REVIEW 1 cited by
Towards Universality: Studying Mechanistic Similarity Across Language Model Architectures
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The hypothesis of Universality in interpretability suggests that different neural networks may converge to implement similar algorithms on similar tasks. In this work, we investigate two mainstream architectures for language modeling, namely Transformers and Mambas, to explore the extent of their mechanistic similarity. We propose to use Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to isolate interpretable features from these models and show that most features are similar in these two models. We also validate the correlation between feature similarity and Universality. We then delve into the circuit-level analysis of Mamba models and find that the induction circuits in Mamba are structurally analogous to those in Transformers. We also identify a nuanced difference we call \emph{Off-by-One motif}: The information of one token is written into the SSM state in its next position. Whilst interaction between tokens in Transformers does not exhibit such trend.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
What, Where, and How: Disentangling the Roles of Task, Language, and Model in Code Model Representations
Across Python and Rust, two code models conserve the ranking of which constructs get dedicated circuits (ρ≈0.65) but differ by 12-13 layers in where those circuits sit and whether they show an early spike.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.