pith. sign in

USPTO: us-12628789 · published 2026-05-19 · patents · A01K 1/0088· A01K 1/02· E05B 15/0093

System and method for securing calf hutches

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 19:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification patents A01K 1/0088A01K 1/02E05B 15/0093
keywords calf hutchlatchcable lockbiased armradial geometryreinforcement platerearward actuation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A latch with rearward-protruding biased arm and radially offset locking slot secures calf-hutch cables against accidental release.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The patent describes a latch fastened to a calf hutch that holds a securing cable in a slot. A spring-biased arm pivots to open or close the slot entrance; its free end travels inside a first radius while the slot bottom sits farther out, so the arm cannot lift the cable out when closed. A rearward extension of the arm lets a person reach behind the hutch panel and flip the latch open without tools. A matching reinforcement plate spreads fastener load on the inside of the hutch wall. The geometry is presented as the means to keep the hutch closed under normal farm handling yet allow quick intentional opening.

Core claim

The latch comprises a back portion with a fastener hole, a biased latch arm whose second end lies at a first radial distance from the pivot, a locking slot whose bottom lies at a longer second radial distance outside the arm's range of motion, and a reinforcement plate, such that the arm protrudes rearwardly for actuation from the closed position.

What carries the argument

Latch arm and locking slot whose bottom sits at a greater radial distance than the arm's free end, combined with rearward protrusion for manual actuation.

If this is right

  • Calf hutches remain closed during routine movement and weather events.
  • One-handed rear access lets a single worker open the latch quickly.
  • The reinforcement plate reduces cracking of plastic hutch walls at the fastener.
  • The same latch geometry can be used on any panel that must be cable-secured yet opened from one side only.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The design trades visual inspection of the latch state for mechanical security.
  • If the arm pivot wears or the spring weakens, the radial safety margin shrinks.
  • A production version could add a visible indicator tab that moves with the arm.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen radial distances and rearward protrusion will keep the cable trapped under ordinary farm forces while still allowing a person to swing the arm open without jamming.

What would settle it

Mount the latch on a hutch, close it over a cable, and apply repeated pulls and bumps typical of calves or handlers; count how often the cable escapes without deliberate rearward actuation of the arm.

read the original abstract

1 . A latch for attaching to a calf hutch and for use with a cable to secure the calf hutch, the latch comprising: a back portion having a front end and a back end, wherein the back portion includes a base portion having a first hole that receives a fastener to attach the latch to the calf hutch; a latch arm secured to the back portion and having a first portion pivotable between a closed position and an open position in which the first portion pivots about a pivot point downwardly thereby defining a range of motion, the first portion being biased to the closed position and having a first end proximal to the pivot point and a second end opposite to the first end, the second end located at a first radial distance from the pivot point; a front portion that defines a locking slot with the front end of the back portion, the locking slot comprising: an open end that is blocked when the latch arm is in the closed position and that is not blocked by the latch arm when the latch arm is in the open position, and a bottom portion that is outside the range of motion of the latch arm and located at a second radial distance from the pivot point, the second radial distance being longer than the first radial distance; and a reinforcement plate for positioning on an interior surface of the calf hutch and having a second hole corresponding to the first hole so that the second hole may also receive the fastener, wherein the latch arm includes a portion that protrudes rearwardly from the back end of the back portion when the latch arm is in the closed position so that the portion of the latch arm may be actuated to shift the latch arm from the closed position to the open position.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a utility patent application that claims a latch for securing calf hutches via a cable. The latch comprises a back portion with a fastener hole and reinforcement plate, a biased latch arm that pivots about a defined point with its second end at a first radial distance, and a locking slot whose bottom lies at a longer second radial distance outside the arm's range of motion. The arm protrudes rearwardly in the closed position to enable intentional actuation while the geometry blocks the open end of the slot against accidental release.

Significance. If the described kinematic relationships hold under farm conditions, the design offers a mechanically self-consistent, fastener-based latch that integrates bias, radial clearance, and rearward actuation to balance security and usability for livestock enclosures. The absence of free parameters or fitted quantities and the explicit enumeration of parts and motion constraints constitute a clear, reproducible mechanical specification.

minor comments (2)
  1. The single independent claim is lengthy; breaking it into dependent claims that separately recite the radial-distance relationship, the rearward protrusion, and the reinforcement plate would improve readability and claim scope.
  2. No reference numerals or figure call-outs appear in the provided text; adding them would clarify the correspondence between the written description and any accompanying drawings.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and for the recommendation to accept. The positive assessment of the kinematic relationships, part enumeration, and mechanical reproducibility is appreciated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The document is a utility patent consisting solely of a mechanical parts description and kinematic constraints for a biased latch. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, derivations, or self-citations appear anywhere in the specification or claims. The central claim simply enumerates geometry (radial distances, rearward protrusion, bias direction) that is defined directly by the text itself; there is no reduction of any asserted result to an input by construction. The deliverable is the description, which is self-contained and contains no load-bearing empirical or theoretical steps that could be circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No mathematical model, free parameters, or theoretical axioms are present; the document is an engineering design specification.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5865 in / 926 out tokens · 48339 ms · 2026-05-21T19:02:47.814495+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.