Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 105 references

A bosonic lattice model produces a massless chiral fermion without doublers by making the reconstructed Dirac operator non-local, thereby respecting the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 07:29 UTC pith:Z5GPGUXZ

load-bearing objection Solid and worth refereeing: the Nielsen-Ninomiya evasion claim holds, but the branch/θ-angle step is under-built. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09935 v2 pith:Z5GPGUXZ submitted 2026-07-10 hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-lat

Bosonization versus the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem

Saif Ullah Baig , Shi Chen , Aleksey Cherman , Maria Neuzil This is my paper
classification hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-lat MSC 81T2581T4081T50 PACS 11.15.Ha11.30.Rd
keywords modified Villain modelbosonizationNielsen-Ninomiya theoremlattice chiral fermionslattice Dirac operatorfermion doublingspin θ-angletwo-dimensional CFT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that a purely bosonic lattice model can reproduce the physics of a massless chiral fermion without running afoul of the Nielsen-Ninomiya no-go theorem. The model, the 2D modified Villain scalar at the self-dual radius R=1/√2, has an ultra-local action and an ultra-local symmetry that becomes the chiral symmetry under bosonization. The lattice Weyl operators the paper constructs have exact two-point functions that match the continuum chiral propagator 1/(x1 ± i x2). Inverting these two-point functions yields a lattice Dirac operator with a single massless zero and no doublers, but that zero is protected by giving the kernel a power-law non-local tail. The paper's conclusion is that bosonization evades Nielsen-Ninomiya by surrendering locality of the derived Dirac operator, not by surrendering locality of the microscopic bosonic model.

Core claim

The central claim is that the 2D modified Villain model—a lattice discretization of a compact scalar with an integer-valued gauge field on links—realizes a single massless chiral fermion without species doubling. The lattice Weyl operators are composite objects, built by attaching a topological line to products of a vortex operator and a half-field exponential, and their exact correlation function is double-valued, with the two branches differing by a sign. Fixing one branch, the two-point function behaves at large separation as 1/(x1 ± i x2) + O(1/|x|^3), exactly the continuum Weyl propagator. The reconstructed hermitian Dirac operator /D(x,y) = 2i[[0,P_+],[P_-,0]], defined by P_∓ S_± = πδ,

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the lattice Hodge star ⋆, a map from sites to plaquettes, which lets the paper place both factors of a Weyl operator at the same lattice point: ψ_±(C_x) = Z_± e^{iθ(⋆x)} exp(± i/2 Σ_ℓ C_x(ℓ)[dφ(ℓ)+2π n(ℓ)]). The integer-valued ray C_x restores gauge invariance and encodes fermionic statistics through its two equivalence classes of paths. The argument then runs through the lattice Green function G(x): completing the square in the Gaussian path integral gives an exact two-point function, whose inverse kernel is analyzed via the Poincaré–Hopf theorem applied to 1/S̃_+(p). The non-locality of the kernel is the signature that the Poincaré–Hopf index balance is achieved by m

Load-bearing premise

The exact two-point-function calculation assumes that the integer link field can be gauge-fixed to a single orbit on a large sphere, that shifting the φ integration contour by a complex amount is valid, and that picking one of the two branches of the double-valued correlator—without actually placing the spin θ-angle on the lattice—does not affect the answers.

What would settle it

Compute the same two-point function on a torus, or with the opposite branch of the path choice, and check whether the inverse kernel 1/S̃_+(p) keeps exactly one zero and the same 1/|x-y| tail; if the pole structure changes, the reconstructed Dirac operator is not unique. Conversely, an explicit local Dirac kernel satisfying all four Nielsen-Ninomiya assumptions and reproducing these correlation functions would break the paper's core conclusion.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A local bosonic lattice action can have a massless chiral fermion in its long-distance spectrum; the absence of doublers is consistent with the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem because the reconstructed Dirac kernel is non-local.
  • Since the non-locality sits only in the derived inverse propagator, gauging the non-anomalous U(1)_V and U(1)_A symmetries can proceed directly on the ultra-local bosonic fields, with no obstruction from the non-local Dirac operator.
  • Propagator zeros in momentum space have a topologically fixed total index, but their number and locations are contact-term dependent, so they are not universal data of the lattice theory.
  • The lattice Weyl operators acquire an irrelevant two-body interaction at finite lattice spacing, visible as a non-zero connected four-point function that vanishes in the continuum limit.
  • The model provides an exact, calculable illustration of how momentum-space zeros can compensate the chiral zero when a fermion propagator is reconstructed from a bosonic theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the non-locality lives in a reconstructed inverse propagator rather than in the microscopic action, the same evasion may appear in 3D bosonization constructions; a lattice Chern-Simons matter model should show a non-local emergent Dirac kernel.
  • Editorial inference: explicitly placing the spin θ-angle on the lattice would test whether branch selection affects correlation functions on finite or toroidal geometries; if it does, the infinite-lattice result may not capture global fermionic data.
  • Editorial inference: one can probe the universality of the propagator zeros by trying different contact terms and path branches; the paper shows their total index is fixed, so any observed change should be in their locations only.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the 2D modified Villain model at the fermionic self-dual radius R=1/sqrt(2) and constructs lattice operators ψ±(C_x), ψ̄±(C_x) that are meant to be the bosonized version of continuum Weyl fermions. Using an exact Gaussian path integration (App. C.1), the authors evaluate the two-point function S±(x−y), obtaining the continuum-like asymptotic behavior S±(x) ∼ 1/(x1 ± i x2) + O(1/|x|^3) after fixing normalization. Inverting S± in momentum space, they reconstruct a lattice Dirac operator /D(x,y) and show, via a Poincaré–Hopf argument, that its symbol 1/S̃±(p) has exactly one zero (at p=0) but also poles, implying /D has no doublers but is non-local, decaying as O(1/|x−y|). This is presented as a concrete realization of a bosonic lattice model that evades the Nielsen–Ninomiya theorem by surrendering locality of the reconstructed Dirac kernel. The paper also computes the leading large-distance behavior of a four-point function and claims a non-vanishing connected part, which is irrelevant in the continuum limit.

Significance. This is a significant, explicitly calculable demonstration of a long-suspected phenomenon: an ultra-local bosonic lattice model can furnish a lattice regularization of a chiral fermion, and the Nielsen–Ninomiya theorem is satisfied because the derived Dirac operator, not the microscopic action, is non-local. The central two-point calculation is done in full detail in the appendices and is of independent value. The Poincaré–Hopf treatment of the pole/zero structure is elegant and clarifies the role of contact terms in determining the locations of propagator zeros. If the claims hold, this work sharpens the modern understanding of lattice bosonization and symmetric mass generation, and it directly addresses recent debates about propagator zeros. The paper is also commendably transparent about what is imported from prior work and what is new.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV.C, Eq. (47); Sec. IV.A after Eq. (35)] The two-point function is double-valued, with the two branches differing by a sign. The paper states that the spin θ-angle picks the branch, but immediately says 'We will not formulate the spin θ-angle on lattice ... does not affect correlation functions on the infinite lattice.' This assertion is not proved, and the branch in Eq. (47) is simply chosen by hand. The NN-consistency claim in Sec. IV.D is branch-independent and thus robust, but the claim that the lattice correlators are exactly those of a continuum chiral fermion (Eq. (53)) is branch-sensitive. Please clarify whether the branch is part of the definition of the fermionic operators (so that the other branch is a different operator normalization), or supply a lattice formulation of the spin θ-angle, or prove the stated assertion. This is load-bearing for the 'chiral lattice fermion' part of the abstract and should be addressed
  2. [Sec. IV.E, Eq. (72)] A non-vanishing connected four-point function is advertised as one of the three main results, but the computation is only summarized ('Using the next order ... we can find') with no derivation of the coefficients 5/24 and 1/12 in Eq. (72). Given the importance of this result, please provide the calculation in an appendix or include enough intermediate steps that the large-L expansion can be independently checked. As written, the reader cannot verify the assertion without repeating a lengthy calculation from scratch.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II, Theorem 1] The theorem is stated for a 'reasonable' Dirac operator, but the conditions (A)–(D) are precise. It might be worth noting explicitly that condition (C) requires exponential locality, which is why the O(1/|x−y|) decay in Eq. (70) constitutes a genuine violation.
  2. [Sec. IV.B, Eq. (43)] The ray C_x is formally infinite. It would help to state that in the gauge-fixed correlation function computation, the sum over links is convergent because the relevant n_{x,y} fields decay as 1/|x| near infinity, and to comment on the operator definition on general n configurations.
  3. [Sec. IV.C, Eq. (50)] The diagonal expression can be written more cleanly in terms of the digamma function as in Eq. (B14); consider doing so to aid comparison.
  4. [Sec. III.B, Eq. (27)] The dictionary entry for ψ_+ uses e^{iθ+iϕ/2}; it would be helpful to state explicitly that e^{±iθ} are vortex defect operators, as done elsewhere, and to define the normalization of the two-point functions in Eq. (28).
  5. [App. C.1, Eq. (C13)] The complex contour shift φ → φ ∓ i2π(ρ_x−ρ_y) is applied to an infinite number of variables. It is plausible, but the justification relies on the large-S^2 regulator. Consider adding a sentence explaining why the shift is legitimate on the infinite lattice, or refer to a standard treatment of Gaussian shifts on lattices.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the lattice two-point computation and the Poincaré–Hopf non-locality argument are self-contained; the only caveats are a minor self-citation and an unformulated spin θ-angle branch choice, neither of which makes a predicted quantity equal to an input by construction.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. The lattice Weyl operators (43) are patterned on the continuum dictionary (27), but their two-point functions are obtained by direct Gaussian integration in App. C.1: θ is integrated out, n is gauge-fixed using H^1(S^2)=0, the φ path integral is completed by the shift (C13), and the numerator/denominator cancel, leaving Eq. (49). The large-|x| behavior (51) and the momentum-space pole/zero structure (66) follow from the lattice Green function asymptotics and the explicit phase expansion, not from assuming a fermion propagator. The reconstructed Dirac operator is defined as the inverse kernel (60)–(61), so its doubler-free but non-local character is a consequence of the computed analytic structure of S̃+(p) plus Poincaré–Hopf; it is not a fitted input. The normalization (52) is a renormalization of composite operators, and the branch choice in Fig. 2 is a convention in defining the operators, not a parameter fitted to the predicted power law. The only self-citation, Ref. [30], supports the motivational claim that the modified Villain model regularizes a Dirac fermion; the current exact two-point calculation independently substantiates that claim, and the action and duality dictionary are drawn from external references [25, 27–29, 68]. The paper explicitly declines to formulate the spin θ-angle on the lattice and asserts it does not affect infinite-volume correlators; this is a proof gap in the interpretation of the branch choice, but it is not circular because the branch does not feed back into the computed S±(x) or into the non-locality argument. Overall, the central claims are derived from the lattice calculation and external mathematical facts, not from self-referential fitting.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The construction is deliberately pinned to the self-dual radius R = 1/√2 and imports the Coleman/Mandelstam duality dictionary plus the modified Villain model's status as a lattice CFT regularization from prior work (some of it the authors' own, Ref. [30]). These are flagged external inputs, not circular conclusions: the lattice correlators and the non-locality of the reconstructed Dirac operator are derived by exact Gaussian integration and a topological index argument. The freely chosen normalization and contact term do not affect the structural claims.

free parameters (4)
  • Compact-boson radius R = 1/√2 (Eq. (35))
    The entire analysis is pinned to the self-dual radius where the continuum dual is a free massless Dirac fermion; this is an input from Coleman duality (Sec. III), not derived in the paper. At generic R the target would be the interacting Thirring model.
  • Weyl-operator normalization Z±Z̄± = 2 e^{γE} (1 ± i) (Eq. (52))
    Chosen so the long-distance correlators match the continuum normalization 1/(x1 ± i x2). Multiplicative; it does not affect the pole/zero structure of S̃+(p) or the non-locality/no-doubler conclusions.
  • Position-space contact term S±(0) = c ∈ C; taken as 0 in the maximally symmetric choice (Eqs. (55), (68))
    Free lattice contact term. The paper shows it moves the locations of momentum-space zeros of S̃+(p) but cannot remove them (Poincaré-Hopf index is fixed).
  • Branch of the double-valued correlator = the Fig. 2a branch (Sec. IV.C)
    The correlator has two branches differing by (−1); the paper fixes one by hand because the spin θ-angle that picks the fermionic branch is not implemented on the lattice.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Coleman/Sine-Gordon duality: the compact boson at R = 1/√2 with spin θ-angle equals a free massless Dirac fermion (partition functions (15), (26))
    Sec. III B; defines the target fermionic theory. Established continuum result (Refs. [25, 26, 68]); used to set R and the operator dictionary.
  • domain assumption The modified Villain model is a lattice regularization of the compact-boson CFT preserving U(1)W × U(1)S and its mixed anomaly
    Sec. IV A; imported from Refs. [27-30]. The current paper does not prove the model flows to the full c = 1 CFT; it verifies only the fermionic two-point sector.
  • domain assumption Continuum local fermionic operators correspond to vertex operators attached to Z2 topological lines (Mandelstam dictionary, Eq. (27))
    Secs. III B and IV B; used to justify the form of the lattice Weyl operators (43).
  • standard math Poincaré-Hopf theorem for complex functions on T² viewed as real 2D vector fields, including meromorphic functions with poles
    Secs. II and IV D; the engine of the argument that S̃+(p) must have zeros and 1/S̃+ poles, hence /D is non-local.
  • domain assumption The spin θ-angle (Arf-based) does not affect infinite-lattice correlation functions
    Sec. IV (intro); justifies computing without the spin θ-angle and fixing the branch by hand. Plausible for local correlators in the thermodynamic limit, but not proven in detail.
invented entities (1)
  • Lattice Weyl operators ψ±(Cx), ψ̄±(Cx) on rays Cx (Eq. (43)) independent evidence
    purpose: Composite, gauge-invariant bosonic operators engineered to reproduce continuum Weyl fermions and fermionic exchange statistics on the lattice.
    Their two-point functions are computed exactly (Eqs. (49)-(51)) and match continuum fermions at long distance (Eq. (53)) — a falsifiable handle checked numerically in Fig. 5; they are not free postulates.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 25590 in / 35455 out tokens · 353614 ms · 2026-08-02T07:29:15.869347+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Thanks to bosonization, bosonic lattice models can offer a lattice regularization of chiral fermions. We construct chiral lattice fermion operators in the 2D modified Villain scalar model and evaluate their correlation functions. This microscopic bosonic model has an ultra-local action and an ultra-local symmetry that realizes the fermionic chiral symmetry under bosonization. The reconstructed lattice Dirac operator has no doublers, but is consistent with the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem because it turns out to be non-local. The non-locality of this derived quantity at finite lattice spacing does not pose any obstructions to gauging the non-anomalous symmetries of the model, which is itself ultra-local.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09935 by Aleksey Cherman, Maria Neuzil, Saif Ullah Baig, Shi Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Lattice sites, links and plaquettes are labeled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Two equivalence classes of lattice paths in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The site-plaquette nature of the Weyl operators in combination with the topological line gives rise to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: When we drag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Magnitude (top) and phase (bottom) of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Magnitude (top) and argument (bottom) of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Magnitude (top) and argument (bottom) of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: A reproduction of Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The tetrahedron of topological manipulations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The lattice differential ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The lattice codifferential ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: The lattice path decomposition of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 60 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Lattice differential operators 14

  2. [2]

    Fermionic description 5 IV

    Physical effect 4 B. Fermionic description 5 IV. Lattice chiral fermion in the 2D Modified Villain Model 6 A. 2D Modified Villain Model 6 B. Fermionic operator 7 C. Two-point correlation function 7 D. Non-local lattice Dirac operator 10 E. Multi-point correlation function 11 V. Outlook 12 A. Appendix: 2D boson-fermion transformation tetrahedron 12 B. Appe...

  3. [3]

    Appendix: Calculation details in the 2D modified Villain model 15

    Lattice Green function 14 C. Appendix: Calculation details in the 2D modified Villain model 15

  4. [4]

    Two-point correlation function 15

  5. [5]

    Asymptotic expansion 17

  6. [6]

    spinθ-angle,

    Momentum-space discontinuity 18 References 19 ∗ sbaig.phys@gmail.com † s.chern.phys@gmail.com ‡ acherman@umn.edu § neuzi008@umn.edu I. Introduction It is notoriously challenging to put massless fermions on a Euclidean spacetime lattice while preserving chiral symmetries. This poses an obstruction to the lattice reg- ularization of chiral gauge theories, s...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    On 2D oriented and spin spacetime manifolds, theθ-angles are classified by the bordism groups (see e.g

    Spinθ-angle The topology of anS 1 scalar brings not only theU(1) W symmetry but also topologicalθ-angles. On 2D oriented and spin spacetime manifolds, theθ-angles are classified by the bordism groups (see e.g. Refs. [63–66]) Hom eΩSO 2 (S1), U(1) = 0,(8a) Hom eΩSpin 2 (S1), U(1) =Z 2 ,(8b) respectively. All 2D orientable manifolds are spinnable, but in ge...

  8. [8]

    protects

    Physical effect Since the spinθ-angle (9) is trivial onS 2, it does not affect local dynamics, and only affects the global struc- ture. Hence the fermionic theory (13) is still a conformal 2 See e.g. Refs. [59–62] for useful reviews about the Arf invariant. field theory with central chargesc= ¯c= 1. Evaluating the path integral (13) on a flat torus, T 2 =...

    2026

  9. [9]

    We use Γ 0, Γ 1, and Γ 2 to de- note the collection of sites, links, and plaquettes, respec- tively

    Lattice differential operators In this subsection, we review the discrete differential operators on a 2D lattice. We use Γ 0, Γ 1, and Γ 2 to de- note the collection of sites, links, and plaquettes, respec- tively. As we explained in Section IV A, it is convenient to label the lattice elements with the 1 2 -notation, Γ0 ∪Γ 1 ∪Γ 2 ≃ 1 2 Z⊕ 1 2 Z(B1) such t...

  10. [10]

    We fix this constant by requiring G(0) = 0.(B10) The Poisson equation (B9) and the convention (B10) de- termine a uniqueG(x)

    Lattice Green function In this subsection, we review the lattice Green function G:Z 2 7→Rthat solves the 2D lattice Poisson equation, −∆G(x) =δ x,0 .(B9) IfG(x) is a solution, so isG(x) +c. We fix this constant by requiring G(0) = 0.(B10) The Poisson equation (B9) and the convention (B10) de- termine a uniqueG(x). 15 G(x) does not have a particularly illu...

  11. [11]

    Based on our discussion in Sec- tion IV C before Eq

    Two-point correlation function In this subsection, we evaluate the two-point correla- tion functionS ±(x). Based on our discussion in Sec- tion IV C before Eq. (47), we have S±(x−y) = Z DφDnDθe −S(φ,n,θ) ψ±(Cx) ¯ψ±(Cy) Z DφDnDθe −S(φ,n,θ) (C1) with the equivalence class of pathsC x,y ≡C y −C x rep- resented by Fig. 2a (and Fig. 4). First let us integrate ...

  12. [12]

    ∓iπ X ℓ∈Γ1 Cx,0(ℓ)δσx(ℓ) # ,(C16a) eiΘ±(x) ≡exp

    Asymptotic expansion In this subsection, we derive the large-|x|asymptotic expansion of the correlation functionS ±(x). Let us rewrite Eq. (49) as S±(x) =Z ±Z ±e2πG(x)eiΦ±(x)eiΘ±(x) ,(C15) where the phase functions eiΦ±(x) ≡exp " ∓iπ X ℓ∈Γ1 Cx,0(ℓ)δσx(ℓ) # ,(C16a) eiΘ±(x) ≡exp " ±iπ X ℓ∈Γ1 Cx,0(ℓ)δσ0(ℓ) # ,(C16b) for the equivalence class of pathsC x,0 re...

  13. [13]

    Since the leadingO(|x| −1) term in the asymptotic expansion (51) ofS +(x) decays more slowly thanO(|x| −2), the Fourier transform eS+(p) will contain singularities

    Momentum-space discontinuity In this subsection, we discuss the singularities of the momentum-space correlation function eS+(p). Since the leadingO(|x| −1) term in the asymptotic expansion (51) ofS +(x) decays more slowly thanO(|x| −2), the Fourier transform eS+(p) will contain singularities. We first show that eS+(p) is continuous onT 2 except forp= (0,0...

  14. [14]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 1. Proof by Homotopy Theory, Nucl. Phys. B185, 20 (1981)

    1981

  15. [15]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 2. Intuitive Topological Proof, Nucl. Phys. B193, 173 (1981)

    1981

  16. [16]

    L. H. Karsten and J. Smit, Lattice Fermions: Species Doubling, Chiral Invariance, and the Triangle Anomaly, Nucl. Phys.B183, 103 (1981), [,495(1980)]

    1981

  17. [17]

    L. H. Karsten, Lattice Fermions in Euclidean Space-time, Phys. Lett. B104, 315 (1981)

    1981

  18. [18]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, No Go Theorem for Reg- ularizing Chiral Fermions, Phys. Lett.105B, 219 (1981)

    1981

  19. [19]

    Friedan, A Proof of the Nielsen-Ninomiya Thorem, Commun

    D. Friedan, A Proof of the Nielsen-Ninomiya Thorem, Commun. Math. Phys.85, 481 (1982)

    1982

  20. [20]

    Luscher, Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, Phys

    M. Luscher, Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, Phys. Lett. B428, 342 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9802011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  21. [21]

    P. H. Ginsparg and K. G. Wilson, A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice, Phys. Rev.D25, 2649 (1982)

    1982

  22. [22]

    Neuberger, Exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys

    H. Neuberger, Exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B417, 141 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9707022

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  23. [23]

    Neuberger, More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys

    H. Neuberger, More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys. Lett.B427, 353 (1998), arXiv:hep- lat/9801031 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 1998

  24. [24]

    Hasenfratz, V

    P. Hasenfratz, V. Laliena, and F. Niedermayer, The Index theorem in QCD with a finite cutoff, Phys. Lett. B427, 125 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9801021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  25. [25]

    D. B. Kaplan, A Method for simulating chiral fermions on the lattice, Phys. Lett.B288, 342 (1992), arXiv:hep- lat/9206013 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 1992

  26. [26]

    Shamir, Chiral fermions from lattice boundaries, Nucl

    Y. Shamir, Chiral fermions from lattice boundaries, Nucl. Phys.B406, 90 (1993), arXiv:hep-lat/9303005 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  27. [27]

    Wang and Y.-Z

    J. Wang and Y.-Z. You, Symmetric Mass Generation, Symmetry14, 1475 (2022), arXiv:2204.14271 [cond- mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    You, Y.-C

    Y.-Z. You, Y.-C. He, C. Xu, and A. Vishwanath, Symmetric Fermion Mass Generation as Deconfined Quantum Criticality, Phys. Rev. X8, 011026 (2018), arXiv:1705.09313 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    You, Y.-C

    Y.-Z. You, Y.-C. He, A. Vishwanath, and C. Xu, From Bosonic Topological Transition to Symmetric Fermion Mass Generation, Phys. Rev. B97, 125112 (2018), arXiv:1711.00863 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Fidkowski and A

    L. Fidkowski and A. Kitaev, The effects of interactions on the topological classification of free fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B81, 134509 (2010), arXiv:0904.2197 [cond- mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  31. [31]

    Tong, Comments on symmetric mass generation in 2d and 4d, JHEP2022(07), 001, arXiv:2104.03997 [hep-th]

    D. Tong, Comments on symmetric mass generation in 2d and 4d, JHEP2022(07), 001, arXiv:2104.03997 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Eichten and J

    E. Eichten and J. Preskill, Chiral Gauge Theories on the Lattice, Nucl. Phys.B268, 179 (1986)

    1986

  33. [33]

    M. Zeng, Z. Zhu, J. Wang, and Y.-Z. You, Symmetric Mass Generation in the 1+1 Dimensional Chiral Fermion 3-4-5-0 Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 185301 (2022), arXiv:2202.12355 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Golterman and Y

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Propagator Zeros and Lat- tice Chiral Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 081903 (2024), arXiv:2311.12790 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Golterman and Y

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Constraints on the symmetric mass generation paradigm for lattice chi- ral gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D113, 014503 (2026), arXiv:2505.20436 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Golterman and Y

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Symmetric mass gener- ation and the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem, in42th In- ternational Symposium on Lattice Field Theory(2026) arXiv:2603.15985 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    T. D. Schultz, D. C. Mattis, and E. H. Lieb, Two- dimensional Ising model as a soluble problem of many fermions, Rev. Mod. Phys.36, 856 (1964)

    1964

  38. [38]

    S. R. Coleman, The Quantum Sine-Gordon Equation as the Massive Thirring Model, Phys. Rev. D11, 2088 (1975)

    2088

  39. [39]

    Witten, Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions, Commun

    E. Witten, Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys.92, 455 (1984), [,201(1983)]

    1984

  40. [40]

    D. J. Gross and I. R. Klebanov, One-dimensional string theory on a circle, Nucl. Phys. B344, 475 (1990)

    1990

  41. [41]

    Sulejmanpasic and C

    T. Sulejmanpasic and C. Gattringer, Abelian gauge the- ories on the lattice:θ-Terms and compact gauge theory with(out) monopoles, Nucl. Phys. B943, 114616 (2019), arXiv:1901.02637 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    Gorantla, H

    P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao, A modified Villain formulation of fractons and other exotic theories, J. Math. Phys.62, 102301 (2021), arXiv:2103.01257 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Berkowitz, A

    E. Berkowitz, A. Cherman, and T. Jacobson, Exact lat- tice chiral symmetry in 2D gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 110, 014510 (2024), arXiv:2310.17539 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Seifnashri, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies as obstruc- tions to gauging (non-on-site) symmetries, arxiv (2023), arXiv:2308.05151 [cond-mat.str-el]

    S. Seifnashri, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies as obstruc- tions to gauging (non-on-site) symmetries, arxiv (2023), arXiv:2308.05151 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    DeMarco, E

    M. DeMarco, E. Lake, and X.-G. Wen, A Lattice Chiral Boson Theory in 1 + 1d, arxiv (2023), arXiv:2305.03024 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Cheng and N

    M. Cheng and N. Seiberg, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Lut- tinger, and ’t Hooft – anomaly matching in lattice sys- tems, SciPost Phys.15, 051 (2023), arXiv:2211.12543 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Fazza and T

    L. Fazza and T. Sulejmanpasic, Lattice quantum Vil- lain Hamiltonians: compact scalars, U(1) gauge theories, fracton models and quantum Ising model dualities, JHEP 05, 017, arXiv:2211.13047 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Thorngren, J

    R. Thorngren, J. Preskill, and L. Fidkowski, Chiral Lat- tice Gauge Theories from Symmetry Disentanglers, arXiv (2026), arXiv:2601.04304 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    Seifnashri, Exactly Solvable 1+1d Chiral Lattice Gauge Theories, arxiv (2026), arXiv:2601.14359 [hep- th]

    S. Seifnashri, Exactly Solvable 1+1d Chiral Lattice Gauge Theories, arxiv (2026), arXiv:2601.14359 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    Shamir, Constraints on the existence of chiral fermions in interacting lattice theories, Phys

    Y. Shamir, Constraints on the existence of chiral fermions in interacting lattice theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 2691 (1993), arXiv:hep-lat/9306023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  51. [51]

    Gurarie, Single-particle Green’s functions and inter- acting topological insulators, Phys

    V. Gurarie, Single-particle Green’s functions and inter- acting topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B83, 085426 (2011)

    2011

  52. [52]

    Xu and C

    Y. Xu and C. Xu, Green’s function Zero and Symmetric Mass Generation, arXiv (2021), arXiv:2103.15865 [cond- mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    D.-C. Lu, M. Zeng, and Y.-Z. You, Green’s function zeros in Fermi surface symmetric mass generation, Phys. Rev. B108, 205117 (2023), arXiv:2307.12223 [cond-mat.str- el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    S. D. Drell, M. Weinstein, and S. Yankielowicz, Strong 20 Coupling Field Theories. 2. Fermions and Gauge Fields on a Lattice, Phys. Rev. D14, 1627 (1976)

    1976

  55. [55]

    J. M. Rabin, Perturbation Theory for SLAC Lattice Fermions, Phys. Rev. D24, 3218 (1981)

    1981

  56. [56]

    Weinstein, Anomalies and the Lattice Schwinger Model: Paradigm Not Paradox, Phys

    M. Weinstein, Anomalies and the Lattice Schwinger Model: Paradigm Not Paradox, Phys. Rev. D26, 839 (1982)

    1982

  57. [57]

    Stacey, Eliminating lattice fermion doubling, Phys

    R. Stacey, Eliminating lattice fermion doubling, Phys. Rev. D26, 468 (1982)

    1982

  58. [58]

    Stacey, GAUGE INV ARIANCE AND FERMION DOUBLING ON THE LATTICE, Z

    R. Stacey, GAUGE INV ARIANCE AND FERMION DOUBLING ON THE LATTICE, Z. Phys. C19, 75 (1983)

    1983

  59. [59]

    Stacey, SIMPLE DOUBLING OF LATTICE FERMIONS, Phys

    R. Stacey, SIMPLE DOUBLING OF LATTICE FERMIONS, Phys. Lett. B127, 440 (1983)

    1983

  60. [60]

    Stacey, SPECTRUM DOUBLING AND GAMMA MATRICES AND LATTICE BASED REGULARIZA- TIONS, J

    R. Stacey, SPECTRUM DOUBLING AND GAMMA MATRICES AND LATTICE BASED REGULARIZA- TIONS, J. Phys. G11, 1097 (1985)

    1985

  61. [61]

    Susskind, Lattice Fermions, Phys

    L. Susskind, Lattice Fermions, Phys. Rev.D16, 3031 (1977)

    1977

  62. [62]

    W. Bock, J. Smit, and J. C. Vink, Fermion Higgs model with reduced staggered fermions, Phys. Lett. B291, 297 (1992), arXiv:hep-lat/9206008

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  63. [63]

    Catterall, Lattice Regularization of Reduced K¨ ahler- Dirac Fermions and Connections to Chiral Fermions, Sci- Post Phys.16, 108 (2024), arXiv:2311.02487 [hep-lat]

    S. Catterall, Lattice Regularization of Reduced K¨ ahler- Dirac Fermions and Connections to Chiral Fermions, Sci- Post Phys.16, 108 (2024), arXiv:2311.02487 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    K. G. Wilson, Quarks and strings on a lattice, inNew Phenomena in Subnuclear Physics: Part A, edited by A. Zichichi (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1977) pp. 69–142

    1977

  65. [65]

    J. W. Milnor,Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint (Princeton University Press, 1997) based on notes by David W. Weaver

    1997

  66. [66]

    Luscher, Abelian chiral gauge theories on the lat- tice with exact gauge invariance, Nucl

    M. Luscher, Abelian chiral gauge theories on the lat- tice with exact gauge invariance, Nucl. Phys. B549, 295 (1999), arXiv:hep-lat/9811032

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  67. [67]

    Luscher, Weyl fermions on the lattice and the non- Abelian gauge anomaly, Nucl

    M. Luscher, Weyl fermions on the lattice and the non- Abelian gauge anomaly, Nucl. Phys. B568, 162 (2000), arXiv:hep-lat/9904009

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  68. [68]

    Chatterjee, S

    A. Chatterjee, S. D. Pace, and S.-H. Shao, Quan- tized Axial Charge of Staggered Fermions and the Chi- ral Anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 021601 (2025), arXiv:2409.12220 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Clancy, D

    M. Clancy, D. B. Kaplan, and H. Singh, General- ized Ginsparg-Wilson equations, arXiv e-prints (2023), arXiv:2309.08542 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Singh, Generalized Ginsparg-Wilson relations: Fermionic anomalies on the lattice, PoSLA T- TICE2024, 375 (2025), arXiv:2503.05900 [hep-lat]

    H. Singh, Generalized Ginsparg-Wilson relations: Fermionic anomalies on the lattice, PoSLA T- TICE2024, 375 (2025), arXiv:2503.05900 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Singh, Ginsparg-Wilson Hamiltonians with Im- proved Chiral Symmetry, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2505.20419 [hep-lat]

    H. Singh, Ginsparg-Wilson Hamiltonians with Im- proved Chiral Symmetry, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2505.20419 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Tachikawa, Topological phases and relativistic QFTs (2018), lectures given in the CERN winter school, Febru- ary 2018

    Y. Tachikawa, Topological phases and relativistic QFTs (2018), lectures given in the CERN winter school, Febru- ary 2018

    2018

  73. [73]

    Thorngren, Anomalies and Bosonization, Commun

    R. Thorngren, Anomalies and Bosonization, Commun. Math. Phys.378, 1775 (2020), arXiv:1810.04414 [cond- mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Karch, D

    A. Karch, D. Tong, and C. Turner, A Web of 2d Dualities: Z2 Gauge Fields and Arf Invariants, SciPost Phys.7, 007 (2019), arXiv:1902.05550 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  75. [75]

    Ji, S.-H

    W. Ji, S.-H. Shao, and X.-G. Wen, Topological Transition on the Conformal Manifold, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033317 (2020), arXiv:1909.01425 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    D. S. Freed, Z. Komargodski, and N. Seiberg, The Sum Over Topological Sectors andθin the 2+1-Dimensional CP1 σ-Model, Commun. Math. Phys.362, 167 (2018), arXiv:1707.05448 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    Y. Lee, K. Ohmori, and Y. Tachikawa, Revisiting Wess- Zumino-Witten terms, SciPost Phys.10, 061 (2021), arXiv:2009.00033 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  78. [78]

    Chen and Y

    S. Chen and Y. Tanizaki, Solitonic Symmetry beyond Ho- motopy: Invertibility from Bordism and Noninvertibil- ity from Topological Quantum Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 011602 (2023), arXiv:2210.13780 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    Chen and Y

    S. Chen and Y. Tanizaki, Solitonic symmetry as non- invertible symmetry: cohomology theories with TQFT coefficients, arXiv e-prints (2023), arXiv:2307.00939 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    P. H. Ginsparg, APPLIED CONFORMAL FIELD THE- ORY, inLes Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics: Fields, Strings, Critical Phenomena(1988) arXiv:hep-th/9108028

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

Showing first 80 references.