Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 1 cited by

Convergence of entropy-conservative summation-by-parts discretizations to smooth solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Entropy-conservative SBP schemes converge to smooth solutions at the operators' accuracy order.

desk verdict Solid relative-entropy convergence proof that actually covers Euler/shallow water and general diagonal-norm SBP; the rate is honest and the soft spots are already labeled. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27049 v1 pith:ZOJCTWIU submitted 2026-07-29 math.NA cs.NA

Hendrik Ranocha This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NAcs.NA MSC 65M1265M0665M6065M7065M2035L65
keywords summation-by-partsoperatorsentropy-conservativemethodsrelativeentropyhyperbolicconservationlawsconvergenceanalysisfluxdifferencingsmoothsolutions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

High-order entropy-conservative discretizations are prized for robustness, yet almost no general proof said they actually converge. This paper supplies one: for smooth solutions of periodic hyperbolic conservation laws with a strictly convex entropy, the discrete relative entropy between the numerical solution and the exact nodal samples forces the error to shrink like h to the power p, where p is the accuracy order of the underlying diagonal-norm summation-by-parts operators. The argument covers general fluxes (including shallow water and compressible Euler), space-time sources, and a broad class of operators on curved meshes—finite differences, continuous and discontinuous Galerkin. The predicted rates are sharp for plain periodic finite differences; some special methods beat them in practice. A sympathetic reader cares because the same entropy structure that makes the schemes stable is shown to be enough, with consistency, to guarantee high-order convergence for smooth flows.

What carries the argument

The discrete relative entropy E_h—the quadrature of U(u^h)−U(u)−w(u)·(u^h−u)—is equivalent to the squared M-norm error. Entropy conservation cancels every term linear in the error; only quadratic flux remainders, truncation error, and a quadratic source remainder survive, and Gronwall then yields the rate.

What would settle it

Run the entropy-conservative scheme on a smooth manufactured solution (for example the 2-D Euler density wave or Burgers) with a family of diagonal-norm SBP operators whose assembled accuracy order is known; if the measured M-norm error fails to decay at least like h^p once the mesh is fine enough that states stay admissible, the central claim is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under stated assumptions, entropy-conservative flux-differencing semidiscretizations based on diagonal-norm SBP operators of order p admit a unique solution that stays admissible and satisfies an M-norm error bound of order h^p against any smooth solution on a finite time interval. The rate is exactly the pointwise accuracy order of the assembled operators; no homogeneity or global second-derivative bounds on the fluxes are required.

Load-bearing premise

The proof needs the numerical solution to stay inside a fixed compact set of admissible states away from vacuum, which the paper obtains from an inverse estimate that requires the accuracy order to exceed half the space dimension.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Compressible Euler and shallow-water entropy-conservative SBP schemes on periodic domains converge at order p for smooth solutions without positivity limiters on fine enough meshes.
  • The same a-priori rate applies to finite-difference, DGSEM, CGSEM, and multidimensional simplex SBP operators, including smoothly curved periodic grids once discrete metric identities hold.
  • State-independent manufactured sources are covered automatically, so method-of-manufactured-solutions tests inherit the theorem.
  • Observed superconvergence for even-degree DG or multi-block FD is outside the general bound and needs method-specific arguments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Removing the order-versus-dimension condition unconditionally would likely need a corrector expansion or an independent maximum principle, both left open.
  • The same relative-entropy balance should extend to entropy-dissipative interface terms once the dissipation on smooth data is controlled, giving a route to shock-capturing variants.
  • Bounded-domain entropy-stable boundary closures will add boundary residuals to E_h; whether those residuals still permit the full rate p is the natural next obstruction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proves that entropy-conservative flux-differencing semidiscretizations based on diagonal-norm SBP operators converge to smooth solutions of periodic hyperbolic balance laws at the accuracy order p of the assembled operators. The argument uses a discrete relative entropy E_h, establishes coercivity, exact discrete entropy balance, O(h^p) truncation, exact cancellation of all linear flux-error terms via Tadmor’s condition and its derivatives, quadratic control of flux remainders under a fixed-local-stencil hypothesis, a source remainder that is quadratic without entropy structure on the source, and a Gronwall-plus-L^∞ bootstrap. The framework covers general strictly convex entropies (including shallow water and compressible Euler), state-independent sources, and a broad class of operators (periodic FD, DGSEM, CGSEM, triangular SBP, and encapsulated curvilinear operators). Numerical experiments confirm the predicted rates and document known superconvergence for even-degree DG and multi-block FD.

Significance. This is a substantial and carefully scoped extension of Worku–Del Rey Fernández–Zingg: it removes the homogeneity/global-second-derivative restriction, admits general symmetrizable systems and manufactured sources, and works in an abstract diagonal-norm SBP setting that includes FD, CG, DG, and curved meshes. To the best of my knowledge it is the first a priori O(h^p) estimate for entropy-conservative high-order SBP flux differencing of nonlinear systems obtained by a discrete relative-entropy argument. Strengths include a complete, modular proof chain (Lemmas 4.1–4.8, Theorem 3.1), explicit isolation of the technical order condition p>d/2 (Props. 4.9–4.10), verification for Euler/shallow water with admissible compact sets away from vacuum, a detailed Appendix B on metric identities and encapsulated operators, and a public reproducibility repository. The limitations (smooth solutions, periodic BCs, entropy-conservative collocation only) are stated clearly and do not undermine the central claim as written.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and several places in the extracted text contain run-together words (e.g. “sharpingeneral”, “An optimalanalysisisexpected…”). Please proofread the camera-ready abstract and introduction for spacing/hyphenation artifacts.
  2. [Section 6.1–6.2] In §6.1 the distinction between the guaranteed rate p (closure-limited for multi-block FD; p=k for element-based methods) and the higher observed EOCs is clear in the body but could be flagged once more when Tables 2 and 6 are introduced, so readers do not misread the tables as contradicting Theorem 3.1.
  3. [Section 3, Theorem 3.1] Assumption A8 / §4.8: the discussion is already excellent. A single forward pointer in the statement of Theorem 3.1 (“the condition p>d/2 is used only in the L^∞ bootstrap; see §4.8”) would help readers who jump to the theorem.
  4. [Section 5.4 / Appendix A] Corollary 5.7 and Appendix A: the explicit Hessian bounds are useful; a brief remark that the displayed c_U is not sharp near vacuum (already in Remark A.1) could also be echoed in the corollary statement so users do not treat (A.10) as sharp constants for mesh design.
  5. [Section 5.3] Notation: the dual use of H for water height and the occasional collision with mesh size h is handled by a footnote, but writing water height as η or h_w in displays (5.5)–(5.10) would reduce cognitive load.
  6. [Section 1 / Remark 5.3] References: the Worku et al. baseline is cited appropriately; if space permits, a one-sentence comparison of the p>1+d/2 requirement in that work versus the weaker p>d/2 (or p≥1 under global bounds) here would make the improvement fully explicit for readers of both papers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: convergence rate is derived from SBP structure, entropy conservation, and relative entropy, not fitted or assumed as the conclusion.

full rationale

Theorem 3.1 is proved in Section 4 from stated Assumptions A1–A8 via a self-contained chain: discrete relative-entropy coercivity (Lemma 4.1), exact entropy balance from Tadmor fluxes and skew-symmetric Q (Lemma 4.2), truncation of order p from operator accuracy (Lemma 4.3), exact cancellation of linear error terms by differentiating the entropy-conservation identity (Lemmas 4.5–4.6), quadratic remainder control under fixed local stencils (Lemma 4.8), source bound, then Gronwall plus L∞ bootstrap. None of these steps redefine the target rate as an input, fit constants to observed EOCs, or import a uniqueness theorem that secretly is the claim. Worku–Del Rey Fernández–Zingg is cited as the restricted baseline being extended (homogeneous fluxes, special CG-type operators), not used as an unexamined lemma that is the conclusion. Self-citations (fluxes, software, prior SBP work) supply concrete applications and operators, not the load-bearing convergence argument. Numerics in Section 6 corroborate sharpness and known superconvergence patterns; they do not calibrate the theorem. Score 0 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 2 invented entities

Load-bearing content is a theorem under explicit assumptions A1–A8 plus standard SBP/entropy calculus. No parameters are fitted to obtain the rate. Invented objects are definitional (discrete relative entropy, structural remainder bound) rather than physical entities. Domain restrictions (smooth solutions, periodic BC, entropy-conservative collocation, diagonal norm, state-independent collocated sources) are declared up front and limit scope without circularly forcing the rate.

assumptions (9)
  • domain assumption A1: strictly convex C^2 entropy pair compatible with the fluxes (symmetrizable hyperbolic system).
    Standard continuum structure (Godunov–Friedrichs–Lax–Mock); required for relative entropy and Tadmor fluxes.
  • domain assumption A2: classical C^{p+1} solution valued in a compact convex K⊂𝒜 with uniform Hessian bounds c_U I ≤ U'' ≤ C_U I (and U∈C^3 if sources present).
    Relative-entropy a priori theory is inherently smooth-solution theory; vacuum margins enter Euler/SWE constants.
  • domain assumption A3: family of diagonal-norm periodic SBP operators of order p with quasi-uniform masses ~ h^d.
    Defines the discretization class; excludes non-diagonal mass and N-dependent spectral p.
  • domain assumption A4: symmetric, consistent, C^{p+1} Tadmor entropy-conservative two-point fluxes.
    Enables discrete entropy equality and linear-error cancellation (Lemma 4.6).
  • ad hoc to paper A5/A5*: structural remainder bound, implied by fixed local stencil (locality, bounded nnz, |Q_ij|≲h^{d-1}).
    Only non-standard structural hypothesis beyond SBP+EC; essential so |w_i−w_j|=O(h) cancels mass/row-sum scaling (Lemma 4.8). Dense spectral operators fail it.
  • domain assumption A6–A7: continuous bounded state-independent collocated sources; consistent initial data with E_h(0)^{1/2}≤C_0 h^p.
    Exact collocation makes source contribution quadratic in the error (Lemma 4.7).
  • ad hoc to paper A8: p>d/2 for the L^∞ bootstrap into K.
    Technical inverse-estimate condition; paper supplies global/conditional escapes (Props. 4.9–4.10).
  • domain assumption Periodic boundary conditions only; no entropy-stable boundary closures in the theorem.
    Stated scope limit (§1.1); boundaries need case-by-case entropy estimates.
  • standard math Standard calculus facts: Taylor with integral remainder, discrete Gronwall, Picard–Lindelöf on R^N.
    Used throughout §4 without novelty claims.
invented entities (2)
  • Discrete relative entropy E_h (2.10) with mass-matrix quadrature independent evidence
    purpose: Lyapunov/error functional equivalent to ||e||_M^2 via entropy convexity
    Discrete analogue of Dafermos–DiPerna relative entropy; definitional tool, not a new physical law.
  • Structural remainder bound Assumption A5
    purpose: Close the estimate on quadratic flux Taylor remainders contracted with (w_i−w_j) and Q
    Abstract hypothesis proved from fixed local stencil; could fail for non-local operators.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Convergence of entropy-conservative summation-by-parts discretizations to smooth solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZOJCTWIU

@misc{pith2026260727049,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Convergence of entropy-conservative summation-by-parts discretizations to smooth solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZOJCTWIU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27049}
}
read the original abstract

Although entropy-based summation-by-parts (SBP) discretizations of hyperbolic conservation laws are widely used for their robustness and stability properties, there are very few results on their convergence. We extend a recent convergence analysis of Worku, Del Rey Fern\'andez, and Zingg (2026, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.18369) in two ways. First, instead of allowing only hyperbolic conservation laws whose fluxes are homogeneous and have globally bounded second derivatives (a restriction essentially to linear or quadratic fluxes), we consider general hyperbolic systems with strictly convex entropy and source terms depending on time and space. Second, instead of requiring a special class of SBP operators, we consider a general framework of diagonal-norm SBP operators on curved meshes, including finite differences, continuous and discontinuous Galerkin methods. Since the error analysis is based on a discrete relative entropy, it is restricted to smooth solutions. To enable a unified treatment of conservation laws, we restrict the analysis to periodic boundary conditions. Numerical results demonstrate that the predicted convergence rates are sharp in general, but can be improved for special cases such as discontinuous Galerkin methods with even polynomial degree and multi-block finite difference methods. An optimal analysis is expected to require more sophisticated arguments specialized to the class of methods instead of the general framework of SBP operators used in this work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The error estimate of entropy-stable discontinuous Galerkin methods for hyperbolic conservation laws

    math.NA 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Under a polynomial reconstruction hypothesis, entropy-stable DG methods converge at O(h^k) in a norm equivalent to L^2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A general framework to construct schemes satisfying additional conservation relations.Applicationtoentropyconservativeandentropydissipativeschemes

    R. Abgrall. “A general framework to construct schemes satisfying additional conservation relations.Applicationtoentropyconservativeandentropydissipativeschemes.”In:Journal of Computational Physics372 (2018), pp. 640–666.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.06.031. arXiv: 1711.10358 [math.NA]

    arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    AnalysisoftheSBP-SATStabilization for Finite Element Methods Part I: Linear problems

    R.Abgrall,J.Nordström,P.Öffner,andS.Tokareva.“AnalysisoftheSBP-SATStabilization for Finite Element Methods Part I: Linear problems.” In:Journal of Scientific Computing85.2 (2020), pp. 1–29.doi:10.1007/s10915-020-01349-z. arXiv:1912.08108 [math.NA]

    arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Reinterpretation and Extension of Entropy Correc- tion Terms for Residual Distribution and Discontinuous Galerkin Schemes: Application to Structure Preserving Discretization

    R. Abgrall, P. Öffner, and H. Ranocha. “Reinterpretation and Extension of Entropy Correc- tion Terms for Residual Distribution and Discontinuous Galerkin Schemes: Application to Structure Preserving Discretization.” In:Journal of Computational Physics453 (Mar. 2022), p. 110955.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2022.110955. arXiv:1908.04556 [math.NA]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    A posteriori error estimation for discontinuous Galerkin solutions of hyperbolic problems

    S. Adjerid, K. D. Devine, J. E. Flaherty, and L. Krivodonova. “A posteriori error estimation for discontinuous Galerkin solutions of hyperbolic problems.” In:Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering191.11–12 (2002), pp. 1097–1112.doi:10.1016/S0045- 7825(01)00318-8

    doi:10.1016/s0045- 2002

  5. [5]

    Encapsulated high order difference operators on curvilinear non-conforming grids

    O. Ålund and J. Nordström. “Encapsulated high order difference operators on curvilinear non-conforming grids.” In:Journal of Computational Physics385 (2019), pp. 209–224.doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.02.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2019.02.007 2019

  6. [6]

    M.Anandan,K.R.Arun,A.Krishnamurthy,andM.Lukáčová-Medvidová.Erroranalysisof an asymptotic-preserving, energy-stable finite volume method for barotropic Euler equations. Mar. 2026.doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.27421. arXiv:2603.27421 [math.NA]

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.27421 2026

  7. [7]

    Stability and Convergence of a Class of Finite Element Schemes for Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws

    C. Arvanitis, C. Makridakis, and A. E. Tzavaras. “Stability and Convergence of a Class of Finite Element Schemes for Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws.” In:SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis42.4 (2004), pp. 1357–1393.doi:10.1137/S0036142902420436

    work page doi:10.1137/s0036142902420436 2004

  8. [8]

    An entropy-stable and kinetic energy-preserving macro-element HDG method for compressible flows

    V. Badrkhani, M. F. P. ten Eikelder, and D. Schillinger.An entropy-stable and kinetic energy- preserving macro-element HDG method for compressible flows. 2025.doi:10 . 48550 / arXiv . 2507.22195. arXiv:2507.22195 [cs.CE]

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.22195 2025

Show all 131 references
  1. [9]

    Sta- bility of the Active Flux Method in the Framework of Summation-by-Parts Operators

    W. Barsukow, C. Klingenberg, L. Lechner, J. Nordström, S. Ortleb, and H. Ranocha. “Sta- bility of the Active Flux Method in the Framework of Summation-by-Parts Operators.” In: BIT Numerical Mathematics66 (July 2026), p. 49.doi:10.1007/s10543-026-01144-6. arXiv: 2507.11068 [math.NA]

    2026 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Numerical methods for gasdynamic systems on unstructured meshes

    T. J. Barth. “Numerical methods for gasdynamic systems on unstructured meshes.” In: An Introduction to Recent Developments in Theory and Numerics for Conservation Laws. Vol. 5. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1999, pp. 195–...

    1999 doi

  3. [11]

    Julia:AFreshApproachtoNumer- ical Computing

    J.Bezanson,A.Edelman,S.Karpinski,andV.B.Shah.“Julia:AFreshApproachtoNumer- ical Computing.” In:SIAM Review59.1 (2017), pp. 65–98.doi:10.1137/141000671. arXiv: 1411.1607 [cs.MS]

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Boyd and L

    S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe.Convex Optimization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511804441

    2004 doi

  5. [13]

    Error Estimate for Time-Explicit Finite Volume Approximation of Strong Solutions to Systems of Conservation Laws

    C. Cancès, H. Mathis, and N. Seguin. “Error Estimate for Time-Explicit Finite Volume Approximation of Strong Solutions to Systems of Conservation Laws.” In:SIAM Journal on NumericalAnalysis54.2(2016),pp.1263–1287.doi:10.1137/15M1029886.arXiv:1602.02128 [math.NA]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Superconvergence of discontinuous Galerkin methods for linear hyperbolic equations

    W. Cao, Z. Zhang, and Q. Zou. “Superconvergence of discontinuous Galerkin methods for linear hyperbolic equations.” In:SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis52.5 (2014), pp. 2555– 2573.doi:10.1137/130946873. 36

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    Efficient Compressible Turbulent Flow Simulations: Entropy Projection and Correction for an ILES in a Discontinuous Galerkin solver

    E Carnevali, A Crivellini, L Alberti, and A. Colombo. “Efficient Compressible Turbulent Flow Simulations: Entropy Projection and Correction for an ILES in a Discontinuous Galerkin solver.” In:Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 3173. 1. IOP Publishing. 2026, p. 012034....

    2026 doi

  8. [16]

    Entropy Stable Spectral Collocation Schemes for the Navier-Stokes Equations: Discontinuous Interfaces

    M. H. Carpenter, T. C. Fisher, E. J. Nielsen, and S. H. Frankel. “Entropy Stable Spectral Collocation Schemes for the Navier-Stokes Equations: Discontinuous Interfaces.” In:SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing36.5 (2014), B835–B867.doi:10.1137/130932193

    2014 doi

  9. [17]

    Time-Stable Boundary Conditions for Finite-Difference Schemes Solving Hyperbolic Systems: Methodology and Application to High-Order Compact Schemes

    M. H. Carpenter, D. Gottlieb, and S. Abarbanel. “Time-Stable Boundary Conditions for Finite-Difference Schemes Solving Hyperbolic Systems: Methodology and Application to High-Order Compact Schemes.” In:Journal of Computational Physics111.2 (1994), pp. 220– 236.doi:10.1006/jcph...

    1994

  10. [18]

    An artificial viscosity approach to high order entropy stable discontinuous Galerkin methods

    J. Chan. “An artificial viscosity approach to high order entropy stable discontinuous Galerkin methods.” In:Journal of Computational Physics543 (2025), p. 114380.doi:10.1016/ j.jcp.2025.114380

    2025

  11. [20]

    J. Chan, D. Knapp, M. McCallum, H. Ranocha, C. G. Taylor, P. Baasch, D. Doehring, J. Markert,J.Lampert,T.Montoya,andV.X.Wang.StartUpDG.jl:Initializesandsetsupreference elements and physical meshes for DG.https://github.com/jlchan/StartUpDG.jl. 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.19906078

    2026 doi

  12. [21]

    Ontheentropy projectionandtherobustnessofhighorderentropystablediscontinuousGalerkinschemes for under-resolved flows

    J.Chan,H.Ranocha,A.M.Rueda-Ramírez,G.Gassner,andT.Warburton.“Ontheentropy projectionandtherobustnessofhighorderentropystablediscontinuousGalerkinschemes for under-resolved flows.” In:Frontiers in Physics10 (2022), p. 898028.doi:10.3389/fphy. 2022.898028

    2022

  13. [22]

    Kinetic Energy Preserving and Entropy Stable Finite Volume Schemes forCompressibleEulerandNavier-StokesEquations

    P. Chandrashekar. “Kinetic Energy Preserving and Entropy Stable Finite Volume Schemes forCompressibleEulerandNavier-StokesEquations.”In:CommunicationsinComputational Physics14.5 (2013), pp. 1252–1286.doi:10.4208/cicp.170712.010313a

    2013

  14. [23]

    Means Generated by an Integral

    H. Chen. “Means Generated by an Integral.” In:Mathematics Magazine78.5 (2005), pp. 397– 399.doi:10.2307/30044201

    2005 doi

  15. [24]

    Entropy stable high order discontinuous Galerkin methods with suitable quadrature rules for hyperbolic conservation laws

    T. Chen and C.-W. Shu. “Entropy stable high order discontinuous Galerkin methods with suitable quadrature rules for hyperbolic conservation laws.” In:Journal of Computational Physics345 (2017), pp. 427–461.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.05.025

    2017 doi

  16. [25]

    Review of Entropy Stable Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Systems of Conservation Laws on Unstructured Simplex Meshes

    T. Chen and C.-W. Shu. “Review of Entropy Stable Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Systems of Conservation Laws on Unstructured Simplex Meshes.” In:CSIAM Transactions on Applied Mathematics1.1 (2020), pp. 1–52.doi:10.4208/csiam-am.2020-0003

    2020 doi

  17. [26]

    Superconvergence of discontinuous Galerkin and local discon- tinuous Galerkin schemes for linear hyperbolic and convection-diffusion equations in one space dimension

    Y. Cheng and C.-W. Shu. “Superconvergence of discontinuous Galerkin and local discon- tinuous Galerkin schemes for linear hyperbolic and convection-diffusion equations in one space dimension.” In:SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis47.6 (2010), pp. 4044–4072.doi: 10.1137/090747701

    2010 doi

  18. [28]

    Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2016.doi:10

    C.M.Dafermos.HyperbolicConservationLawsinContinuumPhysics.4thed.Vol.325.Grund- lehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2016.doi:10 . 1007/978-3-662-49451-6. 37

    2016

  19. [29]

    TheSecondLawofThermodynamicsandStability

    C.M.Dafermos.“TheSecondLawofThermodynamicsandStability.”In:ArchiveforRational Mechanics and Analysis70.2 (1979), pp. 167–179.doi:10.1007/BF00250353

    1979 doi

  20. [30]

    A Posteriori Analysis of Fully Discrete Method of Lines Discontinuous Galerkin Schemes for Systems of Conservation Laws

    A. Dedner and J. Giesselmann. “A Posteriori Analysis of Fully Discrete Method of Lines Discontinuous Galerkin Schemes for Systems of Conservation Laws.” In:SIAM Journal on NumericalAnalysis54.6(2016),pp.3523–3549.doi:10.1137/15M1046265.arXiv:1510.05430 [math.NA]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [31]

    Review of summation-by-parts operators with simultaneous approximation terms for the numerical solution of partial differential equations

    D. C. Del Rey Fernández, J. E. Hicken, and D. W. Zingg. “Review of summation-by-parts operators with simultaneous approximation terms for the numerical solution of partial differential equations.” In:Computers & Fluids95 (2014), pp. 171–196.doi:10 . 1016 / j . compfluid.2014.02.016

    2014

  22. [32]

    Two methods of Galerkin type achieving optimum𝐿2 rates of convergence for first order hyperbolics

    J. E. Dendy. “Two methods of Galerkin type achieving optimum𝐿2 rates of convergence for first order hyperbolics.” In:SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis11.3 (1974), pp. 637–653. doi:10.1137/0711052

    1974 doi

  23. [33]

    Uniqueness of Solutions to Hyperbolic Conservation Laws

    R. J. DiPerna. “Uniqueness of Solutions to Hyperbolic Conservation Laws.” In:Indiana UniversityMathematicsJournal28.1(1979),pp.137–188.doi:10.1512/iumj.1979.28.28011

    1979 doi

  24. [34]

    Doehring, J

    D. Doehring, J. Chan, H. Ranocha, M. Schlottke-Lakemper, M. Torrilhon, and G. Gassner. VolumeTermAdaptivityforDiscontinuousGalerkinMethods.Mar.2026.doi:10.48550/arXiv. 2603.24189. arXiv:2603.24189 [math.NA]

    2026 doi

  25. [35]

    Galerkin methods for first order hyperbolics: An example

    T. Dupont. “Galerkin methods for first order hyperbolics: An example.” In:SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis10.5 (1973), pp. 890–899.doi:10.1137/0710074

    1973 doi

  26. [36]

    Conservative correction procedures utilizing artificial dissipation operators

    A. K. Edoh. “Conservative correction procedures utilizing artificial dissipation operators.” In:JournalofComputationalPhysics504(2024),p.112880.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2024.112880

    2024

  27. [37]

    L. C. Evans.Partial Differential Equations. 2nd ed. Vol. 19. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society, 2010.doi:10.1090/gsm/019

    2010 doi

  28. [38]

    High-order entropy stable finite difference schemes for nonlinearconservationlaws:Finitedomains

    T. C. Fisher and M. H. Carpenter. “High-order entropy stable finite difference schemes for nonlinearconservationlaws:Finitedomains.”In:JournalofComputationalPhysics252(2013), pp. 518–557.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2013.06.014

    2013 doi

  29. [39]

    Construction of Approximate Entropy Measure-Valued Solutions for Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws

    U. S. Fjordholm, R. Käppeli, S. Mishra, and E. Tadmor. “Construction of Approximate Entropy Measure-Valued Solutions for Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws.” In: Foundations of Computational Mathematics17.3 (2017), pp. 763–827.doi:10.1007/s10208- 015-9299-z

    2017 doi

  30. [40]

    EnergyPreservingandEnergyStableSchemes for the Shallow Water Equations

    U.S.Fjordholm,S.Mishra,andE.Tadmor.“EnergyPreservingandEnergyStableSchemes for the Shallow Water Equations.” In:Foundations of Computational Mathematics, Hong Kong

  31. [41]

    Well-balanced and energy stable schemes for the shallow water equations with discontinuous topography

    U. S. Fjordholm, S. Mishra, and E. Tadmor. “Well-balanced and energy stable schemes for the shallow water equations with discontinuous topography.” In:Journal of Computational Physics230.14 (2011), pp. 5587–5609.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2011.03.042

    2011 doi

  32. [42]

    ArbitrarilyHigh-OrderAccurateEntropyStable Essentially Nonoscillatory Schemes for Systems of Conservation Laws

    U.S.Fjordholm,S.Mishra,andE.Tadmor.“ArbitrarilyHigh-OrderAccurateEntropyStable Essentially Nonoscillatory Schemes for Systems of Conservation Laws.” In:SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis50.2 (2012), pp. 544–573.doi:10.1137/110836961

    2012 doi

  33. [43]

    Systems of Conservation Equations with a Convex Ex- tension

    K. O. Friedrichs and P. D. Lax. “Systems of Conservation Equations with a Convex Ex- tension.” In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences68.8 (1971), pp. 1686–1688.doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.8.1686

    1971 doi

  34. [44]

    Error estimates for a numerical ap- proximation to the compressible barotropic Navier-Stokes equations

    T. Gallouët, R. Herbin, D. Maltese, and A. Novotný. “Error estimates for a numerical ap- proximation to the compressible barotropic Navier-Stokes equations.” In:IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis36.2 (2016), pp. 543–592.doi:10.1093/imanum/drv028. 38

    2016 doi

  35. [45]

    Stability Issues of Entropy-Stable and/or Split-form High-order Schemes

    G. J. Gassner, M. Svärd, and F. J. Hindenlang. “Stability Issues of Entropy-Stable and/or Split-form High-order Schemes.” In:Journal of Scientific Computing90.3 (2022), p. 79.doi: 10.1007/s10915-021-01720-8. arXiv:2007.09026 [math.NA]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [46]

    A Novel Robust Strategy for Discontinuous Galerkin Methods in Computational Fluid Mechanics: Why? When? What? Where?

    G. J. Gassner and A. R. Winters. “A Novel Robust Strategy for Discontinuous Galerkin Methods in Computational Fluid Mechanics: Why? When? What? Where?” In:Frontiers in Physics8 (2021), p. 612.doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.500690

    2021

  37. [47]

    Split form nodal discontinuous Galerkin schemes with summation-by-parts property for the compressible Euler equations

    G. J. Gassner, A. R. Winters, and D. A. Kopriva. “Split form nodal discontinuous Galerkin schemes with summation-by-parts property for the compressible Euler equations.” In: Journal of Computational Physics327 (2016), pp. 39–66.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.09.013

    2016 doi

  38. [48]

    ASkew-SymmetricDiscontinuousGalerkinSpectralElementDiscretization and Its Relation to SBP-SAT Finite Difference Methods

    G.J.Gassner.“ASkew-SymmetricDiscontinuousGalerkinSpectralElementDiscretization and Its Relation to SBP-SAT Finite Difference Methods.” In:SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing35.3 (2013), A1233–A1253.doi:10.1137/120890144

    2013 doi

  39. [49]

    Awellbalancedandentropyconservative discontinuous Galerkin spectral element method for the shallow water equations

    G.J.Gassner,A.R.Winters,andD.A.Kopriva.“Awellbalancedandentropyconservative discontinuous Galerkin spectral element method for the shallow water equations.” In: Applied Mathematics and Computation272 (2016), pp. 291–308.doi:10.1016/j.amc.2015. 07.014

    2016 doi

  40. [50]

    RelativeentropybasederrorestimatesfordiscontinuousGalerkinschemes

    J.Giesselmann.“RelativeentropybasederrorestimatesfordiscontinuousGalerkinschemes.” In:Bulletin of the Brazilian Mathematical Society, New Series47.1 (2016), pp. 359–372.doi: 10.1007/s00574-016-0144-z

    2016 doi

  41. [51]

    A Posteriori Analysis of Discontinuous Galerkin Schemes for Systems of Hyperbolic Conservation Laws

    J. Giesselmann, C. Makridakis, and T. Pryer. “A Posteriori Analysis of Discontinuous Galerkin Schemes for Systems of Hyperbolic Conservation Laws.” In:SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis53.3 (2015), pp. 1280–1303.doi:10.1137/140970999. arXiv:1405.7616 [math.NA]

    2015 arXiv

  42. [52]

    Convergence of hyperbolic approximations to higher- order PDEs for smooth solutions

    J. Giesselmann and H. Ranocha. “Convergence of hyperbolic approximations to higher- order PDEs for smooth solutions.” In:The SMAI Journal of Computational Mathematics12 (Mar. 2026), pp. 75–102.doi:10.5802/jcm.144. arXiv:2508.04112 [math.NA]

    2026

  43. [53]

    Glaubitz, A

    J. Glaubitz, A. Iske, J. Lampert, and P. Öffner.Why summation by parts is not enough. Feb. 2026.doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.10786. arXiv:2602.10786 [math.NA]

    2026 doi

  44. [54]

    An interesting class of quasi-linear systems

    S. K. Godunov. “An interesting class of quasi-linear systems.” In:Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR139.3 (1961), pp. 521–523

    1961

  45. [55]

    Theconvergenceratefordifferenceapproximationstomixedinitialbound- ary value problems

    B.Gustafsson.“Theconvergenceratefordifferenceapproximationstomixedinitialbound- ary value problems.” In:Mathematics of Computation29.130 (1975), pp. 396–406.doi:10. 1090/S0025-5718-1975-0386296-7

    1975

  46. [56]

    Gustafsson, H.-O

    B. Gustafsson, H.-O. Kreiss, and J. Oliger.Time-Dependent Problems and Difference Methods. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.doi:10.1002/9781118548448

    2013 doi

  47. [57]

    On the symmetric form of systems of conservation laws with entropy

    A. Harten. “On the symmetric form of systems of conservation laws with entropy.” In: Journal of Computational Physics49.1 (1983), pp. 151–164.doi:10 . 1016 / 0021 - 9991(83 ) 90118-3

    1983

  48. [58]

    A provably entropy stable subcell shock capturing approach for high order split form DG for the compressible Euler equations

    S. Hennemann, A. M. Rueda-Ramírez, F. J. Hindenlang, and G. J. Gassner. “A provably entropy stable subcell shock capturing approach for high order split form DG for the compressible Euler equations.” In:Journal of Computational Physics426 (2021), p. 109935. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2...

    2021

  49. [59]

    Constructing stable, high-order finite-difference operators on point clouds over complex geometries

    J. Hicken, G. Yan, and S. Kaur. “Constructing stable, high-order finite-difference operators on point clouds over complex geometries.” In:Journal of Computational Physics532 (2025), p. 113940.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2025.113940

    2025

  50. [60]

    Entropy-stable, high-order summation-by-parts discretizations without in- terfacepenalties

    J. E. Hicken. “Entropy-stable, high-order summation-by-parts discretizations without in- terfacepenalties.”In:JournalofScientificComputing82.2(2020),p.50.doi:10.1007/s10915- 020-01154-8. 39

    2020 doi

  51. [61]

    MultidimensionalSummation-By- Parts Operators: General Theory and Application to Simplex Elements

    J.E.Hicken,D.C.DelReyFernández,andD.W.Zingg.“MultidimensionalSummation-By- Parts Operators: General Theory and Application to Simplex Elements.” In:SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing38.4 (2016), A1935–A1958.doi:10.1137/15M1038360

    2016 doi

  52. [62]

    Entropy stable spacetime discontinuous Galerkin methods for the two-dimensional compressible Navier–Stokes equations

    A. Hiltebrand and S. May. “Entropy stable spacetime discontinuous Galerkin methods for the two-dimensional compressible Navier–Stokes equations.” In:Communications in Mathematical Sciences16.8 (2018), pp. 2095–2124

    2018

  53. [63]

    Entropy stable shock capturing space-time discontinuous Galerkinschemesforsystemsofconservationlaws

    A. Hiltebrand and S. Mishra. “Entropy stable shock capturing space-time discontinuous Galerkinschemesforsystemsofconservationlaws.”In:NumerischeMathematik126.1(2014), pp. 103–151.doi:10.1007/s00211-013-0558-0

    2014 doi

  54. [64]

    Error estimates to smooth solutions of semi-discrete discontin- uous Galerkin methods with quadrature rules for scalar conservation laws

    J. Huang and C.-W. Shu. “Error estimates to smooth solutions of semi-discrete discontin- uous Galerkin methods with quadrature rules for scalar conservation laws.” In:Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations33.2 (2017), pp. 467–488.doi:10.1002/num.22089

    2017 doi

  55. [65]

    A new finite element formulation for compu- tational fluid dynamics: I. Symmetric forms of the compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations and the second law of thermodynamics

    T. J. R. Hughes, L. P. Franca, and M Mallet. “A new finite element formulation for compu- tational fluid dynamics: I. Symmetric forms of the compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations and the second law of thermodynamics.” In:Computer Methods in Applied Me- chanics and Eng...

    1986 doi

  56. [66]

    A Flux Reconstruction Approach to High-Order Schemes Including Dis- continuous Galerkin Methods

    H. T. Huynh. “A Flux Reconstruction Approach to High-Order Schemes Including Dis- continuous Galerkin Methods.” In:18th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. 2007.doi:10.2514/6.2007-4079

    2007 doi

  57. [67]

    Affordable, entropy-consistent Euler flux functions II: Entropy productionatshocks

    F. Ismail and P. L. Roe. “Affordable, entropy-consistent Euler flux functions II: Entropy productionatshocks.”In:JournalofComputationalPhysics228.15(2009),pp.5410–5436.doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.04.021

    2009 doi

  58. [68]

    On a cell entropy inequality for discontinuous Galerkin meth- ods

    G. S. Jiang and C.-W. Shu. “On a cell entropy inequality for discontinuous Galerkin meth- ods.” In:Mathematics of Computation62.206 (1994), pp. 531–538.doi:10.1090/S0025-5718- 1994-1223232-7

    1994 doi

  59. [69]

    An analysis of the discontinuous Galerkin method for a scalar hyperbolic equation

    C. Johnson and J. Pitkäranta. “An analysis of the discontinuous Galerkin method for a scalar hyperbolic equation.” In:Mathematics of Computation46.173 (1986), pp. 1–26.doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-1986-0815828-4

    1986 doi

  60. [70]

    ErrorEstimatesforFiniteVolumeApproximationsofClassical SolutionsforNonlinearSystemsofHyperbolicBalanceLaws

    V.JovanovićandC.Rohde.“ErrorEstimatesforFiniteVolumeApproximationsofClassical SolutionsforNonlinearSystemsofHyperbolicBalanceLaws.”In:SIAMJournalonNumerical Analysis43.6 (2006), pp. 2423–2449.doi:10.1137/S0036142903438136

    2006 doi

  61. [71]

    Relaxation Runge-Kutta Methods: Conservation and Stability for Inner- Product Norms

    D. I. Ketcheson. “Relaxation Runge-Kutta Methods: Conservation and Stability for Inner- Product Norms.” In:SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis57.6 (2019), pp. 2850–2870.doi: 10.1137/19M1263662. arXiv:1905.09847 [math.NA]

    2019 arXiv

  62. [72]

    D. A. Kopriva.Implementing Spectral Methods for Partial Differential Equations: Algorithms for ScientistsandEngineers.NewYork:SpringerScience&BusinessMedia,2009.doi:10.1007/ 978-90-481-2261-5

    2009

  63. [73]

    MetricIdentitiesandtheDiscontinuousSpectralElementMethodonCurvi- linear Meshes

    D.A.Kopriva.“MetricIdentitiesandtheDiscontinuousSpectralElementMethodonCurvi- linear Meshes.” In:Journal of Scientific Computing26.3 (2006), pp. 301–327.doi:10.1007/ s10915-005-9070-8

    2006

  64. [74]

    FiniteElementandFiniteDifferenceMethodsforHyperbolic PartialDifferentialEquations

    H.-O.KreissandG.Scherer.“FiniteElementandFiniteDifferenceMethodsforHyperbolic PartialDifferentialEquations.”In:MathematicalAspectsofFiniteElementsinPartialDifferential Equations. Ed. by C. de Boor. New York: Academic Press, 1974, pp. 195–212.doi:10.1016/ B978-0-12-208350-1.50012-1

    1974

  65. [75]

    H.-O.KreissandG.Scherer.OntheExistenceofEnergyEstimatesforDifferenceApproximations for Hyperbolic Systems. Tech. rep. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Scientific Computing, Uppsala University, 1977. 40

    1977

  66. [76]

    A robust first order meshfree method for time-dependent nonlinear conservationlaws

    S. Kwan and J. Chan. “A robust first order meshfree method for time-dependent nonlinear conservationlaws.”In:AdvancesinComputationalScienceandEngineering6(2025),pp.1–24. doi:10.3934/acse.2025021

    2025 doi

  67. [77]

    FullyDiscrete,EntropyConservativeSchemes of Arbitrary Order

    P.G.LeFloch,J.-M.Mercier,andC.Rohde.“FullyDiscrete,EntropyConservativeSchemes of Arbitrary Order.” In:SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis40.5 (2002), pp. 1968–1992.doi: 10.1137/S003614290240069X

    2002 doi

  68. [78]

    Leotta.Conditional a priori error estimates of finite volume and Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods with abstract limiting for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws in 1D

    F. Leotta.Conditional a priori error estimates of finite volume and Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods with abstract limiting for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws in 1D. June 2025.doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.13221. arXiv:2506.13221 [math.NA]

    2025 doi arXiv

  69. [79]

    On the order of accuracy of finite difference operatorsondiagonalnormbasedsummation-by-partsform

    V. Linders, T. Lundquist, and J. Nordström. “On the order of accuracy of finite difference operatorsondiagonalnormbasedsummation-by-partsform.”In:SIAMJournalonNumerical Analysis56.2 (2018), pp. 1048–1063.doi:10.1137/17M1139333

    2018 doi

  70. [80]

    Sub-optimal convergence of discontinuous Galerkin methods with central fluxes for linear hyperbolic equations with even degree polynomial approximations

    Y. Liu, C.-W. Shu, and M. Zhang. “Sub-optimal convergence of discontinuous Galerkin methods with central fluxes for linear hyperbolic equations with even degree polynomial approximations.” In:Journal of Computational Mathematics39.4 (2021), pp. 518–537.doi: 10.4208/jcm.2002-m2019-0305

    2021 doi

  71. [81]

    ConvergenceofDiscontinuousGalerkinSchemesfor the Euler Equations via Dissipative Weak Solutions

    Lukácová-MedvidováandP.Öffner.“ConvergenceofDiscontinuousGalerkinSchemesfor the Euler Equations via Dissipative Weak Solutions.” In:Applied Mathematics and Computa- tion436(2023),p.127508.doi:10.1016/j.amc.2022.127508.arXiv:2202.10043 [math.NA]

    2023

  72. [82]

    Error Estimates of the Godunov Method fortheMultidimensionalCompressibleEulerSystem

    M. Lukáčová-Medvidová, B. She, and Y. Yuan. “Error Estimates of the Godunov Method fortheMultidimensionalCompressibleEulerSystem.”In:JournalofScientificComputing91 (2022), p. 71.doi:10.1007/s10915-022-01843-6

    2022 doi

  73. [84]

    Optimal error estimates for discontinuous Galerkin methods based on upwind-biased fluxes for linear hyperbolic equations

    X. Meng, C.-W. Shu, and B. Wu. “Optimal error estimates for discontinuous Galerkin methods based on upwind-biased fluxes for linear hyperbolic equations.” In:Mathematics of Computation85.299 (2016), pp. 1225–1261.doi:10.1090/mcom/3022

    2016 doi

  74. [85]

    Systemsofconservationlawsofmixedtype

    M.S.Mock.“Systemsofconservationlawsofmixedtype.”In:JournalofDifferentialEquations 37.1 (1980), pp. 70–88.doi:10.1016/0022-0396(80)90089-3

    1980 doi

  75. [86]

    Finite volume approximations and strict stability for hyper- bolic problems

    J. Nordström and M. Björck. “Finite volume approximations and strict stability for hyper- bolic problems.” In:Applied Numerical Mathematics38.3 (2001), pp. 237–255.doi:10.1016/ S0168-9274(01)00027-7

    2001

  76. [87]

    EntropyStableStaggeredGrid Discontinuous Spectral Collocation Methods of any Order for the Compressible Navier- Stokes Equations

    M.Parsani,M.H.Carpenter,T.C.Fisher,andE.J.Nielsen.“EntropyStableStaggeredGrid Discontinuous Spectral Collocation Methods of any Order for the Compressible Navier- Stokes Equations.” In:SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing38.5 (2016), A3129–A3162.doi: 10.1137/15M1043510

    2016 doi

  77. [88]

    OnpositivitypreservingfinitevolumeschemesforEulerequa- tions

    B.PerthameandC.-W.Shu.“OnpositivitypreservingfinitevolumeschemesforEulerequa- tions.” In:Numerische Mathematik73.1 (1996), pp. 119–130.doi:10.1007/s002110050187

    1996 doi

  78. [89]

    A note on the convergence of the discontinuous Galerkin method for a scalarhyperbolicequation

    T. E. Peterson. “A note on the convergence of the discontinuous Galerkin method for a scalarhyperbolicequation.”In:SIAMJournalonNumericalAnalysis28.1(1991),pp.133–140. doi:10.1137/0728006

    1991 doi

  79. [90]

    Petri, S

    L. Petri, S. Ortleb, G. Birke, C. Engwer, and H. Ranocha.Domain-of-dependence-stabilized cut-celldiscretizationsoflinearkineticmodelswithsummation-by-partsproperties.Jan.2026.doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.05817. arXiv:2601.05817 [math.NA]

    2026 doi

  80. [91]

    DifferentialEquations.jl–aperformantandfeature-richecosys- temforsolvingdifferentialequationsinJulia

    C.RackauckasandQ.Nie.“DifferentialEquations.jl–aperformantandfeature-richecosys- temforsolvingdifferentialequationsinJulia.”In:JournalofOpenResearchSoftware5.1(2017), p. 15.doi:10.5334/jors.151. 41

    2017 doi

  81. [92]

    ANoteonNumericalFluxesConservingaMemberofHarten’sOne-Parameter Family of Entropies for the Compressible Euler Equations

    H.Ranocha.“ANoteonNumericalFluxesConservingaMemberofHarten’sOne-Parameter Family of Entropies for the Compressible Euler Equations.” In:Journal of Computational Physics462 (Apr. 2022), p. 111236.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111236. arXiv:2201.03946 [math.NA]

    2022

  82. [93]

    Comparison of Some Entropy Conservative Numerical Fluxes for the Euler Equations

    H. Ranocha. “Comparison of Some Entropy Conservative Numerical Fluxes for the Euler Equations.”In:JournalofScientificComputing76.1(2018),pp.216–242.doi:10.1007/s10915- 017-0618-1. arXiv:1701.02264 [math.NA]

    2018 arXiv

  83. [94]

    Convergence of entropy-conservative summation-by- partsdiscretizationstosmoothsolutionsofhyperbolicconservationlaws

    H. Ranocha.Reproducibility repository for "Convergence of entropy-conservative summation-by- partsdiscretizationstosmoothsolutionsofhyperbolicconservationlaws".https://github.com/ ranocha/2026_convergence_sbp. 2026.doi:10.5281/zenodo.21672279

    2026 doi

  84. [95]

    Shallowwaterequations:Split-form,entropystable,well-balanced,andposi- tivitypreservingnumericalmethods

    H.Ranocha.“Shallowwaterequations:Split-form,entropystable,well-balanced,andposi- tivitypreservingnumericalmethods.”In:GEM–InternationalJournalonGeomathematics8.1 (Apr. 2017), pp. 85–133.doi:10.1007/s13137-016-0089-9. arXiv:1609.08029 [math.NA]

    2017 arXiv

  85. [96]

    SummationByPartsOperators.jl: A Julia library of provably stable discretiza- tion techniques with mimetic properties

    H. Ranocha. “SummationByPartsOperators.jl: A Julia library of provably stable discretiza- tion techniques with mimetic properties.” In:Journal of Open Source Software6.64 (Aug. 2021), p. 3454.doi:10 . 21105 / joss . 03454.url:https : / / github . com / ranocha / SummationByPar...

    2021

  86. [97]

    Optimized Runge-Kutta meth- ods with automatic step size control for compressible computational fluid dynamics

    H. Ranocha, L. Dalcin, M. Parsani, and D. I. Ketcheson. “Optimized Runge-Kutta meth- ods with automatic step size control for compressible computational fluid dynamics.” In:Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation4.4 (2022), pp. 1191–1228.doi: 10.1007/s42967-021-00159-w

    2022 doi

  87. [98]

    PreventingPressureOscillationsDoesNotFixLocalLinear Stability Issues of Entropy-Based Split-Form High-Order Schemes

    H.RanochaandG.J.Gassner.“PreventingPressureOscillationsDoesNotFixLocalLinear Stability Issues of Entropy-Based Split-Form High-Order Schemes.” In:Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation4.3 (2022), pp. 880–903.doi:10.1007/s42967- 021- 00148-z. arXiv:2009.13139 [math.NA]

    2022 arXiv

  88. [99]

    General Relaxation Methods for Initial-Value Problems with Application to Multistep Schemes

    H. Ranocha, L. Lóczi, and D. I. Ketcheson. “General Relaxation Methods for Initial-Value Problems with Application to Multistep Schemes.” In:Numerische Mathematik146 (Oct. 2020), pp. 875–906.doi:10.1007/s00211-020-01158-4. arXiv:2003.03012 [math.NA]

    2020 arXiv

  89. [100]

    ABroadClassofConservativeNumerical Methods for Dispersive Wave Equations

    H.Ranocha,D.Mitsotakis,andD.I.Ketcheson.“ABroadClassofConservativeNumerical Methods for Dispersive Wave Equations.” In:Communications in Computational Physics29.4 (Feb.2021),pp.979–1029.doi:10.4208/cicp.OA-2020-0119.arXiv:2006.14802 [math.NA]

    2021 arXiv

  90. [101]

    Summation-by-parts operators for correction proce- dure via reconstruction

    H. Ranocha, P. Öffner, and T. Sonar. “Summation-by-parts operators for correction proce- dure via reconstruction.” In:Journal of Computational Physics311 (Apr. 2016), pp. 299–328. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.02.009. arXiv:1511.02052 [math.NA]

    2016 arXiv

  91. [102]

    RelaxationRunge-Kutta Methods: Fully Discrete Explicit Entropy-Stable Schemes for the Compressible Euler and Navier-StokesEquations

    H.Ranocha,M.Sayyari,L.Dalcin,M.Parsani,andD.I.Ketcheson.“RelaxationRunge-Kutta Methods: Fully Discrete Explicit Entropy-Stable Schemes for the Compressible Euler and Navier-StokesEquations.”In:SIAMJournalonScientificComputing42.2(2020),A612–A638. doi:10.1137/19M1263480. arXiv:...

    2020 arXiv

  92. [103]

    Efficient Implementation of Modern Entropy Stable and Kinetic Energy Preserving Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Conservation Laws

    H. Ranocha, M. Schlottke-Lakemper, J. Chan, A. M. Rueda-Ramírez, A. R. Winters, F. Hindenlang, and G. J. Gassner. “Efficient Implementation of Modern Entropy Stable and Kinetic Energy Preserving Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Conservation Laws.” In: ACM Transactions on Mat...

    2023 arXiv

  93. [104]

    Adaptive numerical simulations with Trixi.jl: A case study of Julia for scientific comput- ing

    H. Ranocha, M. Schlottke-Lakemper, A. R. Winters, E. Faulhaber, J. Chan, and G. Gassner. “Adaptive numerical simulations with Trixi.jl: A case study of Julia for scientific comput- ing.” In:Proceedings of the JuliaCon Conferences. Vol. 1. 1. 2022, p. 77.doi:10.21105/jcon. 00077. 42

    2022 doi

  94. [105]

    Ontherobustnessandperformanceofentropystablecollocateddiscontinuous Galerkin methods

    D.Rojas,R.Boukharfane,L.Dalcin,D.C.DelReyFernández,H.Ranocha,D.E.Keyes,and M.Parsani.“Ontherobustnessandperformanceofentropystablecollocateddiscontinuous Galerkin methods.” In:Journal of Computational Physics426 (Feb. 2021), p. 109891.doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109891. arXiv:1911...

    2021

  95. [106]

    Salari and P

    K. Salari and P. Knupp.Code Verification by the Method of Manufactured Solutions. Tech. rep. SAND2000-1444.Albuquerque,NewMexico:SandiaNationalLaboratories,June2000.doi: 10.2172/759450

    doi

  96. [107]

    Schlottke-Lakemper, G

    M. Schlottke-Lakemper, G. J. Gassner, H. Ranocha, and A. R. Winters.Trixi.jl: Adaptive high-order numerical simulations of hyperbolic PDEs in Julia.https://github.com/trixi- framework/Trixi.jl. Aug. 2020.doi:10.5281/zenodo.3996439

    2020 doi

  97. [108]

    A purely hyper- bolic discontinuous Galerkin approach for self-gravitating gas dynamics

    M. Schlottke-Lakemper, A. R. Winters, H. Ranocha, and G. J. Gassner. “A purely hyper- bolic discontinuous Galerkin approach for self-gravitating gas dynamics.” In:Journal of Computational Physics442 (2021), p. 110467.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110467

    2021

  98. [109]

    Summation by Parts for Finite Difference Approximations for𝑑/𝑑𝑥

    B. Strand. “Summation by Parts for Finite Difference Approximations for𝑑/𝑑𝑥.” In:Journal of Computational Physics110.1 (1994), pp. 47–67.doi:10.1006/jcph.1994.1005

    1994

  99. [110]

    Accurate partial difference methods II: Non-linear problems

    G. Strang. “Accurate partial difference methods II: Non-linear problems.” In:Numerische Mathematik6.1 (1964), pp. 37–46.doi:10.1007/BF01386051

    1964 doi

  100. [111]

    Entropy stable boundary conditions for the Euler equations

    M. Svärd. “Entropy stable boundary conditions for the Euler equations.” In:Journal of Computational Physics426 (2021), p. 109947.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109947

    2021

  101. [112]

    Entropy-stablein-andoutflowboundaryconditionsforthecompressibleEuler equations

    M.Svärd.“Entropy-stablein-andoutflowboundaryconditionsforthecompressibleEuler equations.” In:Journal of Computational Physics521 (2025), p. 113543.doi:10.1016/j.jcp. 2024.113543

    2025

  102. [113]

    Convergence of energy stable finite-difference schemes with interfaces

    M. Svärd and J. Nordström. “Convergence of energy stable finite-difference schemes with interfaces.” In:Journal of Computational Physics429 (2021), p. 110020.doi:10.1016/j.jcp. 2020.110020

    2021

  103. [114]

    On the convergence rates of energy-stable finite-difference schemes

    M. Svärd and J. Nordström. “On the convergence rates of energy-stable finite-difference schemes.” In:Journal of Computational Physics397 (2019), p. 108819.doi:10.1016/j.jcp. 2019.07.018

    2019 doi

  104. [115]

    On the order of accuracy for difference approximations of initial-boundaryvalueproblems

    M. Svärd and J. Nordström. “On the order of accuracy for difference approximations of initial-boundaryvalueproblems.”In:JournalofComputationalPhysics218.1(2006),pp.333– 352.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2006.02.014

    2006 doi

  105. [116]

    Reviewofsummation-by-partsschemesforinitial-boundary- value problems

    M.SvärdandJ.Nordström.“Reviewofsummation-by-partsschemesforinitial-boundary- value problems.” In:Journal of Computational Physics268 (2014), pp. 17–38.doi:10.1016/j. jcp.2014.02.031

    2014 doi

  106. [117]

    Convergence of spectral methods for nonlinear conservation laws

    E. Tadmor. “Convergence of spectral methods for nonlinear conservation laws.” In:SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis26.1 (1989), pp. 30–44.doi:10.1137/0726003

    1989 doi

  107. [118]

    Entropy stability theory for difference approximations of nonlinear conserva- tion laws and related time-dependent problems

    E. Tadmor. “Entropy stability theory for difference approximations of nonlinear conserva- tion laws and related time-dependent problems.” In:Acta Numerica12 (2003), pp. 451–512. doi:10.1017/S0962492902000156

    2003 doi

  108. [119]

    Thenumericalviscosityofentropystableschemesforsystemsofconservation laws. I

    E.Tadmor.“Thenumericalviscosityofentropystableschemesforsystemsofconservation laws. I.” In:Mathematics of Computation49.179 (1987), pp. 91–103.doi:10 . 1090 / S0025 - 5718-1987-0890255-3

    1987

  109. [120]

    An Entropy Stable High-Order Discontinuous Galerkin Method on Cut Meshes

    C. G. Taylor and J. Chan. “An Entropy Stable High-Order Discontinuous Galerkin Method on Cut Meshes.” In:Journal of Computational Physics548 (2026), p. 114551.doi:10.1016/j. jcp.2025.114551

    2026

  110. [121]

    Geometric Conservation Law and Its Application to Flow Computations on Moving Grids

    P. D. Thomas and C. K. Lombard. “Geometric Conservation Law and Its Application to Flow Computations on Moving Grids.” In:AIAA Journal17.10 (1979), pp. 1030–1037.doi: 10.2514/3.61273. 43

    1979 doi

  111. [122]

    A New Class of High-Order Energy Stable FluxReconstructionSchemes

    P. E. Vincent, P. Castonguay, and A. Jameson. “A New Class of High-Order Energy Stable FluxReconstructionSchemes.”In:JournalofScientificComputing47.1(2011),pp.50–72.doi: 10.1007/s10915-010-9420-z

    2011 doi

  112. [123]

    An entropy stable nodal discontinuous Galerkin method for the two dimensional shallow water equations on un- structuredcurvilinearmesheswithdiscontinuousbathymetry

    N. Wintermeyer, A. R. Winters, G. J. Gassner, and D. A. Kopriva. “An entropy stable nodal discontinuous Galerkin method for the two dimensional shallow water equations on un- structuredcurvilinearmesheswithdiscontinuousbathymetry.”In:JournalofComputational Physics340 (2017), p...

    2017 doi

  113. [124]

    A.R.Winters,P.Ersing,H.Ranocha,andM.Schlottke-Lakemper.TrixiShallowWater.jl:Shal- lowwatersimulationswithTrixi.jl.https://github.com/trixi-framework/TrixiShallowWater. jl. 2025.doi:10.5281/zenodo.15206520

    2025 doi

  114. [125]

    Numerical boundary flux functions that giveprovableboundsfornonlinearinitialboundaryvalueproblemswithopenboundaries

    A. R. Winters, D. A. Kopriva, and J. Nordström. “Numerical boundary flux functions that giveprovableboundsfornonlinearinitialboundaryvalueproblemswithopenboundaries.” In:JournalofComputationalPhysics559(2026),p.114891.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2026.114891

    2026

  115. [126]

    A comparative study on polynomial dealiasing and split form discontinuous Galerkin schemes for under-resolved turbulence computations

    A.R.Winters,R.C.Moura,G.Mengaldo,G.J.Gassner,S.Walch,J.Peiro,andS.J.Sherwin. “A comparative study on polynomial dealiasing and split form discontinuous Galerkin schemes for under-resolved turbulence computations.” In:Journal of Computational Physics 372 (2018), pp. 1–21.doi:10...

    2018 doi

  116. [127]

    Aligninglinearandnonlinearboundaryconditiontheory for the compressible Euler equations using congruence matrix analysis

    A.R.WintersandJ.Nordström.“Aligninglinearandnonlinearboundaryconditiontheory for the compressible Euler equations using congruence matrix analysis.” In:Journal of Computational Physics562 (2026), p. 115010.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2026.115010

    2026

  117. [128]

    Z. A. Worku, D. C. Del Rey Fernández, and D. W. Zingg.Convergence of entropy-stable continuous summation-by-parts discretizations of symmetric hyperbolic conservation laws. Mar. 2026.doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.18369. arXiv:2603.18369 [math.NA]

    2026 doi

  118. [129]

    High-order entropy stable discontinuous Galerkin methodsfortheshallowwaterequations:CurvedtriangularmeshesandGPUacceleration

    X. Wu, E. J. Kubatko, and J. Chan. “High-order entropy stable discontinuous Galerkin methodsfortheshallowwaterequations:CurvedtriangularmeshesandGPUacceleration.” In:Computers&MathematicswithApplications82(2021),pp.179–199.doi:10.1016/j.camwa. 2020.11.006

    2021 doi

  119. [130]

    ErrorEstimatestoSmoothSolutionsofRunge-KuttaDiscontinu- ous Galerkin Method for Symmetrizable Systems of Conservation Laws

    Q.ZhangandC.-W.Shu.“ErrorEstimatestoSmoothSolutionsofRunge-KuttaDiscontinu- ous Galerkin Method for Symmetrizable Systems of Conservation Laws.” In:SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis44.4 (2006), pp. 1703–1720.doi:10.1137/040620382

    2006 doi

  120. [131]

    Error Estimates to Smooth Solutions of Runge-Kutta Discon- tinuous Galerkin Methods for Scalar Conservation Laws

    Q. Zhang and C.-W. Shu. “Error Estimates to Smooth Solutions of Runge-Kutta Discon- tinuous Galerkin Methods for Scalar Conservation Laws.” In:SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis42.2 (2004), pp. 641–666.doi:10.1137/S0036142902404182

    2004 doi

  121. [132]

    StabilityAnalysisandAPrioriErrorEstimatesoftheThirdOrder Explicit Runge-Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Scalar Conservation Laws

    Q.ZhangandC.-W.Shu.“StabilityAnalysisandAPrioriErrorEstimatesoftheThirdOrder Explicit Runge-Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Scalar Conservation Laws.” In: SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis48.3 (2010), pp. 1038–1063.doi:10.1137/090771363

    2010 doi

  122. [133]

    On positivity-preserving high order discontinuous Galerkin schemes for compressible Euler equations on rectangular meshes

    X. Zhang and C.-W. Shu. “On positivity-preserving high order discontinuous Galerkin schemes for compressible Euler equations on rectangular meshes.” In:Journal of Computa- tional Physics229.23 (2010), pp. 8918–8934.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2010.08.016. 44

    2010 doi

  123. [2008]

    Ed. by F. Cucker, A. Pinkus, and M. J. Todd. Vol. 363. London Mathematical So- ciety Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 93–139.doi:10 . 1017 / CBO9781139107068.005

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.