REVIEW 1 cited by
Tracking the Trackers: An Analysis of the State of the Art in Multiple Object Tracking
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Standardized benchmarks are crucial for the majority of computer vision applications. Although leaderboards and ranking tables should not be over-claimed, benchmarks often provide the most objective measure of performance and are therefore important guides for research. We present a benchmark for Multiple Object Tracking launched in the late 2014, with the goal of creating a framework for the standardized evaluation of multiple object tracking methods. This paper collects the two releases of the benchmark made so far, and provides an in-depth analysis of almost 50 state-of-the-art trackers that were tested on over 11000 frames. We show the current trends and weaknesses of multiple people tracking methods, and provide pointers of what researchers should be focusing on to push the field forward.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Contour Errors: Ego-Centric Matching for 3D Multi-Object Tracking Performance Evaluation
A modified Hausdorff distance on ego-nearest bounding box corners is proposed as a 3D tracking matching criterion, showing more robust matches than IoU or center-point distance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.