Algebraic Bethe Ansatz: Twisted XXX Case

S. Belliard, N. A. Slavnov and B. Vallet,“Modified Algebraic Bethe Ansatz: Twisted XXX Case”,SIGMA 14, 054 (2018),arxiv:1804.00597. 49

work page arXiv 2018