REVIEW 4 cited by
Stress Tensor Correlators in the Schwinger-Keldysh Formalism
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We express stress tensor correlators using the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. The absence of off-diagonal counterterms in this formalism ensures that the +- and -+ correlators are free of primitive divergences. We use dimensional regularization in position space to explicitly check this at one loop order for a massless scalar on a flat space background. We use the same procedure to show that the ++ correlator contains the divergences first computed by `t Hooft and Veltman for the scalar contribution to the graviton self-energy.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Resumming Fermion Loops for Inflationary Gravity
The 1-loop graviton self-energy from a massless fermion loop is derived on any cosmological background, and the resulting de Sitter corrections to gravitational waves and the Newtonian potential are resummed via a ren...
-
Resumming Photon Loops for Inflationary Gravity
Photon loops on de Sitter background are conserved at one loop and produce a positive, logarithmically growing correction to the Weyl tensor and Newtonian potential that resums to a power law.
-
Cancellation of one-parameter graviton gauge dependence in the effective scalar field equation in de Sitter
Gauge dependence cancels in the one-loop effective scalar equation in de Sitter when all diagram contributions including external mode corrections are collected.
-
Resummations for Inflationary Quantum Gravity
Secular logarithms from inflationary graviton loops can be resummed by combining a modified stochastic formalism with a modified renormalization group, though the pure-gravity sector remains incomplete.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.