Reply to "Comment on Universal Decoherence in Solids"
classification
❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords
commentdecoherenceletteraffectdescribedmechanismopenovphysical
read the original abstract
The Comment of Openov (PRL 93, 158901 (2004)) on my Physical Review Letter (PRL 92, 120405 (2004)) does not affect the universality of the decoherence mechanism described in the Letter.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.