Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Orca: The World is in Your Mind

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read One learned latent space drives text, image, and robot-action readouts.

desk verdict Orca tests a clean hypothesis—frozen-backbone latent next-state prediction helps downstream text/image/action—but the paper doesn't isolate whether the gains come from temporal state dynamics or just the VQA/language objective. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.30534 v3 pith:ZJL35LI2 submitted 2026-06-29 cs.CV

Yihao Wang , Yuheng Ji , Mingyu Cao , Yanqing Shen , Runze Xiao , Huaihai Lyu , Senwei Xie , Euan Liu
show 49 more authors
Klara Tian Tianfeng Long Yichi Zhang Zhengliang Cai Ruike Chen Jifan Zhao Ruochuan Shi Zihan Tang Jing Lyu Wenxing Tan Ningbo Zhang Yangtao Hu Yuming Gao Xiansheng Chen Junkai Zhao Congsheng Xu Boan Zhu Ziqi Wang Yupu Feng Qiongqiong Zhang Yingli Zhao Yulong Ao Shaoxuan Xie You Liu Guocai Yao Leiduo Zhang Xiaodan Liu Yunyan Zhang Yance Jiao Xinyan Yang Jiaxing Wei Xu Liu Tengfei Pan Shaokai Nie Chunlei Men Sen Cui Xiaojie Jin Hongyang Li Jianlan Luo Yao Mu Yunchao Wei Jun Yan Hang Zhao Xiaolong Zheng Jiaming Li Yonghua Lin Tiejun Huang Zhongyuan Wang Pengwei Wang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords worldmodelnext-statepredictionlatentspaceself-supervisedlearningvision-languageactiongenerationvideounderstandingembodiedAI
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces Orca, a world foundation model built around a unified world latent space learned by Next-State-Prediction—predicting latent future states—rather than by next-token, next-frame, or next-action prediction. Orca pre-trains on 125K hours of video and 160M event annotations using two complementary paradigms: unconscious learning (predicting the latent representation of the next video frame from the current frame) and conscious learning (predicting latent states under language-described event conditions, plus VQA response generation). After pre-training, the model's backbone is frozen and only lightweight modality-specific decoders are trained to read out the latent as text, images, and robot actions. The paper's central claim, backed by scaling curves and comparative results, is that a stronger world latent from pre-training enables stronger downstream readouts across all three modalities, and that Orca outperforms similarly sized specialized models. If this holds, passive video and language data could support robot control without any action labels.

What carries the argument

The central object is the world latent state S, which evolves under S_{t+Δ} ~ p(S_{t+Δ} | S_t, z_t, c_t), where z_t represents implicit dynamics (physical laws, hidden object properties) and c_t an explicit language condition. The implementation uses learnable query tokens inserted into a pre-trained vision-language transformer; a two-layer MLP maps the query's hidden state to a predicted latent, which is teacher-forced against the latent extracted by the frozen vision encoder of the same backbone. This latent is later read out by a language-model head for text, an MLP plus low-rank adaptor on a frozen diffusion image decoder for images, and a diffusion-transformer action expert with flow ma

What would settle it

Train or evaluate with a modified supervision target that provably encodes physical state (e.g., oracle object poses and contact labels) instead of the frozen vision encoder's latent. If downstream action performance improves markedly over the vision-latent version, the vision-latent target is the bottleneck. Conversely, if a version with the vision-latent target but without VQA and event-conditioned losses retains the action gains, the world-latent claim is supported; if action gains vanish, they may stem from language supervision. A simpler probe: feed two videos that share the same vision-e

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Orca's central discovery is that training a vision-language model to predict latent states—teacher-forced against the latents of a frozen vision encoder—produces a representation that can be decoded into three very different output spaces. The pre-training objective combines observation-only next-frame latent prediction, event-conditioned latent prediction in both forward and backward directions, and standard visual question answering. With the backbone frozen during post-training, text, image, and action readouts all improve as pre-training data and model size increase, and the best model outperforms similarly sized specialized baselines on text benchmarks, a newly introduced real-world ima

Load-bearing premise

The state-transition supervision assumes that the frozen vision encoder's latent space is a sufficient target for world-state dynamics; if that encoder discards physical dynamics such as contact, occlusion, or object-state changes, the learned 'world latent' may only re-encode semantic features, and the downstream gains could come from the VQA and language-conditioned objectives rather than from genuine world-state modeling.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, large-scale unlabeled video can serve as a pre-training signal for robot control, mitigating the scarcity of action-labelled data.
  • Scaling model size and pre-training data continues to reduce the next-state-prediction loss and improves all three readouts, suggesting the paradigm does not saturate at the tested 4B scale and 12.5K hours.
  • Each pre-training objective has a distinct role: observation-only transition is critical for action readout, event-conditioned transition for image prediction, and VQA for maintaining the language interface, implying the three objectives jointly shape the latent.
  • The frozen-backbone readout design means the same latent can be reused for multiple tasks without retraining the core, making it a potential general interface for multimodal output.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the latent genuinely encodes physical dynamics, a direct extension is counterfactual prediction—e.g., asking what would happen if an object slipped—which the paper does not test but its formulation supports.
  • The paper's acknowledged reliance on a frozen vision-encoder latent as supervision target (Limitation 2) implies the 'worldness' of the latent is bounded by that encoder. A testable improvement is to replace the target with an object-centric or physics-aware latent and compare downstream readouts.
  • The scaling evidence for 'stronger latent leads to stronger readouts' is correlational; probing the latent with linear classifiers for physical variables (contact, velocity, occlusion) would show whether the improved readouts actually stem from world-state information rather than from generic representation quality.
  • PRICE-V0.1, the new image-prediction benchmark, could be extended to multi-step state prediction and temporal consistency checks, which would stress whether the model predicts state evolution rather than merely plausible still images.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Orca, a world foundation model pre-trained with next-state prediction rather than next-token/frame/action prediction. A VLM backbone is trained with three objectives: (1) observation-only state transition (predicting the latent of the next frame from a current frame), (2) event-conditioned state transition (predicting a latent in an adjacent event given a language description), and (3) VQA response generation. Pre-training uses 125K hours of video, 160M event annotations, and 11.5M VQA samples, with one-tenth of the data used in this version. After pre-training the backbone is frozen and lightweight decoders are trained for text, image prediction (SD3.5 + LoRA), and real-robot action generation (DiT action expert). The experiments report decreasing pre-training loss with scale and improving downstream readouts as pre-training data increases, leading to the central claim that a stronger world latent yields stronger downstream readouts and that Orca outperforms similar-sized specialized baselines on text, image, and action benchmarks.

Significance. If the central causal claim is established, this is a significant result: it would demonstrate that passive video and language-conditioned latent prediction transfers to text understanding, instruction-conditioned image prediction, and real-robot action generation without any action labels in pre-training, with a plausible path toward alleviating robot-data scarcity. The paper's strengths are its clean probing setup (frozen backbone, lightweight readouts), detailed hyperparameters in Appendix C, real-robot OOD evaluation, and unusually honest limitations. The central attribution, however, is currently not isolated: the state-transition targets are frozen ViT latents, and the joint loss co-scales with VQA/language supervision; Table 5 lacks the VQA-only and non-temporal controls that would separate world-state dynamics from semantic re-encoding. The PRICE-V0.1 benchmark also appears to draw from the same video sources as pre-training, and the real-robot results are reported without variance. These issues are addressable with additional experiments and analyses, so the work is promising but not yet conclusive.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1.1 / Eq. (2) / Appendix C.1.1 / Table 5 / Limitation 2] The central claim that state-transition modeling builds a world state space is not isolated. Both L_obs and L_evt supervise predictions against latents from the frozen Qwen3.5 vision encoder (Eqs. C-1, C-2, C-3), so the model is never required to predict a target that is not already expressible in that ViT space. Limitation 2 explicitly concedes that this 'aligns the learned state space with the semantic space.' Because pre-training jointly optimizes 0.1*L_obs + 0.5*L_evt + 0.4*L_vqa and Figure 6 scales this joint objective, the observed downstream gains could come from VQA/instruction supervision or from improved semantic alignment rather than from temporal world-state dynamics. Table 5 ablates the three losses against each other but includes no VQA-only condition and no non-temporal target control (e.g., shuffled frames as targets). To substantiate Answer 1.2, the authors should add a
  2. [§4.2.2 / §E.2.1 / §3.1.2] The PRICE-V0.1 image-prediction benchmark appears to overlap with pre-training data. PRICE-V0.1 is constructed from AgiBot-World, HomeInteract, PE-Video, and PSI-Ego, while pre-training video data includes ego-centric interaction, exo-centric manipulation, action-free robot execution, and natural dynamics from real-world videos. The paper claims zero-shot image prediction, but no overlap analysis is reported between PRICE-V0.1 test samples and the 12.5K hours of pre-training video actually used. If the same scenes, objects, or even video sources appear in pre-training, the Table 3 comparison ceases to be zero-shot and the 'world latent transfers' conclusion is confounded. The authors should provide exact overlap statistics or construct PRICE-V0.1 from held-out sources.
  3. [§4.2.3 / Table 4 / Table E3] The real-robot results are presented as point estimates with no measure of variance, number of evaluation episodes, or repeated-trial data. The headline comparisons (e.g., Orca overall 32.4 vs. pi-0.5 29.4, or Orca object-OOD 28.2 vs. 31.2) may be within run-to-run noise for real-robot manipulation. Rule-based scores and PRM-as-a-Judge diagnostics in Table 4 and Table E3 should be accompanied by evaluation counts, standard errors, or at least seed/trial-level results. Without this, the claim that Orca 'outperforms' the action baselines is not statistically supported.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 4] The Object OOD row for Qwen3.5 contains run-together values such as '12.921.94.5' and '4.61'; these formatting errors make the table difficult to read. Also, add units or a note that all metrics are percentages.
  2. [Table 1] The 'Model Size (B)' column is inconsistent: some rows list the size of the base VLM, some list combined sizes (e.g., '3+4', '4+2'), and V-JEPA 2.1 is listed as '1 (+LLaMA3-8B)'. Define the convention in the table caption or in the text.
  3. [§4.3 / Table 5] The table caption states 'The first three rows average two metrics, while the last two average all three,' but the row labels are easy to misread. Clarify which losses are active in each row (e.g., 'obs only', 'obs+evt', 'obs+vqa', 'evt+vqa', 'all') and why the 'vqa-only' row is absent.
  4. [§3.3 / Table D1] The throughput comparison to StarVLA may not be apples-to-apples. Specify model size, sequence length, batch size, and hardware configuration for each entry so the 4.4x speedup can be reproduced.
  5. [Appendix E.2.2 / Listing E1] The evaluation prompt contains typographic artifacts such as en-dashes and nonstandard characters. More importantly, the prompt instructs the judge to penalize teleported outcomes, which is appropriate, but the scoring rubric could be stated as a single reproducible rubric in the main text rather than only in an appendix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Orca's scaling and readout results are empirical probes; the ViT-supervision limitation is acknowledged, not a definitional reduction.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation chain is empirical rather than definitional: pre-training objectives (Eq. C-1, C-2, C-3) supervise latent prediction against a frozen vision encoder's features, and downstream readouts (LM head, SD3.5 adaptor, Action Expert) are separately trained with the backbone frozen. The pre-training loss does not contain the downstream readout metrics, and no parameter fitted to a downstream benchmark is renamed as a prediction. The scaling result of Answer 1.2 could be confounded by the jointly trained VQA objective, but the paper's own ablation (Table 5) partially isolates the three losses; confounding is a validity concern, not circularity. The only potentially self-referential evaluation tool, PRM-as-a-Judge, is used for dense action diagnostics and is accompanied by independent rule-based scores (Table E3); it is not invoked to justify the central premise or to forbid alternatives. Limitation 2 explicitly acknowledges that supervising in the frozen ViT space 'aligns the learned state space with the semantic space,' which is a construct-validity limitation for world-state modeling, but it is not a circular step in the derivation. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or known result is renamed or imported via self-citation in a load-bearing way. Therefore, no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper postulates a unified world latent and an implicit dynamics variable, and relies on a frozen ViT space as ground truth for state transitions. The main free parameters are loss weights and data-mixing ratios, which are hand-chosen but ablated only at the level of presence/absence, not tuned. The most consequential assumption is that the frozen ViT latent preserves the physical information needed for downstream action and image readouts.

free parameters (3)
  • Pre-training loss coefficients lambda_obs, lambda_evt, lambda_vqa = 0.1, 0.5, 0.4
    Hand-chosen in Eq. (2) and App. C.1.1; not derived, though the paper ablated the on/off presence of each loss in Table 5.
  • Latent matching loss weights (MSE vs cosine) = 0.1 MSE + 0.9 cosine
    Hand-chosen in Eq. (C-1); affects the gradient geometry of both state-transition objectives.
  • State-transition to VQA sampling ratio = 5:1
    App. C.1.1; manually set data mixing ratio, not justified by tuning.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption A frozen VLM vision encoder's latent space is a valid supervision target for world state transitions.
    Eq. C-1/C-2/C-3 match predictions to latents from the frozen Qwen3.5 vision encoder; if this space loses physical dynamics, the state-transition loss is vacuous.
  • domain assumption Query tokens plus a two-layer MLP can instantiate the implicit dynamics variable z_t in Eq. (1).
    z_t is never explicitly modeled; the architecture assumes the learnable queries absorb latent unobserved factors.
  • domain assumption Lower pre-training loss with more data implies a better world latent.
    Sec. 4.1.1 interprets the loss decrease as scalability and effectiveness, without a held-out or downstream validation on the loss alone.
  • domain assumption LLM judges (Gemini, GPT, Doubao, Gemma) provide valid scores of physical plausibility and instruction following in PRICE-V0.1.
    App. E.2.2 uses LLM-judge scores as the evaluation metric for image prediction; no human correlation is reported.
  • domain assumption PRICE-V0.1 is out-of-distribution relative to Orca's pre-training data.
    App. E.2.1 builds PRICE from AgiBot-World, HomeInteract, PE-Video, and PSI-Ego, which are the same interaction domains used in pre-training; no overlap analysis is provided.
invented entities (2)
  • Unified world latent space S
    purpose: Central representation from which text, image, and action decoders read out.
    The existence and quality of this latent are validated only through the paper's own readout probes; no external or directly falsifiable handle is provided.
  • Implicit dynamics variable z_t
    purpose: Conceptual carrier of unobserved physical laws and factors in Eq. (1).
    z_t is never instantiated as a trained variable; the architecture assumes the query/MLP mechanism captures it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Orca: The World is in Your Mind." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZJL35LI2

@misc{pith2026260630534,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Orca: The World is in Your Mind},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZJL35LI2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.30534}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce Orca, an initial instantiation of a general world foundation model. Orca learns a unified world latent space from multimodal world signals and exposes it through multimodal readout interfaces. Rather than optimizing isolated next-token, next-frame, or next-action prediction, we are centered on Next-State-Prediction modeling, offering a unified state-transition modeling route toward understanding, predicting, and acting upon the world. Orca learns through two complementary paradigms: unconscious learning captures dense natural state transitions from continuous videos, and conscious learning models sparse meaningful state transitions by language-described events and VQA supervision. For pre-training, we construct a large-scale world-learning inventory data, including 125K hours of video data and 160M event annotations. After pre-training, Orca learns a unified world latent space. To examine whether the learned latent supports downstream, we evaluate it by three representative downstream readouts: text generation, image prediction, and embodied action generation. Orca's backbone is frozen, and only the lightweight modality-specific decoders are trainable. Experiments show the scalability of the proposed paradigm and verify that stronger world latent enables stronger downstream readouts. Orca outperforms similar-sized specialized baselines. These results show that Orca, as a general world foundation model, presents a promising approach to understanding, predicting, and acting upon the world. Finally, we discuss the current limitations, aiming to provide useful insights and inspiration for the community.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30534 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Orca’s overall framework. Orca follows an Encoder-Decoder architecture. Given mul￾timodal world signals, the Encoder learns a world latent through two complementary paradigms: un￾conscious learning and conscious learning. Unconscious learning captures dense natural state transitions, while conscious learning captures sparse meaningful state transitions. To prove that the learned latent is effective, the Encoder … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of pre-training data. Orca’s pre-training data includes video, event, and VQA data. A. Video Data supports 1) Observation-only state transition, A. Video Data and B. Event Data support 2) Event-conditioned state transition, and C. VQA Data supports 3) VQA response generation. A. Video Data is built from visual signals and covers four types of real-world observations: ego￾centric interaction, exo-centric man… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Downstream readout architectures. To language reuses the LM head for text readout. To vision only trains an MLP adaptor and LoRA on top of a frozen SD3.5 to readout images. To action trains an MLP adaptor and a DiT-based Action Expert from scratch. Action Expert receiv…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Loss of model and data scaling. To answer Question 1.1, we first performed experiments with model sizes and data scaling, and the loss curves are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Scaling behavior on downstream readouts performance. To answer Question 1.2, we performed probe exper￾iments on Orca-0.8B and Orca-4B. We select some checkpoints from the pre￾training process and apply them to downstream tasks to see if a strong world latent can lead t…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visual comparison of image prediction in the real world. 1) Orca’s learned world latent transfers effectively to image readout. Compared with recent image generation baselines, Orca achieves the best average performance on PRICE and remains competitive across different…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Recovery after repeated grasp failures. Orca recovers from early spoon-grasp failures and eventually makes progress, while 𝜋0.5 remains unstable with repeated failed attempts. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

Review history (3 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Diffusion Image Editing via Asynchronous Token Decoding

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Token-wise surprisal selects editable regions, source key/value memory and hard projection preserve the rest, yielding record background-preservation scores on PIE-Bench without masks or fine-tuning.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The loss is: Lobs =E h ℓlat ˆ𝑣𝑙 𝑡+1,𝑣 𝑙 𝑡+1 i

    Observation-only state transition.𝑣 𝑙 𝑡+1 is the latent of the next frame. The loss is: Lobs =E h ℓlat ˆ𝑣𝑙 𝑡+1,𝑣 𝑙 𝑡+1 i . (C-2)

  2. [2]

    Event-conditioned state transition.The language specifies whether the current state should be mapped toward an adjacent (earlier or later) event state. Accordingly, Orca predicts the visual latent in the previous event selected by theprevious-event conditionand the visual latent in the next event selected by thenext-event condition. The event-conditioned ...

  3. [3]

    24 Shangchen Miao, Ningya Feng, Jialong Wu, Ye Lin, Xu He, Dong Li, and Mingsheng Long

    URLhttps://ai.meta.com/blog/llama-4-multimodal-intelligence/. 24 Shangchen Miao, Ningya Feng, Jialong Wu, Ye Lin, Xu He, Dong Li, and Mingsheng Long. Jepa-vla: Video predictive embedding is needed for vla models.ArXiv, 2026. 25 MiniMax Team. Minimax m2.7: Early echoes of self-evolution, March 2026. URLhttps://www.mini max.io/news/minimax-m27-en. 23 Mistra...

    2026

  4. [4]

    Reason-rft: Reinforcement fine-tuning for visual reasoning of vision language models

    25 Huajie Tan, Yuheng Ji, Xiaoshuai Hao, Xiansheng Chen, Pengwei Wang, Zhongyuan Wang, and Shang- hang Zhang. Reason-rft: Reinforcement fine-tuning for visual reasoning of vision language models. InNeurIPS, 2025. 24 Yuxuan Tian, Yuheng Ji, Xiaolong Zheng, Ziheng Qin, Yipu Wang, Xinyi Zheng, Yuyang Liu, Shuanghao Bai, Zhe Li, Liang Wang, et al. Spatial int...

    2025

  5. [5]

    Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models.ArXiv, 2023

    24 Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, et al. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models.ArXiv, 2023. 23 Wan Team, Ang Wang, Baole Ai, Bin Wen, Chaojie Mao, Chen-Wei Xie, Di Chen, Feiwu Yu, Haiming Zhao, Jianxiao Yang, et al. Wa...

    2023

  6. [6]

    23 21 Sec 1: Intro | Sec 2: Orca | Sec 3: Training | Sec 4: Evaluation | Sec 5: Conclusion | Sec 6: Authors | References Appendix A: Conception| B: Related Work | C: Train Settings | D: Infra | E: Eval Settings | F: Visualization Appendix A. Orca Conception Passive Task Driven Active World Learner This is a fridge Next Frame Prediction Visual Dynamics Pre...

    2023

  7. [7]

    next token prediction

    strengthen agentic language modeling. The former emphasizes tool-oriented intelligence, and the latter focuses on long-horizon agentic engineering. MiniMax-M2.7 (MiniMax Team, 2026) investigates self-evolving for real-world productivity. Phi-4-reasoning (Abdin et al., 2025) shows the effectiveness of high-quality reasoning supervision in dense models. The...

    2026

  8. [8]

    Bowl 3 is grasped. 10

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    10 Pull Out Tissue

    Bowl 3 is stably stacked into Bowl 2. 10 Pull Out Tissue

  2. [10]

    This term is denoted asL vqa

    VQA response generation.Orca uses the language modeling head to predict the target answer with the standard next-token prediction loss. This term is denoted asL vqa. The final Orca’s pre-training objective is:L pre =0.1L obs+0.5L evt+0.4L vqa. At the data-sampling level, Orca ...

  3. [11]

    The last-layer hidden state of𝑞 1 is passed to thevisual transition head(two-layer MLP), and the ground truth latent𝑣 𝑙 𝑡+1 is obtained by the frozen vision encoder of VLM backbone

    Observation-only state transition.Given the current observation𝑣 𝑡 and<Query 1>𝑞 1, Orca pre- dicts the latent ˆ𝑣𝑙 𝑡+1 of a temporally next frame. The last-layer hidden state of𝑞 1 is passed to thevisual transition head(two-layer MLP), and the ground truth latent𝑣 𝑙 𝑡+1 is obt...

  4. [12]

    The previous-eventL prev and next-event directionsL next, which are calculatedL evt in Equation C-3

    Event-conditioned State Transition.Given𝑣 𝑡,𝑞 1, an instruction𝑒 𝑡+Δ, and the<Query 2>𝑞 2, Orca predicts the latent ˆ𝑣𝑙 𝑡+Δ of random frame in the instruction-specified target event.𝑒 𝑡+Δ specifies the transition direction and target event, while𝑞 2 reads out the corresponding...

    2024

  5. [13]

    Latent𝑞 1: predictive query states from Orca, providing latent for future state evolution

  6. [14]

    Noisy action with time embedding: Actions with Gaussian noise, and time embedding added

  7. [15]

    score": 3,

    Proprioception: robot proprioceptive state, including joint and end-effector related information. Settings.TheAction Expertis trained with the flow-matching loss to obtain the action chunks. The ground-truth action chunk is perturbed with Gaussian noise, and theAction Expertpr...

    2026

  8. [16]

    The robot arm moves toward the book. 10

  9. [17]

    The gripper contacts the book. 10

  10. [18]

    The book is pushed to the edge, with more than 2 cm beyond the edge, without falling. 20

  11. [19]

    The book is successfully grasped. 30

  12. [20]

    The book is moved toward the bookshelf while being grasped. 20

  13. [21]

    10 Stacked Bowls

    The book is successfully placed on the bookshelf. 10 Stacked Bowls

  14. [22]

    The hand moves toward Bowl 1. 10

  15. [23]

    Bowl 1 is grasped. 20

  16. [24]

    Bowl 1 is placed stably. 10

  17. [25]

    The hand moves toward Bowl 2. 10

  18. [26]

    Bowl 2 is grasped. 10

  19. [27]

    Bowl 2 is stably stacked into Bowl 1. 10

  20. [28]

    The hand moves toward Bowl 3. 10

  21. [31]

    Arm A moves toward the tissue box. 10

  22. [32]

    Arm A holds the tissue box. 20

  23. [33]

    Arm B moves toward the tissue. 20

  24. [34]

    Arm B successfully grasps the yellow tissue. 40

  25. [35]

    10 ⊲The two arms are scored separately.- Stamp

    The tissue is placed on the table. 10 ⊲The two arms are scored separately.- Stamp

  26. [36]

    The robot arm moves toward the stamp. 10

  27. [37]

    The stamp is successfully grasped and lifted. 30

  28. [38]

    The stamp is moved above the document. 10

  29. [39]

    The document is stamped by pressing the stamp. 20

  30. [40]

    The stamp is moved above the ink pad. 10

  31. [41]

    20 ⊲If the stamp topples, scoring stops.- Scoop Sugar

    The stamp is placed stably without toppling. 20 ⊲If the stamp topples, scoring stops.- Scoop Sugar

  32. [42]

    The hand moves toward the spoon. 10

  33. [43]

    The spoon is successfully grasped. 20

  34. [44]

    Sugar is scooped with the spoon. 20

  35. [45]

    The spoon is moved to the mug; the spoon must be held, but sugar is not strictly required. 10

  36. [46]

    The sugar is poured into the mug; the spoon must be held, but sugar is not required. 20

  37. [47]

    Press the button to start copying

    The spoon is placed back on the right side of the table. 20 Table E3.Detailed rule-based results under real-robot OOD settings. Settings Model Rule-based Score Book Bowls Tissue Stamp Sugar Average Environment OOD 𝜋0.5 27 44 32 9 26 27.6 V-JEPA 2.1 24 15 28 6 3 15.2 Qwen3.5-0....

  38. [2025]

    Gemini 3.1 pro best for complex tasks and bringing creative concepts to life, February 2026a

    9, 24, 31 Google Deepmind. Gemini 3.1 pro best for complex tasks and bringing creative concepts to life, February 2026a. URLhttps://deepmind.google/models/gemini/pro/. 10, 23, 32 Google Deepmind. Gemma 4: Byte for byte, the most capable open models, April 2026b. URLhttps: //bl...

    2026 arXiv

  39. [2026]

    Agibot world colosseo: A large-scale manipulation platform for scalable and intelligent embodied systems

    24 AgiBot-World-Contributors, Qingwen Bu, Jisong Cai, Li Chen, Xiuqi Cui, Yan Ding, Siyuan Feng, Shenyuan Gao, Xindong He, Xuan Hu, et al. Agibot world colosseo: A large-scale manipulation platform for scalable and intelligent embodied systems. InIROS, 2025. 31 Mahmoud Assran,...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.