REVIEW 2 cited by
The Mass Discrepancy-Acceleration Relation: Disk Mass and the Dark Matter Distribution
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The mass discrepancy in disk galaxies is shown to be well correlated with acceleration, increasing systematically with decreasing acceleration below a critical scale a0 = 3700 km^2/s^2/kpc = 1.2E-10 m/s/s. For each galaxy, there is an optimal choice of stellar mass-to-light ratio which minimizes the scatter in this mass discrepancy-acceleration relation. The same mass-to-light ratios also minimize the scatter in the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation and are in excellent agreement with the expectations of stellar population synthesis. Once the disk mass is determined in this fashion, the dark matter distribution is specified. The circular velocity attributable to the dark matter can be expressed as a simple equation which depends only on the observed distribution of baryonic mass. It is a challenge to understand how this very fine-tuned coupling between mass and light comes about.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MIGHTEE-HI / LADUMA: Investigating the link between baryons and dynamics with 130 resolved HI-selected galaxies
A 130-galaxy HI-selected sample yields a tight radial acceleration relation with an acceleration scale near 1.5e-10 m/s^2 and a MOND shape parameter around 4, and shows that the bTFR redshift-evolution signal is large...
-
Bridging the gap between dark matter and MOND by a relativistc scalar field approach
A single relativistic scalar field with a Bekenstein-type kinetic term and a mass-generating term reproduces deep-MOND acceleration in the weak-field limit and predicts stronger-than-MOND light bending.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.