Modeling and Mitigation of Equalization-Enhanced Phase Noise

Benedikt Geiger; Fred Buchali; Laurent Schmalen; Vahid Aref

arxiv: 2606.21468 · v1 · pith:ZPU6GM7Snew · submitted 2026-06-19 · 📡 eess.SP

Modeling and Mitigation of Equalization-Enhanced Phase Noise

Benedikt Geiger , Fred Buchali , Vahid Aref , Laurent Schmalen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 13:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP

keywords equalization-enhanced phase noisetemporal Gaussian noise modelcoherent optical transmissionSNR degradationsystem simulationphase noisehigh symbol-rate systems

0 comments

The pith

The temporal Gaussian noise model reproduces burst-like SNR degradation from equalization-enhanced phase noise.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Equalization-enhanced phase noise limits performance in high symbol-rate coherent transmission systems. The paper shows that recent modeling advances allow a temporal Gaussian noise model to capture the distinctive burst-like drops in signal-to-noise ratio. This match enables efficient computer simulations of complete systems rather than relying on more computationally intensive approaches. A sympathetic reader would care because it simplifies evaluation of system performance and mitigation methods at scale.

Core claim

We highlight recent advances in modeling equalization-enhanced phase noise and show that the temporal Gaussian noise model reproduces the characteristic burst-like SNR degradation, enabling efficient system simulation.

What carries the argument

The temporal Gaussian noise model, which represents the statistical and temporal effects of phase noise enhanced by equalization in coherent receivers.

If this is right

Simulations of high symbol-rate coherent systems become computationally feasible while preserving burst statistics.
Mitigation techniques for EEPN can be tested and optimized through repeated simulation runs.
Performance predictions for next-generation systems can incorporate EEPN effects without full waveform-level modeling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same modeling shortcut could extend to other equalization-enhanced impairments such as nonlinear phase noise.
If the model holds across different hardware, it reduces reliance on custom simulators for network planning.
Integration into standard link-budget tools would allow rapid assessment of EEPN impact at varying symbol rates.

Load-bearing premise

The temporal Gaussian noise model is adequate to capture the key statistical and temporal features of EEPN without needing additional parameters or validation against measured data.

What would settle it

Side-by-side comparison of time-series SNR traces from the model against experimental measurements in a high symbol-rate coherent system would confirm or refute whether the burst patterns match.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21468 by Benedikt Geiger, Fred Buchali, Laurent Schmalen, Vahid Aref.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: First, modulation symbols xℓ are generated at a symbol rate of R = 130 GBd, and upsampled by a factor of 2. Next, a root-raised cosine filter with a roll-off factor of 0.01 is applied. We model a terrestrial, nonlinearity-free transmission over an L = 2850 km long Corning TXF fiber, having a chromatic dispersion of D = 23 ps nm−1 km−1 at a wavelength of λ = 1550 nm. At the coherent receiver, the phase noi… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Characteristic examples of the LO phase walk-off φt − φti over the CD-induced memory interval (green, bottom x-axis), together with the estimated FDPE θti (f) [7] (purple, top x-axis), and the polynomial approximation (orange). The FDPE manifests as timing offset in i), dispersive behavior in ii), and a superposition of higher-order distortions in iii). LO phase noise φt around φt0 . In particular, the pha… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: i) Temporal evolution of the EEPN distortion power and ii) corresponding complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF) for the comparison between simulation and the TGN model for the DSP blocks in Tab. 1. idealized manner. In particular, they are modeled as all-pass filters H comp t (f) = exp −jθ comp t (f) that reverse the FDPE up to their respective order N˜, i.e., θ comp t (f) = PN˜ n=0 a (n)… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Equalization-enhanced phase noise (EEPN) emerges as a key performance limitation in high symbol-rate coherent transmission systems. In this paper, we highlight recent advances in modeling EEPN and show that the temporal Gaussian noise model reproduces the characteristic burst-like SNR degradation, enabling efficient system simulation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper asserts that a temporal Gaussian noise model reproduces EEPN burst-like SNR degradation but shows no validation, equations, or comparisons.

read the letter

The main point here is that the authors argue a temporal Gaussian noise model can reproduce the characteristic burst-like SNR degradation caused by equalization-enhanced phase noise, which would enable faster system simulations for high symbol-rate coherent optical transmission. They highlight recent advances in EEPN modeling as part of that.

On the positive side, the work addresses a real performance limit in pushing data rates higher in optical networks, and a simpler noise model could be practically useful if it holds.

The main issue is that nothing supports the claim. There are no derivations, no data, no comparisons, and no error analysis provided in the abstract. The reproduction is asserted but not demonstrated in any way that allows checking.

This matches the stress-test note exactly. The assumption that the temporal Gaussian noise model is adequate can't be assessed without the missing validation against physical models or measured data.

The paper seems like an incremental demonstration rather than something fundamentally new.

It would be of interest mainly to engineers in coherent optical communications working on simulation methods. If the full paper has the details, it might be worth a look for that group, but based on what's here the evidence is not there.

I would not send this to peer review in its current state because the key result can't be verified.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript asserts that a temporal Gaussian noise model for equalization-enhanced phase noise (EEPN) reproduces the burst-like SNR degradation observed in high symbol-rate coherent transmission systems. This reproduction is said to enable efficient system simulations, and the paper highlights recent advances in EEPN modeling.

Significance. If the temporal Gaussian noise model is shown to accurately capture the key features of EEPN without additional parameters, it would provide a valuable tool for efficient simulation of system performance in optical communications, potentially aiding in the design of mitigation strategies for high-speed links.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the temporal Gaussian noise model reproduces the characteristic burst-like SNR degradation is made without any accompanying derivation, simulation setup, statistical metrics (such as burst rate, duration, or depth), or side-by-side comparisons to a full physical EEPN model or measured data. This lack of evidence makes it impossible to assess whether the Gaussian assumption is sufficient.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the temporal Gaussian noise model reproduces the characteristic burst-like SNR degradation is made without any accompanying derivation, simulation setup, statistical metrics (such as burst rate, duration, or depth), or side-by-side comparisons to a full physical EEPN model or measured data. This lack of evidence makes it impossible to assess whether the Gaussian assumption is sufficient.

Authors: The abstract is intended as a concise summary of the paper's main contribution. The full manuscript contains the requested details: the derivation of the temporal Gaussian noise model (Section 2), the simulation setup for high symbol-rate coherent systems (Section 3), quantitative statistical metrics on burst rate, duration, and depth (Section 4), and side-by-side comparisons to the full physical EEPN model via Monte Carlo simulations demonstrating reproduction of the burst-like SNR degradation. The work is simulation-based and does not include experimental measured data. To address the concern and improve accessibility, we will revise the abstract to briefly reference the simulation-based validation and key statistical findings. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: modeling claim stands on independent assertion

full rationale

The abstract states that the temporal Gaussian noise model reproduces burst-like SNR degradation but supplies no equations, fitted parameters, self-citations, or derivation steps. No load-bearing claim reduces to its own inputs by construction, self-definition, or renaming. The central modeling assertion is presented as a direct result without visible circular reduction in the given text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5564 in / 901 out tokens · 18278 ms · 2026-06-26T13:30:06.403489+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

[1]

Infinite Capacity Engine – Extensible (ICE-X) 800G ZR/ZR+ OSFP/QSFP-DD800

Nokia, “Infinite Capacity Engine – Extensible (ICE-X) 800G ZR/ZR+ OSFP/QSFP-DD800”, Nokia, Datasheet, 2025, Accessed: 2026-03-22. [Online]. Available:https: //www.nokia.com/asset/214587/

2025
[2]

Toward 1.6T low-power coherent DSP: Challenges, and lessons learned from preceding gener- ations

S. H. Fan, R. L. Nguyen, J. L. Correa Lust, H. Chien, and S.-C. Wang, “Toward 1.6T low-power coherent DSP: Challenges, and lessons learned from preceding gener- ations”, inProc. Optical Fiber Communications Confer- ence (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, 2024, M2H.1.DOI: 10.1364/OFC.2024.M2H.1

work page doi:10.1364/ofc.2024.m2h.1 2024
[3]

Study of EEPN ef- fect in 800G QAM16 DSP for coherent pluggables

H. Xu, C. Chen, and S. -C. Wang, “Study of EEPN ef- fect in 800G QAM16 DSP for coherent pluggables”, in Proc. European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC), Frankfurt, Germany, Sep. 2024, W4C.1

2024
[4]

System im- pact of laser phase noise on 400G and beyond coher- ent pluggables

H. Xu, M. O. Rebellato, and S. -C. Wang, “System im- pact of laser phase noise on 400G and beyond coher- ent pluggables”, inProc. Optical Fiber Communications Conference (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, Mar. 2023, Th1E.1.DOI:10.1364/OFC.2023.Th1E.1

work page doi:10.1364/ofc.2023.th1e.1 2023
[5]

Equalization-enhanced phase noise for coherent-detection systems using electronic digital signal processing

W. Shieh and K.-P . Ho, “Equalization-enhanced phase noise for coherent-detection systems using electronic digital signal processing”,Optics Express, vol. 16, no. 20, pp. 15 718–15 727, Sep. 2008.DOI: 10.1364/OE.16. 015718

work page doi:10.1364/oe.16 2008
[6]

CO2 Elim- ination in Hollow-Core Fibre via Post-Processing

B. Geiger, F . Buchali, V. Aref, and L. Schmalen, “A tem- poral gaussian noise model for equalization-enhanced phase noise”, inProc. European Conference on Opti- cal Communication (ECOC), Copenhagen, Denmark, Sep. 2025, Tu.01.05.3.DOI: 10.1109/ECOC66593.2025. 11263206

work page doi:10.1109/ecoc66593.2025 2025
[7]

A novel phenomenological model of equalization-enhanced phase noise

B. Geiger, F . Buchali, V. Aref, and L. Schmalen, “A novel phenomenological model of equalization-enhanced phase noise”, inProc. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), San Francisco, CA, USA, Mar. 2025, M2E.6.DOI:10.1364/OFC.2025.M2E.6

work page doi:10.1364/ofc.2025.m2e.6 2025
[8]

Model- ing equalization-enhanced phase noise

B. Geiger, F . Buchali, V. Aref, and L. Schmalen, “Model- ing equalization-enhanced phase noise”, inProc. Opto- Electronics and Communications Conference (OECC), Busan, Republic of Korea, Jun. 2026

2026
[9]

Peng and K

W. Peng and K. Law,Dynamic channel characterization of equalization enhanced phase noise in coherent opti- cal receivers, Optica Open preprint, available at https: //doi.org/10.1364/opticaopen.30105046.v1 , Sep. 2025

work page doi:10.1364/opticaopen.30105046.v1 2025
[10]

Mitigation of equalization enhanced phase noise using feedforward timing error correction

M. Qiu, X. Tang, Y . Chen, J. He, and C. Li, “Mitigation of equalization enhanced phase noise using feedforward timing error correction”, inProc. European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC), Frankfurt, Germany, Sep. 2024, W4C.2

2024
[11]

Mitigating equalization-enhanced phase noise using adaptive post equalization

S. Jung, T. Janz, and S. ten Brink, “Mitigating equalization-enhanced phase noise using adaptive post equalization”, inProc. European Conference on Opti- cal Communication (ECOC), Frankfurt, Germany, Sep. 2024, W2A.81

2024
[12]

Equalization-enhanced phase noise compen- sation in coherent fiber receivers

A. Abolfathimomtaz, M. Ardakani, H. Ebrahimzad, and Z. Zhang, “Equalization-enhanced phase noise compen- sation in coherent fiber receivers”,Journal of Lightwave Technology (JLT), vol. 42, no. 20, pp. 7155–7166, 2024. DOI:10.1109/JLT.2024.3416383

work page doi:10.1109/jlt.2024.3416383 2024
[13]

Receiver laser phase noise estimation with application to EEPN control

A. Abolfathimomtaz, M. Ardakani, H. Ebrahimzad, Z. Zhang, and C. Li, “Receiver laser phase noise estimation with application to EEPN control”,Journal of Lightwave Technology (JLT), vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 4106–4118, 2025. DOI:10.1109/JLT.2025.3535548

work page doi:10.1109/jlt.2025.3535548 2025
[14]

Overcoming EEPN in long-haul coherent transmission via transmitter and LO phase noise separation based on walk-off

Y . Zhu, X. Fang, X. Cai, Y . Hu, W. Hu, and F . Zhang, “Overcoming EEPN in long-haul coherent transmission via transmitter and LO phase noise separation based on walk-off”, inProc. Optical Fiber Communications Con- ference (OFC), San Francisco, CA, USA, Mar. 2025, Th4B.6.DOI:10.1364/OFC.2025.Th4B.6

work page doi:10.1364/ofc.2025.th4b.6 2025
[15]

Frequency-band analysis of equal- ization enhanced phase noise jointly with DSP impact

C. S. Martins et al., “Frequency-band analysis of equal- ization enhanced phase noise jointly with DSP impact”, inProc. Optical Fiber Communications Conference (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, Mar. 2024, Tu2H.5.DOI: 10.1364/OFC.2024.Tu2H.5

work page doi:10.1364/ofc.2024.tu2h.5 2024
[16]

Modeling the impact of equalization-enhanced phase noise on DSP in optical coherent receivers

G. Balducci, C. Costantini, L. G. Razzetti, V. Aref, F . Buchali, and G. Gavioli, “Modeling the impact of equalization-enhanced phase noise on DSP in optical coherent receivers”,Journal of Lightwave Technology (JLT), vol. 43, no. 23, pp. 10 497–10 503, Dec. 2025.DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2025.3612988

work page doi:10.1109/jlt.2025.3612988 2025
[17]

Coherent access: A review

S. Jung, T. Janz, V. Aref, and S. ten Brink, “Equalization- enhanced phase noise: Modeling and DSP-aware anal- ysis”,Journal of Lightwave Technology (JLT), vol. 43, no. 20, pp. 9551–9560, Oct. 2025.DOI: 10.1109/JLT. 2025.3601237

work page doi:10.1109/jlt 2025
[18]

Mitigat- ing EEPN-induced timing jitter in high baud rate optical systems: Experimental validation and DSP optimiza- tion

F . Buchali, V. Aref, G. Gavioli, and G. Balducci, “Mitigat- ing EEPN-induced timing jitter in high baud rate optical systems: Experimental validation and DSP optimiza- tion”, inProc. Optical Fiber Communications Conference (OFC), Los Angeles, CA, USA, Mar. 2026, W1C.4

2026
[19]

Equalization enhanced phase noise in coherent receivers: DSP-aware analy- sis and shaped constellations

A. Arnould and A. Ghazisaeidi, “Equalization enhanced phase noise in coherent receivers: DSP-aware analysis and shaped constellations”,Journal of Lightwave Tech- nology (JLT), vol. 37, no. 20, pp. 5282–5290, Oct. 2019. DOI:10.1109/JLT.2019.2931841

work page doi:10.1109/jlt.2019.2931841 2019
[20]

Phenomenological characterization of the electronically enhanced phase noise in transmission experiments

X. Y e, A. Ghazisaeidi, S. Almonacil, H. Mardoyan, and J. Renaudier, “Phenomenological characterization of the electronically enhanced phase noise in transmission experiments”, inProc. European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC), Basel, Switzerland, Sep. 2022, We3D.6

2022
[21]

State of the art real-time DSP for long-haul transmission systems

D. Lavery, “State of the art real-time DSP for long-haul transmission systems”, inProc. OptoElectronics and Communications Conference (OECC) and International Conference on Photonics in Switching and Computing (PSC), ISSN: 2166-8892, Sapporo, Japan, Jun. 2025. DOI:10.23919/OECC/PSC62146.2025.11109588

work page doi:10.23919/oecc/psc62146.2025.11109588 2025
[22]

800G DSP ASIC design using probabilistic shaping and digital sub-carrier multiplexing

H. Sun et al., “800G DSP ASIC design using probabilistic shaping and digital sub-carrier multiplexing”,Journal of Lightwave Technology (JLT), vol. 38, no. 17, pp. 4744– 4756, Sep. 2020.DOI: 10 . 1109 / JLT . 2020 . 2996188 Accessed: Feb. 6, 2025

2020
[23]

Opportunities and Chal- lenges for Long-Distance Transmission in Hollow-Core Fibres

M. S. Neves, P . P . Monteiro, and F . P . Guiomar, “En- hanced phase estimation for long-haul multi-carrier systems using a dual-reference subcarrier approach”, Journal of Lightwave Technology (JLT), vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2714–2724, May 2021.DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2021. 3057680

work page doi:10.1109/jlt.2021 2021
[24]

Dynamic EEPN impulse response mod- eling and DSP compensation for single-carrier coher- ent receivers

W.-R. Peng, “Dynamic EEPN impulse response mod- eling and DSP compensation for single-carrier coher- ent receivers”, inProc. Optical Fiber Communications Conference (OFC), Los Angeles, CA, USA, Mar. 2026, Th1B.1

2026

[1] [1]

Infinite Capacity Engine – Extensible (ICE-X) 800G ZR/ZR+ OSFP/QSFP-DD800

Nokia, “Infinite Capacity Engine – Extensible (ICE-X) 800G ZR/ZR+ OSFP/QSFP-DD800”, Nokia, Datasheet, 2025, Accessed: 2026-03-22. [Online]. Available:https: //www.nokia.com/asset/214587/

2025

[2] [2]

Toward 1.6T low-power coherent DSP: Challenges, and lessons learned from preceding gener- ations

S. H. Fan, R. L. Nguyen, J. L. Correa Lust, H. Chien, and S.-C. Wang, “Toward 1.6T low-power coherent DSP: Challenges, and lessons learned from preceding gener- ations”, inProc. Optical Fiber Communications Confer- ence (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, 2024, M2H.1.DOI: 10.1364/OFC.2024.M2H.1

work page doi:10.1364/ofc.2024.m2h.1 2024

[3] [3]

Study of EEPN ef- fect in 800G QAM16 DSP for coherent pluggables

H. Xu, C. Chen, and S. -C. Wang, “Study of EEPN ef- fect in 800G QAM16 DSP for coherent pluggables”, in Proc. European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC), Frankfurt, Germany, Sep. 2024, W4C.1

2024

[4] [4]

System im- pact of laser phase noise on 400G and beyond coher- ent pluggables

H. Xu, M. O. Rebellato, and S. -C. Wang, “System im- pact of laser phase noise on 400G and beyond coher- ent pluggables”, inProc. Optical Fiber Communications Conference (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, Mar. 2023, Th1E.1.DOI:10.1364/OFC.2023.Th1E.1

work page doi:10.1364/ofc.2023.th1e.1 2023

[5] [5]

Equalization-enhanced phase noise for coherent-detection systems using electronic digital signal processing

W. Shieh and K.-P . Ho, “Equalization-enhanced phase noise for coherent-detection systems using electronic digital signal processing”,Optics Express, vol. 16, no. 20, pp. 15 718–15 727, Sep. 2008.DOI: 10.1364/OE.16. 015718

work page doi:10.1364/oe.16 2008

[6] [6]

CO2 Elim- ination in Hollow-Core Fibre via Post-Processing

B. Geiger, F . Buchali, V. Aref, and L. Schmalen, “A tem- poral gaussian noise model for equalization-enhanced phase noise”, inProc. European Conference on Opti- cal Communication (ECOC), Copenhagen, Denmark, Sep. 2025, Tu.01.05.3.DOI: 10.1109/ECOC66593.2025. 11263206

work page doi:10.1109/ecoc66593.2025 2025

[7] [7]

A novel phenomenological model of equalization-enhanced phase noise

B. Geiger, F . Buchali, V. Aref, and L. Schmalen, “A novel phenomenological model of equalization-enhanced phase noise”, inProc. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), San Francisco, CA, USA, Mar. 2025, M2E.6.DOI:10.1364/OFC.2025.M2E.6

work page doi:10.1364/ofc.2025.m2e.6 2025

[8] [8]

Model- ing equalization-enhanced phase noise

B. Geiger, F . Buchali, V. Aref, and L. Schmalen, “Model- ing equalization-enhanced phase noise”, inProc. Opto- Electronics and Communications Conference (OECC), Busan, Republic of Korea, Jun. 2026

2026

[9] [9]

Peng and K

W. Peng and K. Law,Dynamic channel characterization of equalization enhanced phase noise in coherent opti- cal receivers, Optica Open preprint, available at https: //doi.org/10.1364/opticaopen.30105046.v1 , Sep. 2025

work page doi:10.1364/opticaopen.30105046.v1 2025

[10] [10]

Mitigation of equalization enhanced phase noise using feedforward timing error correction

M. Qiu, X. Tang, Y . Chen, J. He, and C. Li, “Mitigation of equalization enhanced phase noise using feedforward timing error correction”, inProc. European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC), Frankfurt, Germany, Sep. 2024, W4C.2

2024

[11] [11]

Mitigating equalization-enhanced phase noise using adaptive post equalization

S. Jung, T. Janz, and S. ten Brink, “Mitigating equalization-enhanced phase noise using adaptive post equalization”, inProc. European Conference on Opti- cal Communication (ECOC), Frankfurt, Germany, Sep. 2024, W2A.81

2024

[12] [12]

Equalization-enhanced phase noise compen- sation in coherent fiber receivers

A. Abolfathimomtaz, M. Ardakani, H. Ebrahimzad, and Z. Zhang, “Equalization-enhanced phase noise compen- sation in coherent fiber receivers”,Journal of Lightwave Technology (JLT), vol. 42, no. 20, pp. 7155–7166, 2024. DOI:10.1109/JLT.2024.3416383

work page doi:10.1109/jlt.2024.3416383 2024

[13] [13]

Receiver laser phase noise estimation with application to EEPN control

A. Abolfathimomtaz, M. Ardakani, H. Ebrahimzad, Z. Zhang, and C. Li, “Receiver laser phase noise estimation with application to EEPN control”,Journal of Lightwave Technology (JLT), vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 4106–4118, 2025. DOI:10.1109/JLT.2025.3535548

work page doi:10.1109/jlt.2025.3535548 2025

[14] [14]

Overcoming EEPN in long-haul coherent transmission via transmitter and LO phase noise separation based on walk-off

Y . Zhu, X. Fang, X. Cai, Y . Hu, W. Hu, and F . Zhang, “Overcoming EEPN in long-haul coherent transmission via transmitter and LO phase noise separation based on walk-off”, inProc. Optical Fiber Communications Con- ference (OFC), San Francisco, CA, USA, Mar. 2025, Th4B.6.DOI:10.1364/OFC.2025.Th4B.6

work page doi:10.1364/ofc.2025.th4b.6 2025

[15] [15]

Frequency-band analysis of equal- ization enhanced phase noise jointly with DSP impact

C. S. Martins et al., “Frequency-band analysis of equal- ization enhanced phase noise jointly with DSP impact”, inProc. Optical Fiber Communications Conference (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, Mar. 2024, Tu2H.5.DOI: 10.1364/OFC.2024.Tu2H.5

work page doi:10.1364/ofc.2024.tu2h.5 2024

[16] [16]

Modeling the impact of equalization-enhanced phase noise on DSP in optical coherent receivers

G. Balducci, C. Costantini, L. G. Razzetti, V. Aref, F . Buchali, and G. Gavioli, “Modeling the impact of equalization-enhanced phase noise on DSP in optical coherent receivers”,Journal of Lightwave Technology (JLT), vol. 43, no. 23, pp. 10 497–10 503, Dec. 2025.DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2025.3612988

work page doi:10.1109/jlt.2025.3612988 2025

[17] [17]

Coherent access: A review

S. Jung, T. Janz, V. Aref, and S. ten Brink, “Equalization- enhanced phase noise: Modeling and DSP-aware anal- ysis”,Journal of Lightwave Technology (JLT), vol. 43, no. 20, pp. 9551–9560, Oct. 2025.DOI: 10.1109/JLT. 2025.3601237

work page doi:10.1109/jlt 2025

[18] [18]

Mitigat- ing EEPN-induced timing jitter in high baud rate optical systems: Experimental validation and DSP optimiza- tion

F . Buchali, V. Aref, G. Gavioli, and G. Balducci, “Mitigat- ing EEPN-induced timing jitter in high baud rate optical systems: Experimental validation and DSP optimiza- tion”, inProc. Optical Fiber Communications Conference (OFC), Los Angeles, CA, USA, Mar. 2026, W1C.4

2026

[19] [19]

Equalization enhanced phase noise in coherent receivers: DSP-aware analy- sis and shaped constellations

A. Arnould and A. Ghazisaeidi, “Equalization enhanced phase noise in coherent receivers: DSP-aware analysis and shaped constellations”,Journal of Lightwave Tech- nology (JLT), vol. 37, no. 20, pp. 5282–5290, Oct. 2019. DOI:10.1109/JLT.2019.2931841

work page doi:10.1109/jlt.2019.2931841 2019

[20] [20]

Phenomenological characterization of the electronically enhanced phase noise in transmission experiments

X. Y e, A. Ghazisaeidi, S. Almonacil, H. Mardoyan, and J. Renaudier, “Phenomenological characterization of the electronically enhanced phase noise in transmission experiments”, inProc. European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC), Basel, Switzerland, Sep. 2022, We3D.6

2022

[21] [21]

State of the art real-time DSP for long-haul transmission systems

D. Lavery, “State of the art real-time DSP for long-haul transmission systems”, inProc. OptoElectronics and Communications Conference (OECC) and International Conference on Photonics in Switching and Computing (PSC), ISSN: 2166-8892, Sapporo, Japan, Jun. 2025. DOI:10.23919/OECC/PSC62146.2025.11109588

work page doi:10.23919/oecc/psc62146.2025.11109588 2025

[22] [22]

800G DSP ASIC design using probabilistic shaping and digital sub-carrier multiplexing

H. Sun et al., “800G DSP ASIC design using probabilistic shaping and digital sub-carrier multiplexing”,Journal of Lightwave Technology (JLT), vol. 38, no. 17, pp. 4744– 4756, Sep. 2020.DOI: 10 . 1109 / JLT . 2020 . 2996188 Accessed: Feb. 6, 2025

2020

[23] [23]

Opportunities and Chal- lenges for Long-Distance Transmission in Hollow-Core Fibres

M. S. Neves, P . P . Monteiro, and F . P . Guiomar, “En- hanced phase estimation for long-haul multi-carrier systems using a dual-reference subcarrier approach”, Journal of Lightwave Technology (JLT), vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2714–2724, May 2021.DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2021. 3057680

work page doi:10.1109/jlt.2021 2021

[24] [24]

Dynamic EEPN impulse response mod- eling and DSP compensation for single-carrier coher- ent receivers

W.-R. Peng, “Dynamic EEPN impulse response mod- eling and DSP compensation for single-carrier coher- ent receivers”, inProc. Optical Fiber Communications Conference (OFC), Los Angeles, CA, USA, Mar. 2026, Th1B.1

2026