Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Spatiotemporal Superfocusing

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A spatiotemporal wedge formed by two subluminal moving interfaces can compress and amplify pulses through cascaded Doppler reflections, with critical opening and orientation angles separating focusing from superfocusing.

desk verdict A plausible new wedge geometry for spatiotemporal focusing, but the divergence claim needs a dispersion/loss analysis before I'd trust it. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08157 v1 pith:ZAQ4H4JQ submitted 2024-11-12 physics.optics

Qianru Yang , Haotian Wu , Hao Hu , F. J. García-Vidal , Guangwei Hu , Yu Luo This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords spatiotemporalsuperfocusingamplificationdiffractionextremefieldfocusinglight
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Focusing light to a tiny spot usually requires metal tips that squeeze surface waves into subwavelength volumes, but those waves are stuck near the metal surface. This paper studies a different arrangement: a transparent slab whose two edges move at different constant speeds. When plotted in space and time, the moving edges form a wedge, and a pulse entering between them bounces back and forth many times. Each bounce shifts the pulse to a higher frequency and changes its amplitude, much like a Doppler shift from a moving mirror. Because the edges move slower than light in the material, the pulse is never overtaken and the bounces can accumulate.

The authors derive conditions, expressed through the opening angle and orientation angle of the wedge, that decide whether the bounces merely stabilize or keep growing. Above a critical angle, the pulse amplitude and frequency grow exponentially until the tip is reached; in practice the tip is cut off or rounded, which stops the growth. They verify the analytic scaling with finite-difference time-domain simulations.

The key difference from metal-tip superfocusing is that the output pulses stay propagating and can leave the structure, so the process could fit on a chip. The main caveats are that the calculation assumes lossless, frequency-independent materials and perfectly sharp moving boundaries. Real materials with dispersion and absorption would limit how far the amplification can go.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a dielectric wedge bounded by two subluminal moving interfaces with different velocities acts as a spatiotemporal counterpart of a metallic wedge: an incident pulse undergoes cascaded Doppler reflections so that its frequency and amplitude are multiplied by gamma factors each roundtrip, producing superfocusing (divergent field intensity at the tip) when the opening or orientation angle exceeds a critical value (Eqs. 3 and 4). The abstract states: 'an incident pulse undergoes continuous spatial and temporal compression due to Doppler effects, which accumulates and results in an extreme focusing as it approaches the spatiotemporal vertex.' If correct, this would be a new mechanism for subwavelength concentration and amplification of propagating waves in spacetime.

Load-bearing premise

The cascade calculation assumes the two wedge media are lossless and nondispersive, so the phase velocities v1 and v2 are constants independent of frequency. This enters in the first Results paragraph ('The phase velocity of waves in medium 1(or 2) is denoted as v1(2) = c0(epsilon1(2)/epsilon0)^(-1/2)') and is used in the Doppler scaling factors for every roundtrip. If the media disperse or absorb, later reflections see different phase velocities and the per-roundtrip multiplicative growth, and hence the claimed divergence, is no longer guaranteed. The paper does not analyze how much dispersion or loss cuts off the superfocusing.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a spatiotemporal wedge formed by two intersecting subluminal moving dielectric boundaries with different velocities. The authors argue that an incident pulse undergoes cascaded Doppler reflections inside the wedge, so that after N roundtrips its frequency and amplitude are multiplied by constant factors, producing spatial and temporal compression and, above a critical opening angle (Eq. 3) or orientation angle (Eq. 4), a diverging field at the tip. They support this with FDTD simulations of truncated and blunted wedges and contrast the mechanism with plasmonic superfocusing.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the spatiotemporal wedge is a conceptually new platform for concentrating and amplifying propagating waves, with the advantages of preserving propagation character and being free of the dissipative losses that limit plasmonic nanofocusing. The analytic model has no fitted parameters and the critical-condition formulas are falsifiable predictions. The paper also attempts an experimental discussion grounded in existing time-varying waveguide platforms. However, the significance is currently tempered by three issues: the idealized lossless/nondispersive assumption, the incomplete derivation of the cascade equations, and the qualitative nature of the numerical validation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results and Discussions, first paragraph; Eqs. (2a)-(2b); Conclusion] The per-roundtrip scaling rests on treating the phase velocities v1 and v2 as frequency-independent constants, as stated in the first Results paragraph. Because the cascade upconverts the pulse to ever higher frequencies, any realistic dispersion changes v(omega) at each successive reflection, so the product gamma_r,BC1*gamma_r,BC2 is not constant and the divergence condition embodied in Eqs. (3)-(4) is not guaranteed. Loss would further damp the growth. The manuscript does not analyze how dispersion or absorption modifies Eq. (2), yet the conclusion calls the mechanism 'broadband and lossless.' This is load-bearing for the central claim of extreme focusing; the authors should either include a dispersion/loss analysis with a quantitative cutoff or sharply restrict the claim to the idealized nondispersive limit.
  2. [Figs. 2, 3, and 5; FDTD simulations] The numerical results are presented without any convergence or error analysis. There is no mention of the spatial and temporal grid resolution, the boundary conditions, or a validation of the FDTD pipeline against the analytic cascade model (for instance, comparing the extracted frequency-scaling exponent with Eq. (2) for the first few roundtrips). Without such checks, the snapshots and spectra in Figs. 2, 3, and 5 are only qualitative evidence, which weakens the support for the quantitative threshold behavior claimed in Eqs. (3)-(4).
  3. [Eqs. (2a)-(2b), (3)-(4); Results and Discussions] The derivation of the N-roundtrip scaling formulas and of the critical-angle conditions is too compressed to verify. The text moves directly from the single-boundary scattering factors gamma_r and gamma_tau to the cascaded forms in Eq. (2), and then to the critical conditions in Eqs. (3)-(4), without showing the recursion, the role of the truncation delta, or the separate treatment of the N=0 term in Eq. (2b). Since the divergence claim is the central quantitative result, a complete derivation, even if placed in a supplement, is necessary.
  4. [Abstract; Introduction] The claim of focusing 'beyond the diffraction limit' is not tied to a precise metric. The spatiotemporal wedge upconverts the pulse frequency and compresses its duration and local wavelength, but it is not obvious what observable spot size should be compared with what diffraction-limited value, particularly because the local frequency changes with roundtrip order. The authors should define the metric (e.g., FWHM of the field at a given time versus the local wavelength) and demonstrate the claimed subwavelength behavior on that metric.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout; Eq. (1), Poynting expression, Eq. (4)] Several equations (notably Eq. (1), the Poynting-theorem expression after 'which results in an increase in the energy of the LC circuit,' and Eq. (4)) contain rendering errors with missing symbols and unreadable character combinations. The authors should ensure the source compiles cleanly and re-check the PDF.
  2. [Results and Discussions, paragraph after Eq. (5)] The definition of the opening angle delta_theta and the orientation angle theta_bar is printed in a ways that is easy to misread. Please state explicitly in words and with a figure: delta_theta = pi - (theta_1 + theta_2) and theta_bar = (theta_1 - theta_2)/2, with theta_1 and theta_2 the rapidity angles of the two boundaries.
  3. [Fig. 3] The insets of Fig. 3 are too small to read the pulse-area versus frequency plots. Consider enlarging them or separating the spectra and area integrals into a supplementary figure.
  4. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption says 'the integrated area of each pulse relative to its central frequency' and then states 'the pulse area is proportional to the scattering coefficient for monochromatic wave excitation.' The connection between the time-domain area and the monochromatic scattering coefficient needs a one-sentence explanation.
  5. [References] The reference list includes several preprints (Refs. 17, 21, 30). It would be helpful to update these with published versions where available, and to cite original derivations of the Lorentz-boosted Fresnel factors for moving boundaries (beyond Refs. 39-40) to aid readers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the cascade and critical-angle results follow from first-principles moving-boundary scattering with no fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. It starts from Lorentz-transformed moving-boundary scattering, defines reflection/transmission Doppler scaling factors gamma_r and gamma_tau and static Fresnel coefficients r0 and tau0 from standard formulas, then constructs the roundtrip cascade in Eqs. (2a)-(2b) by repeated application of these single-boundary factors. The critical opening and orientation angle conditions (Eqs. (3) and (4)) are obtained by solving the algebraic threshold gamma_r,BC1 * gamma_r,BC2 = r0^-2 against the geometric relation between boundary velocity and wedge angle; no parameter is fitted to the data being predicted. The FDTD simulations in Figs. 3-5 are independent numerical confirmations rather than outputs of the analytical model. Self-citations (Refs. 16, 21, 24, 27) appear only in the introductory survey of spatiotemporal modulation and amplification mechanisms and are not used to justify the wedge cascade or the critical conditions. The lossless, nondispersive assumption for v1(2) is an explicit modeling idealization that affects physical realizability, but it is not a circular step: the derivation states the assumption and draws consequences from it. No claim in the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation relies on standard Lorentz-boosted scattering theory plus a set of idealized material and interface assumptions: lossless nondispersive media, sharp subluminal boundaries, and independent roundtrip reflections. No parameters are fitted to data; the numeric simulations use illustrative epsilon, velocity, and tip-width values. The main burden is not fitted constants but the physical idealizations, especially no dispersion and no loss.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Lorentz transformation with rapidity theta = arctan(v_BC/c0) gives the scattering by a uniformly moving dielectric boundary.
    Invoked in the Results section to derive the Doppler scaling factors gamma_r and gamma_tau from the rest-frame Fresnel coefficients; this is a standard result used in prior moving-boundary work (Ref. 40).
  • standard math Fresnel reflection and transmission for the static spatial boundary are valid in the co-moving frame.
    The paper writes r = gamma_r r0 and tau = gamma_tau tau0 with r0 and tau0 from a static boundary; this assumes the usual boundary conditions apply in the moving frame.
  • domain assumption The media are lossless and nondispersive with fixed phase velocities v1 = c0/sqrt(epsilon1/epsilon0), v2 = c0/sqrt(epsilon2/epsilon0).
    Used throughout the single-boundary and wedge analysis; the conclusion calls the scheme 'broadband and lossless'. Dispersion would alter the frequencies accumulated over many bounces.
  • domain assumption The two boundaries are sharp step-function interfaces moving at subluminal speeds |v_BC| < v1, v2.
    Eq. (1) uses step functions, and the text states only subluminal modulations are considered so the beam is not overtaken.
  • domain assumption Each roundtrip reflection is independent, so the total scaling after N roundtrips is the product of single-boundary scaling factors.
    The geometric-similarity argument in the text ('trajectories ... form a sequence of similar triangles') supports Eq. (2), but no detailed derivation of the multiplicative cascade is shown.
  • domain assumption The wedge tip is truncated by a temporal boundary of width delta, so fields remain finite and can be simulated.
    Eq. (1) introduces the truncation and the analysis of maximum amplitudes depends on delta; this avoids the mathematical divergence at a perfect vertex.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spatiotemporal Superfocusing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZAQ4H4JQ

@misc{pith2026241108157,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spatiotemporal Superfocusing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZAQ4H4JQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08157}
}
read the original abstract

Superfocusing confines light within subwavelength structures, breaking the diffraction limit. Structures with spatial singularities, such as metallic cones, are crucial to enable nanoscale focusing, leading to significant advancements in nanophotonics, sensing, and imaging. Here, we exploit the spatiotemporal analogue of the wedge structure, i.e. a dielectric medium sandwiched between two subluminal interfaces with distinct velocities, to focus propagating waves beyond the diffraction limit, achieving spatiotemporal superfocusing. Within this structure, an incident pulse undergoes continuous spatial and temporal compression due to Doppler effects, which accumulates and results in an extreme focusing as it approaches the spatiotemporal vertex. Remarkably, unlike the field localization in conventional superfocusing, the compressed light in spatiotemporal wedges experiences significant amplification and then couple to the far field in free space. Our findings represent an indispensable paradigm for extreme concentration and amplification of propagating waves in space-time dimensions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Topologically protected edge states in time photonic crystals with chiral symmetry

    physics.optics 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Chiral-symmetric temporal photonic crystals host edge states whose eigenfrequencies are insensitive to disorder, unlike their time-reversal-symmetric counterparts.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Tip-based plasmonics: squeezing light with metallic nanoprobes,

    N. C. Lindquist, J. Jose, S. Cherukulappurath et al., "Tip-based plasmonics: squeezing light with metallic nanoprobes," Laser & Photonics Reviews 7, 453-477 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Breaking the diffusion limit with super-hydrophobic delivery of molecules to plasmonic nanofocusing SERS structures,

    F. De Angelis, F. Gentile, F. Mecarini et al., "Breaking the diffusion limit with super-hydrophobic delivery of molecules to plasmonic nanofocusing SERS structures," Nature Photonics 5, 682-687 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Metallized tip amplification of near- field Raman scattering,

    N. Hayazawa, Y. Inouye, Z. Sekkat et al., "Metallized tip amplification of near- field Raman scattering," Optics Communications 183, 333-336 (2000)

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy: towards single molecule spectroscopy,

    B. Pettinger, G. Picardi, R. Schuster et al., "Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy: towards single molecule spectroscopy," Electrochemistry 68, 942-949 (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    Nanoscale chemical analysis by tip- enhanced Raman spectroscopy,

    R. M. Stöckle, Y. D. Suh, V. Deckert et al., "Nanoscale chemical analysis by tip- enhanced Raman spectroscopy," Chemical Physics Letters 318, 131-136 (2000)

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    High-harmonic generation by field enhanced femtosecond pulses in metal-sapphire nanostructure,

    S. Han, H. Kim, Y. W. Kim et al., "High-harmonic generation by field enhanced femtosecond pulses in metal-sapphire nanostructure," Nature Communications 7, 13105 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Hot-electron nanoscopy using adiabatic compression of surface plasmons,

    A. Giugni, B. Torre, A. Toma et al., "Hot-electron nanoscopy using adiabatic compression of surface plasmons," Nature Nanotechnology 8, 845-852 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Field-driven photoemission from nanostructures quenches the quiver motion,

    G. Herink, D. R. Solli, M. Gulde et al., "Field-driven photoemission from nanostructures quenches the quiver motion," Nature 483, 190-193 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Surface plasmons and singularities,

    Y. Luo, J. B. Pendry, and A. Aubry, "Surface plasmons and singularities," Nano Lett 10, 4186-4191 (2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    Nanofocusing of optical energy in tapered plasmonic waveguides,

    M. I. Stockman, "Nanofocusing of optical energy in tapered plasmonic waveguides," Phys Rev Lett 93, 137404 (2004)

    2004

  3. [11]

    Collection and concentration of light by touching spheres: a transformation optics approach,

    A. I. Fernandez-Dominguez, S. A. Maier, and J. B. Pendry, "Collection and concentration of light by touching spheres: a transformation optics approach," Phys Rev Lett 105, 266807 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    Plasmonic black- hole: broadband omnidirectional absorber of gap surface plasmons,

    K. V. Nerkararyan, S. K. Nerkararyan, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, "Plasmonic black- hole: broadband omnidirectional absorber of gap surface plasmons," Opt. Lett. 36, 4311-4313 (2011)

    2011

  5. [13]

    3D printing of plasmonic nanofocusing tip enabling high resolution, high throughput and high contrast optical near-field imaging,

    L. Long, Q. Deng, R. Huang et al., "3D printing of plasmonic nanofocusing tip enabling high resolution, high throughput and high contrast optical near-field imaging," Light: Science & Applications 12, 219 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Near-field localization in plasmonic superfocusing: a nanoemitter on a tip,

    C. C. Neacsu, S. Berweger, R. L. Olmon et al., "Near-field localization in plasmonic superfocusing: a nanoemitter on a tip," Nano Lett 10, 592-596 (2010)

    2010

  7. [15]

    Spatiotemporal light control with active metasurfaces,

    A. M. Shaltout, V. M. Shalaev, and M. L. Brongersma, "Spatiotemporal light control with active metasurfaces," Science 364 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Antireflection Spatiotemporal Metamaterials,

    Y. Yu, H. Hu, L. Zou et al., "Antireflection Spatiotemporal Metamaterials," Laser & Photonics Reviews 17, 2300130 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Generalized coherent wave control at dynamic interfaces,

    Y. Yu, D. Gao, Y. Yang et al., "Generalized coherent wave control at dynamic interfaces," arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00574 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Efficient Phase Conjugation in a Space-Time Leaky Waveguide,

    S. Yin, and A. Alù, "Efficient Phase Conjugation in a Space-Time Leaky Waveguide," ACS Photonics 9, 979-984 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation,

    K. Fang, Z. Yu, and S. Fan, "Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation," Nature Photonics 6, 782-787 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    Floquet Chern insulators of light,

    L. He, Z. Addison, J. Jin et al., "Floquet Chern insulators of light," Nature Communications 10, 4194 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Momentum flatband and superluminal propagation in a photonic time Moir\'e superlattice,

    L. Zou, H. Hu, H. Wu et al., "Momentum flatband and superluminal propagation in a photonic time Moir\'e superlattice," arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00215 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Dispersion relations in time-space periodic media: Part I—Stable interactions,

    E. S. Cassedy, and A. A. Oliner, "Dispersion relations in time-space periodic media: Part I—Stable interactions," Proceedings of the IEEE 51, 1342-1359 (1963)

    1963

  15. [23]

    Dispersion relations in time-space periodic media part II— Unstable interactions,

    E. S. Cassedy, "Dispersion relations in time-space periodic media part II— Unstable interactions," Proceedings of the IEEE 55, 1154-1168 (1967)

    1967

  16. [24]

    Cascaded parametric amplification based on spatiotemporal modulations,

    Q. Yang, H. Hu, X. Li et al., "Cascaded parametric amplification based on spatiotemporal modulations," Photonics Research 11, B125-B135 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Linear frequency conversion via sudden merging of meta-atoms in time-variant metasurfaces,

    K. Lee, J. Son, J. Park et al., "Linear frequency conversion via sudden merging of meta-atoms in time-variant metasurfaces," Nature Photonics 12, 765-773 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Epsilon-near-zero Al-doped ZnO for ultrafast switching at telecom wavelengths,

    N. Kinsey, C. DeVault, J. Kim et al., "Epsilon-near-zero Al-doped ZnO for ultrafast switching at telecom wavelengths," Optica 2 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Conformal Spatiotemporal Modulation Enabled Geometric Frequency Combs,

    H. Wu, Q. Yang, H. Hu et al., "Conformal Spatiotemporal Modulation Enabled Geometric Frequency Combs," ACS Photonics 11, 2992-3002 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Quasi-phase-matching of momentum and energy in nonlinear optical processes,

    A. Bahabad, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, "Quasi-phase-matching of momentum and energy in nonlinear optical processes," Nature Photonics 4, 570-575 (2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    Wood Anomalies and Surface-Wave Excitation with a Time Grating,

    E. Galiffi, Y. T. Wang, Z. Lim et al., "Wood Anomalies and Surface-Wave Excitation with a Time Grating," Phys Rev Lett 125, 127403 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Smith-Purcell radiation from time grating,

    J.-F. Zhu, A. Nussupbekov, W. Zhou et al., "Smith-Purcell radiation from time grating," arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07381 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Light emission by free electrons in photonic time-crystals,

    A. Dikopoltsev, Y. Sharabi, M. Lyubarov et al., "Light emission by free electrons in photonic time-crystals," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2119705119 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Fresnel drag in space–time- modulated metamaterials,

    P. A. Huidobro, E. Galiffi, S. Guenneau et al., "Fresnel drag in space–time- modulated metamaterials," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 24943-24948 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Beyond the Bode-Fano Bound: Wideband Impedance Matching for Short Pulses Using Temporal Switching of Transmission-Line Parameters,

    A. Shlivinski, and Y. Hadad, "Beyond the Bode-Fano Bound: Wideband Impedance Matching for Short Pulses Using Temporal Switching of Transmission-Line Parameters," Phys Rev Lett 121, 204301 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Broadband Nonreciprocal Amplification in Luminal Metamaterials,

    E. Galiffi, P. A. Huidobro, and J. B. Pendry, "Broadband Nonreciprocal Amplification in Luminal Metamaterials," Phys Rev Lett 123, 206101 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Gain in time-dependent media—a new mechanism,

    J. B. Pendry, E. Galiffi, and P. A. Huidobro, "Gain in time-dependent media—a new mechanism," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 38 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Photon conservation in trans-luminal metamaterials,

    J. B. Pendry, E. Galiffi, and P. A. Huidobro, "Photon conservation in trans-luminal metamaterials," Optica 9 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Homogenization Theory of Space-Time Metamaterials,

    P. A. Huidobro, M. G. Silveirinha, E. Galiffi et al., "Homogenization Theory of Space-Time Metamaterials," Physical Review Applied 16, 014044 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Quantum electrodynamics of time-varying gratings,

    S. A. R. Horsley, and J. B. Pendry, "Quantum electrodynamics of time-varying gratings," Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 120, e2302652120 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Scattering at Interluminal Interface,

    Z. L. Deck-Léger, and C. Caloz, "Scattering at Interluminal Interface," in 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting(2019), pp. 367-368

    2019

  32. [40]

    Uniform-velocity spacetime crystals,

    Z.-L. Deck-Léger, N. Chamanara, M. Skorobogatiy et al., "Uniform-velocity spacetime crystals," Advanced Photonics 1 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Forshaw, and G

    J. Forshaw, and G. Smith, Dynamics and relativity (John Wiley & Sons, 2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    Observation of temporal reflection and broadband frequency translation at photonic time interfaces,

    H. Moussa, G. Xu, S. Yin et al., "Observation of temporal reflection and broadband frequency translation at photonic time interfaces," Nature Physics 19, 863-868 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Electrically driven nonreciprocity induced by interband photonic transition on a silicon chip,

    H. Lira, Z. Yu, S. Fan et al., "Electrically driven nonreciprocity induced by interband photonic transition on a silicon chip," Phys Rev Lett 109, 033901 (2012)

    2012

  36. [44]

    Space-time-coding digital metasurfaces,

    L. Zhang, X. Q. Chen, S. Liu et al., "Space-time-coding digital metasurfaces," Nat Commun 9, 4334 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.